A double-blinded, randomized trial comparing surgeon-administered transversus abdominis plane block with placebo after midline laparotomy in gynecologic oncology surgery.

BACKGROUND: Surgeon-administered transversus abdominis plane block is a contemporary approach to providing postoperative analgesia, and this approach is performed by transperitoneally administering local anesthetic in the plane between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles to target the sensory nerves of the anterolateral abdominal wall. Although this technique is used in many centers, it has not been studied prospectively in patients undergoing a midline laparotomy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate whether surgeon-administered transversus abdominis plane block reduces postoperative opioid requirements and improves clinical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, patients with a suspected or proven gynecologic malignancy undergoing surgery through a midline laparotomy at 1 Canadian tertiary academic center were randomized to either the bupivacaine group (surgeon-administered transversus abdominis plane blocks with 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine) or the placebo group (surgeon-administered transversus abdominis plane blocks with 40 mL of normal saline solution) before fascial closure. The primary outcome was the total dose of opioids (in morphine milligram equivalents) received in the first 24 hours after surgery. The secondary outcomes included opioid doses between 24 and 48 hours, pain scores, postoperative nausea and vomiting, incidence of clinical ileus, time to flatus, and hospital length of stay. The exclusion criteria included contraindications to study medication, history of chronic opioid use, significant adhesions on the anterior abdominal wall preventing access to the injection site, concurrent nonabdominal surgical procedure, and the planned use of neuraxial anesthesia or analgesia. To detect a 20% decrease in opioid requirements with a 2-sided type 1 error of 5% and power of 80%, a sample size of 36 patients per group was calculated. RESULTS: From October 2020 to November 2021, 38 patients were randomized to the bupivacaine arm, and 41 patients were randomized to the placebo arm. The mean age was 60 years, and the mean body mass index was 29.3. A supraumbilical incision was used in 30 of 79 cases (38.0%), and bowel resection was performed in 10 of 79 cases (12.7%). Patient and surgical characteristics were evenly distributed. The patients in the bupivacaine group required 98.0±59.2 morphine milligram equivalents in the first 24 hours after surgery, whereas the patients in the placebo group required 100.8±44.0 morphine milligram equivalents (P=.85). The mean pain score at 4 hours after surgery was 3.1±2.4 (0-10 scale) in the intervention group vs 3.1±2.0 in the placebo group (P=.93). Clinically significant nausea or vomiting was reported in 1 of 38 patients (2.6%) in the intervention group vs 1 of 41 patients (2.4%) in the placebo group (P=.95). Time to first flatus, rates of clinical ileus, and length of stay were similar between groups. Subgroup analysis of patients with a body mass index of <25 and patients who received an infraumbilical incision showed similarly comparable outcomes. CONCLUSION: Surgeon-administered transversus abdominis plane block with bupivacaine was not found to be superior to the placebo intervention in reducing postoperative opioid requirements or improving other postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing a midline laparotomy. These results differed from previous reports evaluating the ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block approach. Surgeon-administered transversus abdominis plane block should not be considered standard of care in postoperative multimodal analgesia.

Providers' Perceptions Versus Practices Inform Pediatric Colorectal Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Implementation.

