The classification algorithms to support the management of the patient with femur fracture.

Effectiveness in health care is a specific characteristic of each intervention and outcome evaluated. Especially with regard to surgical interventions, organization, structure and processes play a key role in determining this parameter. In addition, health care services by definition operate in a context of limited resources, so rationalization of service organization becomes the primary goal for health care management. This aspect becomes even more relevant for those surgical services for which there are high volumes. Therefore, in order to support and optimize the management of patients undergoing surgical procedures, the data analysis could play a significant role. To this end, in this study used different classification algorithms for characterizing the process of patients undergoing surgery for a femoral neck fracture. The models showed significant accuracy with values of 81%, and parameters such as Anaemia and Gender proved to be determined risk factors for the patient's length of stay. The predictive power of the implemented model is assessed and discussed in view of its capability to support the management and optimisation of the hospitalisation process for femoral neck fracture, and is compared with different model in order to identify the most promising algorithms. In the end, the support of artificial intelligence algorithms laying the basis for building more accurate decision-support tools for healthcare practitioners.

CT of Periarticular Adult Knee Fractures: Classification and Management Implications.

Periarticular knee fractures, which include fractures of the distal femur, tibial plateau, and patella, account for 5%-10% of musculoskeletal injuries encountered in trauma centers and emergency rooms. These injuries are frequently complex, with articular surface involvement. Surgical principles center on reconstruction of the articular surface as well as restoration of limb length, alignment, and rotation to reestablish functional knee biomechanics. Fixation principles are guided by fracture morphology, and thus, CT with multiplanar reformats and volume rendering is routinely used to help plan surgical intervention. Fractures involving the distal femur, tibial plateau, and patella have distinct management considerations. This comprehensive CT primer of periarticular knee fractures promotes succinct and clinically relevant reporting as well as optimized communication with orthopedic trauma surgeon colleagues by tying fracture type and key CT findings with surgical decision making. Fracture patterns are presented within commonly employed fracture classification systems, rooted in specific biomechanical principles. Fracture typing of distal femur fractures and patellar fractures is performed using Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification schemes. Tibial plateau fractures are graded using the Schatzker system, informed by a newer explicitly CT-based three-column concept. For each anatomic region, the fracture pattern helps determine the surgical access required, whether bone grafting is warranted, and the choice of hardware that achieves suitable functional outcomes while minimizing the risk of articular collapse and accelerated osteoarthritis. Emphasis is also placed on recognizing bony avulsive patterns that suggest ligament injury to help guide stress testing in the early acute period. ©RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Deep neural networks with promising diagnostic accuracy for the classification of atypical femoral fractures.

Background and purpose - A correct diagnosis is essential for the appropriate treatment of patients with atypical femoral fractures (AFFs). The diagnostic accuracy of radiographs with standard radiology reports is very poor. We derived a diagnostic algorithm that uses deep neural networks to enable clinicians to discriminate AFFs from normal femur fractures (NFFs) on conventional radiographs.Patients and methods - We entered 433 radiographs from 149 patients with complete AFF and 549 radiographs from 224 patients with NFF into a convolutional neural network (CNN) that acts as a core classifier in an automated pathway and a manual intervention pathway (manual improvement of image orientation). We tested several deep neural network structures (i.e., VGG19, InceptionV3, and ResNet) to identify the network with the highest diagnostic accuracy for distinguishing AFF from NFF. We applied a transfer learning technique and used 5-fold cross-validation and class activation mapping to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy.Results - In the automated pathway, ResNet50 had the highest diagnostic accuracy, with a mean of 91% (SD 1.3), as compared with 83% (SD 1.6) for VGG19, and 89% (SD 2.5) for InceptionV3. The corresponding accuracy levels for the intervention pathway were 94% (SD 2.0), 92% (2.7), and 93% (3.7), respectively. With regards to sensitivity and specificity, ResNet outperformed the other networks with a mean AUC (area under the curve) value of 0.94 (SD 0.01) and surpassed the accuracy of clinical diagnostics.Interpretation - Artificial intelligence systems show excellent diagnostic accuracies for the rare fracture type of AFF in an experimental setting.

The inverted Vancouver C fracture. Case series of unstable proximal femur fractures above a knee revision stem treated by short cephalomedullary nail and lateral submuscular overlapping plate.

