Reducing acetylated tau is neuroprotective in brain injury.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the largest non-genetic, non-aging related risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD). We report here that TBI induces tau acetylation (ac-tau) at sites acetylated also in human AD brain. This is mediated by S-nitrosylated-GAPDH, which simultaneously inactivates Sirtuin1 deacetylase and activates p300/CBP acetyltransferase, increasing neuronal ac-tau. Subsequent tau mislocalization causes neurodegeneration and neurobehavioral impairment, and ac-tau accumulates in the blood. Blocking GAPDH S-nitrosylation, inhibiting p300/CBP, or stimulating Sirtuin1 all protect mice from neurodegeneration, neurobehavioral impairment, and blood and brain accumulation of ac-tau after TBI. Ac-tau is thus a therapeutic target and potential blood biomarker of TBI that may represent pathologic convergence between TBI and AD. Increased ac-tau in human AD brain is further augmented in AD patients with history of TBI, and patients receiving the p300/CBP inhibitors salsalate or diflunisal exhibit decreased incidence of AD and clinically diagnosed TBI.

Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloidosis and the Impact of Classic and New Treatments on Kidney Function: A Review.

Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRv) is a rare, progressive, and life-threatening disease caused by misfolded transthyretin (TTR) proteins that aggregate as abnormal amyloid fibrils and accumulate throughout the body. The kidney is one of the main organs affected in amyloid light chain (AL) amyloidosis and ATTRv amyloidosis. The most common clinical presentation is proteinuria, which consists mainly of albumin; this is the first step in the natural history of ATTRv nephropathy. Not all TTR mutations are equal in terms of ATTRv kidney involvement. Kidney involvement in ATTRv itself is difficult to define, given the numerous associated confounding factors. There are several treatments available to treat ATTRv, including orthotopic liver transplant (OLT), which is the classic treatment for ATTRv. However, we should be careful regarding the use of calcineurin inhibitors in the setting of OLT because these can be nephrotoxic. New treatments for amyloidosis may have an impact on kidney function, including drugs that target specific pathways involved in the disease. Tafamidis and diflunisal, which are TTR stabilizers, patisiran (RNA interference agent), and inotersen (antisense oligonucleotide inhibitor) have been shown to reduce TTR amyloid. Tafamidis and patisiran are medications that have reduced the progression of kidney disease in amyloidosis, but inotersen and diflunisal may damage kidney function.

Targeted Therapeutics for Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Deposition of wild-type or mutant transthyretin (TTR) amyloid fibrils in the myocardium causes TTR amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM). Targeted therapeutics for ATTR-CM include TTR stabilizers (tafamidis and diflunisal) and oligonucleotide drugs (revusiran, patisiran, and inotersen). TTR stabilizers prevent dissociation of transthyretin tetramers. Transthyretin monomers can misfold and form amyloid fibrils. TTR stabilizers thereby limit amyloid fibrils development and deposition. Oligonucleotide drugs inhibit hepatic synthesis of transthyretin, which decreases transthyretin protein levels and thus the amyloid fibril substrate. AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY: To study the safety and efficacy of targeted therapeutics in patients with ATTR-CM, we performed a pooled analysis. A random-effects model with the Mantel-Haenszel method was used to pool the data. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was performed using PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Embase databases using the search terms "cardiac amyloidosis" AND "tafamidis" OR "patisiran" OR "inotersen" OR "revusiran" OR "diflunisal." THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES: We identified 6 studies that compared targeted therapeutics with placebo. One study was stopped prematurely because of increased mortality in the targeted therapeutics arm. Pooled analysis included 1238 patients, of which 738 patients received targeted therapeutics and 500 patients received placebo. When compared with placebo, targeted therapeutics significantly reduced all-cause mortality [OR 0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.16-0.97, P = 0.04]. Only 2 studies reported the effect on cardiovascular-related hospitalizations. There was a trend toward an improvement in global longitudinal strain (mean difference -0.69, 95% CI: -1.44 to 0.05, P = 0.07). When compared with placebo, there was no increase in serious adverse events with targeted therapeutics (OR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.78-1.44, P = 0.72). CONCLUSION: Evidence from the pooled analysis revealed targeted therapeutics improve survival and are well-tolerated. These findings suggest a potential role for targeted therapeutics in the treatment of patients with ATTR-CM.

