Inflammation, Tumoral Markers and Interleukin-17, -10, and -6 Profiles in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma and Chronic Pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Interleukin profiles can be used as biochemical markers regarding the early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. AIMS: To assess CRP, CA 19-9, CEA levels, and interleukin-6, -10, and -17 profiles in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, chronic pancreatitis was compared with a control group, and the correlation with pancreatic cancer survival. METHODS: A total of 87 patients were prospective divided in pancreatic cancer (n = 53), chronic pancreatitis (n = 22) ,and control group (n = 12). The diagnosis of PDAC was made histologically. The diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis was based on medical history, imaging methods, and endoscopic ultrasound. Systemic concentrations of interleukins were measured using ELISA kits. The patients were followed at 1, 3, and 6 months. RESULTS: CRP, CA 19-9, and CEA were higher in the pancreatic cancer group (p < 0.001). Interleukin-10 was significantly higher in the pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis groups (p < 0.001). Interleukin-17 was statistically higher in the pancreatic cancer group (p < 0.0001). The cut-off of interleukin-17 of 0.273 had a sensitivity of 90.9 and a specificity of 80.9 with a curve under ROC of 0.80 in order to differentiate between pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis. The serum levels of interleukins are not correlated with the stage of the disease. CRP, CA 19-9, CEA, and interleukin-6, -10, and -17 were lower in patients with survival more than 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: We detected high levels of interleukin-6, -10, and -17 in chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Serum interleukin-17 levels can discriminate between pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis. The prognostic role of interleukins needs to be established.

The reference intervals for CA125, CA15-3, CA19-9, CA72-4, AFP, CEA, NSE and CYFRA21-1.

Tumor markers are noninvasive diagnostic tools for cancer. Their abnormal expression often occurs earlier than clinical symptoms or other detection signals. Appropriate reference intervals (RIs) of tumor markers are important for health evaluation, cancer diagnosis, therapy monitoring and prognosis assessment. In this study, we aimed to establish the RIs of cancer antigen 125 (CA125), CA15-3, CA19-9, CA72-4, alpha fetoprotein (AFP), carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA), neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen 21-1 (CYFRA21-1) in apparently healthy Henan population. A total of 1705 apparently healthy participants (21-89 years) were recruited from five representative geographical regions in Henan province. Nonparametric 95th percentile intervals were used to define the RIs of CA125, CA15-3, CA19-9, CA72-4, AFP, CEA, NSE and CYFRA21-1. The test results of CA125, CA15-3, CA19-9, CA72-4, AFP, CEA, NSE and CYFRA21-1 can traceable to reference measurement procedures. The age- and gender-specific RIs of the tumor markers were established. We established age- and gender-specific RIs for CA125, CA15-3, CA19-9, CA72-4, AFP, CEA, NSE and CYFRA21-1. The newly established RIs should be more suitable for Henan population. It will be valuable for clinicians to make a medical diagnosis, therapeutic management decision and other physiological assessment.

Design, expression and evaluation of novel chimeric protein constructed from colorectal tumor-associated antigen.

There were 134,000 new diagnosis and 49,000 deaths in 2016 due to colorectal cancer. Similar to most cancers, early diagnosis increases the chance of successful treatment. Detection of tumor-associated antigens or the immune response against such markers is one of the most common methods of diagnosis. In that regard, we aimed to design and express a chimeric protein from the most common tumor-associated antigens in colorectal cancer and assess its ability to detect the immune response in comparison with the parental tumor-associated antigens in patient's sera. Through bioinformatics approaches a chimeric protein from carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19.9 (CA19-9) was designed and expressed in E. coli (BL21DE3). Proper folding, expression levels and immune reactivity were assessed by western blot, ELISA and immunohistochemistry. Recombinant proteins functionality and immune reactivity were confirmed by ELISA and Western blot. Results showed that recombinant CEA, recombinant CA19.9 and chimeric protein of CEA- CA19.9 have strong reactivity with antibodies in the sera of colorectal cancer patients, whereas no reactivity was seen with the sera of healthy volunteers. Significantly stronger immune reactivity was seen with the chimeric protein than each of the CEA or CA19.9 alone. Overall, it was concluded that the designed recombinant proteins in this study could be used to detect autoantibodies produced against the colorectal tumor-associated antigens. The chimeric CEA-CA19.9 protein shows a stronger reactivity with the sera antibodies of colorectal cancer patients that CEA or CA19.9 alone.

