30-Day Outcomes Post Veno-Arterial Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) After Cardiac Surgery and Predictors of Survival.

BACKGROUND: Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is sometimes needed for post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCCS). There is little data regarding outcomes in the Australian context, particularly in a non-cardiac transplant centre. Our aim was to report on 30-day outcomes after patients with PCCS treated with VA-ECMO in an Australian non-cardiac transplant tertiary centre, and to determine risk factors for non-survival in this population. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on all adults treated with VA-ECMO for PCCS between August 2001 and September 2016 at our centre. Univariate analysis with adjustment for multiplicity identified risk factors for non-survival. Area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) method was used to assess their predictive value. RESULTS: We identified 64 patients out of 5,502 open-heart surgery cases of which three patients did not meet inclusion criteria. Mean (SD) age was 63 (14) years. Survival to hospital discharge or 30 days post VA-ECMO occurred in 27/61 (44%) patients. VA-ECMO was able to be weaned in 44/61 patients (72%); 54/61 patients (89%) had at least one major complication. Prior to VA-ECMO initiation, no statistically significant differences between survivors and non-survivors could be determined. After VA-ECMO initiation, only 24-hour nadir lactate and 48-hour nadir lactate levels were significantly different between survivors and non-survivors (1.50 mmol/L vs 3.20 mmol/L p=0.001; and 1.20 mmol/L vs. 1.90 mmol/L p=0.001 respectively). For mortality prediction, 24- and 48-hour nadir lactate levels had AUROCs of 0.775 and 0.782, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: VA-ECMO is associated with acceptable survival rates but significant morbidity. Nadir lactate levels in the first 24 and 48 hours after VA-ECMO initiation may be useful in predicting early survival.

Concomitant temporary mechanical support in high-risk coronary artery bypass surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) undergoing high-risk coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are at increased risk for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock. This report describes planned concomitant microaxial temporary mechanical support (MA-TMS) device placement as a viable bridge-to-recovery strategy for high-risk patients receiving surgical revascularization. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed for all patients from October 2017 to May 2019 with low LVEF (<30%), New York Heart Association Class III or IV symptoms, and myocardial viability who underwent CABG with prophylactic MA-TMS support at a single institution (n = 13). RESULTS: Mean patient age was 64.8 years, and 12 patients (92%) were male. Eight patients (62%) presented with acute coronary syndrome. Mean predicted risk of mortality was 4.6%, ranging from 0.6% to 15.6%. An average of 3.4 grafts were performed per patient. Greater than 60% of patients were extubated within 48 hours and out-of-bed within 72 hours, and the average duration of MA-TMS was 5.7 days. Mean postoperative length of stay was 16.7 days. There were no postoperative myocardial infarctions or deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic MA-TMS may allow safe and effective surgical revascularization for patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction who may otherwise be offered a durable ventricular assist device.

Perioperative use of the intra-aortic balloon pump: where do we stand in 2018?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) has been the most widely used device to help patients recover from circulatory disorder mainly because of cardiogenic shock; however, no evidence-based clinical benefit derived from IABP support has been reported in recent clinical trials. This review provides an overview of the current outcomes and challenges in perioperative IABP use for cardiogenic shock patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Although IABP support yielded no significant difference in mortality for myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock, perioperative IABP use generated beneficial clinical outcomes for high-risk patients undergoing coronary revascularization. The latest technology such as optical fiber sensor incorporated into the devices provides some beneficial effects on hemodynamics and reduces device-related complications. SUMMARY: Perioperative IABP use is reasonable for cardiogenic shock patients as a bridge to further surgical intervention, to wean from cardiopulmonary bypass, and to postoperative recovery. Over the next years, a revolutionary technology will overcome the currently limited IABP therapy. Larger and longer term clinical investigations are also required to identify ideal patients for IABP use and to establish the position of IABP therapy.

Argon attenuates multiorgan failure following experimental aortic cross-clamping.