Cardiac Amyloidosis: Overlooked, Underappreciated, and Treatable.

Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is an infiltrative and restrictive cardiomyopathy that leads to heart failure, reduced quality of life, and death. The disease has two main subtypes, transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA) and immunoglobulin light chain cardiac amyloidosis (AL-CA), characterized by the nature of the infiltrating protein. ATTR-CA is further subdivided into wild-type (ATTRwt-CA) and variant (ATTRv-CA) based on the presence or absence of a mutation in the transthyretin gene. CA is significantly underdiagnosed and increasingly recognized as a cause of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Advances in diagnosis that employ nuclear scintigraphy to diagnose ATTR-CA without a biopsy and the emergence of effective treatments, including transthyretin stabilizers and silencers, have changed the landscape of this field and render early and accurate diagnosis critical. This review summarizes the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, prognosis, and management of CA with an emphasis on the significance of recent developments and suggested future directions.

The use of diflunisal for transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis: a review.

Transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CM) is caused by the accumulation of misfolded transthyretin (TTR) protein in the myocardium. Diflunisal, an agent that stabilizes TTR, has been used as an off-label therapeutic for ATTR-CM. Given limited data surrounding the use of diflunisal, a systematic review of the literature is warranted. We searched the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases for studies that reported on the use of diflunisal therapy for patients with ATTR-CM. We included English language studies which assessed the effect of diflunisal in adult patients with ATTR-CM who received diflunisal as primary treatment and reported clinical outcomes with emphasis on studies that noted the safety and efficacy of diflunisal in cardiac manifestations of ATTR amyloidosis. We excluded studies which did not use diflunisal therapy or used diflunisal therapy for non-cardiac manifestations of TTR amyloidosis. We also excluded case reports, abstracts, oral presentations, and studies with fewer than 10 subjects. Our search yielded 316 records, and we included 6 studies reporting on 400 patients. Non-comparative single-arm small non-randomized trials for diflunisal comprised 4 of the included studies. The 2 studies that compared diflunisal versus no treatment found improvements in TTR concentration, left atrial volume index, cardiac troponin I, and global longitudinal strain. Overall, diflunisal use was associated with decreased mortality and number of orthotopic heart transplant in ATTR-CM patients. Although a smaller number of patients had to stop treatment due to gastrointestinal side effects and transient renal dysfunction, there were no severe reactions reported in the studies included in our review. This systematic review supports the use of diflunisal for ATTR-CM. Additional long-term analyses and randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm these results.

Treatment With Diflunisal in Domino Liver Transplant Recipients With Acquired Amyloid Neuropathy.

Objectives: To analyze the efficacy and tolerability of diflunisal for the treatment of acquired amyloid neuropathy in domino liver transplant recipients. Methods: We performed a retrospective longitudinal study of prospectively collected data for all domino liver transplant recipients with acquired amyloid neuropathy who received diflunisal at our hospital. Neurological deterioration was defined as an score increase of ≥2 points from baseline on the Neurological Impairment Scale/Neurological Impairment Scale-Lower Limbs. Results: Twelve patients who had received compassionate use treatment with diflunisal were identified, of whom seven had follow-up data for ≥12 months. Five patients (71.4%) presented with neurological deterioration on the Neurological Impairment Scale after 12 months (p = 0.0382). The main adverse effects were cardiovascular and renal, leading to diflunisal being stopped in five patients and the dose being reduced in two patients. Conclusion: Our study suggests that most domino liver transplant recipients with acquired amyloid neuropathy will develop neurological deterioration by 12 months of treatment with diflunisal. This therapy was also associated with a high incidence of adverse effects and low treatment retention. The low efficacy and low tolerability of diflunisal treatment encourage the search for new therapeutic options.

Osteosarcoma Stem Cell Potent Gallium(III)-Polypyridyl Complexes Bearing Diflunisal.

