Evaluation of the mannan antigen assay in neonates with or without Candida albicans colonization.

Mannan antigen (MA) in neonates as a marker of invasive candidemia is not well studied, although 4% of all neonatal intensive care unit admissions are attributed to Candida spp. infections. The aim of this case-control study was to evaluate the performance of MA (Platelia™ Candida AgPluskit, Bio-Rad) in neonates who had rectal Candida colonization or in non-colonized controls. We cultured 340 rectal swabs of neonates and MA was negative in 24/25 C. albicans colonized (96% specificity) and in 30/30 non-colonized neonates (100% specificity). The results indicate a high specificity of the assay, which could be useful in neonates with possible candidemia.

The present study aimed to evaluate the use of mannan antigen (MA) assay in a neonatal unit and compared between C. albicans colonized and non-colonized infants. According to our results, MA found to have high specificity in both groups.

The added value of (1,3)-ß-D-glucan for the diagnosis of Invasive Candidiasis in ICU patients: a prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Beta-D-Glucan (BDG) testing has been suggested to support the diagnosis of candidemia and invasive candidiasis. The actual benefit in critically ill high-risk patients in intensive care units (ICU) has not been verified so far. METHODS: In ICU patients receiving empirical echinocandin treatment for suspected invasive candidiasis (IC), serial BDG testing using the Fujifilm Wako Beta-Glucan Test was performed, starting on the first day of echinocandin administration and every 24-48 h afterwards. Diagnostic accuracy was determined for single testing and serial testing strategies using a range of cut-off values. In addition, we compared the added value of these testing strategies when their results were introduced as additional predictors into a multivariable logistic regression model controlling for established risk factors of IC. RESULTS: A total of 174 ICU patients, forty-six of which (25.7%) classified as cases of IC, were included in our study. Initial BDG testing showed moderate sensitivity (74%, 95%CI 59-86%) and poor specificity (45%, 95% CI 36-54%) for IC which could hardly be improved by follow-up testing. While raw BDG values or test results obtained with very high thresholds improved the predictive performance of our multivariable logistic regression model for IC, neither single nor serial testing with the manufacturer-proposed low-level cut-off showed substantial benefit. CONCLUSIONS: In our study of critically ill intensive care patients at high risk for candidemia or invasive candidiasis, diagnostic accuracy of BDG testing was insufficient to inform treatment decisions. Improved classification was only achieved for cases with very high BDG values.

Candidemia in Adult Patients in the ICU: A Reappraisal of Susceptibility Testing and Antifungal Therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To provide updates on the epidemiology and recommendations for management of candidemia in patients with critical illness. DATA SOURCES: A literature search using the PubMed database (inception to March 2023) was conducted using the search terms "invasive candidiasis," "candidemia," "critically ill," "azoles," "echinocandin," "antifungal agents," "rapid diagnostics," "antifungal susceptibility testing," "therapeutic drug monitoring," "antifungal dosing," "persistent candidemia," and "Candida biofilm." STUDY SELECTION/DATA EXTRACTION: Clinical data were limited to those published in the English language. Ongoing trials were identified through ClinicalTrials.gov. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 109 articles were reviewed including 25 pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies and 30 studies including patient data, 13 of which were randomized controlled clinical trials. The remaining 54 articles included fungal surveillance data, in vitro studies, review articles, and survey data. The current 2016 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Candidiasis provides recommendations for selecting empiric and definitive antifungal therapies for candidemia, but data are limited regarding optimized dosing strategies in critically ill patients with dynamic pharmacokinetic changes or persistent candidemia complicated. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: Outcomes due to candidemia remain poor despite improved diagnostic platforms, antifungal susceptibility testing, and antifungal therapy selection for candidemia in critically ill patients. Earlier detection and identification of the species causing candidemia combined with recognition of patient-specific factors leading to dosing discrepancies are crucial to improving outcomes in critically ill patients with candidemia. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of candidemia in critically ill patients must account for the incidence of non-albicans Candida species and trends in antifungal resistance as well as overcome the complex pathophysiologic changes to avoid suboptimal antifungal exposure.