INTRODUCTION: There are many barriers to the implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway. The aim of this study was to compare surgeon and anesthesia perceptions with current practices prior to the initiation of an ERAS protocol in pediatric colorectal patients and to use that information to inform ERAS implementation. METHODS: This was a mixed method single institution study of barriers to implementation of an ERAS pathway at a free-standing children's hospital. Anesthesiologists and surgeons at a free-standing children's hospital were surveyed regarding current practices of ERAS components. A retrospective chart review was performed of 5- to 18-y-old patients undergoing colorectal procedures between 2013 and 2017, followed by the initiation of an ERAS pathway, and a prospective chart review for 18 mo postimplementation. RESULTS: The response rate was 100% (n = 7) for surgeons and 60% (n = 9) for anesthesiologists. Preoperative nonopioid analgesics and regional anesthesia were rarely used. Intraoperatively, 54.7% of patients had a fluid balance of <10 cc/kg/h and normothermia was achieved in only 38.7%. Mechanical bowel prep was frequently utilized (48%). Median nil per os time was significantly longer than required at 12 h. Postoperatively, 42.9% of surgeons reported that patients could have clears on postoperative day zero, 28.6% on postoperative day one, and 28.6% after flatus. In reality, 53.3% of patients were started on clears after flatus, with a median time of 2 d. Most surgeons (85.7%) expected patients to get out of bed once awake from anesthesia; however, median time that patients were out of bed was postoperative day one. While most surgeons reported frequent use of acetaminophen and/or ketorolac, only 69.3% received any nonopioid analgesic postoperatively, with only 41.3% receiving two or more nonopioid analgesics. Nonopioid analgesia showed the highest rates of improvement from retrospective to prospective: preoperative use of analgesics increased from 5.3% to 41.2% (P < 0.0001), postoperative use of acetaminophen increased by 27.4% (P = 0.5), Toradol by 45.5% (P = 0.11), and gabapentin by 86.7% (P < 0.0001). Postoperative nausea/vomiting prophylaxis with >1 class of antiemetic increased from 8% to 47.1% (P < 0.001). The length of stay was unchanged (5.7 versus 4.4 d, P = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: For the successful implementation of an ERAS protocol, perceptions versus reality must be assessed to determine current practices and identify barriers to implementation.

Penehyclidine hydrochloride for treating postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common and distressing complication of laparoscopic bariatric surgery (LBS). Penehyclidine hydrochloride has been reported to be effective in preventing PONV. Considering the potential preventive effects of penehyclidine against PONV, we hypothesized that intravenous infusion of penehyclidine may alleviate PONV within the first 48 h in patients scheduled for LBS. METHODS: Patients who underwent LBS were randomly assigned (1:2) to receive saline (Control group, n = 113) or a single intravenous dose of penehyclidine 0.5 mg (PHC group, n = 221). The primary outcome was incidence of PONV within the first 48 h postoperatively. Secondary endpoints included severity of PONV, need for rescue antiemetic therapy, volume of water intake, and time to first flatus. RESULTS: PONV occurred in 159 (48%) patients within the first 48 h postoperatively, including 51% in the Control group and 46% in the PHC group. There was no significant difference in the incidence or severity of PONV between the two groups (P > 0.05). Within the first 24 h and 24-48 h, no significant difference was found in incidence or severity of PONV, postoperative nausea, postoperative vomiting, need for rescue antiemetic therapy, or volume of water intake (P > 0.05). Kaplan-Meier curves showed that penehyclidine was significantly associated with a prolonged time to first flatus (median onset time: 22 h vs. 21 h, P = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Penehyclidine did not decrease incidence and severity of PONV in patients undergoing LBS. However, a single intravenous dose of penehyclidine (0.5 mg) was associated with a slightly prolonged time to first flatus. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100052418, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=134893 , date of registration: 25/10/2021).

Use of sugammadex is associated with reduced incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting in adult patients with obesity undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a post-hoc analysis.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common but troublesome complication in patients who undergo laparoscopic bariatric surgery (LBS). Whether sugammadex use is related to the persistent decrease in the occurrence of PONV during postoperative inpatient hospitalization, which is critical for the rehabilitation of patients after LBS, remains unknown. METHODS: The study was based on a randomized controlled trial conducted in an accredited bariatric centre. A total of 205 patients who underwent LBS were included in the analysis. Univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression model were used to identify the significant variables related to PONV. Then propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were employed to compare outcomes between the sugammadex and neostigmine groups. The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV within 48 h after LBS. The secondary endpoints included the severity of PONV, time to first flatus, need for rescue antiemetic therapy, and water intake. RESULTS: The incidence of PONV was 43.4% (89/205) within the first 48 h after LBS. In multivariable analysis, sugammadex use (OR 0.03, 95% CI 0.01-0.09, P < 0.001) was an independent protective factor of PONV. After IPTW adjustment, sugammadex use was associated with lower incidence of PONV (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.48-0.61, P < 0.001), postoperative nausea (PON) (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.67-0.88, P < 0.001), and postoperative vomiting (POV) (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.53-0.68, P < 0.001) within postoperative 48 h. The severity of PON as well as the incidence and severity of POV within the first 24 h were also lower in the sugammadex group (all P < 0.05). Reduced need for rescue antiemetic therapy within the first 24 h, increased water intake for both periods, and earlier first passage of flatus were observed in the sugammadex group (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with neostigmine, sugammadex can reduce the incidence and severity of PONV, increase postoperative water intake, and shorten the time to first flatus in bariatric patients during postoperative inpatient hospitalization, which may play a pivotal role in enhanced recovery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100052418, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=134893 , date of registration: October 25, 2021).