Unstable proximal femur fractures above a knee revision stem are an emerging complication that is especially difficult to treat. Since this pattern does not adapt to any previously reported classification, we named it "inverted Vancouver C fracture". In this single-centre case series, we pose a nail-plate combination for the treatment of such clinical picture. The incidence was low among proximal and implant-related femoral fractures. All the fractures healed without records of major local complications. Thus, we consider this technique safe and reproducible.

Expert Consensus for a Principle-based Classification for Treatment of Diaphyseal Pediatric Femur Fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies demonstrate considerable deviation from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of pediatric diaphyseal femur fractures (PDFFs). This study aimed to determine if expert-consensus can be reached on a principle-based classification to be applied broadly to a wide variety of PDFF scenarios and if outcomes correspond to adherence to the classification. METHODS: A 2-stage study was performed. First, a survey of experts using a principle-based approach to PDFF. We conducted a survey of 17 thought-leaders (criteria≥20 y' experience+authors of the seminal pediatric femur fracture studies) who were asked to classify 15 cases of PDFF using the principle-based classification for agreement. Next, we conducted a retrospective review of 289 consecutive PDFF treated (2011-2015) at a level 1 pediatric trauma center. For each case, we compared the actual treatment and proposed "ideal" principle-based classification. We then compared clinical results and outcome data points including the length of stay, physician visits, and hospital charge data. RESULTS: A substantial (κ=0.7) expert-agreement was noted for assigning treatment principles with near-perfect (κ=0.93) agreement on conservative versus surgical management. We obtained agreement on employing a flexible implant (κ=0.84) rigid fixation (κ=0.75) and damage control philosophy (κ=0.64). Suboptimal clinical results were noted in 43% of the undertreated patients (24/56), 18.8% of the adequately treated, and 14.3% of overtreated (P<0.01) patients. An increasing trend for the length of hospital stay and a number of clinic visits was noted as the treatment class increased (P<0.01). Charges were 4.2 times higher for an episode of operative versus nonoperative care (P<0.01). Rigid fixation (class 4) had significantly (P=0.01) higher total and material charges than flexible fixation (class 3). DISCUSSION: The proposed classification has a substantial agreement among thought-leaders. Clinical results demonstrated significantly more suboptimal results in undertreated fractures, compared with ideally treated or more invasively treated fractures. More invasive treatments led to increased burden to families and the system in terms of length of stay and hospital charges. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Incidence and pattern of periprosthetic hip fractures around the stem in different stem geometry.

BACKGROUND: The number of total hip arthroplasties (THA) is expected to increase worldwide; thus, complications are likely to increase at the same ratio. In this scenario, periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) are an increasing concern. Identifying the predisposing factors is important in order to prevent as much as possible the risk of PFF in the future. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The purpose of this study was to correlate the risk of periprosthetic femoral fractures to the most common patients' comorbidities and stem geometry. We reviewed all THA for non-oncologic indications between 2004 and 2014 with a mean follow-up of six years (range, 2-12). Three thousand two hundred forty-eight patients (3593 implants) were enrolled in the study, and 45 PFF were registered during this time period. Two thousand five hundred seventy-seven implants (71%) were straight stems, and 1015 (28.3%) were anatomic stems. All X-rays were then analyzed and classified according to the modified Vancouver classification. RESULTS: Periprosthetic femoral fractures incidence was associated with anatomic stem geometry (p < 0.001, OR = 2.2), BMI (p < 0.001), and diabetes (p < 0.001, OR = 5.18). PFFs were not significantly associated with age, gender, and all the other variables. Fracture pattern was different between straight and anatomic stems. Clamshell fractures were more likely to occur in anatomic stems compared to straight stems (p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Periprosthetic femoral fractures are highly associated with obesity and osteoporosis. Anatomic stems reported a higher incidence of PPF than straight stems. The typical fracture type for anatomical stems is the clamshell pattern, while straight stems are more likely affected by type B fractures.

Femoral fracture classification in the Swedish Fracture Register - a validity study.

