Cardiovascular risk with androgen deprivation therapy.

BACKGROUND: From the primary care perspective, many urologists and oncologists appear to be ignoring an FDA warning to assess patients' cardiovascular (CV) risk before instituting androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists. A growing body of data suggest an association between ADT and CV/cardiometabolic risk, particularly for GnRH agonists. METHODOLOGY: The author examined available evidence regarding CV side effects with GnRH agonists and antagonists to determine what urologists, medical oncologists, primary care physicians (PCPs) and patients need to know about these risks. RESULTS: Data are inconclusive and somewhat conflicting-for example, both low testosterone and testosterone replacement have been associated with elevated CV risk. But the distinction between GnRH agonists and antagonists is becoming clearer, as agonists appear to be more strongly linked with CV risk, perhaps due to the transient testosterone surge they cause upon administration. Moreover, adverse CV events associated with GnRH agonists can emerge relatively quickly, within weeks to months. Conversely, two studies show that GnRH antagonists may significantly reduce CV risk compared to GnRH agonists. CONCLUSIONS: Both GnRH agonists and antagonists carry some degree of CV risk. Although the risk appears to be lower with GnRH antagonists, urologists and oncologists should communicate with PCPs to determine patients' baseline CV risk levels before implementing ADT with either type of agent.

GnRH triggering may improve euploidy and live birth rate in hyper-responders: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Despite the increasing use of GnRHa to trigger final oocyte maturation in segmented IVF cycles, the effects of trigger modality on chromosomal competence and embryo quality remain controversial. Hence, the purpose of this study was to compare euploidy rates and pregnancy outcomes among hyper-responding women using hCG versus GnRHa trigger. METHODS: This retrospective study included 333 hyper-responders, defined as >15 oocytes retrieved, who underwent preimplantation genetic testing (PGT-A) in segmented IVF cycles using either GnRHa or urinary hCG trigger. Live birth rate (LBR) was the primary outcome of interest. Implantation rate (IR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and euploidy rate were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: GnRH triggering was associated with improved IR (70.5 vs. 53.2%, p = 0.0475), LBR (51.3 vs. 33.8%, p = 0.0170) compared to hCG. A greater number of oocytes were retrieved (21.9 vs 18.4%, p < 0.001) and euploid embryos produced (2.8 vs. 2.1, p = 0.0109) after GnRHa triggering, while higher euploidy rates were only observed among women <35-years-old (62.0 vs. 51.7%, p = 0.0307) using GnRHa trigger. Higher OHSS rates were observed after hCG triggering (10.6 vs. 2.1%, p = 0.0009). CONCLUSION: Hyper-responders who received GnRHa trigger experienced improved pregnancy outcomes and lower rates of OHSS compared to hCG triggering. The higher number of oocytes retrieved and euploid embryos produced may reflect an improved developmental competence using GnRHa triggering due to physiologic induction of both LH and FSH surge or other undefined mechanisms that improve embryo development. However, higher overall euploid rates were only observed among women <35-years-old using the GnRHa trigger. Further prospective studies are required to validate this observation and evaluate the specific influence of different ovulation triggers on gamete developmental competence among hyper-responder women.

Medroxyprogesterone acetate versus ganirelix in oocyte donation: a randomized controlled trial.