S-ketamine promotes postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal function and reduces postoperative pain in gynecological abdominal surgery patients: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: This prospective randomized controlled study was designed to evaluate the effect of S-ketamine with sufentanil given intraoperatively and postoperatively on recovery of gastrointestinal (GI) function and postoperative pain in gynecological patients undergoing open abdomen surgery. METHODS: One hundred gynecological patients undergoing open abdomen surgery were randomized into an S-ketamine group (group S) or placebo group (0.9% saline; group C). Anesthesia was maintained with S-ketamine, sevoflurane, and remifentanil-propofol target-controlled infusion in group S and with sevoflurane and remifentanil-propofol target-controlled infusion in group C. All patients were connected to patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) pump at the end of the surgery with sufentanil, ketorolac tromethamine, and tropisetron in group C and additional S-ketamine in group S. The primary outcome was the time of first postoperative flatus, and the secondary outcome was postoperative pain score of patients. Postoperative sufentanil consumption within the first postoperative 24 h and adverse events such as nausea and vomiting were recorded. RESULTS: The time of first postoperative flatus in group S was significantly shorter (mean ± SD, 50.3 ± 13.5 h) than that in group C (mean ± SD, 56.5 ± 14.3 h, p = 0.042). The patient's visual analog scale (VAS) pain score 24 h after surgery at rest was significantly lower in group S than in group C (p = 0.032). There were no differences in sufentanil consumption within the first postoperative 24 h, postoperative complications related to PCIA between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: S-ketamine accelerated postoperative GI recovery and reduced 24 h postoperative pain in patients undergoing open gynecological surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2200055180. Registered on 02/01/2022. It is a secondary analysis of the same trial.

Minimal Patient-Reported Side Effects for a Chemoablative Gel (UGN-102) Used as Frontline Treatment in Adults with Nonmuscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.

PURPOSE: Optima II ("OPTimized Instillation of Mitomycin for Bladder Cancer Treatment," clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03558503) was a phase 2b trial evaluating a nonsurgical alternative as a primary treatment for nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Patients received 6 weekly instillations of UGN-102, a mitomycin-containing reverse thermal gel. This is the first study to report on patient-reported side effects of UGN-102. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-three patients enrolled in Optima II from 20 sites. Of these 63 patients, 44 were in the cohort completing a quarterly patient-reported outcome measure assessing side effects. Changes in side effects were evaluated using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Associations of 3-month outcomes with demographic and clinical characteristics were examined with regression, controlling for baseline values. Ten of 44 patients (23%) were interviewed after the trial to understand tolerability for future patients making treatment decisions. Transcripts were double-coded using standard methods. RESULTS: In the patient-reported outcome measure cohort (44), 61% were men, 57% aged 65+ years and 89% were non-Hispanic White. UGN-102 did not cause decrements in patient-reported urinary symptoms, bloating/flatulence or malaise at the primary endpoint of 3 months. Sexual function mildly worsened. Future health worries improved. Demographics were not correlated with changes. Clinically, sexual function was correlated with new NMIBC and bloating/flatulence was associated with transurethral resection of bladder tumor within 12 months. In interviews, patients appreciated a nonsurgical alternative, would recommend the gel to other patients and would choose the gel over surgery. CONCLUSIONS: A nonsurgical, chemoablative gel (UGN-102) used as a primary treatment for NMIBC offers a more patient-centered therapeutic approach than standard treatments.