Integrating omics techniques and culture-independent systems may improve the detection of persistent candidemia: data from an observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Blood cultures have low sensitivity for candidemia. Sensitivity can be improved by the culture-independent system T2 Magnetic Resonance (T2). SeptiCyte RAPID is a host response assay quantifying the risk of infection-related inflammation through a scoring system (SeptiScore). We investigate the performance of SeptiScore in detecting persistent candidemia as defined by conventional cultures and T2. METHODS: This is a prospective multicentre observational study on patients with candidemia. Blood cultures and blood samples for assessment by T2 and SeptiCyte were collected for 4 consecutive days after the index culture. The performance of SeptiScore was explored to predict persistent candidemia as defined by (1) positive follow-up blood culture (2) either positive follow-up blood culture or T2 sample. RESULTS: 10 patients were enrolled including 34 blood collections assessed with the 3 methods. Overall, 4/34 (12%) follow-up blood cultures and 6/34 (18%) T2 samples were positive. A mixed model showed significantly higher SeptiScores associated with persistent candidemia when this was defined as either a positive follow-up blood culture or T2 sample (0.82, 95%CI 0.06 to 1.58) but not when this was defined as a positive follow-up blood culture only (-0.57, 95%CI -1.28 to 0.14). ROC curve for detection of persistent candidemia by SeptiScore at day 1 follow-up showed an AUC of 0.85 (95%CI 0.52-1.00) when candidemia was defined by positive follow-up blood culture, and an AUC of 1.00 (95%CI 1.00-1.00) when candidemia was defined according to both methods. CONCLUSION: Integrating transcriptome profiling with culture-independent systems and conventional cultures may increase our ability to diagnose persistent candidemia.

Bloodstream infection caused by Wickerhamiella pararugosa in a patient with intestinal obstruction: A case report.

The fungus Wickerhamiella pararugosa (Candida pararugosa) has been detected in various human organs but has rarely caused bloodstream infections. This report presents a case of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) of W. pararugosa in an adult. A female patient in her 80s was admitted to our facility for intestinal obstruction caused by colorectal cancer. The patient's ability to consume food was hindered, necessitating the insertion of a central venous catheter (CVC) into the internal jugular vein. On day 3 after admission, the patient developed a fever, prompting blood and CVC tip cultures to be performed. On day 5, yeast-like fungi were discovered in the blood cultures, and fosfluconazole (fluconazole [FLCZ] pro-drug) treatment was initiated. On day 8, yeast-like fungi were identified in both the blood and CVC tip cultures, leading to a diagnosis of CRBSI. The fungus was identified as W. pararugosa through biochemical and genetic characterization. This finding justified the use of micafungin (MCFG) for combination therapy. On day 17, the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for FLCZ and MCFG were 4-8 and 0.06 µg/mL, respectively. Accordingly, the treatment was changed to monotherapy with MCFG. After a 21-day treatment regimen, the patient was discharged on day 31. We present a case of CRBSI caused by W. pararugosa in an adult with intestinal obstruction. The notable increase in the MIC of FLCZ necessitated monotherapy with MCFG, which resulted in successful recovery of the patient.

Application of machine learning for mortality prediction in patients with candidemia: Feasibility verification and comparison with clinical severity scores.

BACKGROUND: Clinical severity scores, such as acute physiology, age, chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), Pitt Bacteremia Score (PBS), and European Confederation of Medical Mycology Quality (EQUAL) score, may not reliably predict candidemia prognosis owing to their prespecified scorings that can limit their adaptability and applicability. OBJECTIVES: Unlike those fixed and prespecified scorings, we aim to develop and validate a machine learning (ML) approach that is able to learn predictive models adaptively from available patient data to increase adaptability and applicability. METHODS: Different ML algorithms follow different design philosophies and consequently, they carry different learning biases. We have designed an ensemble meta-learner based on stacked generalisation to integrate multiple learners as a team to work at its best in a synergy to improve predictive performances. RESULTS: In the multicenter retrospective study, we analysed 512 patients with candidemia from January 2014 to July 2019 and compared a stacked generalisation model (SGM) with APACHE II, SOFA, PBS and EQUAL score to predict the 14-day mortality. The cross-validation results showed that the SGM significantly outperformed APACHE II, SOFA, PBS, and EQUAL score across several metrics, including F1-score (0.68, p < .005), Matthews correlation coefficient (0.54, p < .05 vs. SOFA, p < .005 vs. the others) and the area under the curve (AUC; 0.87, p < .005). In addition, in an independent external test, the model effectively predicted patients' mortality in the external validation cohort, with an AUC of 0.77. CONCLUSIONS: ML models show potential for improving mortality prediction amongst patients with candidemia compared to clinical severity scores.