New observations on the utility of CA19-9 as a biomarker in Lewis negative patients with pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) is the best-validated biomarker for pancreatic cancer. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline asserts that "CA19-9 will be undetectable in Lewis antigen-negative individuals". However, reports of CA19-9 secretion and its significance in Lewis (-) patients with pancreatic cancer have been inconsistent. This study was to examine serum CA19-9 levels in patients with pancreatic cancer according to Lewis status. METHODS: Patients with pancreatic cancer (1482 cases) were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database. Patients with benign pancreatic disease (210 cases) and normal subjects (315 cases) were used as controls. Lewis genotypes were examined by fucosyltransferase 3 (FUT3) sequencing. RESULTS: In patients with pancreatic cancer, 8.4% of subjects were Lewis (-), but only 41.9% of Lewis (-) subjects had CA19-9 values ≤ 2 U/mL. CA19-9 was even elevated (>37 U/mL) in 27.4% of Lewis (-) patients. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for CA19-9 as a diagnostic biomarker was 0.842 in Lewis (-) patients with pancreatic cancer, which is closing to that of CA19-9 applied in all of patients with pancreatic cancer (0.898). Lewis (-) status was an independent prognostic factor for shorter survival in a multivariable analysis (hazard ratio (HR), 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03-1.64; P = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Not all Lewis (-) patients with pancreatic cancer are non-secretors of CA19-9. Contrary to general understanding, CA19-9 can retain its utility as a biomarker in these patients in spite of Lewis (-) genotype.

Dilemma of elevated CA 19-9 in biliary pathology.

Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) is a tumor marker which has been extensively evaluated and widely utilized primarily in diagnosing and prognosticating pancreaticobiliary malignancies. Levels may be significantly influenced and elevated in cases of benign biliary conditions however, especially in obstructive jaundice, thereby posing difficulty in distinguishing between benign and malignant cholestasis. A myriad of studies have focused on elucidating proper use and interpretation of CA 19-9 in pancreatic cancer as well as in the setting of cholestasis. These studies have demonstrated that many factors influence CA 19-9 values and various methods for interpreting CA 19-9 in obstructive jaundice have been proposed. With improvements in diagnostic imaging, advancements in endoscopic modalities, and likelihood that management will not change based on the results of the test, clinicians should be cautious when ordering CA 19-9 and consider the reasons for measuring the tumor marker.

Potential Biomarkers in Lewis Negative Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To examine potential biomarkers in Lewis negative patients with pancreatic cancer. BACKGROUND: Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) is currently the most important and widely used biomarker in pancreatic cancer. However, approximately 5 to 10% of the population are Lewis negative individuals, and they are documented to have scarce or no CA19-9 secretion. Therefore, it is necessary to explore potential biomarkers to compensate for this drawback. METHODS: Lewis genotypes were determined in a large cohort of patients with pancreatic cancer (682 cases) and controls (525 cases) by sequencing the Fucosyltransferase 3 (FUT3) gene from genomic DNA. Potential biomarkers were examined in patients with Lewis negative genotypes and normal subjects. The impact of potential biomarkers on tumor burden and survival was analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-seven (6.9%) patients with pancreatic cancer had Lewis negative genotypes. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and CA125 had greater sensitivity than other biomarkers in Lewis negative patients with pancreatic cancer [CEA, 63.8%; CA125, 51.1%; CA72-4, 25.5%; CA15-3, 21.3%; CA19-9, 19.1%; CA50, 12.8%; CA242, 10.6%; and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), 0.0%]. In addition, both CEA (98.0%) and CA125 (93.8%) showed a high specificity. Compared with other biomarkers, CEA (60.9%) was sensitive for stage I, II diseases and CA125 (75.0%) was sensitive for stage III, IV diseases. CEA and CA125 were associated with tumor metastasis and therapeutic response. CONCLUSIONS: CEA and CA125 have the potential to be applied as biomarkers in Lewis negative patients with pancreatic cancer. CEA and CA125 should be routinely measured for all patients with pancreatic cancer.