We report the anti-osteosarcoma stem cell (OSC) properties of a series of gallium(III)-polypyridyl complexes (5-7) containing diflunisal, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug. The most effective complex within the series, 6 (containing 3,4,7,8-tetramethyl-1,10-phenanthroline), displayed similar potency towards bulk osteosarcoma cells and OSCs, in the nanomolar range. Remarkably, 6 exhibited significantly higher monolayer and sarcosphere OSC potency (up to three orders of magnitude) than clinically approved drugs used in frontline (cisplatin and doxorubicin) and secondary (etoposide, ifosfamide, and carboplatin) osteosarcoma treatments. Mechanistic studies show that 6 downregulates cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and kills osteosarcoma cells in a COX-2 dependent manner. Furthermore, 6 induces genomic DNA damage and caspase-dependent apoptosis. To the best of our knowledge, 6 is the first metal complex to kill osteosarcoma cells by simultaneously inhibiting COX-2 and damaging nuclear DNA.

A Review of Novel Agents and Clinical Considerations in Patients With ATTR Cardiac Amyloidosis.

ABSTRACT: Transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis is a multisystem disease caused by organ deposition of amyloid fibrils derived from the misfolded transthyretin (TTR) protein. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of current treatment regimens and summarize important considerations for each agent. A literature search was performed with the PubMed database for articles published through October 2020. Search criteria included therapies available on the market and investigational therapies used for ATTR amyloidosis treatment. Both prospective clinical trials and retrospective studies have been included in this review. Available therapies discussed in this review article are tafamidis, diflunisal, patisiran, and inotersen. Tafamidis is FDA approved for treatment of wild-type ATTR (ATTRwt) and hereditary ATTR (ATTRv) cardiomyopathy, and patisiran and inotersen are FDA approved for ATTRv polyneuropathy. Diflunisal does not have an FDA-labeled indication for amyloidosis but has been studied in ATTRv polyneuropathy and ATTRwt cardiomyopathy. Investigational therapies include a TTR stabilizer, AG10; 2 antifibril agents, PRX004 and doxycycline/tauroursodeoxycholic acid; and 2 gene silencers, vutrisiran and AKCEA-TTR-LRx; and clinical trials are ongoing. ATTR amyloidosis treatment selection is based on subtype and presence of cardiac or neurological manifestations. Additional considerations such as side effects, monitoring, and administration are outlined in this review.

Unusual duplication mutation in a surface loop of human transthyretin leads to an aggressive drug-resistant amyloid disease.

Transthyretin (TTR) is a globular tetrameric transport protein in plasma. Nearly 140 single amino acid substitutions in TTR cause life-threatening amyloid disease. We report a one-of-a-kind pathological variant featuring a Glu51, Ser52 duplication mutation (Glu51_Ser52dup). The proband, heterozygous for the mutation, exhibited an unusually aggressive amyloidosis that was refractory to treatment with the small-molecule drug diflunisal. To understand the poor treatment response and expand therapeutic options, we explored the structure and stability of recombinant Glu51_Ser52dup. The duplication did not alter the protein secondary or tertiary structure but decreased the stability of the TTR monomer and tetramer. Diflunisal, which bound with near-micromolar affinity, partially restored tetramer stability. The duplication had no significant effect on the free energy and enthalpy of diflunisal binding, and hence on the drug-protein interactions. However, the duplication induced tryptic digestion of TTR at near-physiological conditions, releasing a C-terminal fragment 49-129 that formed amyloid fibrils under conditions in which the full-length protein did not. Such C-terminal fragments, along with the full-length TTR, comprise amyloid deposits in vivo. Bioinformatics and structural analyses suggested that increased disorder in the surface loop, which contains the Glu51_Ser52dup duplication, not only helped generate amyloid-forming fragments but also decreased structural protection in the amyloidogenic residue segment 25-34, promoting misfolding of the full-length protein. Our studies of a unique duplication mutation explain its diflunisal-resistant nature, identify misfolding pathways for amyloidogenic TTR variants, and provide therapeutic targets to inhibit amyloid fibril formation by variant TTR.

