Meloxicam and/or Etoricoxib Could Be Administered Safely in Two Equal Doses during an Open Oral Challenge in Patients with Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Hypersensitivity.

BACKGROUND: Hypersensitivity reactions to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are common. These patients require an effective and safe analgesic alternative. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to demonstrate the safety of meloxicam and etoricoxib administered by open oral challenge in 2 equal steps in patients with NSAID hypersensitivity. METHODS: A cross-sectional, descriptive study of patients with a diagnosis of NSAID hypersensitivity who underwent an oral drug provocation test (DPT) with meloxicam or etoricoxib between January 2011 and August 2017 was conducted. The analysis was performed from a database in BD Clinic. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-eight oral provocations were performed with an alternative NSAID (203 with meloxicam and 25 with etoricoxib) in 217 patients with hypersensitivity to NSAIDs. The median age was 38 years. Ninety-eight percent of meloxicam and 100% of etoricoxib DPTs were performed in 2 steps (without previous placebo), and 52% and 64% of meloxicam and etoricoxib DPTs, respectively, were performed with 50% of the therapeutic dose in each step. Tolerance to meloxicam was demonstrated in 192 patients (94.5%) and in 100% of patients receiving etoricoxib. CONCLUSIONS: Open oral provocation with meloxicam and etoricoxib carried out in 2 steps without placebo seems to be safe and implies less costs and less time expenditure. Also, it could be performed with 2 equal doses.

Etoricoxib-induced fixed drug eruption: Report of seven cases.

BACKGROUND: Fixed drug eruption (FDE) is a characteristic form of intraepidermal CD8+ T cell-mediated drug reaction, with repeated appearance of isolated or multiple skin lesions in the same location after receiving the offending drug. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) are the most common cause. Selective inhibitors of inducible cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) provoke a lesser degree of allergic or idiosyncratic adverse reactions than conventional NSAID, but they can cause skin reactions of variable severity. OBJECTIVE: Etoricoxib has been related to a variety of unusual skin reactions, including several reports of FDE. METHODS: We perfomed epicutaneous test to diagnose patients with suspected etoricoxib fixe drug rash due to clinical features and reproducibility on at least two occasions. RESULTS: We present seven new cases of etoricoxib-induced fixed drug eruption, with a diagnosis based on clinical presentation. This diagnosis was confirmed by an etoricoxib-positive lesional patch test in six cases and by a positive low-dose oral challenge in the other one. Two patients showed negative patch tests with celecoxib (10% in pet.) on the residual lesions, and oral tolerance was confirmed in one. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the largest series on FDE induced by etoricoxib reported to date.

Probable Etoricoxib-Induced Severe Thrombocytopenia: A Case Report.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a case of likely etoricoxib-induced severe thrombocytopenia. CLINICAL PRESENTATION AND INTERVENTION: A 32-year-old woman was referred to our hospital for disseminated petechial rash after 7 days of therapy with etoricoxib. At admission, the patient's platelet count was 3,000/mm3. At Naranjo's scale correlation between thrombocytopenia and drug was considered as "probable." With the diagnostic tests performed we did not find other causes of thrombocytopenia. Etoricoxib was discontinued. The patient was treated with intravenous immunoglobulin and corticosteroids with a complete resolution of the thrombocytopenia in a few days. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of thrombocytopenia induced by etoricoxib should be studied as it may not be very rare.

Sudden cardiac death in J wave syndrome with short QT associated to a novel mutation in Nav 1.8 coding gene SCN10A: First case report for a possible pharmacogenomic role.

INTRODUCTION: Sudden cardiac death is an important cause of mortality in the general population. It represents an important challenge for clinicians, often being the only symptom of a broad spectrum of cardiac pathologies and inherited heart conditions. Early repolarization syndrome and Brugada syndrome are part of the wider "J-wave" syndrome, which may also include the short QT syndrome as a third factor of an ionic channel imbalance in the arrhythmogenic landscape. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe the case of a woman struck down by sudden cardiac death, with short QT and early repolarization, in which we found an extremely rare and putatively pathogenic heterozygous variant in the SCN10A gene. Variants involving SCN10A, which encodes a voltage-gated sodium channel, were already associated with alterations of cardiac conduction parameters and the cardiac rhythm disorder, thereby influencing the cardiac physiology and predisposing to arrhythmia. CONCLUSION: We underline the role of genetic predisposition to sudden cardiac death and, for the first time, suggest a possible environmental effect, such as a pharmacological therapy in the setting of sudden death, with the purpose to increase awareness in clinical practice.