Glycoprotein CA19.9-specific monoclonal antibodies recognize sialic acid-independent glycotope.

A repertoire of monoclonal antibodies was generated by immunization of mice with cancer-associated glycoprotein CA19.9, and two of them were selected as optimal capture and detecting counterparts for sandwich test system for detection of CA19.9. Fine epitope specificity of the antibodies was determined using printed glycan array, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and inhibitory enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Unexpectedly, both immunoglobulins did not bind key epitope of CA19.9 glycoprotein, tetrasaccharide SiaLeA, as well as its defucosylated form sialyl LeC (known as CA-50 epitope). The antibodies were found to have different glycan-binding profiles; however, they recognized similar glycotopes with common motif Galß1-3GlcNAcß (LeC), thus resembling specificity of human natural cancer-associated anti-LeC antibodies. We propose that cancer-specific glycopeptide epitope includes Galß1-3GlcNAcß fragment of a glycoprotein O-chain in combination with proximal hydrophobic amino acid(s) of the polypeptide chain.

Current and future biomarkers for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Although pancreatic cancer is only the twelfth most common type of cancer in the world, it features a very unfavorable prognosis. The mortality rate almost equals the incidence rate, corroborating the very poor prognosis of pancreatic cancer. The 5-year survival rate for all stages of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is only 7%. Surgical resection represents the only potentially curative treatment option for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients but is often not feasible due to the advanced stage of the disease upon diagnosis. For advanced disease, palliative chemotherapy is the treatment of choice although the regimens available to date are untargeted and have extensive side-effect profiles, making them unsuitable for patients with a low performance status. For this reason, early detection of pancreatic cancer is essential in order to provide patients with an optimal therapeutic approach. Up to the present day, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 is the only diagnostic marker approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration but its diagnostic potential is limited due to its restricted sensitivity and specificity, supporting the urgent need for novel biomarkers. In addition, prognostic and treatment-predictive biomarkers might provide essential information regarding personalized treatment decisions for individual patients. In this article, we aim to review current and future diagnostic, prognostic, and treatment-predictive biomarkers for pancreatic cancer.

Identification of Circulating MiR-25 as a Potential Biomarker for Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to identify novel microRNAs for potential use in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer (PaC). METHODS: A total of 1063 serum samples from 303 patients with PaC were collected, and the expression level of miR-25 was measured using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). RESULTS: We found that miR-25 had significant diagnostic value for the differential diagnosis of PaC in normal controls with an AUC (the area under the ROC curve) of 0.915 (95% CI: 0.893-0.937) that was significantly higher compared with an AUC of 0.725 for serum tumor marker carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and an AUC of 0.844 for CA19-9. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that serum miR-25 has strong potential as a novel biomarker for the early detection of PaC.