The Ultrastructure of Tissue Damage by Amyloid Fibrils.

Amyloidosis is a group of diseases that includes Alzheimer's disease, prion diseases, transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis, and immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis. The mechanism of organ dysfunction resulting from amyloidosis has been a topic of debate. This review focuses on the ultrastructure of tissue damage resulting from amyloid deposition and therapeutic insights based on the pathophysiology of amyloidosis. Studies of nerve biopsy or cardiac autopsy specimens from patients with ATTR and AL amyloidoses show atrophy of cells near amyloid fibril aggregates. In addition to the stress or toxicity attributable to amyloid fibrils themselves, the toxicity of non-fibrillar states of amyloidogenic proteins, particularly oligomers, may also participate in the mechanisms of tissue damage. The obscuration of the basement and cytoplasmic membranes of cells near amyloid fibrils attributable to an affinity of components constituting these membranes to those of amyloid fibrils may also play an important role in tissue damage. Possible major therapeutic strategies based on pathophysiology of amyloidosis consist of the following: (1) reducing or preventing the production of causative proteins; (2) preventing the causative proteins from participating in the process of amyloid fibril formation; and/or (3) eliminating already-deposited amyloid fibrils. As the development of novel disease-modifying therapies such as short interfering RNA, antisense oligonucleotide, and monoclonal antibodies is remarkable, early diagnosis and appropriate selection of treatment is becoming more and more important for patients with amyloidosis.

Pharmacological treatment for familial amyloid polyneuropathy.