Fixed drug eruption secondary to etoricoxib.

Fixed drug eruptions (FDE) are adverse cutaneous drug reactions and a form of delayed type 4 hypersensitivity reaction characterised by recurrent lesions at the same site each time a specific drug is taken. They most commonly result in cutaneous lesions presenting as an erythematous round or oval macule or plaque. FDEs have rarely been reported to affect oral mucous membranes and tend to have a bullous or aphthous-like appearance with erythema. Almost half of patients report an increase in the severity of symptoms with prolonged exposure to the offending medication. The most commonly attributed classes of drug are antibiotics (tetracyclines and sulphonamides) alongside non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Cutaneous adverse reactions to etoricoxib, a highly selective COX-2 inhibitor, have been reported. Here we describe an adverse reaction restricted to the oral mucosa.

Comparative Risks of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs on Cardiovascular Diseases: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Through examining the incidence of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) among nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) users and nonusers, this study aims to compare the risks contributed by different NSAIDs in a Chinese population. The retrospective cohort including 4 298 368 adults without CVD from electronic health records between 2008 and 2017 in Hong Kong was adopted. A total of 4.5% of individuals received NSAIDs including celecoxib, etoricoxib, diclofenac, ibuprofen, indomethacin, mefenamic acid, or naproxen for ≥4 consecutive weeks at baseline. Cox regression, including NSAID use as a time-dependent covariate and adjusted with patient's characteristics, was conducted to examine the association between NSAID exposure and incident CVD. After a median follow-up of 6.9 years (30 million person-years), a total of 258 601 cases of incident CVD was recorded. NSAID use was shown to be associated with a significantly higher risk of CVD (hazard ratio [HR], 1.32 [95%CI, 1.28-1.37]) compared to non-NSAID use. Similar results in coronary heart disease (HR, 1.37 [95%CI, 1.31-1.43]), stroke (HR, 1.27 [95%CI, 1.21-1.33]), and heart failure (HR, 1.25 [95%CI, 1.16-1.34]) were obtained. Overall, similar CVD risk was observed across users of NSAIDs except for etoricoxib, which showed a higher risk (HR, 2.01 [95%CI, 1.63-2.48]). Considering that a higher CVD risk was consistently displayed among NSAID users, NSAIDs should be used cautiously, and the usage of etoricoxib in the Chinese population should be reviewed.

[Selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor hypersensitivity]. / Hipersensibilidad selectiva a inhibidores de la ciclooxigenasa-2.

BACKGROUND: The cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors are usually recommended as a safe alternative in patients with multiple hypersensitivity to non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Nevertheless, both immediate and delayed hypersensitivity reactions have been described, and the possibility of cross-reactivity with sulphonamides. CASE REPORT: A 66-year-old patient who, after taking a celecoxib tablet, presented with latency of several hours a skin reaction. Previously, he had presented a minor reaction during treatment with etoricoxib without establishing the correlation at that time. The patient underwent an allergological study by means of skin tests with negative results and an oral challenged test with etoricoxib with positive results. Tolerance to sulfonamides was proven. CONCLUSIONS: We present a singular case of a cross-reactivity skin reaction to etoricoxib and celecoxib, suggesting the need to perform challenge tests to confirm the tolerance or not of each drug before allowing their use. On the contrary, trimethropim/sulfamethoxazole could be safely used in our patients, if needed.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Los inhibidores de la ciclooxigenasa-2 suelen indicarse en pacientes con hipersensibilidad múltiple a los antiinflamatorios no esteroides. Sin embargo, se han descrito reacciones de hipersensibilidad inmediata y retardada, además de posible reactividad cruzada con sulfonamidas. REPORTE DE CASO: Paciente masculino de 66 años, que acudió al servicio de Alergia por una reacción cutánea, luego de haber consumido un comprimido de celecoxib. Previamente, durante el tratamiento con etoricoxib, tuvo una reacción menor, sin establecer la correlación farmacológica. Se realizaron pruebas cutáneas (intraepidérmicas y epicutáneas), con resultados negativos, y un examen de exposición oral controlada con etoricoxib, con resultado positivo. Se comprobó la tolerancia a las sulfamidas. CONCLUSIONES: El caso de reacción cutánea, mediante reactividad cruzada, entre etoricoxib y celecoxib expuesto en este artículo sugiere la necesidad de realizar pruebas de provocación para confirmar la tolerancia de cada fármaco antes de su prescripción. Por el contrario, trimetropim-sulfametoxazol pueden indicarse con seguridad, si fuese necesario.