CA-125, but not galectin-3, complements CA 19-9 for discriminating ductal adenocarcinoma versus non-malignant pancreatic diseases.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: CA 19-9 is the gold standard biomarker of pancreatic adenocarcinoma despite several weaknesses in particular a high rate of false positives or negatives. CA-125 corresponding to MUC16 and galectin-3, a lectin able to interact with mucin-associated carbohydrates, are tumor-associated proteins. We investigated whether combined measurement of CA 19-9, galectin-3 and CA-125 may help to better discriminate pancreatic adenocarcinoma versus non-malignant pancreatic diseases. METHODS: We evaluated by immunohistochemistry the expression of MUC4, MUC16 (CA-125) and galectin-3 in 31 pancreatic adenocarcinomas. We measured CA 19-9, CA-125 and Gal-3 in the serum from patients with pancreatic benign diseases (n = 58) or adenocarcinoma (n = 44). Clinical performance of the 3 biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and prognosis was analyzed. RESULTS: By immunohistochemistry, MUC16 and Gal-3 were expressed in 74% and 84% of adenocarcinomas versus 0% and 3.2% in peri-tumoral regions, respectively. At the serum level, CA 19-9 and CA125 were significantly higher in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma whereas Gal-3 levels did not differ. The performance of CA 19-9 for cancer detection was higher than those of CA-125 or Gal-3 by ROC analysis. However, CA-125 offers the highest specificity for malignancy (81%) because of an absence of false positives among type 2 diabetic patients. Cancer deaths assessed 6 or 12 months after diagnosis varied according to the initial CA-125 level (p < 0.006). CONCLUSION: Gal-3 is not an interesting biomarker for pancreatic adenocarcinoma detection. CA 19-9 alone exhibits the best performance but measuring CA-125 provides complementary information in terms of diagnosis and prognosis.

Advances in Molecular Biomarkers for Gastric Cancer.

Gastric cancer (GC) is the second most frequent oncological cause of death, the fifth most common malignancy in the world, and accounts for 6.8% of all tumors. As an aggressive disease, GC is often diagnosed at an advanced stage, which is why it is a major cause of cancer-related death. In the last several decades, the incidence of GC has decreased, which should be credited to advances in diagnostic and therapeutic technologies including tumor-marker detection systems, imaging modalities, pathological methods, gastroscopy, and particularly surgical and pharmacologic interventions. Because they are economical, convenient, and noninvasive, the detection of conventional serum tumor biomarkers (e.g., CEA, CA19-9, and CA72-4) has been widely employed in the diagnosis and evaluation of GC. However, due to their poor specificity and sensitivity, these molecular markers cannot meet the demand of early GC detection. Hence, new and reliable tumor biomarkers are desperately needed. This review systematically summarizes the three most commonly used biomarkers of GC (e.g., CEA, CA19-9, and CA72-4) and addresses two categories of potential molecular biomarkers for the diagnosis of GC: microRNA and methylated DNA.

A genome wide association study of genetic loci that influence tumour biomarkers cancer antigen 19-9, carcinoembryonic antigen and α fetoprotein and their associations with cancer risk.

OBJECTIVE: Tumour biomarkers are used as indicators for cancer screening and as predictors for therapeutic responses and prognoses in cancer patients. We aimed to identify genetic loci that influence concentrations of cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and α fetoprotein (AFP), and investigated the associations between the significant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with risks of oesophageal squamous cell (OSCC), pancreatic and hepatocellular cancers. DESIGN: We carried out a genome wide association study on plasma CA19-9, CEA and AFP concentrations in 3451 healthy Han Chinese and validated the results in 10 326 individuals. Significant SNPs were further investigated in three case control studies (2031 OSCC cases and 2044 controls; 981 pancreatic cancer cases and 1991 controls; and 348 hepatocellular cancer cases and 359 controls). RESULTS: The analyses showed association peaks on three genetic loci for CA19-9 (FUT6-FUT3 at 19p13.3, FUT2-CA11 at 19q13.3 and B3GNT3 at 19p13.1; p=1.16×10(-13)-3.30×10(-290)); four for CEA (ABO at 9q34.2, FUT6 at 19p13.3, FUT2 at 19q13.3 and FAM3B at 21q22.3; p=3.33×10(-22)-5.81×10(-209)); and two for AFP (AFP at 4q11-q13 and HISPPD2A at 15q15.3; p=3.27×10(-18) and 1.28×10(-14)). These explained 17.14% of the variations in CA19-9, 8.95% in CEA and 0.57% in AFP concentrations. Significant ABO variants were also associated with risk of OSCC and pancreatic cancers, and AFP variants with risk of hepatocellular cancer (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study identified several loci associated with CA19-9, CEA and AFP concentrations. The ABO variants were associated with risk of OSCC and pancreatic cancers and AFP variants with risk of hepatocellular cancer.

Serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and prognosis of patients with gastric cancer.

Previous studies have assessed the prognostic role of serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) concentration in patients with gastric cancer, but the findings from those studies were inconsistent. We searched the PubMed and Web of Science databases to find eligible studies assessing the prognostic role of CA 19-9 in patients with gastric cancer. Twelve studies with a total of 5,072 gastric cancer patients were finally included into the meta-analysis. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) with corresponding 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) for overall survival were calculated to assess the prognostic role of CA 19-9 in patients with gastric cancer. Overall, elevated serum concentration of CA 19-9 (>37 U/mL) was associated with poorer overall survival in patients with gastric cancer (fixed-effects HR = 1.36, 95 % CI 1.24-1.48, P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis by study design further showed that elevated serum concentration of CA 19-9 was associated with poorer overall survival in patients with gastric cancer. There was no obvious risk of publication bias. Elevated concentration of serum CA 19-9 is associated with poorer overall survival in patients with gastric cancer.

A novel genotyping method for rapid identification of the Le gene to select patients for diagnosis with CA19-9.

BACKGROUND: The antigenic determinant of CA19-9 is synthesized by the α1,3/4fucosyltransferase encoded by the Le gene in the Lewis blood group system. Accordingly, a diagnosis with CA19-9 is not appropriate forLe-negative patients who possess the Le gene-mutated le alleles homozygously. METHODS: A Le gene-specific PCR was undertaken to determine c59T>G by using a set of tag-sense and biotin-labeled anti-sense primers and a peptide nucleic acid-le-clamp which bound to G59 in the le alleles. Following mixing with streptavidin-coatedbluelatex beads, the PCR products were developed on a strip on which the complementary tag oligonucleotide to theLe gene-specific amplicon was immobilized. RESULTS: When the PCR products were developed on the strip, a clear line was rapidly observed in Le-positive but not in Le-negative individuals. In contrast, a significant number of cancer patients with Lewis-negative phenotype were found to possess CA19-9, while they were specifically genotyped asLe/-. No contradictory results were observed in cancer patients (n = 315) with respect to their Lewis genotypes and CA19-9 levels. CONCLUSIONS: c59T>G occurred commonly in the le alleles could be specifically and rapidly identified by the present method. This method appeared to be relevant forselecting cancer patientsto bediagnosed with CA19-9.

Comparative analysis of tumor markers and evaluation of their predictive value in patients with colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the feasibility of CEA/CK20 mRNA and CEA/CA19-9 proteins as tumor markers for colorectal cancer by detecting tumor-specific mRNAs in circulating tumor cells and secreted tumor-specific proteins in the peripheral blood of colorectal cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Peripheral blood was obtained from 23 healthy volunteers and 46 colorectal cancer patients on the day of initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery (stages I-III, n = 27) or on the first day of chemotherapy after diagnosis (stage IV, n = 19). Levels of CEA/CK20 mRNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were determined with quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, and serum CEA/CA19-9 protein levels were determined by radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: The detection sensitivity of CK20 mRNA was approximately 1 tumor cell in 1 × 10(7) PBMCs, and that of CEA mRNA was approximately 1 tumor cell in 1 × 10(6) PBMCs. Patients with stage IV colorectal cancer had higher levels of CEA mRNA, CK20 mRNA, and serum CEA than patients at stages I-III. Peripheral blood CEA mRNA levels were predictive of overall survival, while serum protein levels of CEA and CA19-9 had no predictive value. CONCLUSION: Peripheral blood CEA mRNA is a useful marker of overall survival in colorectal cancer patients, that is sensitive and specific.

Serum CA 19-9 and CA 125 as a diagnostic marker in carcinoma of gallbladder.