Combination of thoracic epidural analgesia with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia versus traditional thoracic epidural analgesia for postoperative analgesia and early recovery of laparotomy: a prospective single-centre, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) has always been the first choice for postoperative pain treatment, but associated complications and contraindications may limit its use. Our study put forward a new analgesic strategy that combines TEA with patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) to optimize TEA. METHODS: Patients undergoing laparotomy were enrolled in this prospective randomized study. Patients were randomized to one of two groups: TEA/PCIA group and TEA group. Patients in TEA/PCIA group received TEA in the day of surgery and the first postoperative day and PCIA continued to use until the third postoperative day. Patients in TEA group received TEA for three days postoperatively. Visual analogue scale (VSA) pain scores at rest and on movement at 6, 24,48,72 h after surgery were recorded. In addition, the incidence of inadequate analgesia, adverse events, time to first mobilization, time to pass first flatus, time of oral intake recovery, time of urinary catheter removal, postoperative length of hospital stay, cumulative opioid consumption, and the overall cost were compared between the two groups. We examined VAS pain scores using repeated measures analysis of variance; P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients were analysed (TEA/PCIA = 44, TEA = 42). The mean VAS pain scores at rest and on movement in TEA/PCIA group were lower than TEA group, with a significant difference on movement and 48 h postoperatively (P < 0.05). The time to first mobilization and pass first flatus were shorter in TEA/PCIA group (P < 0.05). Other measurement showed no statistically significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of TEA with PCIA for patients undergoing laparotomy, can enhance postoperative pain control and facilitate early recovery without increasing the incidence of adverse effects and overall cost of hospitalization. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry( www.chictr.org.cn ), ChiCTR 1,800,020,308, 13 December 2018.

Does oral α-galactosidase relieve irritable bowel symptoms?

OBJECTIVE: Abdominal bloating is reported by a majority of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients. Excess colonic fermentation may cause gaseous symptoms. Several foodstuffs contain oligosaccharides with an α-galactosidic linkage that is resistant to mammalian hydrolases. Assisted hydrolysis by exogenous α-galactosidase enzyme (AG) could offer a way of controlling IBS symptoms by reducing colonic fermentation and gas production. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of AG on symptom severity and quality of life in IBS patients with abdominal bloating or flatulence. METHODS: A total of 125 subjects with IBS received AG or placebo at meals for 12 weeks. IBS-Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS) and quality of life (QoL) were assessed at baseline, during the treatment and at 4-week follow-up. RESULTS: AG showed a trend toward a more prominent decrease in IBS-SSS. The responder rate at week 16 was higher for the AG group. No difference was detected in QoL between AG and placebo groups. A total of 25 patients (18 in AG group and 7 in placebo group, p = 0.016) withdrew from the study. Abdominal pain and diarrhea were more often reported as reason for withdrawal in AG group. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence to support the use of AG routinely in IBS patients. Improvement of clinical response at 4-week follow-up may suggest a long-term effect of unknown mechanism, but could also be attributed to non-responder drop out. Gastrointestinal (GI) side effects may be a coincidence in this study, but irritation of GI tract by AG administration cannot be excluded.

Effect of selective CCK1 receptor antagonism on accommodation and tolerance of intestinal gas in functional gut disorders.

BACKGROUND: Participants with functional gut disorders develop gas retention and symptoms in response to intestinal gas loads that are well tolerated by healthy subjects. To determine the role of cholecystokinin (CCK1 ) receptors on gas transit and tolerance in women with functional gut disorders. METHODS: In 12 healthy women, and 24 women with functional gut disorders (12 dyspepsia and 12 constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome) gas was infused into the jejunum at 12 mL/min for 3 h with simultaneous duodenal lipid infusion (intralipid 1 kcal/min), while measuring anal gas evacuation and abdominal symptoms on a 0-6 score scale. Triple-blind paired studies during iv infusion of dexloxiglumide (2.5 mg/kg bolus plus 5 mg/kg h continuous infusion), a selective CCK1 inhibitor, or saline (control) were performed in random order. RESULTS: During saline infusion participants with functional gut disorders developed significantly greater gas retention and abdominal symptoms than healthy subjects (394 ± 40 mL vs 265 ± 35 mL and 2.8 ± 0.3 vs 1.9 ± 0.4 highest abdominal symptom score, respectively; P < 0.05 for both). Dexloxiglumide increased gas retention in both groups (514 ± 35 mL and 439 ± 60 mL, respectively; P = 0.033 vs saline for both); however, despite the larger retention, dexloxiglumide reduced abdominal symptoms (2.3 ± 0.2 score and 0.8 ± 0.3 score, respectively; P = 0.05 vs saline for both). Post-hoc analysis showed that, the decrease in abdominal symptoms was more pronounced in those participants with functional gut disorders with higher basal abdominal symptoms than in the rest (P = 0.037). CONCLUSION: Inhibition of CCK1 receptors by dexloxiglumide increases intestinal gas retention and reduces abdominal symptoms in response to by intestinal gas loads. European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT 2005-003338-16).