STUDY QUESTION: Is oral medroxiprogesterone acetate (MPA) non-inferior compared to ganirelix with respect to the number of mature oocytes (MII) retrieved at ovum pick-up (OPU) in oocyte donation cycles? SUMMARY ANSWER: MPA is comparable to ganirelix in terms of number of MII retrieved at OPU in oocyte donation cycles. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Oral treatment with MPA inhibits the pituitary LH surge during ovarian stimulation in infertile patients. Because of its negative effect on the endometrium, MPA suppression is combined with freeze-all. Published reports indicate that both the number of MII retrieved and pregnancy rates from these oocytes are comparable to short protocol of GnRH agonists during IVF cycles with freeze-all. MPA might allow for more comfortable and cost-effective ovarian stimulation. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Randomized clinical trial, open-label, single center, to assess the non-inferiority of MPA (10 mg/day) versus ganirelix (0.25 mg/day) from Day 7, in ovarian stimulation cycles triggered with triptoreline acetate. Trigger criterion was ≥3 follicles of diameter >18 mm. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Overall, 252 oocyte donors were selected (eligible), 216 were randomized and 173 reached OPU: 86 under MPA and 87 under ganirelix. The main outcome was the number of MII retrieved at OPU. Secondary outcomes were embryological laboratory outcomes and reproductive outcomes in recipients. The study was powered to test that the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval of the difference in retrieved MII between groups will be above the non-inferiority limit of -3. Differences were tested using a two-sided Student's t-test or a Pearson's Chi2 test, as appropriate. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: All participants were in their first cycle of oocyte donation. On average, donors were 24 (SD 4.5) years old and with a BMI of 23 (SD 2.9) kg/m2. Duration of stimulation was similar in both groups (11.2 days), as well as the total gonadotropin dose up to trigger (2162 IU in MPA and 2163 IU in ganirelix). The number of MII retrieved was no different: 15.1 (SD 8.3) with MPA and 14.6 (SD 7.0), 95% CI of the difference -2.78, -1.83 excluding the pre-defined non-inferiority limit (-3). Recipients and embryo transfer (ET) characteristics were also similar between groups. The average age of recipients was 42 (SD 4.8) years and the BMI was 24 (SD 4.4) kg/m2. The mean number of MII assigned to each recipients was 6.7 (SD 1.2) in MPA and 6.6 (SD 1.2) in ganirelix (P = 0.58). MII were fertilized with partner sperm in 84% cycles overall and fertilization rate was 76% in MPA versus 74% in ganirelix (P = 0.34). Overall, there was 54% of double ET and 46% of single ET, with 40% of ETs were performed in D5. In spite of similar recipients and cycle characteristics, reproductive outcomes were unexpectedly lower with MPA. Biochemical pregnancy rate was 44 versus 57% (P = 0.023); clinical pregnancy rate 31 versus 46% (P = 0.006); ongoing pregnancy rate 27 versus 40%, (P = 0.015) and live birth rate 22 versus 31%, (P = 0.10). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Although oocyte recipient and ET characteristics are similar among groups, this RCT has been designed under a hypothesis of non-inferiority in the number of MII obtained and recipients were not randomized; therefore, the reproductive outcomes in recipients should be evaluated with extreme caution. WIDER IMPLICATION OF THE FINDINGS: Ovarian stimulation using MPA for prevention of LH surge yields comparable number of MII oocytes compared to ganirelix in oocyte donation cycles. The unexpected finding in reproductive outcomes should be further investigated. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): None to report. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT number: 2015-004328-73; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02796105. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 29 September 2015 (EudraCT); 9 June 2016 (ClinicalTrials.gov). DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLLMENT: The date of enrollment of the first participant was 07 July 2016, and the last participant last visit in the study was on 10 July 2017.

Risk of ovarian torsion is reduced in GnRH agonist triggered freeze-all cycles: a retrospective cohort study.

Ovarian torsion (OT) in IVF is rare, however, the consequences are significant, which include ovariotomy. In the present study, it was aimed for the first time to compare the incidence of OT between hCG triggered cycles with ICSI and fresh transfer and GnRH-agonist triggered cycles with the ICSI-freeze-all and frozen embryo transfer (FET). In total, 15,577 ICSI cycles performed between 2001 and 2016 were categorised into two groups (Group 1, n: 9978): cycles with controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and hCG-triggered (Group 2, n: 5599) and COS, with GnRH-agonist only triggered and freeze-all. Thirteen patients (0.13%) were diagnosed with OT and corrected by laparoscopy (12) and laparotomy (1) in Group 1. One patient (0.018%) was diagnosed with OT and corrected by laparotomy in Group 2 (Group 1 vs. Group 2, p = .049). The incidence of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) was 2.4% in Group 1 and 0.05% in Group 2 (p < .001). The use of freeze-all with GnRH agonist trigger in ART significantly reduced the incidence of OT and concomitantly OHSS, with no effect on the reproductive outcome. Impact Statement What is already known on this subject? Adnexal ovarian torsion (OT) is a well-known gynaecological event that constitutes a surgical emergency. Assisted reproduction technologies (ART) may result in ovarian conditions that predispose patients to ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and torsion. What the results of this study add? The combined use of GnRH agonist trigger for final oocyte maturation after OS with freeze-all and frozen embryo transfer (FET) significantly reduces the incidence of OT, as well as OHSS. What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The treatment strategy of GnRH agonist trigger with freeze-all significantly reduces the risks of adverse complications.