AIMS: Argon has been shown to prevent ischaemic injuries in several scenarios of regional ischaemia. We determined whether it could provide a systemic effect in a model of multiorgan failure (MOF) induced by aortic cross-clamping. METHODS: Anaesthetized rabbits were submitted to aortic cross-clamping (30 min) and subsequent reperfusion (300 min). They were either ventilated with oxygen-enriched air throughout the protocol [fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2 ) = 30%; control group) or with a mixture of 30% oxygen and 70% argon (argon groups). In a first group treated with argon ('Argon-Total'), its administration was started 30 min before ischaemia and maintained throughout the protocol. In the two other groups, the administration was started either 30 min before ischaemia ('Argon-Pre') or at the onset of reperfusion ('Argon-Post'), for a total duration of 2 h. Cardiovascular, renal and inflammatory endpoints were assessed throughout protocol. RESULTS: Compared with control, shock was significantly attenuated in Argon-Total and Argon-Pre but not Argon-Post groups (e.g. cardiac output = 62±5 vs. 29 ± 5 ml min-1 kg-1 in Argon-Total and control groups at the end of the follow-up). Shock and renal failure were reduced in all argon vs. control groups. Histopathological examination of the gut showed attenuation of ischaemic lesions in all argon vs. control groups. Blood transcription levels of interleukin (IL) 1ß, IL-8, IL-10 and hypoxia-inducible factor 1α were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: Argon attenuated clinical and biological modifications of cardiovascular, renal and intestinal systems, but not the inflammatory response, after aortic cross-clamping. The window of administration was crucial to optimize organ protection.

Comparison of Levosimendan and Milrinone for ECLS Weaning in Patients After Cardiac Surgery-A Retrospective Before-and-After Study.

OBJECTIVES: Pharmacodynamics suggests that levosimendan might be a valuable inotrope for weaning from extracorporeal life support (ECLS). As there is a paucity of evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of such an approach, the aim was to report the authors' experiences in ECLS weaning before and after the implementation of levosimendan in clinical practice. DESIGN: Retrospective before-and-after study. SETTING: Cardiac intensive care unit of a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 64 patients under ECLS for postcardiotomy cardiac failure, who underwent an ECLS weaning trial. INTERVENTION: Group comparisons between patients treated with levosimendan and patients treated with milrinone were made with the Mann-Whitney U test or the Pearson chi-squared test. Results are given as median (interquartile range) or numbers (percentages). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 64 patients, 26 (41%) received levosimendan. Successful ECLS weaning was achieved in 24 (92%) and 30 patients (79%) in the levosimendan and milrinone group, respectively (p = 0.18). In the levosimendan group, fewer patients had an intra-aortic balloon pump for weaning (2 [7.7%] v 15 [40%], p = 0.008). The support with norepinephrine was similar in the levosimendan and milrinone groups at the time of ECLS removal (0.06 [0.01-0.11] v 0.07 [0.01-0.16] µg/kg/min, p = 0.64) and 24 hours later (0.06 [0.04-0.09] v 0.04 [0.00-0.09] µg/kg/min, p = 0.15). Twenty-eight days (9/26 (35%) v 14/35 (40%), p = 0.28) and 180 days (13/26 [50%] v 15/34 [44%], p = 0.80) mortalities after ECLS removal were similar in the levosimendan and the milrinone groups. CONCLUSION: Levosimendan enabled ECLS weaning without increasing norepinephrine requirements when compared to a control group receiving milrinone.

A method for maintaining vascular access when Impella exchange is required.

A 45-year old male with no prior cardiac history, presented with cardiogenic shock in the setting of an anterolateral ST elevation myocardial infarction. We first placed a 2.5 Impella for hemodynamic support, and proceeded with emergent percutaneous coronary intervention to the proximal LAD. Several hours following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the patient became acutely hypotensive and an echocardiogram revealed the Impella catheter was kinked within the left ventricle. The patient was taken back to the cath lab for Impella adjustment; however, damage to the distal catheter required the Impella be exchanged. As the patient was therapeutically anticoagulated and on dual antiplatelet therapy, we modified the Impella catheter in order to maintain existing vascular access during Impella exchange. This case demonstrates our method for maintaining vascular access during Impella exchange, thereby eliminating the need for a second arterial puncture. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[Use of vasopressors and inotropics in cardiogenic shock]. / Einsatz von Vasopressoren und Inotropika im kardiogenen Schock.