Systematic Review of Candidemia in Brazil: Unlocking Historical Trends and Challenges in Conducting Surveys in Middle-Income Countries.

INTRODUCTION: Candidemia, a bloodstream infection predominantly affecting critically ill patients, poses a significant global health threat especially with the emergence of non-albicans Candida species, including drug-resistant strains. In Brazil, limited access to advanced diagnostic tools and trained microbiologists hampers accurate identification of Candida species and susceptibility to antifungals testing hindering surveillance efforts. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review spanning publications from 2017 to 2023 addressing Candida species distribution and antifungal susceptibility among Brazilian patients with candidemia. RESULTS: Despite initially identifying 7075 records, only 16 met inclusion criteria providing accurate information of 2305 episodes of candidemia. The predominant species were C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis, followed by notable proportions of Nakaseomyces glabratus. Limited access to diagnostic tests was evident as only 5 out of 16 studies on candidemia were able to report antifungal susceptibility testing results. In vitro resistance to echinocandins was rare (only 6/396 isolates, 1,5%). In counterpart, fluconazole exhibited resistance rates ranging from 0 to 43%, with great heterogeneity among different studies and species of Candida considered. CONCLUSION: Our review underscores the critical need for enhanced surveillance and research efforts to address the evolving landscape of candidemia and antifungal resistance in Brazil. Despite some limitations, available data suggest that while resistance to echinocandins and amphotericin B remains rare, there is a growing concern regarding resistance to fluconazole among Candida species.

Detailed ß-(1→3)-D-glucan and mannan antigen kinetics in patients with candidemia.

Fungal antigens such as ß-(1→3)-D-glucan (BDG) or mannan (Mn) are useful for detection of candidemia. However, detailed data on serum levels before diagnosis and during treatment are scarce. We conducted a prospective study at two German tertiary care centers for 36 months. Sera from adult patients with candidemia were tested for BDG (Fungitell assay) and Mn (Platelia Candida Ag-Plus assay). For each patient, the clinical course and biomarker kinetics were closely followed and compared. 1,243 sera from 131 candidemia episodes and 15 relapses were tested. In 35% of episodes, empirical therapy included an antifungal drug. Before blood culture sampling, BDG and Mn levels were elevated in 62.4% and 30.8% of patients, respectively. Sensitivity at blood culture sampling was 78.6% (BDG) and 35.1% (Mn). BDG levels of non-survivors were significantly higher than those of survivors. During follow-up, a therapeutic response was associated with decreasing BDG and Mn levels in 84.3% or 70.5% of episodes, respectively. A median increase of 513 pg BDG/mL and 390 pg Mn/mL indicated a relapse of candidemia with a sensitivity of 80% or 46.7%, respectively. In 72.9% and 46.8% of patients, increasing BDG or Mn levels were associated with a fatal outcome. Prior to discharge, BDG and Mn levels had dropped or normalized in 65.7% or 82.1% of patients, respectively. Summarising, in patients with candidemia, biomarker positivity usually precedes culture positivity. Relapses are mostly accompanied by secondary biomarker increases. Rising concentrations of BDG and Mn predict lethality, whereas decreasing levels suggest a favorable outcome in the majority of patients.

Clinical characteristics and prognostic risk factors of candidemia in non-neutropenic patients: a retrospective cohort study.

This study aimed to determine the clinical characteristics and the prognostic risk factors in non-neutropenic patients with candidemia. Data were retrospectively collected through the medical record information system. Non-neutropenic patients with candidemia were relatively aged, with a more than one-third rate of in-hospitalization mortality. In multivariate analysis, APACHE II score (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.138; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.067-1.213), septic shock (aOR, 5.704; 95% CI, 2.639-12.326) and RRT (aOR, 16.152; 95% CI, 2.628-99.275) (all P < 0.01) were independent related with non-survivors. In conclusion, non-neutropenic patients with candidemia have a high in-hospitalization mortality, and APACHE II, septic shock, and RRT are independently factors.