Structural modeling and mRNA expression of epididymal ß-defensins in GnRH immunized boars: A model for secondary hypogonadism in man.

Human secondary hypogonadism is associated with impaired testicular function, however, little is known about its impact on sperm epididymal maturation. Endocrine disruption in the epididymis could impair the secretion of key proteins, such as ß-defensins, responsible for spermatozoa maturation during epididymal transit. This study evaluated the sequence and structural similarities between porcine epididymal ß-defensins porcine ß-defensins (pBD3), pBD4, pBD125, and pEP2C and their human homologs using bioinformatics integrated with information derived from protein databanks. We then verified whether the expression of pBD3, pBD4, pBD125, and pEP2C genes in the testis and epididymis are influenced by disruption of the hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular (HPT) axis in a pig model for male human secondary hypogonadism. Upon modeling porcine ß-defensins, structural and functional analysis confirmed the presence of motifs associated with ß-defensin function, validating the models generated in silico. pBD3 and pBD4 showed acceptable structural alignments with human ß-defensins BDEF103 and BDEF110, respectively. In addition, evaluation of hormonal regulation of ß-defensins was assessed by analyzing the expression of these four ß-defensins in adult boars immunized against gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). Our results indicate that HPT axis disruption modifies the expression of pBD3, pBD4, pBD125, and pEP2C in boar testis and epididymis, suggesting an endocrine-dependent regulation of ß-defensins in swine epididymis. In conclusion, sequence and structural homology between pBD3 and pBD4 and their human homologs provide a basis for using the pig as a model for the study of human secondary hypogonadism. Further investigation of the human homologs in hypogonadal men could elucidate the connections between fertility and epididymal expression of ß-defensins.

Radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer in patients aged 75 years or older: comparison with primary androgen deprivation therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether radical prostatetomy (RP) is suitable for prostate cancer patients with age ≥75 years in comparison to primary androgen deprivation therapy (PADT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cohort study was conducted in clinically localized prostate cancer patients with ≥75 years of age who underwent RP or PADT at six institutions from 2005 to 2013. Patients who had less than 12 months of follow-up, or received neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy were excluded. We compared clinical characteristics, cancer-specific and overall survivals, and post-treatment complication rates between two groups. RESULTS: We included 92 and 99 patients in the RP and PADT groups, respectively. In survival analyses, there were no significant differences in cancer-specific and overall survivals (p = .302 and .995, respectively). The incidence of serious adverse events (cardio- or cerebrovascular event, or bone fracture) was higher in the PADT group (p = .001). Multivariable analysis showed that PADT had a worse effect on the serious adverse events (OR 10.12, p = .038). CONCLUSIONS: In selected elderly patients, RP was safe and effective for treatment of localized prostate cancer, as compared to PADT. Surgical treatment options should be considered in elderly patients with respect to life expectancy, rather than chronological age.

Are GnRH and FSH potentially damaging factors in the cardiovascular system?

In the physiological view the human cardiomyocytes express receptors of gonadotropin-releasing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone. The local effects of these hormones in the heart are related also to some interstitial cells, such as endothelial cells with follicle-stimulating hormone receptors and immune cells with gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptors. The administration of androgen deprivation therapy in patients with prostate cancer is associated with increased incidence of cardiovascular complications. It is suggested that negative action of this therapy on cardiovascular system is due to the loss of testosterone but also levels of gonadotropin-releasing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone are changed by therapy. In this article we review the literature to date with an emphasis on recent investigation focused on potential role of abnormal gonadotropin-releasing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone levels induced by gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists on the cardiovascular risk. These facts exacerbate the complexity of specific hormone and cell relationships within heart and vessels. Androgen deprivation therapy reveals the physiological relationships between hormones and specific tissues that are not part of the endocrine system.

Risk of endometrial cancer in women treated with ovary-stimulating drugs for subfertility.

