Transcarotid Arterial Revascularization of Symptomatic Internal Carotid Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Study-Level Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) is an interventional therapy for symptomatic internal carotid artery disease. Currently, the utilization of TCAR is contentious due to limited evidence. In this study, we evaluate the safety and efficacy of TCAR in patients with symptomatic internal carotid artery disease compared with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS). METHODS: A systematic review was conducted, spanning from January 2000 to February 2023, encompassing studies that used TCAR for the treatment of symptomatic internal carotid artery disease. The primary outcomes included a 30-day stroke or transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, and mortality. Secondary outcomes comprised cranial nerve injury and major bleeding. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) for each outcome were calculated to compare TCAR with CEA and CAS. Furthermore, subgroup analyses were performed based on age and degree of stenosis. In addition, a sensitivity analysis was conducted by excluding the vascular quality initiative registry population. RESULTS: A total of 7 studies involving 24 246 patients were analyzed. Within this patient cohort, 4771 individuals underwent TCAR, 12 350 underwent CEA, and 7125 patients underwent CAS. Compared with CAS, TCAR was associated with a similar rate of stroke or transient ischemic attack (OR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.33-1.82]) and myocardial infarction (OR, 1.29 [95% CI, 0.83-2.01]) but lower mortality (OR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.22-0.81]). Compared with CEA, TCAR was associated with a higher rate of stroke or transient ischemic attack (OR, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.03-1.54]) but similar rates of myocardial infarction (OR, 0.9 [95% CI, 0.64-1.38]) and mortality (OR, 1.35 [95% CI, 0.87-2.10]). CONCLUSIONS: Although CEA has traditionally been considered superior to stenting for symptomatic carotid stenosis, TCAR may have some advantages over CAS. Prospective randomized trials comparing the 3 modalities are needed.

Long-Term Outcomes After Stenting in Extracranial vs. Intracranial Stenosis.

Objective: The purpose of this pilot study is to explore the difference in safety and effectiveness after stenting in patients with extracranial or intracranial vertebral artery stenosis. Methods: The study involved 26 patients treated with stents for ≥70% stenosis between January 1, 2017, and September 8, 2020. The patients were divided into intracranial and extracranial groups based on the location of the target vessel stenosis. The incidence of stroke or death within 30 days, long-term recurrence of ischemic symptoms, and restenosis during follow-up were monitored. Results: Within 30 days, no stroke or death was observed in the 26 patients, During the follow-up period, the risk of recurrence of posterior circulation stroke or transient ischemic attack was 23.1% (6/26). Vascular-related complications were 5.6% vs. 12.5% (P = .529) in the intracranial vs. extracranial stenosis group. After 1 year, stroke or transient ischemic attack of posterior circulation was observed in 12.5% (1/8) vs. 16.7% (3/18) in the intracranial and extracranial stenosis group, respectively. The restenosis rate in the intracranial stenosis group was higher than the extracranial stenosis group (37.5% vs. 28.6%, P > .05). This trend was also found in the asymptomatic restenosis rate (25% vs. 7.1%, P = .527). Conclusions: The study results showed that there was no significant difference in the safety and effectiveness after stenting in extracranial and intracranial vertebral artery stenosis, but intracranial vertebral artery stenosis has a low rate of symptomatic restenosis. Symptomatic restenosis may be an important problem that limits the efficacy of extracranial vertebral artery stenting.

