RESUMEN
The burden of hepatitis E in Southeast Asia is substantial, influenced by its distinct socio-economic and environmental factors, as well as variations in healthcare systems. The aim of this study was to assess the pooled seroprevalence of hepatitis E across countries within the Southeast Asian region by the UN division.The study analyzed 66 papers across PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases, encompassing data from of 44,850 individuals focusing on anti-HEV seroprevalence. The investigation spanned nine countries, excluding Brunei and East Timor due to lack of data. The pooled prevalence of anti-HEV IgG was determined to be 21.03%, with the highest prevalence observed in Myanmar (33.46%) and the lowest in Malaysia (5.93%). IgM prevalence was highest in Indonesia (12.43%) and lowest in Malaysia (0.91%). The study stratified populations into high-risk (farm workers, chronic patients) and low-risk groups (general population, blood donors, pregnant women, hospital patients). It revealed a higher IgG-28.9%, IgM-4.42% prevalence in the former group, while the latter group exhibited figures of 17.86% and 3.15%, respectively, indicating occupational and health-related vulnerabilities to HEV.A temporal analysis (1987-2023), indicated an upward trend in both IgG and IgM prevalence, suggesting an escalating HEV burden.These findings contribute to a better understanding of HEV seroprevalence in Southeast Asia, shedding light on important public health implications and suggesting directions for further research and intervention strategies.Key pointsResearch QuestionInvestigate the seroprevalence of hepatitis E virus (HEV) in Southeast Asian countries focusing on different patterns, timelines, and population cohorts.FindingsSporadic Transmission of IgG and IgM Prevalence:⢠Pooled anti-HEV IgG prevalence: 21.03%⢠Pooled anti-HEV IgM prevalence: 3.49%Seroprevalence among specific groups:High-risk group (farm workers and chronic patients):⢠anti-HEV IgG: 28.9%⢠anti-HEV IgM: 4.42%Low-risk group (general population, blood donors, pregnant women, hospital patients):⢠anti-HEV IgG: 17.86%⢠anti-HEV IgM: 3.15%Temporal Seroprevalence of HEV:Anti-HEV IgG prevalence increased over decades (1987-1999; 2000-2010; 2011-2023): 12.47%, 18.43%, 29.17% as an anti-HEV IgM prevalence: 1.92%, 2.44%, 5.27%ImportanceProvides a comprehensive overview of HEV seroprevalence in Southeast Asia.Highlights variation in seroprevalence among different population groups.Reveals increasing trend in HEV seroprevalence over the years.Distinguishes between sporadic and epidemic cases for a better understanding of transmission dynamics.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antihepatitis , Virus de la Hepatitis E , Hepatitis E , Inmunoglobulina G , Inmunoglobulina M , Hepatitis E/epidemiología , Hepatitis E/sangre , Humanos , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Virus de la Hepatitis E/inmunología , Inmunoglobulina M/sangre , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Anticuerpos Antihepatitis/sangre , Asia Sudoriental/epidemiología , Femenino , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Masculino , EmbarazoRESUMEN
BackgroundAwareness of transfusion-transmitted hepatitis E raised in recent years led to the mandatory testing of blood donations in some European countries for hepatitis E virus (HEV) RNA. However, little is known about the epidemiology of HEV infections.AimTo and describe and analyse the epidemiology of HEV infections in blood donors in Germany.MethodsData from routine testing of therapeutic blood products donated between January 2015 and December 2022 at the Uni.Blutspendedienst OWL were analysed at the Institute of Laboratory and Transfusion Medicine, Heart and Diabetes Centre North Rhine-Westphalia. A total of 731,630 allogenic blood donations from 119,610 individual blood donors were tested for HEV RNA in minipools of 96 samples. The HEV RNA-positive donations were analysed for the presence of anti-HEV IgM and IgG. The HEV strains were genotyped and various clinical liver-specific parameters were determined.ResultsA total of 497 HEV-positive blood donations were identified, resulting in a yearly incidence of 1:1,474, from which 78.4% of the donations were RNA-only positive. Increased alanine aminotransferase activity was determined in 26.6% of HEV RNA-positive donors and was associated with the detection of IgG antibodies (1.2% anti-HEV IgM-positive, 11.9% anti-HEV IgM- and IgG-positive and 8.5% anti-HEV IgG-positive). An average incidence of 0.084-0.083% HEV RNA-positive donations in June and July in all years was observed, and a higher proportion of HEV RNA-positive men compared with women. All isolated HEV sequences corresponded to genotype 3.ConclusionOur results underline the necessity of HEV RNA screening in blood donations.