Effect of the implementation of clinical guidelines on management of candidemia in elderly patients.

INTRODUCTION: Mortality from candidemia is higher in elderly population than in younger patients, which may be related to suboptimal management. The aim of the present study is to evaluate adherence to the recommendations for the clinical management of candidemia in a population over 75 years before and after implementing specific training. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We recorded retrospectively data from candidemia episodes in elderly patients during two periods of time: 2010-2015 years (before training) and 2017-2022 years (after training), as well as adherence to the recommendations of the clinical practice guidelines, mortality and consultation to infectious disease specialists. RESULTS: Forty-five episodes of candidemia were recorded in the first period and 29 episodes in the second period. A better compliance to the recommendations of the clinical practice guidelines was observed in the second period: echocardiogram performance (75.9% vs. 48.9% p = .021), fundoscopy (65.5% vs. 44.4% p = .076), follow-up blood cultures (72.4% vs. 42.2% p = .011), removal of central venous catheter (80% vs. 52.9% p = .080) and adequate antifungal treatment (82.6% vs. 52.6% p = .018). A trend towards lower mortality was observed during the second period (27.6% vs. 44.4% p = .144). CONCLUSION: The improvement of knowledge of clinical guidelines on candidemia and the participation of infectious disease specialists may increase the quality of care in elderly patients with candidemia. It would be necessary to enlarge the sample size to evaluate the real impact of this intervention on mortality.

Development and validation of COVID-19 associated candidemia score (CAC-Score) in ICU patients.

BACKGROUND: The development of candidemia is a highly fatal condition in severe COVID-19 infection. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to develop a candidemia prediction score in COVID-19 patient based on the patient's clinical characteristics, and healthcare-related factors during intensive care units (ICU) follow-up. PATIENTS/METHODS: Severe COVID-19 patients hospitalised in ICU in Ankara City Hospital during the one-year period (August 15, 2020, and August 15, 2021) were included. After univariate analysis, multivariate analysis was applied using variable selection approach to investigate the effects of variables together and to create a score model for candidemia. Statistically significant factors were included in the development process of candida prediction score. RESULTS: Of 1305 COVID-19 ICU patients, 139 had a candidemia episode. According to the final model, four variables, presence of central venous catheter (CVC) (OR 19.07, CI 8.12-44.8, p < .0001), multifocal colonisation (OR 2.28, CI 1.39-3.72, p 0.001), length of ICU stays ≥14 days (OR 3.62, CI 2.42-5.44, p < .0001) and corticosteroids (OR 0.51, CI 0.34-0.76, p 0.0011) were the only statistically significant independent risk factors for candidemia. Score model was demonstrated by a nomogram, and the risk for candidemia was calculated to be high in patients who scored ≥56 points by using the criteria [CVC = 51, multifocal colonisation = 14, prolonged hospitalisation = 23, no steroid use = 12 points]. The AUC of the score is 0.84 (CI 0.81-0.87). CONCLUSION: We developed and validated an easy-to-use clinical prediction score for candidemia in severe COVID-19 infection. In COVID-19 ICU patients, the risk of candidemia is high if one of the other risk factors is present together with CVC.

Screening for Ocular Candidiasis Among Patients With Candidemia: Is It Time to Change Practice?

Ocular candidiasis (OC) complicates approximately 10% of candidemia and carries potentially severe morbidity. There are conflicting recommendations about the need for routine funduscopic examinations of candidemic patients. Indirect funduscopy is accurate and safe in diagnosing OC, and positive findings change recommended treatment. However, conclusive evidence that treatment changes improve outcomes is lacking. Bringing perspectives as infectious diseases physicians and ophthalmologists, we review controversies about OC and endorse routine screening during candidemia. We acknowledge difficulties in obtaining inpatient ophthalmologic consults and recommend studies to evaluate digital fundus photography and teleophthalmology as an alternative to funduscopic examinations by ophthalmologists in asymptomatic patients.

American Academy of Ophthalmology Recommendations on Screening for Endogenous Candida Endophthalmitis.