Extracranial-Intracranial Bypass and Risk of Stroke and Death in Patients With Symptomatic Artery Occlusion: The CMOSS Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Prior trials of extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass surgery showed no benefit for stroke prevention in patients with atherosclerotic occlusion of the internal carotid artery (ICA) or middle cerebral artery (MCA), but there have been subsequent improvements in surgical techniques and patient selection. Objective: To evaluate EC-IC bypass surgery in symptomatic patients with atherosclerotic occlusion of the ICA or MCA, using refined patient and operator selection. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a randomized, open-label, outcome assessor-blinded trial conducted at 13 centers in China. A total of 324 patients with ICA or MCA occlusion with transient ischemic attack or nondisabling ischemic stroke attributed to hemodynamic insufficiency based on computed tomography perfusion imaging were recruited between June 2013 and March 2018 (final follow-up: March 18, 2020). Interventions: EC-IC bypass surgery plus medical therapy (surgical group; n = 161) or medical therapy alone (medical group; n = 163). Medical therapy included antiplatelet therapy and stroke risk factor control. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a composite of stroke or death within 30 days or ipsilateral ischemic stroke beyond 30 days through 2 years after randomization. There were 9 secondary outcomes, including any stroke or death within 2 years and fatal stroke within 2 years. Results: Among 330 patients who were enrolled, 324 patients were confirmed eligible (median age, 52.7 years; 257 men [79.3%]) and 309 (95.4%) completed the trial. For the surgical group vs medical group, no significant difference was found for the composite primary outcome (8.6% [13/151] vs 12.3% [19/155]; incidence difference, -3.6% [95% CI, -10.1% to 2.9%]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.71 [95% CI, 0.33-1.54]; P = .39). The 30-day risk of stroke or death was 6.2% (10/161) in the surgical group and 1.8% (3/163) in the medical group, and the risk of ipsilateral ischemic stroke beyond 30 days through 2 years was 2.0% (3/151) and 10.3% (16/155), respectively. Of the 9 prespecified secondary end points, none showed a significant difference including any stroke or death within 2 years (9.9% [15/152] vs 15.3% [24/157]; incidence difference, -5.4% [95% CI, -12.5% to 1.7%]; HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.34-1.39]; P = .30) and fatal stroke within 2 years (2.0% [3/150] vs 0% [0/153]; incidence difference, 1.9% [95% CI, -0.2% to 4.0%]; P = .08). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with symptomatic ICA or MCA occlusion and hemodynamic insufficiency, the addition of bypass surgery to medical therapy did not significantly change the risk of the composite outcome of stroke or death within 30 days or ipsilateral ischemic stroke beyond 30 days through 2 years. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01758614.

Impact of Shunting Practice Patterns During Carotid Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess the effect of surgeons' shunting practice and shunt use on the early outcomes of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in recently symptomatic patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study based on a multicenter national prospective database. The Vascular Quality Initiative database (2010-2019) was queried for CEAs performed within 14 days after an ipsilateral stroke or transient ischemic attack. Surgeons were gauged as routine shunters if they shunted in >95% of CEAs, otherwise were classified as selective shunters. In-hospital stroke and death rates were compared between routine and selective shunters, stratifying by type of index event (transient ischemic attack versus stroke) and timing of CEA (≤2 versus >2 days). RESULTS: Thirteen thousand four hundred sixty-nine CEAs were performed after a transient ischemic attack (43%) or stroke (57%), 3186 (24%) by routine shunters, and 10 283 (76%) by selective shunters. Comparing routine and selective shunters, in-hospital stroke (1.9% versus 2.4%; P=0.09) and death (0.4% versus 0.5%; P=0.73) rates were similar. A lower stroke rate (1.5% versus 4.2%; P=0.02) was achieved by routine shunters for CEA performed <2 days after an ischemic stroke. Among selective shunters, a higher stroke rate occurred in case of shunt use (2.9% versus 2.3%; P<0.01), mainly due to cases presenting with stroke (3.5% versus 2.4%; P<0.01) but not transient ischemic attack (1.8% versus 1.5%; P=0.57). Awake anesthesia was adopted in 7.8% of cases by selective shunters and in 0.8% by routine shunters, without impact on the perioperative stroke rate (1.8% versus 2.3%; P=0.349). CONCLUSIONS: In this large national cohort, the overall outcomes of CEA were similar between routine and selective shunters. A lower postoperative stroke rate was achieved by routine shunters in CEA performed <2 days after an ischemic stroke. Among selective shunters, intraoperatively indicated shunting determined an increased stroke rate, likely due to intraoperative hypoperfusion. These data may guide the decision regarding timing of CEA and shunting intention in symptomatic patients.