The Protective Role of Etoricoxib Against Diethylnitrosamine/2-acetylaminofluorene- Induced Hepatocarcinogenesis in Wistar Rats: The Impact of NF-κB/COX-2/PGE2 Signaling.

BACKGROUND: Liver cancer ranks as the 7th and 5th leading cause of cancer morbidity worldwide in men and women, respectively. Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of liver cancer and is associated with an increasing global burden of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) and Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH). OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to investigate the possible chemopreventive effect of etoricoxib on diethylnitrosamine (DENA) and 2-acetylaminofluorene (2AAF)-induced HCC in male Wistar rats. METHODS: HCC was induced by DENA (150 mg/kg/week; i.p) for 2 weeks, then 2AAF (20 mg/kg; p.o) every other day for three successive weeks. Etoricoxib (0.6 mg/kg, p.o.) was given to DENA/ 2AAF-administered rats for 20 weeks. RESULTS: Etoricoxib significantly suppressed alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19.9) as liver tumor biomarkers. It also decreased serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and total bilirubin levels while increased serum albumin levels. Besides, it alleviated DENA/2AAF-induced histopathological abrasions and inflammatory cell infiltration. Furthermore, etoricoxib showed a potent antioxidant effect, supported by a significant lipid peroxide reduction and elevation in superoxide dismutase activity and GSH content. In addition, Etoricoxib significantly down-regulated the protein expression of interleukin 1 beta (IL-1ß), tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), nuclear Factor-kappa B (NF-κB), phosphorylated nuclear Factor-kappa B (p-NF-κB), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the current results proved that etoricoxib possesses an anticarcinogenic effect via its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and modulation of NF-κB/COX-2/PGE2 signaling.

Etoricoxib Induced Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis in a case of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Case Report.

Toxic epidermal necrolysis is a potentially life-threatening dermatological condition whose pathogenesis and exact treatment are not yet known. Drugs like anticonvulsants, allopurinol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs like etoricoxib, a selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor prescribed for pain management are associated with a high risk of toxic epidermal necrolysis. It is also associated with immunodeficiency and dysregulated immune reactions like systemic lupus erythematosus, an autoimmune disease in which organs and cells undergo damage initially mediated by tissue binding auto-antibodies and immune complexes. Here, a 34 year old lady was presented in emergency with multiple maculopapular rashes over the neck and trunk region after treatment with etoricoxib for osteoarthritis of the left foot.

Cardiovascular Risks of Diclofenac Versus Other Older COX-2 Inhibitors (Meloxicam and Etodolac) and Newer COX-2 Inhibitors (Celecoxib and Etoricoxib): A Series of Nationwide Emulated Trials.

INTRODUCTION: Diclofenac has increased cardiovascular risks, but its risk profile compared with other COX-2 inhibitors remains unknown. AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the cardiovascular risks of diclofenac versus other older and newer COX-2 inhibitors (coxibs). METHODS: Using Danish nationwide health registries (1999-2020), we conducted a series of emulated trials (n = 264). Eligible adults had no recent NSAID prescriptions, contraindications or conditions with low adherence. We included initiators of diclofenac (n = 1,600,202), meloxicam (n = 10,903), etodolac (n = 238,538), celecoxib (n = 77,591), and etoricoxib (n = 12,122). We computed the adjusted intention-to-treat incidence rate ratio (aIRR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) within 30 days of initiation (5562 events). RESULTS: MACE was 20% increased among initiators of diclofenac compared with other older COX-2 inhibitors (aIRR 1.19, 95% CI 1.10-1.28), driven by cardiac death (aIRR 1.57, 95% CI 1.21-2.03). The effect appeared strongest for women (aIRR 1.28, 95% CI 1.15-1.43), individuals with high baseline cardiovascular risk (aIRR 1.32, 95% CI 1.05-1.66), and when comparing high-dose diclofenac with low doses of the other older COX-2 inhibitors (aIRR 1.31, 95% CI 1.13-1.52). The results reflected increased rates compared with both meloxicam (aIRR 1.46, 95% CI 0.94-2.26) and etodolac (aIRR 1.18, 95% CI 1.09-1.28). Diclofenac initiators had similar increased rates of MACE compared with coxibs (aIRR 0.96, 95% CI 0.85-1.08), consistent for celecoxib (aIRR 1.02, 95% CI 0.88-1.19) and etoricoxib (aIRR 0.85, 95% CI 0.66-1.10). CONCLUSIONS: The increased cardiovascular risks associated with diclofenac initiation were higher than for other older COX-2 inhibitors (meloxicam/etodolac) and comparable to coxibs (celecoxib/etoricoxib).