BACKGROUND: Disease-modifying pharmacological agents for transthyretin (TTR)-related familial amyloid polyneuropathy (FAP) have become available in the last decade, but evidence on their efficacy and safety is limited. This review focuses on disease-modifying pharmacological treatment for TTR-related and other FAPs, encompassing amyloid kinetic stabilisers, amyloid matrix solvents, and amyloid precursor inhibitors. OBJECTIVES: To assess and compare the efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability of disease-modifying pharmacological agents for familial amyloid polyneuropathies (FAPs). SEARCH METHODS: On 18 November 2019, we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and Embase. We reviewed reference lists of articles and textbooks on peripheral neuropathies. We also contacted experts in the field. We searched clinical trials registries and manufacturers' websites. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised clinical trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs investigating any disease-modifying pharmacological agent in adults with FAPs. Disability due to FAP progression was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were severity of peripheral neuropathy, change in modified body mass index (mBMI), quality of life, severity of depression, mortality, and adverse events during the trial. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We followed standard Cochrane methodology. MAIN RESULTS: The review included four RCTs involving 655 people with TTR-FAP. The manufacturers of the drugs under investigation funded three of the studies. The trials investigated different drugs versus placebo and we did not conduct a meta-analysis. One RCT compared tafamidis with placebo in early-stage TTR-FAP (128 randomised participants). The trial did not explore our predetermined disability outcome measures. After 18 months, tafamidis might reduce progression of peripheral neuropathy slightly more than placebo (Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) in the lower limbs; mean difference (MD) -3.21 points, 95% confidential interval (CI) -5.63 to -0.79; P = 0.009; low-certainty evidence). However, tafamidis might lead to little or no difference in the change of quality of life between groups (Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) total score; MD -4.50 points, 95% CI -11.27 to 2.27; P = 0.19; very low-certainty evidence). No clear between-group difference was found in the numbers of participants who died (risk ratio (RR) 0.65, 95% CI 0.11 to 3.74; P = 0.63; very low-certainty evidence), who dropped out due to adverse events (RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.30 to 5.54; P = 0.73; very low-certainty evidence), or who experienced at least one severe adverse event during the trial (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.37 to 3.62; P = 0.79; very low-certainty evidence). One RCT compared diflunisal with placebo (130 randomised participants). At month 24, diflunisal might reduce progression of disability (Kumamoto Score; MD -4.90 points, 95% CI -7.89 to -1.91; P = 0.002; low-certainty evidence) and peripheral neuropathy (NIS plus 7 nerve tests; MD -18.10 points, 95% CI -26.03 to -10.17; P < 0.001; low-certainty evidence) more than placebo. After 24 months, changes from baseline in the quality of life measured by the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey score showed no clear difference between groups for the physical component (MD 6.10 points, 95% CI 2.56 to 9.64; P = 0.001; very low-certainty evidence) and the mental component (MD 4.40 points, 95% CI -0.19 to 8.99; P = 0.063; very low-certainty evidence). There was no clear between-group difference in the number of people who died (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.15 to 1.41; P = 0.17; very low-certainty evidence), in the number of dropouts due to adverse events (RR 2.06, 95% CI 0.39 to 10.87; P = 0.39; very low-certainty evidence), and in the number of people who experienced at least one severe adverse event (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.18 to 3.32; P = 0.73; very low-certainty evidence) during the trial. One RCT compared patisiran with placebo (225 randomised participants). After 18 months, patisiran reduced both progression of disability (Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale; least-squares MD 8.90 points, 95% CI 7.00 to 10.80; P < 0.001; moderate-certainty evidence) and peripheral neuropathy (modified NIS plus 7 nerve tests - Alnylam version; least-squares MD -33.99 points, 95% CI -39.86 to -28.13; P < 0.001; moderate-certainty evidence) more than placebo. At month 18, the change in quality of life between groups favoured patisiran (Norfolk QOL-DN total score; least-squares MD -21.10 points, 95% CI -27.20 to -15.00; P < 0.001; low-certainty evidence). There was little or no between-group difference in the number of participants who died (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.74; P = 0.35; low-certainty evidence), dropped out due to adverse events (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.82; P = 0.017; low-certainty evidence), or experienced at least one severe adverse event (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.28; P = 0.58; low-certainty evidence) during the trial. One RCT compared inotersen with placebo (172 randomised participants). The trial did not explore our predetermined disability outcome measures. From baseline to week 66, inotersen reduced progression of peripheral neuropathy more than placebo (modified NIS plus 7 nerve tests - Ionis version; MD -19.73 points, 95% CI -26.50 to -12.96; P < 0.001; moderate-certainty evidence). At week 65, the change in quality of life between groups favoured inotersen (Norfolk QOL-DN total score; MD -10.85 points, 95% CI -17.25 to -4.45; P < 0.001; low-certainty evidence). Inotersen may slightly increase mortality (RR 5.94, 95% CI 0.33 to 105.60; P = 0.22; low-certainty evidence) and occurrence of severe adverse events (RR 1.48, 95% CI 0.85 to 2.57; P = 0.16; low-certainty evidence) compared to placebo. More dropouts due to adverse events were observed in the inotersen than in the placebo group (RR 8.57, 95% CI 1.16 to 63.07; P = 0.035; low-certainty evidence). There were no studies addressing apolipoprotein AI-FAP, gelsolin-FAP, and beta-2-microglobulin-FAP. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Evidence on the pharmacological treatment of FAPs from RCTs is limited to TTR-FAP. No studies directly compare disease-modifying pharmacological treatments for TTR-FAP. Results from placebo-controlled trials indicate that tafamidis, diflunisal, patisiran, and inotersen may be beneficial in TTR-FAP, but further investigations are needed. Since direct comparative studies for TTR-FAP will be hampered by sample size and costs required to demonstrate superiority of one drug over another, long-term non-randomised open-label studies monitoring their efficacy and safety are needed.

Inhibition of the Amyloidogenesis of Transthyretin by Natural Products and Synthetic Compounds.

Hereditary transthyretin (TTR)-related amyloidosis is caused by mutations in the TTR gene. The mutations destabilize the tetramer and/or monomer of TTR, and thus the stabilization of TTR is a key strategy for the treatment of TTR-related amyloidosis. In this review, we summarized the natural products and synthetic compounds that have been shown to inhibit the amyloidogenesis of TTR. The stabilizers and/or the amyloid fibril disrupters isolated from natural sources may become lead compounds for the treatment of TTR-related amyloidosis.