No Evidence for Long Term Blood Pressure Differences Between Eversion and Conventional Carotid Endarterectomy in Two Independent Study Cohorts.

OBJECTIVE: Blood pressure (BP) management is a vital aspect of stroke prevention and post-stroke care. Different surgical carotid endarterectomy (CEA) techniques may impact on BP control post-operatively. Specifically, the carotid sinus nerve, which innervates the carotid baroreceptors and carotid body, is commonly left intact during conventional CEA but is routinely transected as part of eversion CEA. The aim of this study was to assess long term BP control after eversion and conventional CEA. METHODS: Patients from the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS cohort) and a personal series of patients from the Stroke Clinical Trials Unit at University College London (UCL cohort) were separately analysed and divided into eversion and conventional CEA groups. Mixed effect linear models were fitted and adjusted for baseline demographic data and antihypertensive treatment to test for changes in BP from baseline over a three year follow up period after the respective procedures. RESULTS: There were no differences in changes in baseline BP readings and follow up readings between eversion and conventional CEA in the ICSS or UCL cohorts. In the ICSS cohort a mild but significant systolic (-8.6 mmHg; 95% confidence interval [CI] -10.6 - -6.6) and diastolic (-4.9 mmHg; 95% CI -6.0 - -3.8) BP lowering effect was evident at discharge in the conventional group but not in the eversion CEA group. BP monitoring during follow up did not reveal any consistent BP changes with either conventional or eversion CEA vs. baseline levels. CONCLUSION: Neither conventional nor eversion CEA seem to result in clinically significant long term BP changes. Potential concerns related to either short or long term alterations in BP levels with transection of the carotid sinus nerve during eversion CEA could not be substantiated.

[Indications for Extracranial-Intracranial Bypass Surgery].

Previous randomized clinical trials have so far failed to establish the efficacy of extracranial-intracranial(EC-IC)bypass in the prevention of secondary ischemic strokes. For patients with a recent transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke ipsilateral to a stenosis or occlusion of the middle cerebral or carotid artery, EC-IC bypass is not recommended as per the American heart association/American stroke association guidelines(Class III, Level of Evidence A). However, patients with severe hemodynamic impairment(misery perfusion)are at high risk of developing stroke, and EC-IC bypass is recommended as per the Japan stroke guideline 2021, provided that the patients show cerebral blood flow less than 80% from baseline and cerebral vascular reserve less than 10%. Perioperative management is also important in preventing ischemic complications and hyperperfusion. Some adjunctive drugs, including minocycline and edaravone, have been reported to be effective against brain damage from hyperperfusion. Regarding Moyamoya disease, EC-IC bypass has been established as a recommended strategy for ischemic presentation, hemorrhagic presentation, hemodynamic impairment, and choroidal anastomosis. EC-IC bypass is also necessary for specific types of aneurysms, including fusiform and thrombotic, as well as in the dissection of aneurysms that are difficult to clip.

Patients Receiving Extracranial to Intracranial Bypass for Atherosclerotic Vessel Occlusion Today Differ Significantly From the COSS Population.