Association of Etoricoxib treatment and incident hypoxia in patients with aortic dissection undergoing endovascular aortic repair.

OBJECTIVE: The current study was to evaluate the association of Etoricoxib treatment and incident hypoxia among type-B aortic dissection (AD) patients undergoing endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). METHODS: Patients undergoing EVAR were retrospectively recruited. Based on Etoricoxib use, patients were divided into the non-treated and Etoricoxib-treated groups. Baseline characteristics including demographics, laboratory parameters, characteristics of aortic computer tomography and echocardiography, medications used, and procedural characteristics were collected from the electronic health record. RESULTS: Compared to non-treated group (n = 36), prevalence of obesity and fever at baseline was higher in Etoricoxib-treated group (n = 24; P < 0.05). Mean number of neutrophils, and mean serum CRP and D-dimer levels were higher in Etoricoxib-treated group (P < 0.05). The overall incidence of hypoxia was lower in Etoricoxib-treated group (44.4% vs 33.4%, P < 0.05). Increase in neutrophils count, serum CRP and D-dimer levels was associated with incident hypoxia, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.36 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.65), 1.44 (95% CI 1.12-1.78) and 1.25 (95% CI 1.01-1.47) respectively. In unadjusted model, Etoricoxib use was associated with a 44% lower odds of incident hypoxia. After adjustment for inflammatory markers, the association between Etoricoxib and incident hypoxia was non-significant, with OR of 0.95% and 95% CI of 0.78-1.06. CONCLUSION: Compared to patients who did not receive Etoricoxib during hospitalization, those treated with Etoricoxib had lower incidence of hypoxia, which might be attributed to its anti-inflammatory effects.

Cardiovascular Risk of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Classical and Selective Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors: A Meta-analysis of Observational Studies.

The purpose of this study was to review the published evidence on the clinical use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and to assess the cardiovascular risk (CVR) of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors (coxibs), excluding aspirin, by means of a meta-analytic procedure. A search was conducted on MEDLINE and EMBASE databases between October 1999 and June 2018. Cohort and case-control studies showing CVR as relative risk (RR), odds ratio, hazard ratio, or incidence rate ratio associated with NSAIDs versus no treatment were selected. We estimated the pooled RR and the 95% confidence interval (CI) for all NSAIDs as a whole and individually. Eighty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Overall, NSAIDs were found to be associated with a statistically significantly increased CVR (RR, 1.24 [95%CI, 1.19-1.28]). The risk was slightly higher for coxibs (RR, 1.22 [95%CI, 1.17-1.28]) as compared with nonselective NSAIDs (RR, 1.18 [95%CI, 1.12-1.24]). Data analysis by drug disclosed that rofecoxib (RR, 1.39 [95%CI, 1.31-1.47]), followed by diclofenac (RR, 1.34 [95%CI, 1.26-1.42]) and etoricoxib (RR, 1.27 [95%CI, 1.12-1.43]) were the NSAIDs associated with the highest CVR. Analysis by type of event showed that the highest risk corresponded to vascular events for both coxibs (RR, 2.18 [95%CI, 1.72-2.78]) and nonselective NSAIDs (RR, 2.46 [95%CI, 2.00-3.02]). The meta-analysis results suggest that the use of the marketed coxibs celecoxib and etoricoxib would be related to a statistically significant CVR increase. Etoricoxib CVR could be higher than that for celecoxib. This increment would be similar to classical NSAID CVR.

Etoricoxib-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis: A fatal case report.

Cyclooxygenase inhibitors were developed in the quest of enhanced analgesic efficacy devoid of gastric side effects. High usage of etoricoxib by prescription as well as self-administered routes has led to increasing reports of side effects and adverse reactions including dermatologic reactions in 0.1%-0.3% of cases. The present report enumerates a case of toxic epidermal necrolysis induced by etoricoxib.

Risk of acute myocardial infarction during use of individual NSAIDs: A nested case-control study from the SOS project.