The American Academy of Ophthalmology evaluated the practice of routine screening for intraocular infection from Candida septicemia. In the United States, ophthalmologists are consulted in the hospital to screen for intraocular infection routinely for patients with Candida bloodstream infections. This practice was established in the era before the use of systemic antifungal medication and the establishment of definitions of ocular disease with candidemia. A recent systematic review found a rate of less than 1% of routinely screened patients with endophthalmitis from Candida septicemia. Other studies found higher rates of endophthalmitis but had limitations in terms of inaccuracies in ocular disease classification, lack of vitreous biopsies, selection biases, and lack of longer-term visual outcomes. Some studies attributed ocular findings to Candida infections, rather than other comorbidities. Studies also have not demonstrated differences in medical management that are modified for eye disease treatment; therefore, therapy should be dictated by the underlying Candida infection, rather than be tailored on the basis of ocular findings. In summary, the Academy does not recommend a routine ophthalmologic consultation after laboratory findings of systemic Candida septicemia, which appears to be a low-value practice. An ophthalmologic consultation is a reasonable practice for a patient with signs or symptoms suggestive of ocular infection regardless of Candida septicemia.

A longitudinal study of Candida bloodstream infections in a Japanese university hospital: species distribution, drug susceptibility, clinical features, and mortality predictors.

We aimed to detect possible changes in Candida species distribution over time and to know the antifungal susceptibility profile of isolates obtained from patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) due to this pathogen. Risk factors associated with 30-day mortality were also assessed. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with Candida BSI at a Japanese university hospital from 2013 to 2021. The change in the distribution pattern of the Candida spp. isolated was examined by considering three successive sub-periods of 3 years each. Risk factors for 30-day mortality were determined using Cox regression analysis. In the entire study period, Candida albicans was the most frequent species (46.7%), followed by Candida glabrata (21.5%) and Candida parapsilosis (18.7%). There was no change in Candida species distribution comparing the three sub-periods analyzed. All isolates were susceptible to micafungin, and most were susceptible to fluconazole, except for C. glabrata. No isolates were resistant to amphotericin B or voriconazole. The overall 30-day mortality was 40.2%. Univariate analysis revealed an association between 30-day mortality and central venous catheter (CVC) removal at any time, high Pitt bacteremia score (PBS), and high Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). Multivariate Cox analysis found that high PBS was the only independent predictor of 30-day mortality; subsequent multivariate Cox regression demonstrated that early CVC removal significantly reduced 30-day mortality. Candida species distribution and antifungal susceptibility profile in our hospital remained similar from 2013 to 2021. Early CVC removal may improve candidemia outcomes.

Contribution of the anaerobic blood culture vial for the recovery of Candida glabrata: A retrospective multicentric study.

Although Candida spp are aerobic microorganisms, some Candida strains, mainly Candida glabrata, can be recovered from anaerobic blood culture vials. We assessed the contribution of the anaerobic vials for the diagnosis of candidemia, especially for C. glabrata. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study including eight university or regional hospitals. A single episode of monomicrobial candidemia per patient was included from September 1st, 2016, to August 31st, 2019. The characteristics of all aerobic and anaerobic blood culture vials sampled within 2 h before and after the first positive blood culture vials were recorded (type of vials, result, and for positive vials time-to-positivity and Candida species). Overall, 509 episodes of candidemia were included. The main species were C. albicans (55.6%) followed by C. glabrata (17.1%), C. parapsilosis (4.9%), and C. tropicalis (4.5%). An anaerobic vial was positive in 76 (14.9%) of all episodes of which 56 (73.8%) were due to C. glabrata. The number of C. glabrata infections only positive in anaerobic vials was 1 (2.6%), 1 (11.1%), and 15 (37.5%) with the BACT/ALERT 3D the BACT/ALERT VIRTUO and the BACTEC FX instrument, respectively (P < 0.01). The initial positivity of an anaerobic vial was highly predictive of the isolation of C. glabrata with the BACTEC FX (sensitivity of 96.8%). C. glabrata time-to-positivity was shorter in anaerobic vial than aerobic vial with all instruments. Anaerobic blood culture vials improve the recovery of Candida spp mainly C. glabrata. This study could be completed by further analyses including mycological and pediatric vials. LAY SUMMARY: Although Candida spp are aerobic microorganisms, C. glabrata is able to grow in anaerobic conditions. In blood culture, the time-to-positivity of C. glabrata is shorter in anaerobic than aerobic vials. Only the anaerobic vial was positive in up to 15 (37.5%) C. glabrata bloodstream infections.