Background and Purpose: Despite the findings reported in the COSS (Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study), patients with atherosclerotic cerebrovascular disease continue to be referred for superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery bypass surgery. Here, we determined how today's patients differ from the population reported in COSS. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all patients that were referred to our Department for superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery bypass surgery of atherosclerotic cerebrovascular disease following the publication of COSS. Results: Between 2012 and 2019, 179 patients were referred for 186 bypass surgeries. Ninety-one (51%) patients suffered atherosclerotic, unilateral internal carotid occlusion and 88 (49%) atherosclerotic multivessel disease. All patients had received intensive medical management. A single transitory ischemic attack or ischemic stroke within the last 120 days according to the inclusion criteria of COSS occurred in only 36 out of 179 (20%) patients, whereas 27 out of 179 (15%) suffered >1 transitory ischemic attack within 120 days, 109 out of 179 (61%) had recurrent minor ischemic stroke, and 7 out of 179 (4%) were hemodynamically unstable and required blood pressure maintenance. The distribution of symptoms did not differ between atherosclerotic unilateral internal carotid artery occlusion and atherosclerotic multivessel disease (P=0.376) but hemodynamic impairment was significantly greater in atherosclerotic multivessel disease (P<0.001 for atherosclerotic multivessel disease versus atherosclerotic unilateral internal carotid artery occlusion). The overall perioperative stroke rate was 4.3%. Conclusions: Patients referred for flow augmentation surgery today appear to suffer more severe symptoms and vessel occlusion patterns than patients reported in COSS. A new, carefully designed randomized controlled trial appears warranted, considering the still poor prognosis of severe atherosclerotic cerebrovascular disease.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Emergency Department Use: Focus on Patients Requiring Urgent Revascularization.

BACKGROUND: The novel coronavirus (2019-nCOV) appeared in China and precipitously extended across the globe. As always, natural disasters or infectious disease outbreaks have the potential to cause emergency department (ED) volume changes. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the influence of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on ED visits and the impact on the handling of patients requiring urgent revascularization. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of all patients presenting to the ED of Hospital Sainte Anne (Toulon, France) from March 23 to April 5, 2020 and compared them with those of the same period in 2019. Then we analyzed complementary data on acute coronary syndrome (ST-elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI] and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction [NSTEMI]) and neurovascular emergencies (strokes and transient ischemic attacks). RESULTS: The total number of visits decreased by 47%. The number of people assessed as triage level 2 was 8% lower in 2020. There were five fewer cases of NSTEMI in 2020, but the same number of STEMI. The number of neurovascular emergencies increased (27 cases in 2019 compared with 30 in 2020). We observed a reduction in the delay between arrival at the ED and the beginning of coronary angiography for STEMI cases (27 min in 2019 and 22 min in 2020). In 2020, 7 more stroke patients were admitted. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic probably dissuaded "non-critical" patients from coming to the hospital, whereas the same number of patients with a critical illness attended the ED as attended prior to the pandemic. There does not seem to have been any effect of the pandemic on patients requiring reperfusion therapy (STEMI and stroke).

Additional Revascularization Using Multiple Burr Holes for PCA Involvement in Moyamoya Disease.

In specific cases of moyamoya disease (MMD), posterior cerebral artery (PCA) stenosis can develop after treatment of the anterior circulation and require additional revascularization. Here, we report two cases that underwent additional posterior indirect revascularization with multiple burr holes for PCA involvement after bilateral revascularization treatment of the anterior circulation. They presented with transient ischemic attack even after bilateral superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery bypass, and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) showed that PCA stenosis had worsened. Indirect revascularization with multiple burr holes using Benz-marked skin incisions was performed. After surgery, the symptoms improved without perioperative complications, and cerebral angiography showed collateral circulation via the burr hole. Indirect revascularization for MMD is often combined with direct revascularization, and there are only a few reports on the use of multiple burr hole surgery alone. In addition, there are few reports of posterior circulation, despite the emphasis on the importance of PCA involvement in MMD. Indirect revascularization with multiple burr holes alone can be performed in multiple areas and applied to patients who cannot undergo direct revascularization using the occipital artery. The procedure is simple and less invasive than traditional direct revascularization procedures. Therefore, it can be effective, especially in pediatric cases of MMD with PCA involvement.