BACKGROUND: Gall bladder carcinoma is endemic in North India along the Ganges belt. Most of the cases usually present in late stage when prognosis is poor. That mandates a necessity for proper screening in these areas for gall bladder lesions. Tumor markers CA 19-9 and CA 125 have been studied in various GI cancers and may also help in the screening, diagnosis and evaluation of gall bladder carcinoma. Aims: To assess serum CA19-9 and serum CA125 in patients with gall bladder lesions and find out a cut off value for diagnosis of carcinoma gallbladder. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Study included 118 cases, with female: male ratio of 4:1.Out of it, 91 (77 %) cases were benign and 27 (23 %) were malignant. Patients' sera was collected and analyzed for CA19-9 and CA 125 by CMIA method. RESULTS: The Mean (SD) value of CA19-9 for benign and malignant cases was found to be 12.86 (17.54) and 625.35(186.52) U/ml. For CA 125 it was found to be 17.98(13.69) and 239.63(73.72) U/ml respectively. The difference was statistically significant (P< 0.001). When Mean - 2SD value of malignant lesions were taken as cut off a value of CA 19-9 and CA 125 were found be 252.31 U/ml & 92.19U/ml respectively, found to be significant to suggest /diagnose a case of carcinoma gall bladder along with clinicoradiological findings. Taking these value as cut off Sensitivity & Specificity for CA 19-9 and CA 125 in detecting malignant cases were found to be 100% & 98.90% and 100% & 94.50% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that both serum CA 19-9 and serum CA 125 may act as a good adjunct for diagnosis of cases of carcinoma gallbladder along with imaging studies. However, changes in CA19-9 are more significant than CA 125.

Specific Norovirus Interaction with Lewis x and Lewis a on Human Intestinal Inflammatory Mucosa during Refractory Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which includes Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), is related to immunological and microbial factors, with the possible implication of enteric viruses. We characterized the interaction between human noroviruses (HuNoVs) and blood group antigens in refractory CD and UC using HuNoV virus-like particles (VLPs) and histological tissues. Immunohistochemistry was conducted on inflammatory tissue samples from the small intestine, colon, and rectum in 15 CD and 9 UC patients. Analysis of the regenerative mucosa of the colon and rectum revealed strong expression of sialylated Lewis a (sLea) and Lewis x (sLex) antigens and HuNoV VLP binding in the absence of ABO antigen expression in both UC and CD. Competition experiments using sialidase, lectins, and monoclonal antibodies demonstrated that HuNoV attachment mostly involved Lea and, to a lesser extent, Lex moieties on regenerative mucosa in both UC and CD. Further studies will be required to understand the implications of specific HuNoV binding to regenerative mucosa in refractory IBD.IMPORTANCE Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), including Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), are progressive diseases affecting millions of people each year. Flare-ups during IBD result in severe mucosal alterations of the small intestine (in CD) and in the colon and rectum (in CD and UC). Immunohistochemical analysis of CD and UC samples showed strong expression of known tumoral markers sialyl Lewis a (CA19.9) and sialyl Lewis x (CD15s) antigens on colonic and rectal regenerative mucosa, concurrent with strong human norovirus (HuNov) VLP GII.4 affinity. Sialidase treatment and competition experiments using histo-blood group antigen (HBGA)-specific monoclonal antibodies and lectins clearly demonstrated the implication of the Lewis a moiety and, to a lesser extent, the Lewis x moiety in HuNov recognition in regenerative mucosa of CD and UC tissues. Further studies are required to explore the possible implications of enteric viruses in the impairment of epithelial repair and dysregulation of inflammatory pathways during severe IBD.

Molecular and clinical markers of pancreas cancer.