Xyloglucan for the treatment of acute diarrhea: results of a randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel group, multicentre, national clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: There is a strong rationale for the use of agents with film-forming protective properties, like xyloglucan, for the treatment of acute diarrhea. However, few data from clinical trials are available. METHODS: A randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel group, multicentre, clinical trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of xyloglucan, in comparison with diosmectite and Saccharomyces in adult patients with acute diarrhea due to different causes. Patients were randomized to receive a 3-day treatment. Symptoms (stools type, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and flatulence) were assessed by a self-administered ad-hoc questionnaire 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h following the first dose administration. Adverse events were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 150 patients (69.3 % women and 30.7 % men, mean age 47.3 ± 14.7 years) were included (n = 50 in each group). A faster onset of action was observed in the xyloglucan group compared with the diosmectite and S. bouliardii groups. At 6 h xyloglucan produced a statistically significant higher decrease in the mean number of type 6 and 7 stools compared with diosmectite (p = 0.031). Xyloglucan was the most efficient treatment in reducing the percentage of patients with nausea throughout the study period, particularly during the first hours (from 26 % at baseline to 4 % after 6 and 12 h). An important improvement of vomiting was observed in all three treatment groups. Xyloglucan was more effective than diosmectite and S. bouliardii in reducing abdominal pain, with a constant improvement observed throughout the study. The clinical evolution of flatulence followed similar patterns in the three groups, with continuous improvement of the symptom. All treatments were well tolerated, without reported adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Xyloglucan is a fast, efficacious and safe option for the treatment of acute diarrhea. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT number 2014-001814-24 (date: 2014-04-28) ISRCTN number: 90311828.

Efficacy and tolerability of α-galactosidase in treating gas-related symptoms in children: a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Gas-related symptoms represent very common complaints in children. The reduction of gas production can be considered as a valuable target in controlling symptoms. α-galactosidase has been shown to reduce gas production and related symptoms in adults. To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of α-galactosidase in the treatment of gas-related symptoms in pediatric patients. METHODS: Single center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study performed in tertiary care setting. Fifty-two pediatric patients (32 female, age range 4-17) with chronic or recurrent gas-related symptoms were randomized to receive placebo (n = 25) or α-galactosidase (n = 27). Both treatments were given as drops or tablets, according to body weight for 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was the reduction in global distress measured by the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) at the end of treatment compared to baseline. Secondary endpoints were the reduction in severity and frequency of gas-related symptoms as recorded by parents and/or children. RESULTS: α-galactosidase significantly reduced global distress (p = 0.02) compared to placebo. The digestive enzyme decreased the number of days with moderate to severe bloating (p = 0.03) and the proportion of patients with flatulence (p = 0.02). No significant differences were found for abdominal spasms and abdominal distension. No adverse events were reported during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Although larger and longer trials are needed to confirm this result, α-galactosidase seems to be a safe, well tolerated and effective treatment for gas-related symptoms in the pediatric population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01595932.

Papaya preparation (Caricol®) in digestive disorders.

OBJECTIVE: Papaya (Carica papaya L.) is used as a natural remedy in abnormal digestion in tropical and industrialized countries. Besides this wide distribution little evidence has been produced with reference to its physiological effect in humans and the proof of efficacy. Former clinical observations had revealed positive effects for patients with constipation, heartburn, and symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) after eating papaya preparations. In line with these former positive clinical observations, we studied the clinical effects of the papaya preparation Caricol® in a double blind placebo controlled study design. METHODS: In this study the participants were volunteers, with chronic (prevailing) indigestions and dysfunctions in the gastrointestinal tract. During the trial the intake of the substance of intent and placebo was 20 ml daily for 40 days. The endpoints were the frequency of 22 symptoms recorded before and after the documented intake recorded by questionnaire. RESULTS: The symptoms "Constipation", "Bloating", and "Heartburn" were defined as primary and frequency of "painful (straining) bowel movements" as secondary endpoint. The participation ended after the intake period within two days ("early returnees"). Wash out effects were observed in "late returnees", who returned with a delay of 8.6 (±5.95 days). In the verum group early returnees revealed statistically significant improvements of the symptoms "constipation" and "bloating". The analysis of "heartburn" felt short of significant improvement because of the small number of included cases with this criteria (N=13, p=0.114). None of the significant benefits were observed after the washout phase. CONCLUSION: We conclude from these results, that the papaya preparation (Caricol®) contributes to the maintenance of digestive tract physiology. It ameliorates various functional disturbances, like symptoms of IBS. The mechanism of this digestive tract physiology support is discussed.