Endovascular Recanalization for Nonacute Intracranial Vertebral Artery Occlusion According to a New Classification.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Endovascular recanalization for patients with nonacute intracranial vertebral artery occlusion remains clinically challenging. We aim to evaluate the feasibility and safety of endovascular recanalization for nonacute intracranial vertebral artery occlusion and propose a new angiographic classification. METHODS: Fifty patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic nonacute intracranial vertebral artery occlusion from January 2015 to December 2019 were analyzed, retrospectively. The rate of recanalization, peri-procedural complications, and follow-up results were evaluated. All patients were divided into 4 groups according to an angiographic classification. RESULTS: Among the 50 patients, 38 (76%) achieved successful recanalization. Any stroke or death within 30 days was 4% (2/50). From type I to type IV, the recanalization rate gradually decreased (94.1%, 76.9%, 70%, and 50%, respectively, P=0.012), while the perioperative complication rate gradually increased (0.0%, 7.7%, 20%, and 50%, respectively, P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular recanalization may be feasible and safe for carefully selected patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic nonacute intracranial vertebral artery occlusion and, therefore, represents an alternative treatment, especially for type I and type II patients.

Cerebral glucose metabolism changes in chronic ischemia patients following subcranial-intracranial bypass.

The use of the internal maxillary artery (IMA) in intracranial artery bypass or subcranial-intracranial (SC-IC) bypass has recently been described as an alternative to traditional bypass. This study explores cerebral glucose metabolism characteristics of SC-IC bypass. Ten crescendo transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients with chronic occlusion of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) received bypass surgery of IMA with the radial artery graft (RAG) to the branch of MCA. The graft's flow volume (FV) was measured by operative intraoperative duplex ultrasonography. Positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) was used to calculate the preoperational and postoperational average of the standard uptake value (SUVavg) of the 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) in the region of interest (ROI). The asymmetric index (AI) is recommended to reflect the SUVavg changes, and subsequently, cerebral glucose metabolism changes are supposedly clarified. Patent IMA-RAG-MCA bypass in ten chronic ischemia patients was confirmed by angiography after surgery. The intraoperative FV measurement value was 65.64 ± 10.52 (58.11-73.17) ml/min. Before the operation, the SUVavg of the ROI in the ischemic hemisphere (4.76 ± 2.35 (3.08-6.04)) clearly decreased compared to the one (5.99 ± 2.63 (4.11-7.87)) in the contralateral mirror region (P = 0.003). The result of AI of preoperation minus AI of postoperation was more than 10% (P = 0.031), which indicated suspicious significant changes in cerebral metabolism. All symptoms of study patients having crescendo ischemia were resolved in 1 month after the operation. In the cerebral hypoperfusion territory, uptake of 18F-FDG deceased. Improving the flow volume via SC-IC bypass makes available an elevated uptake of 18F-FDG.

Oral anticoagulation and left atrial appendage closure: a new strategy for recurrent cardioembolic stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There are no recommendations regarding how to treat cardioembolic recurrent strokes when patients are well anticoagulated. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of combining oral anticoagulation (OAC) with percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in patients with well-anticoagulated atrial fibrillation (AF) with recurrent strokes. METHODS: In an explorative, prospective, observational study, LAAC was performed in patients with AF with at least two ischaemic strokes in the previous year, despite good anticoagulation using the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (St Jude Medical, St Paul, MN, USA) or Amulet Abbot device (Abbot Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA). We recorded age, type of AF, CHA2 DS2 -VASC and HAS-BLED scores, types of OAC and risk factors. After closure, treatment with aspirin (100 mg/day) was continued for 3 months in combination with indefinite OAC. Clinical status, recurrent embolisms and bleeding complications were recorded during follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients were included (mean age, 72.1 ± 9.6 years; mean CHA2 DS2 -VASC score, 5.3 ± 1.48; mean number of previous strokes, 2.78 ± 1.15). Thirteen had spontaneous echocardiographic contrast and all had dilatation of the left atrium. Eighteen patients had a multilobulated left atrial appendage, 17 with 'chicken-wing' morphology and one patient had a left atrial appendage thrombus. There were no complications during the procedure. Only one patient had a transient ischaemic attack and no major bleeding occurred during a mean follow-up of 17.4 ± 11.5 months. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy with indefinite OAC plus LAAC in patients with AF with recurrent strokes despite good anticoagulation should be considered in order to prevent a new stroke.