BACKGROUND: Medical treatment for subfertility principally involves the use of ovary-stimulating agents, including selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), such as clomiphene citrate, gonadotropins, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists and antagonists, as well as human chorionic gonadotropin. Ovary-stimulating drugs may act directly or indirectly upon the endometrium (lining of the womb). Nulliparity and some causes of subfertility are recognized as risk factors for endometrial cancer. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between the use of ovary-stimulating drugs for the treatment of subfertility and the risk of endometrial cancer. SEARCH METHODS: A search was performed in CENTRAL, MEDLINE (Ovid) and Embase (Ovid) databases up to July 2016, using a predefined search algorithm. A search in OpenGrey, ProQuest, ClinicalTrials.gov, ZETOC and reports of major conferences was also performed. We did not impose language and publication status restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: Cohort and case-control studies reporting on the association between endometrial cancer and exposure to ovary-stimulating drugs for subfertility in adult women were deemed eligible. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Study characteristics and findings were extracted by review authors independently working in pairs. Inconsistency between studies was quantified by estimating I2. Random-effects (RE) models were used to calculate pooled effect estimates. Separate analyses were performed, comparing treated subfertile women versus general population and/or unexposed subfertile women, to address the superimposition of subfertility as an independent risk factor for endometrial cancer. MAIN RESULTS: Nineteen studies were eligible for inclusion (1,937,880 participants). Overall, the quality of evidence was very low, due to serious risk of bias and indirectness (non-randomised studies (NRS), which was reflected on the GRADE assessment.Six eligible studies, including subfertile women, without a general population control group, found that exposure to any ovary-stimulating drug was not associated with an increased risk of endometrial cancer (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.37; 156,774 participants; very low quality evidence). Fifteen eligible studies, using a general population as the control group, found an increased risk after exposure to any ovary-stimulating drug (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.61; 1,762,829 participants; very low quality evidence).Five eligible studies, confined to subfertile women (92,849 participants), reported on exposure to clomiphene citrate; the pooled studies indicated a positive association ( RR 1.32; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.71; 88,618 participants; very low quality evidence), although only at high dosage (RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.68; two studies; 12,073 participants) and at a high number of cycles (RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.47; three studies; 13,757 participants). Four studies found an increased risk of endometrial cancer in subfertile women who required clomiphene citrate compared to a general population control group (RR 1.87, 95% CI 1.00 to 3.48; four studies, 19,614 participants; very low quality evidence). These data do not tell us whether the association is due to the underlying conditions requiring clomiphene or the treatment itself.Using unexposed subfertile women as controls, exposure to gonadotropins was associated with an increased risk of endometrial cancer (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.34; four studies; 17,769 participants; very low quality evidence). The respective analysis of two studies (1595 participants) versus the general population found no difference in risk (RR 2.12, 95% CI 0.79 to 5.64: very low quality evidence).Exposure to a combination of clomiphene citrate and gonadotropins, compared to unexposed subfertile women, produced no difference in risk of endometrial cancer (RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.57 to 2.44; two studies; 6345 participants; very low quality evidence). However, when compared to the general population, an increased risk was found , suggesting that the key factor might be subfertility, rather than treatment (RR 2.99, 95% CI 1.53 to 5.86; three studies; 7789 participants; very low quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The synthesis of the currently available evidence does not allow us to draw robust conclusions, due to the very low quality of evidence. It seems that exposure to clomiphene citrate as an ovary-stimulating drug in subfertile women is associated with increased risk of endometrial cancer, especially at doses greater than 2000 mg and high (more than 7) number of cycles. This may largely be due to underlying risk factors in women who need treatment with clomiphene citrate, such as polycystic ovary syndrome, rather than exposure to the drug itself. The evidence regarding exposure to gonadotropins was inconclusive.

Severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome after combined GnRH-agonist and low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin trigger in a patient with a single kidney.

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) following gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) trigger is rare. Here, we report a case of severe OHSS after combined GnRH-a and low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger in a patient with a single kidney. The patient is a 32-year-old women with a two-year history of infertility. The patient's history was significant for a single kidney, that is, she had donated a kidney to a family member three years ago. The patient underwent controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for in vitro fertilization (IVF) and received a combined 2 mg GnRH-a and 1500 IU hCG ovulatory trigger. Estradiol (E2) levels on the day of and after the trigger were 3800 pg/mL and 4001 pg/mL, respectively. Four days after the trigger, the patient began experiencing nausea, abdominal distention and dyspnea, and her blood testing revealed hemoconcentration (hemoglobin: 16.9 g/dL; hematocrit: 51.0%) and an elevated creatinine level (1.16 mg/dL). Fresh embryo transfer was deferred. The patient was admitted to the hospital for fluid monitoring and prophylactic anticoagulation. Following inpatient management, her hemoglobin, hematocrit and creatinine levels normalized. The current report highlights that the systemic effects of OHSS can be accentuated in patients with preexisting renal disease or a single kidney.