Asunto(s)
Hepatitis E , Hepatitis E/sangre , Hepatitis E/epidemiología , Alemania/epidemiología , Donantes de Sangre/estadística & datos numéricos , Donación de Sangre/estadística & datos numéricos , Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , ARN , Inmunoglobulina M , Inmunoglobulina G , Hígado/metabolismoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the performance of the automated Altostar HEV RNA platform for detecting HEV RNA. METHODS AND RESULTS: Clinical performance was determined by testing 81 plasma samples and 10 fecal samples manually quantified previously with the Realstar RT-PCR assay using the Magnapure instrument for extraction. The assays were concordant for 79/81 plasma samples (97.5%) and 10/10 (100%) fecal samples. The two plasma samples that tested negative with the Altostar assay had a very low HEV RNA concentration (1.6 and 1.4â¯log10 IU/ml). Quantitative results obtained with the automated platform and the manual workflow were highly correlated (ρ= 0.98, p<0.01). The intra-run and inter-run standard deviation were 0.09 IU/ml and 0.13 IU/ml respectively. The assay was linear from 2 to 6â¯log IU/ml. The limit of detection determined by Probit analysis with the WHO HEV RNA standard was 7.6 [95% CI: 4.4-52.5] IU/ml. CONCLUSIONS: The Altostar platform enables highly accurate testing for the detection of HEV RNA in stool and the quantification of HEV RNA in plasma. This allowed us to shorten turnaround times and to save time for the technical staff.
Asunto(s)
Automatización de Laboratorios , Heces , Virus de la Hepatitis E , Hepatitis E , ARN Viral , Heces/virología , Humanos , ARN Viral/aislamiento & purificación , ARN Viral/sangre , ARN Viral/análisis , ARN Viral/genética , Virus de la Hepatitis E/aislamiento & purificación , Virus de la Hepatitis E/genética , Hepatitis E/diagnóstico , Hepatitis E/virología , Hepatitis E/sangre , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Plasma/virología , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodosRESUMEN
Guillain-Barré syndrome and neuralgic amyotrophy have been associated with hepatitis E virus (HEV) genotype 3 infections, while myasthenia gravis (MG) has been associated with HEV genotype 4 infections. However, whether chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is associated with HEV infections has not been conclusively clarified yet. 102 CIDP patients, 102 age- and sex-matched blood donors, 61 peripheral neuropathy patients (non-CIDP patients), and 26 MG patients were tested for HEV and anti-HEV IgM and IgG. Sixty-five of the 102 (64%) CIDP patients tested positive for anti-HEV IgG and one (1%) for anti-HEV IgM. No other patient tested positive for ati-HEV IgM. In the subgroup of CIDP patients with initial diagnosis (without previous IVIG treatment), 30/54 (56%) tested positive for anti-HEV IgG. Anti-HEV rates were significantly lower in blood donors (28%), non-CIDP peripheral neuropathy patients (20%), and MG patients (12%). No subject tested positive for HEV viremia. CSF tested negative for in 61 CIDP patients (54 patients with primary diagnosis). The development of CIDP but not non-CIDP polyneuropathy may be triggered by HEV exposure in an HEV genotype 3 endemic region. The increased anti-HEV seroprevalence in CIDP patients is not a consequence of IVIG therapy.