Genotype-Phenotype Correlation in Long-Term Cohort of Japanese Patients with Moyamoya Disease.

BACKGROUND: Homozygosity of this p.R4810K founder variant of RNF213moyamoya disease (MMD) susceptibility gene is known to influence the severity of the clinical disease phenotype at disease onset. However, the association between this genotype and long-term clinical manifestations has remained unclear. OBJECTIVES: The principal goal of this study was to investigate whether and how the p.R4810K variant of RNF213influences the long-term phenotype in Japanese patients with MMD. METHOD: This retrospective cohort study included 94 Japanese patients with MMD who underwent direct or combined bypass for revascularization with the p.R4810K genotype determined in our hospital. The following phenotypic parameters were analyzed at disease onset and over a long-term period: age and initial presentation at onset, recurrent stroke after initial revascularization, and final modified Rankin Scale. RESULTS: The p.R4810K genotype was significantly associated with the phenotype at onset, especially in younger patients. Over a median follow-up period of 100 months, recurrent stroke occurred in 6 out of 94 patients: none out of 5 patients with the homozygous variant, 5 out of 64 with the heterozygous variant, and 1 out of 25 in the wild-type group. There were no significant differences among the genotypes. In particular, recurrent cerebral hemorrhage occurred in 5 patients, all possessing the heterozygous variant. The log-rank test showed no difference between the genotypes in the stroke-free survival rate. Furthermore, the p.R4810K genotype was not associated with a poor functional condition. CONCLUSIONS: The p.R4810K founder variant of RNF213 affects the phenotype at disease onset. However, the optimal revascularization may be effective, regardless of the genotype, even for the homozygous variant, which has been thought to be the most pathogenic. This genotype may not strongly influence the long-term clinical manifestations or poor prognosis in MMD.

Moyamoya syndrome as a manifestation of varicella-associated cerebral vasculopathy-case report and review of literature.

BACKGROUND: Varicella-associated cerebral vasculopathy (VACV) is a serious complication of Varicella zoster virus (VZV) infection. VACV has protean manifestations, with varying clinical, radiological features and prognosis. CASE DESCRIPTION: Moyamoya syndrome (MMS) with VACV is reported in few cases in the past. All the patients were in paediatric age group, presenting with multiple episodes of transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) and infarct. Our case was a 10-year-old Indian girl with ischemic stroke due to VACV who was treated with intravenous acyclovir. She presented 11 months later with multiple episodes of TIAs. Her angiogram showed bilateral moyamoya vasculature. Acetazolamide challenge study revealed areas of hypoperfusion. Previously reported such cases had been treated medically with steroids and antiplatelets. Most of these patients had resolution of motor symptoms after long follow-up; however, this period was marred by recurrent symptoms. Our patient underwent cerebral revascularisation procedure, following which her TIAs resolved, there was improvement in her limb power and, according to her parents, her performance in school has improved at 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: MMS can be a manifestation of VACV and should be suspected in paediatric patient of non-east Asian population. These patients require treatment with intravenous acyclovir to inactivate the virus. Those with TIAs should undergo cerebral revascularisation procedures. Medical management should be reserved for patients with adequate collaterals.

Unexpected immediate postoperative resolution of long-standing neurological deficits following extracranial-intracranial bypass: a report of three cases.

While intracranial ischemic insults often result in neuronal death and permanent neurological deficits, some patients may develop potentially reversible neurological dysfunction from persistent hypoperfusion, as surviving neurons remain in an "idling" state. We report a unique series of three patients with long-standing neurological deficits who underwent EC-IC bypass for repeated TIAs and demonstrated unexpected, rapid resolution of long-standing pre-existing neurological deficits. We suggest that these individuals harbored regions of underperfused, idling neurons that responded rapidly to restored cerebral reperfusion.

The different scenarios of urgent carotid revascularization for crescendo and single transient ischemic attack.