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome following GnRH agonist trigger-think ectopic.

PURPOSE: This study aims to report a case of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) following GnRH agonist trigger for final follicular maturation. METHODS: This study is a retrospective chart review. RESULTS: We report the first case of OHSS following GnRH agonist trigger for final follicular maturation and freeze-all, masking extrauterine pregnancy (EUP). The present case report elucidates the feasibility of stimulating and recruiting ovarian follicles yielding mature oocytes during early pregnancy and the ability of GnRH agonist to trigger final follicular maturation during pregnancy, in the presence of high progesterone and hCG levels. CONCLUSIONS: Since OHSS almost always develops after hCG administration or in early pregnancy, its occurrence following GnRH agonist trigger should alert physician to search for either an inadvertent administration of exogenous hCG, or the endogenous secretion of hCG by pregnancy, e.g. EUP, or as part of a paraneoplastic syndrome.

Effects and safety of GnRH-a as a luteal support in women undertaking assisted reproductive technology procedures: follow-up results for pregnancy, delivery, and neonates.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects and safety of gonadotropin releasing hormone analogue (GnRH-a) as an addition to progesterone luteal support in women who underwent in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI-ET) and achieved a clinical pregnancy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 214 patients who underwent IVF/ICSI-ET procedures with standard long mid-luteal protocol, of which 123 received GnRH-a-free protocol and 91 received GnRH-a-added protocol. The patients' pregnancy and delivery course, and their neonates' status at birth and growth/development after birth were statistically compared. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between both study groups regarding embryo risks and maternal complications during early pregnancy. as well as fetal risks during the middle and late stages and neonate risks during birth, except that the twin pregnancies of the GnRH-a-added group had a considerably greater male/female ratio, and a significantly higher rate of premature delivery and low birth weight than those of the GnRH-a-free group. In addition, there was no significant difference in neonate risks within 2 years after birth between both cohorts. CONCLUSION: With precautions taken to control the number of implanted embryos and reduce the incidence of twinning pregnancy, the addition of GnRH-a to luteal support is relatively safe and effective.

A short course of metformin does not reduce OHSS in a GnRH antagonist cycle for women with PCOS undergoing IVF: a randomised placebo-controlled trial.

STUDY QUESTION: Does 'metformin' reduce the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) for women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) undergoing a GnRH antagonist assisted conception treatment cycle? SUMMARY ANSWER: A short course of metformin does not reduce the incidence of OHSS for women with PCOS undergoing a GnRH antagonist treatment cycle. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Metformin does reduce the incidence of OHSS in a GnRH-agonist treatment cycle. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A randomised placebo-controlled trial (RCT) using metformin or placebo. Randomisation was blinded to both patient and investigator, using a random permuted blocks method with a 50:50 allocation ratio. The study was completed over 5 years (2009-2014) with 153 randomised patients. A sample size calculation based on the incidence of OHSS was completed prospectively suggesting a minimum of 146 recruits was required for the trial with a power of 80% and a type 1 error of 0.05. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: All patients met the Rotterdam criteria for PCOS and were treated with a standard GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI treatment cycle in a tertiary infertility clinic. The study medication was started prior to stimulation and continued to oocyte retrieval. Of the 153 patients, 77 received metformin and 76 placebo. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: There was no reduction in the incidence of moderate-severe OHSS (Placebo (PLA) 12.2%, metformin (MET) = 16%, 95% CI -0.08-0.16, P = 0.66). There was no difference in total gonadotrophin dose (PLA = 1200, MET = 1200, 95% CI -118.67-118.67, P = 0.75), oocytes retrieved (PLA = 15, MET = 14, 95% CI -2.37-4.37, P = 0.66) or fertilisation rate (PLA = 60.7%, MET = 53.3%, 95% CI -0.96-14.94, P = 0.07). However, using metformin resulted in a reduced clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) per cycle started (PLA = 48.7%, MET = 28.6%, 95% CI 0.04-0.35, P = 0.02) and live birth rate (PLA = 51.6%, MET = 27.6%, 95% CI 0.05-0.40, P = 0.02). Furthermore, when ethnicity was taken into account there was a significant reduction in pregnancy outcome for the South Asian population irrespective of metformin or placebo use (CPR per cycle started, White Caucasian = 44.4%, South Asian = 19.4%; 95% CI 0.06-0.39, P = 0.01). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study was only undertaken on an infertility population with PCOS with a limited duration of study medication use. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This is the first adequately powered RCT to assess the impact of metformin on OHSS in a high-risk group (women with PCOS) undergoing a GnRH antagonist cycle. It does not support the empirical prescribing of metformin as an adjunct to a GnRH antagonist treatment cycle. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: None. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT number 2009-010952-81. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 21 September 2009. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT: 30 October 2009.