BACKGROUND: A total of more than 270,000 fractures are registered in the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR), a national quality register. Fractures are classified following the AO/OTA classification, commonly by a junior doctor. As a step in the process of validating the data in the SFR, several studies of the accuracy of the fracture classification have already been published. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of femoral fracture classification in the SFR. METHODS: One hundred and eighteen femur fractures were randomly selected from the SFR. Three experienced orthopaedic surgeons individually classified these fractures on two separate occasions and a gold standard classification was established. This classification was compared with the original classification in the SFR. Inter- and intraobserver agreement was calculated. RESULTS: The agreement between the classification in the SFR and the gold standard classification was kappa = 0.65 for the AO/OTA group and kappa = 0.83 for the AO/OTA type. This corresponds to substantial and almost perfect agreement, according to Landis and Koch. The kappa values for interobserver agreement ranged from 0.64-0.76 for the AO/OTA group and 0.76-0.85 for the AO/OTA type. The kappa values for intraobserver agreement ranged from 0.79-0.81 for the AO/OTA group and 0.91-0.93 for the AO/OTA type. CONCLUSIONS: The classification of femoral fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register is substantial (AO/OTA group) to almost perfect (AO/OTA type) and as accurate as in previous studies. The present study also shows that the agreement between the SFR classification and a gold standard classification is in the same range of agreement as between experienced raters. In contrast to previous studies, the classifications in the SFR are made by an unselected group of mostly inexperienced classifiers. The results indicate that the fracture classification in a national quality register can be accurate enough to permit the evaluation of fracture treatment in specific groups of fractures.

Reliability and Validity of the Vancouver Classification in Periprosthetic Fractures Around Cementless Femoral Stems.

BACKGROUND: The Vancouver classification of periprosthetic femur fractures divides B1 and B2 subtypes based on the stability of the femoral stem. However, this classification was described and validated with cemented femoral stems. We sought to assess reliability and validity of the Vancouver classification in patients with cementless femoral stems. METHODS: This is a blinded radiographic study which included patients treated for Vancouver B cementless periprosthetic femur fractures between February 2007 and December 2017. Adult reconstruction-trained and trauma fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons graded all preoperative radiographs using the Vancouver classification on 3 separate occasions. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability was assessed via the Fleiss' kappa statistic. Validity was assessed via accuracy between radiographic and intraoperative assessments. The Landis and Koch criteria were used to interpret the kappa values. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients with Vancouver B fractures (B1, 8; B2, 45) around a cementless femoral stem were included in the study. Five reconstruction-trained and 5 trauma-trained orthopedic surgeons graded all radiographs. The interobserver reliability kappa value was 0.45 (moderate agreement), with all raters agreeing on only 43% of radiographs. Validity analysis showed demonstrated 79% agreement. Overall, 20% (range, 14%-24%) of unstable B2 fractures were misread as B1 fractures. Intraobserver reliability was 0.71 between readings. CONCLUSION: The reliability of the Vancouver classification for cementless total hip arthroplasty is lower than previously described in cemented femoral stems. Radiographic assessment alone may be inadequate for determination of stability of cementless stems in periprosthetic femur fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III therapeutic study: retrospective comparative study.

Incidence, Classification, and Risk Factors for Intraoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Single Stem: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: The collum femoris preserving (CFP) stem was a specially designed femoral neck preserving component. The incidence, classification, and risk factors for intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures with this special stem remain unclear. METHODS: This was a retrospective study. We analyzed the clinical and radiological data of all patients who underwent primary hip arthroplasty with a CFP stem in our hospital between January 2006 and November 2018. Demographic characteristics and radiological features were obtained from the medical records and the Picture Archiving and Communication System, respectively. The incidence, Vancouver classification, and risk factors for intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures were identified. RESULTS: A total of 1633 hips were included. The incidence rate of periprosthetic femoral fractures in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty with a CFP stem was 3.2%. According to the Vancouver classification, there were 24 patients (45.3%) with Vancouver type A fractures, 27 patients (50.9%) with Vancouver type B fractures, and 2 patients (3.8%) with Vancouver type C fractures. Five independent risk (protective) factors were found, including surgical history (odds ratio [OR] = 3.275, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.192-8.997), neck-shaft angle (OR = 1.104, 95% CI = 1.058-1.152), neck length preserved (OR = 0.913, 95% CI = 0.850-0.980), canal flare index (OR = 0.636, 95% CI = 0.413-0.980), and bone mineral density (OR = 0.083, 95% CI = 0.016-0.417). CONCLUSION: The detailed characteristics of intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures in patients who received a CFP stem were identified in this study. Cracks of the femoral neck and fractures on the front side of the proximal femur were more common in patients with CFP stems. As a kind of a femoral neck preserving stem, the anatomical features (eg, neck-shaft angle, preserving length) of the remaining femoral neck might influence the incidence and characteristics of intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures in patients with CFP stems.