Asunto(s)
Virus de la Hepatitis E , Hepatitis E , Inmunoglobulina G , Inmunoglobulina M , Polirradiculoneuropatía Crónica Inflamatoria Desmielinizante , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Hepatitis E/complicaciones , Hepatitis E/sangre , Hepatitis E/inmunología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polirradiculoneuropatía Crónica Inflamatoria Desmielinizante/sangre , Polirradiculoneuropatía Crónica Inflamatoria Desmielinizante/diagnóstico , Polirradiculoneuropatía Crónica Inflamatoria Desmielinizante/inmunología , Adulto , Anciano , Virus de la Hepatitis E/inmunología , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Inmunoglobulina M/sangre , Anticuerpos Antihepatitis/sangreRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hepatitis-E virus (HEV), an etiologic agent of acute inflammatory liver disease, is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in South Asia. HEV is considered endemic in Nepal; but data on population-level infection transmission is sparse. METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal serosurvey in central Nepal to assess HEV exposure. At each visit, capillary blood samples were collected and analyzed for the presence of anti-HEV IgG antibodies. The study took place between February 2019 and April 2021, with up to 4 visits per participant approximately 6 months apart. RESULTS: We collected 2513 samples from 923 participants aged 0-25 years, finding a seroprevalence of 4.8% and a seroincidence rate of 10.9 per 1000 person-years. Young adults and individuals consuming surface water faced the highest incidence of infection. Geospatial analysis identified potential HEV clusters, suggesting a need for targeted interventions. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings demonstrate that HEV is endemic in Nepal and that the risk of infection increases with age.
Asunto(s)
Virus de la Hepatitis E , Hepatitis E , Humanos , Nepal/epidemiología , Hepatitis E/epidemiología , Hepatitis E/sangre , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Adolescente , Adulto , Adulto Joven , Virus de la Hepatitis E/inmunología , Niño , Masculino , Femenino , Preescolar , Estudios Longitudinales , Lactante , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Anticuerpos Antihepatitis/sangre , Recién Nacido , IncidenciaRESUMEN
La infección por el virus de la hepatitis E (VHE) es una enfermedad muy prevalente en países en vías de desarrollo, llegando a causar aproximadamente 3,5 millones de casos sintomáticos y 70.000 muertes anuales, según datos recientes de la Organización Mundial de la Salud. En países desarrollados, no se conoce aún con exactitud la prevalencia de anticuerpos frente al VHE (anti-IgG-VHE) e incluso en España puede variar desde el 0,6 hasta el 12% en población general según la zona geográfica o la metodología utilizada. La hepatitis E se considera una zoonosis en países desarrollados, pero otras vías de transmisión permanecen desconocidas. Un aspecto interesante de las manifestaciones clínicas es que puede producir desde infecciones asintomáticas hasta fallo hepático fulminante y variadas manifestaciones extrahepáticas. En pacientes trasplantados e inmunodeprimidos en general, el VHE causa hepatitis crónicas en un elevado número de casos. El diagnóstico de laboratorio es fácil de realizar y se basa en estudios serológicos y la detección del ARN-VHE en sangre. El tratamiento con ribavirina da buenos resultados en la mayoría de los casos. En cuanto a la prevención, la vacuna es una buena opción en países endémicos, pero no se ha evaluado en países de baja prevalencia o en pacientes de riesgo como trasplantados hepáticos. En España se han comunicado un número importante y creciente de hepatitis E autóctonas, por lo que es imprescindible conocer las situaciones clínicas en las que se debe sospechar y confirmar su diagnóstico en el laboratorio (AU)
Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection is highly prevalent in developing countries, accounting for approximately 3.5 million asymptomatic infections and 70,000 deaths annually, according to World Health Organization estimations. In developed countries, the prevalence of HEV-IgG antibodies is not fully known, and in Spain it can range from 0.6% to 12% among the general population in different geographical areas. In developed countries, hepatitis E is considered a zoonotic infection, but other routes of transmission remain unknown. An interesting aspect regarding clinical manifestations is that they can vary from asymptomatic infection to fulminant hepatitis and various extrahepatic manifestations. Moreover, HEV can cause chronic hepatitis in a large number of transplanted and immunosuppressed patients. Diagnosis is based on serological studies and detection of viral RNA in blood. Treatment with ribavirin is successful in most cases. The vaccine is a good option to prevent the infection in developing countries, but has not been evaluated in low prevalence countries or in risk groups such as liver transplant patients. In Spain, a large and growing number of autochthonous cases of hepatitis E have been reported. It is therefore essential to determine the clinical scenarios where a diagnosis of hepatitis E must be confirmed in the laboratory (AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Hepatitis E/epidemiología , Virus de la Hepatitis E , Hepevirus/clasificación , Hepatitis E/transmisión , Hepatitis E/microbiología , España/epidemiología , Hepatitis E/sangre , Hepatitis E/tratamiento farmacológico , Virología/métodos , Zoonosis/epidemiología , Zoonosis/transmisiónRESUMEN
Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is classified within the family Hepeviridae, genus Hepevirus. HEV genotype 3 (Gt3) infections are endemic in pigs in Western Europe and in North and South America and cause zoonotic infections in humans. Several serological assays to detect HEV antibodies in pigs have been developed, at first mainly based on HEV genotype 1 (Gt1) antigens. To develop a sensitive HEV Gt3 ELISA, a recombinant baculovirus expression product of HEV Gt3 open reading frame-2 was produced and coated onto polystyrene ELISA plates. After incubation of porcine sera, bound HEV antibodies were detected with anti-porcine anti-IgG and anti-IgM conjugates. For primary estimation of sensitivity and specificity of the assay, sets of sera were used from pigs experimentally infected with HEV Gt3. For further validation of the assay and to set the cutoff value, a batch of 1100 pig sera was used. All pig sera were tested using the developed HEV Gt3 assay and two other serologic assays based on HEV Gt1 antigens. Since there is no gold standard available for HEV antibody testing, further validation and a definite setting of the cutoff of the developed HEV Gt3 assay were performed using a statistical approach based on Bayes' theorem. The developed and validated HEV antibody assay showed effective detection of HEV-specific antibodies. This assay can contribute to an improved detection of HEV antibodies and enable more reliable estimates of the prevalence of HEV Gt3 in swine in different regions.
Asunto(s)
Animales , Virus de la Hepatitis E/aislamiento & purificación , Hepatitis E/veterinaria , Hepatitis Viral Animal/diagnóstico , Porcinos/virología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Baculoviridae , Teorema de Bayes , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Genotipo , Vectores Genéticos , Virus de la Hepatitis E/clasificación , Hepatitis E/sangre , Sistemas de Lectura Abierta , Proteínas Recombinantes , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Pruebas SerológicasRESUMEN
A retrospective study on the prevalence of hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection was conducted in selected populations in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. A total of 1,115 subjects were tested including 146 patients with acute Non-A Non-B Non-C (NANBNC) viral hepatitis, 65 hemodialysis patients, 93 blood donors, 102 intravenous drug users (IVDUs), 304 pregnant women, 145 individuals living in the rural area and 260 individuals living in the urban area. In order to characterize a favorable epidemiological set for enterically transmitted infection in the studied populations we also evaluated the prevalence of anti-HAV IgG (hepatitis A virus) antibodies. Specific antibodies to HEV (anti-HEV IgG) were detected by a commercial EIA and specific antibodies to HAV (anti-HAV IgG) were detected using a competitive "in house" EIA. We found a high prevalence of anti-HAV IgG in these populations, that could indicate some risk for infections transmitted via the fecal-oral route. The anti-HEV IgG prevalence among the different groups were: 2.1 percent in patients with acute NANBNC viral hepatitis, 6.2 percent in hemodialysis patients, 4.3 percent in blood donors, 11.8 percent in IVDUs, 1 percent in pregnant women, and 2.1 percent in individuals form the rural area. Among individuals living in the urban area we did not find a single positive serum sample. Our results demonstrated the presence of anti-HEV IgG in almost all studied populations; however, further studies are necessary to establish the real situation of HEV epidemiology in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Virus de la Hepatitis E/inmunología , Hepatitis E/epidemiología , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Brasil/epidemiología , Hepatitis E/sangre , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Población UrbanaRESUMEN
Background. Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection causes an acute, self-limited hepatitis associated with high mortality in pregnant women. Community-based surverys are scarce and information on HEV infection in populations in needed. The aim of this work was to study seroprevalence to HEV in young adults and children in Mexico, using a community-based survey. Methods. Serum samples from 3,459 individuals were studied; the population included subjects from 1 to 29 years old from all regions of the country representing all socioeconomic levels, IgG anti-HEV was determined by ELISA. Results. Anti-HEV antibodies were found in 374 (10.5 percent) individuals. Seroprevalence increased with age from 1.1 percent in children young than 5 years to 14.2 percent in persons 26 to 29 years of age (p = 0.006). Risk factors for infection included living in rural communities and a low educational level. Seroprevalence was not associated with the level of regional development. Conclusions. HEV infection is endemic in Mexico. Age, type of community, and educational level were identified as risk factors for infection