Pancreas cancer has the worst prognosis of any solid tumor but is potentially treatable if it is diagnosed at an early stage. Thus there is critical interest in delineating clinical and molecular markers of incipient disease. The currently available biomarker, CA 19-9, has an inadequate sensitivity and specificity to achieve this objective. Diabetes mellitus, tobacco use, and chronic pancreatitis are associated with pancreas cancer. However, screening is currently only recommended in those with hereditary pancreatitis and genetic syndromes which predispose to cancer. Ongoing work to identify early markers of pancreas cancer consists of high throughput discovery methods including gene arrays and proteomics as well as hypothesis driven methods. While several promising candidates have been identified none has yet been convincingly proven to be better than CA 19-9. New methods including endoscopic ultrasound are improving detection of pancreas cancer and are being used to acquire tissue for biomarker discovery.

p53, carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19.9 expression in gall bladder cancer, precursor epithelial lesions and xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis.

BACKGROUND: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is the commonest gastrointestinal cancer in women of north India. Precursor epithelial lesions in GBC are known; however, the role of xanthogranulomatous (XG) inflammation in the pathogenesis of GBC is unknown. AIMS: To analyze the role of precursor lesions in the pathogenesis of GBC we studied the immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of p53, carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19.9 (CA-19.9) in GBC, chronic cholecystitis (CC), XG cholecystitis (XGC) and precursor lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 51 GBC, 68 CC, 42 XGC and 10 normal gallbladders. All cases were evaluated for presence of precursor lesions and IHC was performed. RESULTS: p53 immunoreactivity was found in 55% GBC, 32% of dysplasia with malignancy and in 14% of dysplasia with CC. Sixteen percent GBC had associated XG inflammation. Normal and metaplastic epithelium in CC and in XGC did not express p53. CEA expression was apical in normal and inflammatory GBs (CC, XGC), while cytoplasmic focal to diffuse positivity was seen in 82% GBC. CA-19.9 expression was seen in all cases of normal and inflammatory GBs; however, foci of antral metaplasia were negative. Seventy-five percent of GBC expressed CA-19.9; all negative cases were high-grade on histology. CONCLUSIONS: Altered CEA expression is seen in GBC as compared to normal and inflammatory gallbladders. Loss of expression of CA19.9 in antral metaplasia and poorly differentiated GBC may indicate that it is a marker of biliary differentiation. p53 over-expression seen in GBC and in dysplasia associated with malignancy and with CC suggests that p53 mutation and dysplasia are early events in the evolution of GBC. Epithelial metaplasia and XG inflammation are often associated with GBC but do not appear to play a role in its pathogenesis through the p53 pathway.

Clinical significance of CA 19.9 and LINC01197 in pancreatic cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the expression and clinical significance of LINC01197 in serum of patients with pancreatic cancer (PC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty PC patients (patient group) treated in our hospital from March 2012 to April 2014 were collected, and another 50 normal people (normal group) were collected for physical examination. The LINC01197 expression in serum of the two groups was detected by qRT-PCR method, and the CA 19.9 expression in serum was detected by Roche automatic biochemistry. The expression and diagnostic value of CA 19.9 and LINC01197 in PC were analyzed, and the relationship between LINC01197 and prognosis of PC patients was observed. RESULTS: The CA 19.9 expression in the patient group was significantly higher than that in the normal group (p<0.001). Their area under the curve was 0.791 and 0.944 respectively. The incidence of phases III+IV, lymphatic invasion, and distant metastasis in patients with low expression of LINC01197 is significantly higher than that in those with high expression, and has higher diagnostic value. With the progress of clinical staging, the TNM expression decreased gradually and there were differences between groups (p<0.001). Spearman's test analysis found that the decreased TNM staging of LINC01197 increased gradually (r=-0.816, p<0.001), and the area under the curve of LINC01197 distinguishing phase I and phase II+phase+III+phase IV was 0.930. The 1-year survival rate and 5-year survival rate of patients in low expression group were lower than those in high expression group (p1 year =0.037, p5 year =0.014). Distant metastasis is an independent prognostic factor for PC patients to survive for 1 to 5 years. Differentiation, TNM staging, and LINC01197 are independent prognostic factors for PC patients to survive for 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: The low expression of LINC01197 in PC patients indicates poor prognosis of patients and is expected to be a potential diagnostic and prognostic indicator of PC.