Vasoactive drugs and inotropic agents are important for the hemodynamic management of cardiogenic shock. In this article the use of different vasoactive and ionotropic drugs in cardiogenic shock is presented. Hemodynamic management during cardiogenic shock occurs after initial moderate volume delivery by dobutamine to increase inotropism. If adequate perfusion pressures are not achieved norepinephrine is administered. If a sufficient increase in cardiac performance can still not be achieved by the treatment, administration of levosimendan or phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitors may be necessary. Levosimendan is superior to PDE inhibitors for patients in cardiogenic shock. The aim of hemodynamic management in cardiogenic shock is to allow the transient use of inotropics and vasopressors in the lowest necessary dose and only as long as necessary. The daily question is whether the dose can be reduced or in the case of deterioration whether the use of an extracorporeal circulatory support system should be considered. There are currently no available data on mortality that demonstrate the benefit of hemodynamic monitoring using target criteria. The advantage, however, results from the economic use of inotropics and vasopressors by certain target criteria.

A Survival Case of Fulminant Right-Side Dominant Eosinophilic Myocarditis.

A 59-year-old Japanese woman was admitted to a nearby hospital with dyspnea and general malaise. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed right ventricular (RV) dilatation with severely reduced systolic function and leftward shift of the intraventricular septum. She was initially diagnosed with acute right heart failure, and fell into cardiogenic shock requiring an intra-aortic balloon pump and inotropic agents. An endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) demonstrated extensive interstitial edema, infiltration of inflammatory cells including numerous eosinophils, and myocytolysis with eosinophil degranulation. She was histologically diagnosed with eosinophilic myocarditis. Steroid pulse therapy was initiated, and her hemodynamic status improved along with dramatic recovery of the RV function. EMB 6 days after the initiation of steroid pulse therapy showed the disappearance of infiltration and degranulation of eosinophils, although lymphocytic infiltration still remained. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) 23 days after steroid pulse therapy showed an increased 18F-FDG uptake in the intraventricular septum and left ventricle, suggesting persistent myocardial inflammation. She was then treated with a maintenance dose of prednisolone. She became free of symptoms and follow-up echocardiography showed normal cardiac function 3 months after the initiation of corticosteroid treatment. In addition, EMB and PET/CT showed no inflammation. This is the first case report of fulminant and right-sided dominant eosinophilic myocarditis successfully treated with corticosteroid.

Review of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Development of Intracardiac Thrombosis in Adult Cardiothoracic Patients.

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) has become an indispensable treatment option for adult cardiothoracic patients experiencing acute refractory cardiogenic shock. VA ECMO is not without inherent complications as in-hospital mortality has ranged from 45% to 65% (1-3). Intracardiac thrombosis (ICT) is a rare but life-threatening complication associated with VA ECMO. VA ECMO cases complicated by ICT were searched for using the MEDLINE (PubMed and OVID), Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiology Headquarters, and Google Scholar databases. Twelve cases of VA ECMO-associated ICT were discovered for review. Indications for VA ECMO were postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock and heart failure. The primary location of thrombus was the left ventricle and aortic root. Majority of the cases did not report subtherapeutic systemic anticoagulation. Two patients survived after the development of ICT. VA ECMO-associated ICT is a devastating consequence with high mortality. The majority of ICT occurred in cases with perceived adequate anticoagulation, but this may not result in complete suppression of the coagulation response. Continued exposure to procoagulant stimuli and worsening ventricular function and intracardiac stasis can shift the balance toward a hypercoagulable state and development of thrombosis.