Therapeutic Strategies Targeting Inherited Cardiomyopathies.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cardiomyopathies due to genetic mutations are a heterogeneous group of disorders that comprise diseases of contractility, myocardial relaxation, and arrhythmias. Our goal here is to discuss a limited list of genetically inherited cardiomyopathies and the specific therapeutic strategies used to treat them. RECENT FINDINGS: Research into the molecular pathophysiology of the development of these cardiomyopathies is leading to the development of novel treatment approaches. Therapies targeting these specific mutations with gene therapy vectors are on the horizon, while other therapies which indirectly affect the physiologic derangements of the mutations are currently being studied and used clinically. Many of these therapies are older medications being given new roles such as mexiletine for Brugada syndrome and diflunisal for transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. A newer targeted therapy, the inhibitor of myosin ATPase MYK-461, has been shown to suppress the development of ventricular hypertrophy, fibrosis, and myocyte disarray and is being studied as a potential therapy in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. While this field is too large to be completely contained in a single review, we present a large cross section of recent developments in the field of therapeutics for inherited cardiomyopathies. New therapies are on the horizon, and their development will likely result in improved outcomes for patients inflicted by these conditions.

Correct Diagnosis of Wild-Type Transthyretin-Related Amyloidosis Followed by the Introduction of a Novel Therapy in a Patient With Cardiac Wall Thickening of Unknown Cause.

We report here the case of a 67-year-old man who was initially diagnosed with myocardial hypertrophy with progressive hypertensive heart disease. After 6 years a cardiac biopsy was conducted because of changes in the electrocardiogram and transthoracic echocardiogram results, revealing amyloid deposition. Additional genetic studies revealed no TTR gene mutations, leading to a definitive diagnosis of wild-type transthyretin-related amyloidosis (ATTR). The patient started taking diflunisal as a stabilizer which is one of the advanced therapies for ATTR, and then the heart failure symptoms and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) level improved in short-term follow-up. We present an elderly patient with ATTR, which is believed to be rare. We also discuss the apparent efficacy of novel therapeutic agents that increase the incentive to diagnose ATTR at an early stage. Therefore, we should always consider the existence of cardiac amyloidosis when we initiate the management of an elderly patient with cardiac wall thickening.

Natural history and therapy of TTR-cardiac amyloidosis: emerging disease-modifying therapies from organ transplantation to stabilizer and silencer drugs.

Transthyretin-cardiac amyloidoses (ATTR-CA) are an underdiagnosed but increasingly recognized cause of heart failure. Extracellular deposition of fibrillary proteins into tissues due to a variety of inherited transthyretin mutations in ATTRm or due to advanced age in ATTRwt eventually leads to organ failure. In the heart, amyloid deposition causes diastolic dysfunction, restrictive cardiomyopathy with progressive loss of systolic function, arrhythmias, and heart failure. While traditional treatments have consisted of conventional heart failure management and supportive care for systemic symptoms, numerous disease-modifying therapies have emerged over the past decade. From organ transplantation to transthyretin stabilizers (diflunisal, tafamidis, AG-1), TTR silencers (ALN-ATTR02, ISIS-TTR(Rx)), and degraders of amyloid fibrils (doxycycline/TUDCA), the potential for effective transthyretin amyloid therapy is greater now than ever before. In light of these multiple agents under investigation in human clinical trials, clinicians should be familiar with the systemic cardiac amyloidoses, their differing pathophysiology, natural histories, and unique treatment strategies.

Transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis: clinical spectrum, molecular pathogenesis and disease-modifying treatments.

Transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis is a life-threatening, gain-of-toxic-function disease characterised by extracellular deposition of amyloid fibrils composed of transthyretin (TTR). TTR protein destabilised by TTR gene mutation is prone to dissociate from its native tetramer to monomer, and to then misfold and aggregate into amyloid fibrils, resulting in autosomal dominant hereditary amyloidosis, including familial amyloid polyneuropathy, familial amyloid cardiomyopathy and familial leptomeningeal amyloidosis. Analogous misfolding of wild-type TTR results in senile systemic amyloidosis, now termed wild-type ATTR amyloidosis, characterised by acquired amyloid disease in the elderly. With the availability of genetic, biochemical and immunohistochemical diagnostic tests, patients with ATTR amyloidosis have been found in many nations; however, misdiagnosis is still common and considerable time is required before correct diagnosis in many cases. The current standard first-line treatment for hereditary ATTR amyloidosis is liver transplantation, which allows suppression of the main source of variant TTR. However, large numbers of patients are not suitable transplant candidates. Recently, the clinical effects of TTR tetramer stabilisers, diflunisal and tafamidis, were demonstrated in randomised clinical trials, and tafamidis has been approved for treatment of hereditary ATTR amyloidosis in European countries and in Japan. Moreover, antisense oligonucleotides and small interfering RNAs for suppression of variant and wild-type TTR synthesis are promising therapeutic approaches to ameliorate ATTR amyloidosis and are currently in phase III clinical trials. These newly developed therapies are expected to be effective for not only hereditary ATTR amyloidosis but also wild-type ATTR amyloidosis.

Recent progress in the understanding and treatment of transthyretin amyloidosis.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Transthyretin (TTR) is a representative amyloidogenic protein in humans. Rate-limiting tetramer dissociation and rapid monomer misfolding and misassembly of variant TTR result in autosomal dominant familial amyloidosis. Analogous misfolding of wild-type TTR results in senile systemic amyloidosis (SSA) presenting as sporadic amyloid disease in the elderly. The objective of this review is to summarize recent progress in our understanding and treatment of TTR amyloidosis. METHODS: Literature searches were conducted on the topics of transthyretin, familial amyloid polyneuropathy and clinical trials, using PubMed, the United States clinical trials directory, pharmaceutical company websites and news reports. The information was collected, evaluated for relevance and quality, critically assessed and summarized. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The current standard first-line treatment of familial TTR amyloidosis is liver transplantation. However, large numbers of patients are not suitable transplant candidates. Recently, the clinical effects of TTR tetramer stabilizers, tafamidis and diflunisal, were demonstrated in randomized clinical trials, and tafamidis has been approved for the treatment of FAP in European countries and Japan. In addition, gene therapies with antisense oligonucleotides and small interfering RNAs are promising strategies to ameliorate TTR amyloidoses and are currently in clinical trials. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS: Liver transplantation to treat the familial TTR amyloidosis will likely be replaced by other less invasive therapies, such as TTR tetramer stabilizers and possibly gene therapy approaches. These newly developed therapies are expected to be effective for not only familial TTR amyloidosis but also SSA, based on their mechanisms of action.

Repurposing diflunisal for familial amyloid polyneuropathy: a randomized clinical trial.

IMPORTANCE: Familial amyloid polyneuropathy, a lethal genetic disease caused by aggregation of variant transthyretin, induces progressive peripheral nerve deficits and disability. Diflunisal, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent, stabilizes transthyretin tetramers and prevents amyloid fibril formation in vitro. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of diflunisal on polyneuropathy progression in patients with familial amyloid polyneuropathy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: International randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted among 130 patients with familial amyloid polyneuropathy exhibiting clinically detectable peripheral or autonomic neuropathy at amyloid centers in Sweden (Umeå), Italy (Pavia), Japan (Matsumoto and Kumamoto), England (London), and the United States (Boston, Massachusetts; New York, New York; and Rochester, Minnesota) from 2006 through 2012. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned to receive diflunisal, 250 mg (n=64), or placebo (n=66) twice daily for 2 years. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point, the difference in polyneuropathy progression between treatments, was measured by the Neuropathy Impairment Score plus 7 nerve tests (NIS+7) which ranges from 0 (no neurological deficits) to 270 points (no detectable peripheral nerve function). Secondary outcomes included a quality-of-life questionnaire (36-Item Short-Form Health Survey [SF-36]) and modified body mass index. Because of attrition, we used likelihood-based modeling and multiple imputation analysis of baseline to 2-year data. RESULTS: By multiple imputation, the NIS+7 score increased by 25.0 (95% CI, 18.4-31.6) points in the placebo group and by 8.7 (95% CI, 3.3-14.1) points in the diflunisal group, a difference of 16.3 points (95% CI, 8.1-24.5 points; P < .001). Mean SF-36 physical scores decreased by 4.9 (95% CI, -7.6 to -2.2) points in the placebo group and increased by 1.5 (95% CI, -0.8 to 3.7) points in the diflunisal group (P < .001). Mean SF-36 mental scores declined by 1.1 (95% CI, -4.3 to 2.0) points in the placebo group while increasing by 3.7 (95% CI, 1.0-6.4) points in the diflunisal group (P = .02). By responder analysis, 29.7% of the diflunisal group and 9.4% of the placebo group exhibited neurological stability at 2 years (<2-point increase in NIS+7 score; P = .007). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with familial amyloid polyneuropathy, the use of diflunisal compared with placebo for 2 years reduced the rate of progression of neurological impairment and preserved quality of life. Although longer-term follow-up studies are needed, these findings suggest benefit of this treatment for familial amyloid polyneuropathy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00294671.