A simplified classification of proximal femoral fractures improves accuracy, confidence, and inter-reader agreement of hip fracture classification by radiology residents.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the effect of teaching a simplified treatment-based classification of proximal femoral fractures on the accuracy, confidence, and inter-reader agreement of radiology residents. The authors hypothesize that these measures will improve after viewing an educational presentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three radiology residents independently classified 100 operative proximal femoral fractures, both before and after viewing a 45-min educational video describing the simplified classification scheme, with a washout period of at least 12 weeks between sessions. Based on the gold standard established by consensus of two radiologists and an orthopedic trauma surgeon utilizing intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging, operative reports, and pre-procedural imaging, accuracy of classification was calculated for each reader before and after viewing the educational video. Reader confidence was recorded on a 0-10 scale, and inter-reader agreement was calculated with Fleiss's kappa. McNemar's test was used to compare accuracy, a paired t test was used to compare confidence, and the Z-test was used to compare kappa values after bootstrapping to determine the standard error of the mean. RESULTS: The study cohort included 60/100 females, with a mean age of 76.6 years. The pooled classification accuracy was initially 65%, which improved to 80% in the second reading session after viewing the educational video (p < 0.0001). Confidence improved from 6.9 initially to 8.6 (p < 0.0001). Inter-reader agreement improved from a kappa of 0.45 (moderate agreement) to 0.74 (substantial agreement) (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: A simplified treatment-based classification of proximal femoral fractures is easily taught to radiology residents and resulted in increased accuracy, increased inter-reader agreement, and increased reader confidence.

Femoral Neck Stress Injuries: Analysis of 156 Cases in a U.S. Military Population and Proposal of a New MRI Classification System.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to formulate a new MRI classification system for fatigue-type femoral neck stress injuries (FNSIs) that is based on patient management and return-to-duty (RTD) time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 156 consecutive FNSIs in 127 U.S. Army soldiers over a 24-month period was performed. The width of marrow edema for low-grade FNSIs and the measurement of macroscopic fracture as a percentage of femoral neck width for high-grade FNSIs were recorded. RTD time was available for 90 soldiers. Nonparametric testing, univariate linear regression, and survival analysis on RTD time were used in conjunction with patient management criteria to develop a new FNSI MRI classification system. RESULTS: The FNSI incidence was 0.09%, and all FNSIs were compressive-sided injuries. RTD time was significantly longer for high-grade FNSIs versus low-grade FNSIs (p < 0.001). Our FNSI MRI classification system showed a significant difference in RTD time between grades 1 and 2 (p = 0.001-0.029), 1 and 3 (p < 0.001), and 1 and 4 (p = 0.001-0.01). There was no significant RTD time difference between the remaining grades. The rates of completing basic training (BT) and requiring medical discharge were significantly associated with the FNSI MRI grades (p = 0.038 and p = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: The proposed FNSI MRI classification system provides a robust framework for patient management optimization by permitting differentiation between operative and nonoperative candidates, by allowing accurate prediction of RTD time, and by estimating the risk of not completing BT and requiring medical discharge from the military.

Hip arthroscopy enables classification and treatment of precollapse subchondral insufficiency fracture of the femoral head associated intra-articular pathology.