Veno-Arterial ECMO in the Setting of Post-Infarct Ventricular Septal Defect: A Bridge to Surgical Repair.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a complex rescue therapy utilised to provide circulatory and/or respiratory support to critically ill patients who have failed maximal conventional therapy. The use of ECMO in adult cardiac surgery is not routine, occurring in a minority of critically ill patients, typically postoperatively. Presented here are three cases of post-infarct ventricular septal defect with cardiogenic shock managed preoperatively with ECMO support as a bridge to definitive surgical closure. We present a review of ECMO in the adult cardiac surgical population and highlight the potential role of preoperative ECMO for cardiogenic shock in the setting of post-infarct ventricular septal defect (PI VSD) as a bridge to definitive closure.

Hemodynamic support with percutaneous devices in patients with heart failure.

The use of surgically implanted durable mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in high-risk patients with heart failure is declining and short-term, nondurable MCS device use is growing. Percutaneously delivered MCS options for advanced heart failure include the intra-aortic balloon pump, Impella axial flow catheter, TandemHeart centrifugal pump, and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Nondurable MCS devices have unique implantation characteristics and hemodynamic effects. Algorithms and guidelines for optimal nondurable MCS device selection do not exist. Emerging technologies and applications will address the need for improved left ventricular unloading using lower-profile devices, longer-term ambulatory support, and the potential for myocardial recovery.

[Modern drug therapy in cardiovascular intensive care medicine]. / Moderne Arzneitherapie in der kardiovaskulären Intensivmedizin.

Vasoactive drugs and inotropes are important in the hemodynamic management of patients with cardiogenic shock despite modest volume administration. Currently, the concept of cardiac relief is pursued in the treatment of acute heart failure. In this article we present the use of different drugs in the intensive care unit for acute heart failure and cardiogenic shock. In acute heart failure catecholamines are only used during the transition from heart failure to cardiogenic shock. Here, the therapeutic concept of ventricular unloading is more sought after. This can be achieved by the use of diuretics, nitrates, levosimendan (inodilatator), or in the future serelaxin. The hemodynamic management in cardiogenic shock occurs after moderate volume administration with dobutamine to increase inotropy. If no adequate perfusion pressures are achieved, norepinephrine can be administered as a vasopressor. If there is still no sufficient increase in cardiac output, the inodilatator levosimendan can be used. Levosimendan instead of phosphodiesterase inhibitors in this case is preferable. The maxim of hemodynamic management in cardiogenic shock is the transient use of inotropes and vasopressors in the lowest dose possible and only for as long as necessary. This means that one should continuously check whether the dose can be reduced. There are no mortality data demonstrating the utility of hemodynamic monitoring based on objective criteria­but it makes sense to use inotropes and vasopressors sparingly.

Appropriate duration of driving restrictions after inappropriate therapy from implantable cardiac shock devices-interim analysis of the Nippon Storm Study.

BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding the appropriate duration for driving restrictions after inappropriate implantable cardiac shock device (ICSD) therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated the Nippon Storm Study data, and found that inappropriate ICSD therapy occurred in 114 (7.6%) patients during a median follow-up of 464 days. Among those patients, 25 experienced further inappropriate ICSD therapy during a subsequent median follow-up of 380 days. Time-dependent recurrence of inappropriate ICSD therapy occurred in 19 (76%) patients within 180 days. CONCLUSIONS: The interval for driving restrictions after inappropriate ICSD therapy can be reduced.

Pheochromocytoma crisis presenting with cardiogenic shock.

Pheochromocytoma is a catecholamine-secreting tumor of the adrenal glands whose typical presentation includes the triad of headache, palpitations, and diaphoresis. Pheochromocytoma crisis is an urgent medical condition whose diagnosis and management constitute a challenge for physicians. We present the case of a 55-year-old man who developed cardiogenic shock in the setting of a pheochromocytoma crisis. After stabilizing blood pressure with combined administration of α- and ß-blockers, the tumor was surgically removed. Our diagnostic and therapeutic challenges are discussed.