BACKGROUND: Use of selective COX-2 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (coxibs) has been associated with an increased risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, the risk of AMI has only been studied for very few NSAIDs that are frequently used. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the risk of AMI for individual NSAIDs. METHODS: A nested case-control study was performed from a cohort of new NSAID users ≥18 years (1999-2011) matching cases to a maximum of 100 controls on database, sex, age, and calendar time. Data were retrieved from six healthcare databases. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of current use of individual NSAIDs compared to past use were estimated per database. Pooling was done by two-stage pooling using a random effects model (ORmeta) and by one-stage pooling (ORpool). RESULTS: Among 8.5 million new NSAID users, 79,553 AMI cases were identified. The risk was elevated for current use of ketorolac (ORmeta 2.06;95%CI 1.83-2.32, ORpool 1.80; 1.49-2.18) followed, in descending order of point estimate, by indometacin, etoricoxib, rofecoxib, diclofenac, fixed combination of diclofenac with misoprostol, piroxicam, ibuprofen, naproxen, celecoxib, meloxicam, nimesulide and ketoprofen (ORmeta 1.12; 1.03-1.22, ORpool 1.00;0.86-1.16). Higher doses showed higher risk estimates than lower doses. CONCLUSIONS: The relative risk estimates of AMI differed slightly between 28 individual NSAIDs. The relative risk was highest for ketorolac and was correlated with COX-2 potency, but not restricted to coxibs.

One-stage and two-stage meta-analysis of individual participant data led to consistent summarized evidence: lessons learned from combining multiple databases.

OBJECTIVE: Combining multiple health-care databases (DBs) allows comparing the effects of a wide variety of health-care services. There is a growing interest in methods for combining the results from multiple DBs. We attempted to learn lessons about the performance of one- and two-stage approaches from the reanalysis of data drawn from two studies of pharmacoepidemiology based on multiple DBs. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Two nested case-control studies were carried out for estimating the tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs)-arrhythmia and etoricoxib-heart failure associations, respectively, from the Italian Group for Appropriate Drug Prescription in the Elderly and the European Safety of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory programs. The associations of interest were modeled by conditional logistic regression for matched case-control sets, fitting fixed-effect and random-effect models with both one- and two-stage approaches. RESULTS: One- and two-stage approaches gave very similar results, showing uncertainty of TCA-arrhythmia association (random-effect odds ratios [ORs], 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26, 0.71-2.24, and 1.30, 0.66-2.55, respectively) and statistical evidence for etoricoxib-heart failure association (fixed-effect OR, 95% CI, 1.53, 1.41-1.66, and 1.54, 1.42-1.66, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our study offers further evidence that two-stage approach generates estimates very similar as those from one-stage approach, even in the case of between-DB exposure heterogeneity and when several covariates must be concurrently considered. As current rules limit the free movement of electronic health data, our findings open the door of treating data within the country where they are generated and then to apply conventional techniques for summarizing estimates, which is the two-stage approach for meta-analysis using individual participant data.

Effects of the highly COX-2-selective analgesic NSAID etoricoxib on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement and cranial growth.

BACKGROUND: NSAID analgesics have found widespread use in the treatment of pain, inflammation and fever. The highly COX-2-selective NSAID etoricoxib has shown a favorable side effect profile and excellent analgesic efficacy, particularly for dental and orthodontic pain, surpassing the current standard analgesic in orthodontics, acetaminophen. However, potential side effects on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) and cranial growth, relevant for clinical usability during orthodontic treatment, have not yet been investigated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 40 male Fischer344 rats were randomly assigned to 4 groups (n=10) - controls receiving only 1.5ml tap water per day by oral gavage for a total of 5 weeks (1) as well as rats receiving an additional daily normal etoricoxib dosage of 7.8mg/kg for 3d (2) and 7d/week (3) and a high dosage of 13.1mg/kg for 7d/week (4) with serum bioavailability assessed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. After one week of premedication, the first upper left molars (M1) were moved orthodontically in anterior direction for 4 weeks using a closed NiTi coil spring (0.25N) and OTM as well as sagittal cranial growth were quantified cephalometrically by CBCT imaging at the start and end of OTM. RESULTS: OTM, quantified as anterior metric tipping of M1, was significantly inhibited by about 33% only in rats receiving high-dose etoricoxib 7d/week (p=0.046) with a respective, but insignificant tendency also detectable for the normal dosages, whereas sagittal cranial growth was by tendency slightly increased with rising etoricoxib dosages, reflected by corresponding steady-state serum concentrations, confirming etoricoxib bioavailability. CONCLUSIONS: An etoricoxib-induced clinically relevant deceleration of OTM is not to be expected at dosage regimens used in clinical practice to treat dental or orthodontic pain in contrast to a continuously administered high dosage. Due to its favorable side effect profile and higher analgesic efficiency regarding dental and orthodontic pain, etoricoxib should be a clinically valid alternative to the current standard orthodontic analgesic acetaminophen with its associated higher risk profile.