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to investigate (1) the clinical, radiographic and arthroscopic presentation of patients with subchondral insufficiency fracture of the femoral head (SIFFH) and (2) the outcomes following arthroscopic treatment with internal fixation using hydroxyapatite poly-lactate acid (HA/PLLA) threaded pins and concomitant arthroscopic treatment of associated findings. METHODS: Nine patients (median age 49.0 years, range 43-65, five female and four male patients) with SIFFH who underwent arthroscopic treatment with labral repair, capsular closure and internal fixation of SIFFH using HA/PLLA pins were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were adult patients with precollapse SIFFH with minimum 1-year follow-up (median follow-up 30.0 months, range 12-56). RESULTS: Acetabular labral tears were observed in all patients. The median BMI was 24.3 kg/m2 (range 20.1-31.8). Clinical presentations and radiographic measurements demonstrated mixed type FAI in six patients, borderline developmental dysplasia in two patients and pincer type FAI in one patient. The median MHHS significantly improved from preoperatively (67.1, range 36.3-78.0) to post-operatively (96.8, range 82.5-100; p = 0.001). The median NAHS significantly improved from preoperatively (34.0, range 17-63) to post-operatively (78.0 range 61-80; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: SIFFH is associated with bony deformities and labral tears. Precollapse SIFFH can be treated with bioabsorbable pin stabilization of unstable lesions and treatment of associated intra-capsular pathology in those with stable lesions as determined by a new arthroscopic classification system with promising early outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Modification of the Unified Classification System for periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The Unified Classification System (UCS) for Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPFF) still has some limitations. METHODS: We retrieved 18 previous classifications for PPFF based on systematic review of the literature, and also retrospectively analyzed 402 cases with PPFF. 46 cases (11.4%) were identified as beyond the classification scope of the original UCS. RESULTS: We modified the UCS as follows: (1) add two new B2 subtypes: B2PALT/B2PAGT (i.e., the pseudo ALT/AGT: Fracture in trochanter region including a segment of the proximal medial/lateral femoral cortex); (2) add a new FS category to encompass stem fracture alone or accompanied by PPFF, with FSO designating this fracture with stem fracture alone, FS1 designating this fracture with the proximal portion of the fractured femoral prosthesis being stable, FS2 designating this fracture with the proximal portion of the fractured femoral prosthesis being loose and the surrounding bone quality being good, and FS3 designating this fracture with the proximal portion of the fractured femoral prosthesis being loose and the bone bed being of poor quality; and (3) delete Type F which does not apply to the femur. Thus, using our modification of the UCS, among the 46 cases, we found thirty-five B2PALT, two B2PAGT, three FSO, one FS1, two FS2 and three SF3. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the original UCS, our modified version is more comprehensive. We believe it is useful to improve the judgment of the implant stability, and establish the therapeutic strategy for PPFF.

The Baba classification focused on implant designs is useful in setting the therapeutic strategy for interprosthetic femoral fracture.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of femoral fracture with implants on the proximal and distal sides to verify whether actual fracture morphologies follow the fracture types of Baba classification focusing on implant designs useful for periprosthetic femoral fracture. METHODS: Prosthesis was present in 85 with periprosthetic femoral fractures. Excluding 73 patients with fracture around the femoral stem or fracture of the TKA femoral component alone, 12 patients with 14 legs with both implants were investigated. All patients were radiographically assessed for implant stability according to the Baba classification. For clinical evaluation, intra- and postoperative complications, the operation time, and intra-operative blood loss were investigated. RESULTS: The Baba classification fracture type showed the implant as unstable and stable types in 3 and 11 legs, respectively. The consistency rate between the Baba classification-based judgment of plain radiograms acquired at the time of injury and actual surgical findings was 100%. As a result of treatment according to the Baba classification, bone union was achieved in all patients. There were no intra- or postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Applying the Baba classification, implant stability could be sufficiently evaluated in not only periprosthetic femoral fractures following hip arthroplasty, but also interprosthetic femoral fractures, thereby verifying its usefulness in setting the treatment strategy.

Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures: a comparative study of stem revision versus internal fixation with plate.

INTRODUCTION: The aim is to compare stem revision versus internal fixation with plate in the treatment of Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 34 consecutive patients admitted from June 1998 to May 2017. One patient was treated conservatively, 11 with stem revision (group 1), 20 with plate, screws and cerclage (group 2), one patient with cerclage alone and another by Girdlestone procedure. We assessed surgical complications, mortality within 1 year, functional outcome with Harris Hip Score and radiographic outcome with Beals and Tower's criteria. RESULTS: At an average follow-up of 30.1 months in group 1, we had 36.4% of patients with complications, HHS of 66.8, radiographic outcome "excellent-good" in 91% of cases. In group 2 we had 25% of patients with complications, HHS of 71.8, radiographic outcome "excellent-good" in 80% of cases. There were no significant differences in 1-year mortality between the two groups. In group 2, the best outcomes were obtained in uncemented straight stems with Johansson type 1 fracture and in cemented polished stems with stem detachment from the cement-bone complex. Whatever treatment was adopted, there was an overall worsening in quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Stem revision remains the treatment of choice in Vancouver B2 fractures, but, in selected cases, internal fixation with plate, screws and cerclage can be a viable alternative option.

A new classification of TKA periprosthetic femur fractures considering the implant type.