TandemHeart device as rescue therapy in the management of acute heart failure.

BACKGROUND: The TandemHeart device (THD) is a pump system that can be deployed percutaneously (PC) or via conventional surgical (CS) cannulation; it is capable of supporting one or both ventricles. It is a versatile system designed for use as a rescue device in acute heart failure and as a bridge to decision in moribund patients. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was conducted on all patients who underwent a THD implant; either PC or CS; at our institution. Univariate analysis was done using Fisher's exact and Chi-square tests for categorical variables and Wilcoxon Rank Sum test for continuous ones. RESULTS: 51 adult patients were identified: 10 PC and 41 CS. Mean age was 58.9 ± 12.8 years, and 31% were female. In hospital mortality was 61%. Univariate predictors of death were prolonged support (74% versus 46%, P = .04) and higher lactic acid levels (5.3 ± 4.9 versus 2.3 ± 1.9 mmol/L, P = .012). The length of stay (LOS) for survivors was 59.8 ± 30.0 days. CONCLUSION: Uni- or bi-ventricular unloading can be successfully achieved using the THD, either trans-thoracically or percutaneously, with an acceptable complication profile.

[Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support: options and importance]. / Perkutane mechanische Kreislaufunterstützung: Möglichkeiten und Stellenwert.

In cases of low cardiac output and chronic cardiac failure despite conventional therapy, mechanical circulatory support may be the only option to ensure adequate organ perfusion and to save the life of the patient. In recent years, several conceptionally different methods of circulatory support have been developed for percutaneous application in interventional cardiology and intensive care. Indications range from elective use in complex cardiac interventions to long-term support as a bridge to recovery. As intra-aortic balloon pump support can no longer be considered for routine use in ischemic cardiogenic shock, micro-axial pumps for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and extracorporeal life support systems (ECMO/ECLS) gain attractiveness due to a more convincing impact on the hemodynamics. However, an increasing level of support is paralleled by greater invasiveness and complexity of the systems. Due to a lack of larger comparative trials, the benefits and risks of adverse events must be balanced against those of conventional therapy with inotropes and largely on an individual basis. This review summarizes the options for percutaneous circulatory support with special consideration to applications in the catheter laboratory and intensive care units in internal medicine.

[New options in the treatment of acute heart failure]. / Neues zur akuten Herzinsuffizienz.

Acute heart failure is defined as the acute onset of symptoms due to hear failure necessitating emergency therapy. The in-hospital mortality rate ranges up to 10 % and in cardiogenic shock is 50-70 %. In acute heart failure, rapid diagnosis and causal therapy are necessary to avoid cardiogenic shock. In cases of acute coronary syndromes, primary percutaneous intervention should be performed immediately. Medical and apparative treatment strategies focus on decreasing pulmonary congestion, afterload, and neurohormonal activation in order to improve hemodynamics and reduce symptoms of dyspnea. In contrast to chronic heart failure, no medical therapy has been able to reduce mortality rates in acute heart failure. However, new medical therapies should at least improve clinical symptoms of congestion and favorably reduce cardiovascular events, re-hospitalization, and mortality rates.

In-hospital cardiac arrest after STEMI: prevention strategies and post-arrest care.

INTRODUCTION: In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (IHCA) after ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) is a subset of IHCA with high morbidity. While information on this selected group of patients is limited, closer inspection reveals that this is a challenging patient population with certain risk factors for IHCA following treatment of STEMI. AREAS COVERED: In this review article, strategies for prevention of IHCA post STEMI are reviewed, as well as best-practices for the care of STEMI patients post-IHCA. EXPERT OPINION: Early and successful reperfusion is key for the prevention of IHCA and has a significant impact on in-hospital mortality. A number of pharmacological treatments have also been studied that can impact the progression to IHCA. Development of cardiogenic shock post-STEMI increases mortality and raises the risk of cardiac arrest. The treatment of IHCA follows the ACLS algorithm with some notable exceptions.