Epidemiology and Risk Factors of Candidemia Among Hospitalized Patients in a Turkish Tertiary Care Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Candidemia, which constitutes 50 - 70% of invasive Candida infections, is an important clinical condition with high mortality and difficulty in diagnosis and treatment. Our objective was to determine the epidemiology, risk factors of candidemia, the distribution, and antifungal susceptibilities of Candida spp. responsible for candidemia among hospitalized patients in Gazi University Medical Faculty Hospital. METHODS: This was a laboratory-based, prospective observational study conducted between 2009 and 2010. The definition of nosocomial candidemia was based on CDC criteria. All relevant demographic and clinical data were collected from patient files. Candida spp. were identified by API ID32C system. Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed using broth microdilution method according to CLSI. RESULTS: Seventy-one candidemia episodes were identified with the incidence of 0.94 cases/1,000 hospital admissions. C. albicans was isolated in 47.9% of the admissions and in 52.1% of non-albicans Candida admissions. Among the latter, C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis were the most frequent species. The most common risk factors were use of antibiotics (94.4%), hospitalization in the last 1 month (93%), history of hospitalization in ICU (74.6%), and CVC use (70.4%). Abdominal surgery, urethral catheter insertion, and use of piperacillin/tazobactam was found to increase the risk of C. albicans. A history of hospitalization within the last 3 months increased the risk of developing candidemia with non-albicans Candida spp. In total, fluconazole resistance was 20% (24.2% for C. albicans and 16.2% for non-albicans Candida strains) and voriconazole resistance was 5.7% (12.1% for C. albicans and 0% for non- albicans Candida). CONCLUSIONS: This study provided a relevant source of information for the prediction of high-risk patients and the implementation of prevention strategies for nosocomial candidemia.

Candida dubliniensis fungemia in a patient with severe COVID-19: A case report.

Candida dubliniensis phenotypically mimics Candida albicans in its microbiological features; thus, its clinical characteristics have yet to be fully elucidated. Here we report the case of a 68-year-old Japanese man who developed C. dubliniensis fungemia during treatment for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The patient was intubated and received a combination of immunosuppressants, including high-dose methylprednisolone and two doses of tocilizumab, as well as remdesivir, intravenous heparin, and ceftriaxone. A blood culture on admission day 11 revealed Candida species, which was confirmed as C. dubliniensis by mass spectrometry. An additional sequencing analysis of the 26S rDNA and ITS regions confirmed that the organism was 100% identical to the reference strain of C. dubliniensis (ATCC MYA-646). Considering the simultaneous isolation of C. dubliniensis from a sputum sample, the lower respiratory tract could be an entry point for candidemia. Although treatment with micafungin successfully eradicated the C. dubliniensis fungemia, the patient died of COVID-19 progression. In this case, aggressive immunosuppressive therapy could have caused the C. dubliniensis fungemia. Due to insufficient clinical reports on C. dubliniensis infection based on definitive diagnosis, the whole picture of the cryptic organism is still unknown. Further accumulation of clinical and microbiological data of the pathogen is needed to elucidate their clinical significance.

Lower beta-1,3-D-glucan testing cut-offs increase sensitivity for non-albicans Candida species bloodstream infections.