BACKGROUND: The treatment aims of periprosthetic fractures (PPF) of the distal femur are a gentle stabilization, an early load-bearing capacity and a rapid postoperative mobilization of the affected patients. For the therapy planning of PPF a standardized classification is necessary which leads to a clear and safe therapy recommendation. Despite different established classifications, there is none that includes the types of prosthesis used in the assessment. For this purpose, the objective of this work is to create a new more extensive fracture and implant-related classification of periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur based on available classifications which allows distinct therapeutic recommendations. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis all patients who were treated in the University Hospital Leipzig from 2010 to 2016 due to a distal femur fracture with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were established. To create an implant-associated classification the cases were discussed in a panel of experienced orthopaedists and well-practiced traumatologists with a great knowledge in the field of endoprosthetics and fracture care. In this context, two experienced surgeons classified 55 consecutive fractures according to Su et al., Lewis and Rorabeck and by the new created classification. In this regard, the interobserver reliability was determined for two independent raters in terms of Cohen Kappa. RESULTS: On the basis of the most widely recognized classifications of Su et al. as well as Lewis and Rorabeck, we established an implant-dependent classification for PPF of the distal femur. In accordance with the two stated classifications four fracture types were created and defined. Moreover, the four most frequent prosthesis types were integrated. Finally, a new classification with 16 subtypes was generated based on four types of fracture and four types of prosthesis. Considering all cases the presented implant-associated classification (κ = 0.74) showed a considerably higher interobserver reliability compared to the other classifications of Su et al. (κ = 0.39) as well as Lewis and Rorabeck (κ = 0.31). Excluding the cases which were only assessable by the new classification, it still shows a higher interobserver reliability (κ = 0.70) than the other ones (κ = 0.63 or κ = 0.45). CONCLUSIONS: The new classification system for PPF of the distal femur following TKA considers fracture location and implant type. It is easy to use, shows agood interobserver reliability and allows conclusions to be drawn on treatment recommendations. Moreover, further studies on the evaluation of the classification are necessary and planned.

Fracture Table Application for Pediatric Femur Fractures: Incidence and Risk Factors Associated With Adverse Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Flexible elastic nails, submuscular plating, and rigid locked intramedullary nails are common methods of fixation for pediatric femur fractures (PFF) in which the fracture table is used to aid reduction. Little is known about complications associated with fracture table application in PFF. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and risk factors associated with adverse outcomes related to fracture table application for the treatment of PFF. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all children (younger than 18 y) treated for a femur fracture with the use of the fracture table between 2004 and 2015 at a single tertiary pediatric hospital was performed. Data on demographics, mechanism of injury, treatment modality, radiographic characteristics, and fracture table-related complications were gathered. Complications of interest included nerve palsy, skin breakdown/ulceration, vascular injury, and compartment syndrome. Penalized likelihood logistic regression was used to determine risk factors associated with adverse outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 260 patients were included. There were 8 patients with nerve palsies related to positioning and traction on the fracture table (1 bilateral and 6 ipsilateral peroneal nerve palsies, 1 contralateral tibial nerve palsy; incidence of 3.1%). No other fracture table-related complications were recorded. Patients who developed a nerve palsy were significantly heavier (78.7 vs. 44.3 kg, P<0.001) and had a significantly longer mean surgical time (188.6 vs. 117.0 min, P<0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated weight to be the only significant risk factor for complications, with a 5% increase in odds of complication with each additional kilogram (odds ratio, 1.05; confidence interval, 1.03-1.08; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Nerve palsy related to the use of the fracture table during the fixation of PFF occurred in 3.1% of patients in our series. Patients who developed nerve palsies were significantly heavier and had significantly longer surgical times. Although the use of the fracture table for fixation of PFF is safe, every effort should be made to minimize time in traction to avoid iatrogenic nerve palsy, particularly in heavier children (>80 kg). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The AO Pediatric Comprehensive Classification of Long Bone Fractures (PCCF).