Electropress Needle Stimulation for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Being overweight or obese is becoming increasingly prevalent worldwide and seriously endangers human health. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has been successfully used for the treatment of severe obesity, but the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is high. However, traditional antiemetics have limited effects on PONV. Electropress needle therapy, which can be enhanced with electrical stimulation, is a promising therapy for the prevention and treatment of PONV. However, whether the electropress needle is effective for PONV in patients with LSG remains uncertain. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized controlled trial. A total of 106 patients who planned to undergo elective LSG between October 2021 and July 2022 were randomly allocated to receive electropress needle stimulation combined with dexamethasone and granisetron (group A) or dexamethasone plus granisetron (group B). The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV 48 h after surgery. The secondary outcomes were PONV severity score, time to first flatus, length of hospital stay, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and postoperative remedial medication use. RESULTS: Compared with dexamethasone plus granisetron, electropress needle stimulation combined with dexamethasone and granisetron significantly decreased the incidence and severity of PONV (P<0.001). Patients in Group A consumed less antiemetics postoperatively (P<0.05) and had a much shorter length of postoperative hospital stay (P<0.05). There was no difference in the time to first flatus between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Electropress needle acupoint stimulation can reduce the incidence and severity of PONV in patients undergoing LSG.

Low Incidence and Brief Duration of Gastrointestinal Adverse Events with Darunavir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) Over 96 Weeks: Post hoc Analyses of AMBER and EMERALD.

Gastrointestinal intolerance has been associated with ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors. This post hoc analysis evaluated gastrointestinal adverse events of interest (AEOIs; diarrhea, nausea, abdominal discomfort, flatulence [MedDRAv21]) through Wk96 among patients enrolled in the phase 3 AMBER (treatment-naïve) and EMERALD (virologically suppressed) studies of darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) 800/150/200/10 mg. 362 and 763 patients initiated D/C/F/TAF in AMBER and EMERALD, respectively. All D/C/F/TAF-related gastrointestinal AEOIs were grade 1/2 in severity; none were serious. Across studies, incidence of D/C/F/TAF-related diarrhea and nausea were each ≤5% in Wk1 (≤1% post-Wk2); prevalence of each decreased to <5% post-Wk2. In each study, there was 1 case of D/C/F/TAF-related abdominal discomfort during Wk1 and none thereafter. Incidence of D/C/F/TAF-related flatulence was <1% throughout. Median duration of D/C/F/TAF-related gastrointestinal AEOIs was 16.5 (AMBER) and 8.5 (EMERALD) days. In conclusion, in treatment-naïve and virologically suppressed patients, incidences and prevalences of D/C/F/TAF-related gastrointestinal AEOIs were low and tended to present early.

Effect of beta-glucan, inositol and digestive enzymes in GI symptoms of patients with IBS.

BACKGROUND: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a very common functional gastrointestinal (GI). Diagnosis of IBS is based on the fulfilment of the Rome III criteria. Common GI symptoms are lower abdominal pain, bloating and disturbed defecation, such as urgent diarrhoea and/or episodes of chronic constipation. Many agents have been employed in the management of IBS, although only few have been demonstrated to show a relevant efficacy. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of the administration of a mixture of beta-glucan, inositol and digestive enzymes (Biointo) in improving GI symptoms in patients affected by IBS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 50 IBS patients (20 males, 30 females; mean age 51 +/- 19) were treated with Biointo (group A) while another group consisting of 40 IBS patients (15 males, 25 females; mean age 50 +/- 18) did not receive any therapy (group B). RESULTS: Biointol administration improved significantly bloating, flatulence and abdominal pain, with a slight increasing of urgency for bowel movements. On the contrary, Biointol did not show any significant effect on the other IBS symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, only few agents used in the management of IBS have been proven to be effective. Biointol administration has shown to improve some IBS symptoms, such as bloating, flatulence and abdominal pain, all connected to the presence of gas inside the intestinal lumen.