PURPOSE: Fungal biomarkers support early diagnosis of invasive fungal infections. In this study, we evaluated the impact of a recent update to the manufacturer-recommended cut-off for beta-1,3-D-glucan (BDG) testing (Fujifilm Wako BDG assay) on sensitivity and specificity for the detection of candidemia. Additionally, we compared the performance with tests for Candida antigen (Ag by Serion ELISA antigen Candida, Virion\Serion) and anti-mannan antibodies (Ab by Hemkit Candida IHA, Ravo Diagnostika). METHODS: Sera of 82 patients with candidemia, which were sampled with a maximum distance of ±14 days from the date of sampling of the corresponding positive blood cultures, were retrospectively analysed for BDG, Ag and Ab. Results of BDG testing were compared with results from sera of 129 patients with candidemia from a different hospital. RESULTS: Sensitivity of BDG testing (47%) was higher than for Ag (17%) or Ab (20%). By combining Ag and Ab testing, sensitivity was raised to 32%. Lowering the cut-off of BDG from 11 pg/ml to the newly recommended cut-off of 7 pg/ml resulted in a significant increase in sensitivity (47% vs 58%, p = .01 and 63% vs 71% p < .01). At both centres, the increase was significant in NAC but not in C. albicans candidemia. No significant effects on specificity were observed. CONCLUSION: BDG testing outperformed Ag and Ab testing and its combination. Lowering the BDG cut-off had no significant impact on specificity. The increase in sensitivity can be mainly attributed to a gain in sensitivity for non-albicans Candida species bloodstream infections.

Comparison of blood cultures versus T2 Candida Panel in management of candidemia at a large community hospital.

The T2 Candida Panel (T2CP) has high sensitivity and specificity to detect candidemia. Its role in the diagnosis and management of candidemia compared to blood cultures (BC) remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the T2CP versus BC in detecting and treating candidemia. A retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted to compare clinical outcomes in patients with candidemia identified by BC versus T2CP. Patients with a positive BC or T2CP for Candida spp. from January 2012 to August 2020 were grouped by initial method of detection (BC vs T2CP). Co-primary endpoints assessed included time to detection of candidemia and time to antifungal therapy. Key secondary endpoints included length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, and mortality. One hundred sixty-three patients with a positive BC and 89 patients with a positive T2CP were included in the evaluation. The average time to detection of candidemia was significantly shorter in the T2CP group compared to BC group (9 vs 41 h, p < 0.001). The time to antifungal was also significantly shorter in the T2CP group compared to the BC group (4 vs 37 h, p < 0.001). However, LOS was significantly shorter in the BC positive group than the T2CP group with no difference in ICU LOS. There was no difference in in-hospital or 30-day mortality between the two groups. Of patients diagnosed with candidemia at our large community hospital, identification by T2CP led to faster detection and initiation of antifungal compared to blood cultures without improvement in LOS or mortality.

Whole genome sequencing confirms Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis microsatellite sporadic and persistent clones causing outbreaks of candidemia in neonates.

Whole genome sequencing has been extensively used to describe infection outbreaks, although with limited application on Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis.We retrospectively studied all patients admitted to the neonatal care unit diagnosed with candidemia caused by C. albicans (n = 46) or C. parapsilosis (n = 31) between 2007 and 2010 (Period 1) and 2011 and 2014 (Period 2). All isolates were genotyped by microsatellite markers. A cluster was defined as a group of ≥ 2 patients infected by strains with identical genotypes. For the validation of microsatellite markers and outbreak investigation, phylogenetic analyses and whole genome pairwise strain comparisons were performed.The number of episodes was significantly higher in Period 1 than in Period 2 (51 vs 32; P = 0.003); the reduction in the number of cases coincided with the educational campaign for catheter care implementation in 2011. Overall, eight genotypes were clusters involving 29 patients. All C. albicans (n = 5) and C. parapsilosis (n = 3) clusters were found during Period 1 before the educational campaign. No statistically significant differences were found between the percentage of C. albicans and C. parapsilosis clusters, but the percentage of patients associated to the clusters was significantly higher for C. parapsilosis clusters in comparison to C. albicans clusters (52 vs 28.2%; P = 0.03). Whole genome sequencing confirmed microsatellite-defined clusters with high bootstrap values.Whole genome sequences confirmed microsatellite-defined clusters, corroborating the presence of outbreaks. Persistent or sporadic Candida clusters causing candidemia in neonates disappeared after the implementation of catheter care educational campaigns. LAY SUMMARY: We retrospectively studied all patients admitted to the neonatal care unit diagnosed with candidemia caused by C. albicans or C. parapsilosis. Reliable whole genome sequences confirmed microsatellite-defined clusters, corroborating the presence of outbreaks before educational campaigns for catheter care.