Background and purpose - To achieve a common understanding when dealing with long bone fractures in children, the AO Pediatric Comprehensive Classification of Long Bone Fractures (AO PCCF) was introduced in 2007. As part of its final validation, we present the most relevant fracture patterns in the lower extremities of a representative population of children classified according to the PCCF. Patients and methods - We included patients up to the age of 17 who were diagnosed with 1 or more long bone fractures between January 2009 and December 2011 at either of 2 tertiary care university hospitals in Switzerland. Patient charts were retrospectively reviewed. Results - More lower extremity fractures occurred in boys (62%, n = 341). Of 548 fractured long bones in the lower extremity, 25% involved the femur and 75% the lower leg. The older the patients, the more combined fractures of the tibia and fibula were sustained (adolescents: 50%, 61 of 123). Salter-Harris (SH) fracture patterns represented 66% of single epiphyseal fractures (83 of 126). Overall, 74 of the 83 SH patterns occurred in the distal epiphysis. Of all the metaphyseal fractures, 74 of 79 were classified as incomplete or complete. Complete oblique spiral fractures accounted for 57% of diaphyseal fractures (120 of 211). Of all fractures, 7% (40 of 548) were classified in the category "other", including 29 fractures that were identified as toddler's fractures. 5 combined lower leg fractures were reported in the proximal metaphysis, 40 in the diaphysis, 26 in the distal metaphysis, and 8 in the distal epiphysis. Interpretation - The PCCF allows classification of lower extremity fracture patterns in the clinical setting. Re-introduction of a specific code for toddler's fractures in the PCCF should be considered.

The AO Pediatric Comprehensive Classification of Long Bone Fractures (PCCF).

Background and purpose - The AO Pediatric Comprehensive Classification of Long Bone Fractures (PCCF) describes the localization and morphology of fractures, and considers severity in 2 categories: (1) simple, and (2) multifragmentary. We evaluated simple and multifragmentary fractures in a large consecutive cohort of children diagnosed with long bone fractures in Switzerland. Patients and methods - Children and adolescents treated for fractures between 2009 and 2011 at 2 tertiary pediatric surgery hospitals were retrospectively included. Fractures were classified according to the AO PCCF. Severity classes were described according to fracture location, patient age and sex, BMI, and cause of trauma. Results - Of all trauma events, 3% (84 of 2,730) were diagnosed with a multifragmentary fracture. This proportion was age-related: 2% of multifragmentary fractures occurred in school-children and 7% occurred in adolescents. In patients diagnosed with a single fracture only, the highest percentage of multifragmentation occurred in the femur (12%, 15 of 123). In fractured paired radius/ulna bones, multifragmentation occurred in 2% (11 of 687); in fractured paired tibia/fibula bones, it occurred in 21% (24 of 115), particularly in schoolchildren (5 of 18) and adolescents (16 of 40). In a multivariable regression model, age, cause of injury, and bone were found to be relevant prognostic factors of multifragmentation (odds ratio (OR) > 2). Interpretation - Overall, multifragmentation in long bone fractures in children was rare and was mostly observed in adolescents. The femur was mostly affected in single fractures and the lower leg was mostly affected in paired-bone fractures. The clinical relevance of multifragmentation regarding growth and long-term functional recovery remains to be determined.

Management and radiographic outcomes of femoral head fractures.

BACKGROUND: Femoral head fractures are uncommon injuries. Small series constitute the majority of the available literature. Surgical approach and fracture management is variable. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence, method of treatment, and outcomes of consecutive femoral head fractures at a regional academic Level I trauma center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospective database was performed over a 13-year period. All AO/OTA 31C femoral head fractures were identified. A surgical approach and fixation method was recorded. Clinical and radiographic evaluation was performed for patients with 6 months or greater follow-up. Radiographs were evaluated for fixation failure, heterotopic ossification (HO), avascular necrosis (AVN) and post-traumatic arthritis. RESULTS: We identified 164 fractures in 163 patients; 147 fractures were available for review. Treatment was operative reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in 78 (53.1%), fragment excision in 37 (25.1%) and non-operative in 28 (19%). An anterior approach and mini-fragment screws were used in the majority of patients treated with fixation. Sixty-nine fractures had follow-up greater than 6 months. Sixty-two fractures (89.9%) proceeded to uneventful union. All Pipkin III fractures failed operative fixation. Six patients developed AVN, seven patients had a known conversion to hip arthroplasty; HO developed in 28 (40.6%) patients and rarely required excision. CONCLUSIONS: Fractures of the femoral head are rare. An anterior approach can be used for fragment excision or fixation using mini-fragment screws. Pipkin III fractures represent catastrophic injuries. Non-bridging, asymptomatic HO is common. AVN and posttraumatic degenerative disease of the hip occur but are uncommon. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV-prognostic.