Efficacy of Lactobacillus paracasei sub. paracasei F19 on abdominal symptoms in patients with symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease: a pilot study.

AIM: The standard therapeutic approach for symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (DD) remains to be defined, and only a few studies have tested the efficacy of probiotics in these patients. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic uncomplicated DD were randomized to a control arm, i.e., (group A, [N.=16], high-fibre diet alone), or to Group B ([n=18], twice daily 1 sachet of probiotic + high-fibre diet), or group C ([N.=16], twice daily 2 sachets of probiotic + high-fibre diet). The probiotic Genefilus F19© containing Lactobacillus paracasei sub. paracasei F19 was administered for 14 days/month for 6 months. The primary endpoint under consideration was a decrease in abdominal pain and bloating intensity after treatment. RESULTS: Bloating decreased significantly in Groups B and C VAS score group B: 4.6 ± 2.6 vs. 2.3 ± 2.0, P<0.05, group C: 3.9 ± 2.9 vs. 1.8 ± 2.1, P<0.05). The decrease in abdominal pain within 24 hours in these groups did not reach statistical significance. During treatment, none of the group B (N.=4) or group C patients (N=3) with abdominal pain >24 hours reported the recurrence of this symptom, while the 3 group A patients reported at least one episode (P=0.016). No significant difference regarding abdominal pain <24 hours and bloating was observed between the two groups of patients treated with a low or high probiotic dose. CONCLUSION: Lactobacillus paracasei F19, in association with a high-fibre diet, is effective in reducing abdominal bloating and prolonged abdominal pain in symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease, and could thus be a promising option in the treatment of these patients.

Effect of Pancrelipase Therapy on Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency Symptoms and Coefficient of Fat Absorption Associated With Chronic Pancreatitis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether improvement in coefficient of fat absorption (CFA) with pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy correlates with clinical symptoms in patients with chronic pancreatitis with moderate to severe exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. METHODS: Data were pooled from 2 randomized double-blind trials of the effects of 1 week of pancrelipase (n = 59) versus placebo (n = 57) on CFA and stool frequency, stool consistency, abdominal pain, and flatulence; 1 trial included a 51-week open-label pancrelipase treatment period (n = 34). RESULTS: Compared with placebo, significantly more patients receiving pancrelipase reported decreased stool frequency at week 1 (72% vs 38%; P < 0.001). Although 30% of patients receiving pancrelipase and 20% receiving placebo reported improved stool consistency, changes in stool consistency, abdominal pain, and flatulence were not different between groups. Mean CFA absolute change from baseline was significantly greater with pancrelipase versus placebo (24.7% vs 6.4%; P < 0.001). Improvements in stool consistency and frequency correlated with CFA improvement. Symptom improvements persisted or further improved through 52 weeks of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Pancrelipase significantly improved exocrine pancreatic insufficiency maldigestive symptoms. Improvements in objective stool symptoms with pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy correlated with CFA improvement at 1 week.

[Forty-four years of advances in pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of flatulence syndrome]. / 44 años de avances en etiopatogenia, diagnóstico y tratamiento del síndrome flatulencia.

In the present paper, the author reminds investigations performed, since forty-four years ago, to clarify the etiopathogenesis and to improve the diagnosis and treatment of the flatulence syndrome.

[Use of the prokinetic domperidine in patients in the early postoperative period].

The work focuses on the comparison of influence of domperidone and metoclopramide on rehabilitation of motor-evacuation function of stomach and small intestine in 82 patients with post-surgical flatulent distention. For group 1 (n=50) - metoclopramide was administered intravenously from the 1st postoperative day, 10 mg 3 times a day. For group 2 (n=32) - domperidone was used from the 1st postoperative day (motilium suspension), 20 ml 4 times a day. The results of gastrointestinal tract capacity rehabilitation were evaluated using the data of peripheral electrogastroenterography, enteral balance, a complex of radial diagnostics methods. Application of domperidone in patients with post-surgical flatulent distention resulted in quicker gastrointestinal tract motor resolution.