Characterising diflunisal as a transthyretin kinetic stabilizer at relevant concentrations in human plasma using subunit exchange.

Transthyretin (TTR) dissociation is the rate limiting step for both aggregation and subunit exchange. Kinetic stabilisers, small molecules that bind to the native tetrameric structure of TTR, slow TTR dissociation and inhibit aggregation. One such stabiliser is the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), diflunisal, which has been repurposed to treat TTR polyneuropathy. Previously, we compared the efficacy of diflunisal, tafamidis, tolcapone, and AG10 as kinetic stabilisers for transthyretin. However, we could not meaningfully compare diflunisal because we were unsure of its plasma concentration after long-term oral dosing. Herein, we report the diflunisal plasma concentrations measured by extraction, reversed phase HPLC separation, and fluorescence detection after long-term 250 mg BID oral dosing in two groups: a placebo-controlled diflunisal clinical trial group and an open-label Japanese polyneuropathy treatment cohort. The measured mean diflunisal plasma concentration from both groups was 282.2 µM ± 143.7 µM (mean ± standard deviation). Thus, quantification of TTR kinetic stabilisation using subunit exchange was carried out at 100, 200, 300, and 400 µM diflunisal concentrations, all observed in patients after 250 mg BID oral dosing. A 250 µM diflunisal plasma concentration reduced the wild-type TTR dissociation rate in plasma by 95%, which is sufficient to stop transthyretin aggregation, consistent with the clinical efficacy of diflunisal for ameliorating transthyretin polyneuropathy.

Repurposing of FDA-approved drugs as dual-acting MAO-B and AChE inhibitors against Alzheimer's disease: An in silico and in vitro study.

An in silico consensus molecular docking approach and in vitro evaluations were adopted in the present study to explore a dataset of FDA-approved drugs as novel multitarget MAO-B/AChE agents in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). GOLD 5.3 and Glide were employed in the virtual assessments and consensus superimpositions of the obtained poses were applied to increase the reliability of the docking protocols. Furthermore, the top ranked molecules were subjected to binding free energy calculations using MM/GBSA, Induced fit docking (IFD) simulations, and a literature review. Consequently, the top four multitarget drugs were examined for their in vitro MAO-B and AChE inhibition effects. The consensus molecular docking identified Dolutegravir, Rebamipide, Loracarbef and Diflunisal as potential multitarget drugs. The biological data demonstrated that most of the docking scores were in good correlation with the in vitro experiments, however the theoretical simulations in the active site of MAO-B identified two false-positives - Rebamipide and Diflunisal. Dolutegravir and Loracarbef were accessed as active MAO-B inhibitors, while Dolutegravir, Rebamapide and Diflunisal as potential AChE inhibitors. The antiretroviral agent Dolutegravir exhibited the most potent multitarget activity - 41% inhibition of MAO-B (1 µM) and 68% inhibition of AChE (10 µM). Visualizations of the intermolecular interactions of Dolutegravir in the active sites of MAO-B and AChE revealed the formation of several stable hydrogen bonds. Overall, Dolutegravir was identified as a potential anti-AD drug, however further in vivo evaluations should be considered.