OBJECTIVE: Carotid stenosis with crescendo-transient-ischemic-attack (cTIA) requires a prompt intervention to reduce the stroke risk. Few data are reported in literature about cTIA suggesting a different perioperative risk compared with patients with single TIA (sTIA). This study aimed to compare the outcome of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients with TIA (single/crescendo) and evaluate the outcome risk-factors. METHODS: Data from two tertiary hospitals for vascular treatment were analyzed from 2007 to 2016. All patients with TIA subjected to CEA were considered, comparing the 30-day postoperative stroke and stroke/death in patients with cTIA and sTIA, particularly in the urgent (≤48 h) setting. RESULTS: On a total of 3866 CEA, 888 (23%) were performed in symptomatic patients and 515 for TIA: 365 (71%) patients with sTIA and 150 (29%) with cTIA. When compared with sTIA, cTIA patients were younger and less frequently affected by coronary disease, dyslipidemia, and chronic pulmonary disease; however, contralateral carotid occlusion was more common (20% vs. 10%, P = .004; 56% vs. 46, P = .03; 16% vs. 7%, P = .01; >80 years 26% vs. 16%, P = .01 and 2% vs. 10%, P = .001; respectively). Postoperative stroke and stroke/death were significantly higher in cTIA compared with sTIA (5.3% vs. 1.6%, P = .02 and 6.0% vs. 2.2%, P = .03; respectively). Urgent CEA was performed in 58% ( n: 87) cTIA and in 11% ( n: 56) sTIA( P<.01). The urgent setting did not influence the stroke and stroke/death rate of CEA for sTIA (3.6% vs. 1.3%, P = .21 and 3.6% vs. 1.9%, P = .44, respectively), but was associated with lower rate of events in cTIA (1.1%vs. 11.1%, P = .01 and 2.3% vs. 11.1%, P = .03, respectively). This beneficial effect in patients with cTIA treated within 48-h was confirmed also by multivariate analysis (OR: 0.09, 95% CI: 0.76-0.01, P=.02). CONCLUSIONS: cTIA subjected to CEA have a higher stroke and stroke/death risk compared with patients with sTIA. The urgent setting seems to reduce the stroke/death rate cTIA; for sTIA with a stable neurological condition, the timing of CEA did not influence the outcome.

Weekend Effect in Carotid Endarterectomy.

Background and Purpose- Patients undergoing surgery on the weekend may experience worse outcomes, but this weekend effect has not been studied in carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Methods- We identified patients undergoing isolated CEA in the Vascular Quality Initiative between 2003 and 2018. Our primary outcome was in-hospital stroke or perioperative death (stroke/death), stratified by symptom status. For asymptomatic patients, we also compared rates of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services quality metric prolonged length of stay (>2 days or failed discharge home). We calculated propensity scores and used multilevel, inverse probability weighted logistic regression clustering at the hospital level. Results- There were 86 123 repairs during the study period, 53% asymptomatic lesions and 47% symptomatic. Only 0.7% of asymptomatic patients underwent CEA on the weekend, compared with 3.1% of symptomatic patients. Patients undergoing weekend repairs were more often white, with lower rates of most comorbidities. In asymptomatic patients, weekend operations were associated significantly higher odds of stroke/death (odds ratio [OR], 2.3 [1.1-4.8]; P=0.02), and prolonged length of stay (OR, 3.6 [2.7-4.7]; P<0.001). In symptomatic patients, weekend operations were associated with significantly higher adjusted odds of stroke/death (OR, 1.7 [1.2-2.4]; P=0.007) and longer postoperative length of stay (3.3 days versus 2.0 days, P=0.002). However, the difference in stroke/death was driven by patients presenting with stroke (OR, 2.2 [1.5-2.3]; P<0.001), rather than those presenting with transient ischemic attack (OR, 1.2 [0.6-2.1]; P=0.56). Conclusions- We found evidence of a significant weekend effect in CEA, as weekend operations in asymptomatic patients and patients who presented with stroke were associated with higher rates of stroke/death and prolonged length of stay. However, there was no evidence of such an effect in patients with transient ischemic attack. These data suggest that weekend CEA should be avoided except in the case of expedited revascularization after transient ischemic attack.

Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale Versus Medical Therapy in Patients With Cryptogenic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses compared the efficacy and safety of patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure versus medical treatment in patients with cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Recently, new evidence from randomized trials became available. METHODS: We searched PubMed until September 24, 2017, for trials comparing PFO closure with medical treatment in patients with cryptogenic stroke/TIA using the items: stroke or cerebrovascular accident or TIA and patent foramen ovale or paradoxical embolism and trial or study. RESULTS: Among 851 identified articles, 5 were eligible. In 3627 patients with 3.7-year mean follow-up, there was significant difference in ischemic stroke recurrence (0.53 versus 1.1 per 100 patient-years, respectively; odds ratio [OR], 0.43; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.21-0.90; relative risk reduction, 50.5%; absolute risk reduction, 2.11%; and number needed to treat to prevent 1 event, 46.5 for 3.7 years). There was no significant difference in TIAs (0.78 versus 0.98 per 100 patient-years, respectively; OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.53-1.19) and all-cause mortality (0.18 versus 0.23 per 100 patient-years, respectively; OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.34-1.56). New-onset atrial fibrillation occurred more frequently in the PFO closure arm (1.3 versus 0.25 per 100 patient-years, respectively; OR, 5.15; 95% CI, 2.18-12.15) and resolved in 72% of cases within 45 days, whereas rates of myocardial infarction (0.12 versus 0.09 per 100 patient-years, respectively; OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.25-5.91) and any serious adverse events (7.3 versus 7.3 per 100 patient-years, respectively; OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.92-1.25) were similar. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cryptogenic stroke/TIA and PFO who have their PFO closed, ischemic stroke recurrence is less frequent compared with patients receiving medical treatment. Atrial fibrillation is more frequent but mostly transient. There is no difference in TIA, all-cause mortality, or myocardial infarction.

Brachiocephalic Arterial Occlusive Disease Presenting as Limb-Shaking Transient Ischemic Attacks.

Limb-shaking transient ischemic attacks (LSTIAs) are a phenomenon that occurs due to transient hypoperfusion to a cerebral motor territory with a chronically outstripped autoregulatory vascular reserve. First described in 1962 by Miller Fisher, the pathogenesis and the global understanding of this presentation have undergone a significant advancement throughout the years. Typically, patients will present with this syndrome of transient hypoperfusion in the context of extracranial carotid intrinsic vessel stenosis or by intracranial vascular stenosis to select motor pathways. We present within this case report a novel mechanism by which LSTIAs may emerge. Through this knowledge, clinicians may need to consider expansion of their diagnostic breadth to include proximal vasculature luminal integrity.

Revascularization for Aplastic or Twiglike Middle Cerebral Artery: A Case Report.

An aplastic or twiglike middle cerebral artery (Ap/T-MCA) is a congenital anomaly related to interference of normal embryonic development of the middle cerebral artery (MCA). This condition may cause ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes as a result of hypoperfusion, vulnerable collateral circulation, and associated aneurysms. We reported a case of Ap/T-MCA with transient ischemic attack, which was successfully treated with revascularization. A 19-year-old woman with a history of transient left upper limb hemiparesis, dysesthesia, and headache visited our hospital. Digital subtraction angiography showed an occlusion in the M1 segment of the MCA and abnormal vascular networks distal to the occlusion site. The patient underwent direct and indirect revascularizations, including superficial temporal artery-to-MCA bypass and encephalomyosynangiosis. She was discharged home without any neurological deficit. Magnetic resonance angiography at 12 months after revascularization showed regression of blood flow signals at the twigs network. In spite of congenital anomaly, revascularization for an Ap/T-MCA may be useful to reduce collateral stress in microvascular networks and to prevent future stroke in selected patients.