Does polycystic ovarian morphology influence the response to treatment with pulsatile GnRH in functional hypothalamic amenorrhea?

BACKGROUND: Pulsatile GnRH therapy is the gold standard treatment for ovulation induction in women having functional hypothalamic amenorrhea (FHA). The use of pulsatile GnRH therapy in FHA patients with polycystic ovarian morphology (PCOM), called "FHA-PCOM", has been little studied in the literature and results remain contradictory. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of pulsatile GnRH therapy for ovulation induction between FHA and "FHA-PCOM" patients in order to search for an eventual impact of PCOM. METHODS: Retrospective study from August 2002 to June 2015, including 27 patients with FHA and 40 "FHA-PCOM" patients (85 and 104 initiated cycles, respectively) treated by pulsatile GnRH therapy for induction ovulation. RESULTS: The two groups were similar except for markers of PCOM (follicle number per ovary, serum Anti-Müllerian Hormone level and ovarian area), which were significantly higher in patients with "FHA-PCOM". There was no significant difference between the groups concerning the ovarian response: with equivalent doses of GnRH, both groups had similar ovulation (80.8 vs 77.7 %, NS) and excessive response rates (12.5 vs 10.6 %, NS). There was no significant difference in on-going pregnancy rates (26.9 vs 20 % per initiated cycle, NS), as well as in miscarriage, multiple pregnancy or biochemical pregnancy rates. CONCLUSION: Pulsatile GnRH seems to be a successful and safe method for ovulation induction in "FHA-PCOM" patients. If results were confirmed by prospective studies, GnRH therapy could therefore become a first-line treatment for this specific population, just as it is for women with FHA without PCOM.

Stroke related to androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Whether androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) leads to stroke morbidity is still unclear because of inconsistent evidence. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate if ADT used in men with prostate cancer (PCa) is associated with stroke. METHODS AND RESULTS: Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library databases up to September 30th 2014 were systematically searched with no date or language restriction, and reports from potentially relevant journals were complementally searched. Both randomized controlled trials and observational studies were included. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality. Six observational studies finally met inclusion criteria, with 74,538 ADT users and 85,947 non-ADT users reporting stroke as an endpoint. Although no significant association was observed in pooled estimates, the incidence of stroke in ADT users was 12 % higher than control groups, (HR = 1.12, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.95 to 1.32; P = 0.16). In subgroup-analyses of different ADT types, stroke was found to be significantly associated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) alone (HR = 1.20, 95 % CI: 1.12 to 1.28; P < 0.001), GnRH plus oral antiandrogen (AA) (HR = 1.23, 95 % CI: 1.13 to 1.34; P < 0.001) and orchiectomy (HR = 1.37, 95 % CI: 1.33 to 1. 46; P = 0.001), but not with AA alone (HR = 1.06, 95 % CI: 0.71 to 1.57; P = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS: GnRH alone, GnRH plus AA and orchiectomy is significantly associated with stroke in patients with PCa.

The Effectiveness of hCG and LHRH in Boys with Cryptorchidism: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

To systematically review the efficacy of hCG and LHRH on testicular descent in boys with cryptorchidism, comprehensive search was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Wanfang Database, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) up to March 2014. Outcomes included testicular complete descent rate (TCDR) and cure rate of patients. Study quality was evaluated using the Jadad scale. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager software. Finally, 13 studies were included. hCG and LHRH increased TCDR comparing with control group. The success rate of hCG and LHRH was 24 and 19%, respectively. Further, hCG and LHRH had significant effect on bilateral cryptorchidism, but not on unilateral cryptorchidism. All side effects were transitory and not severe, but if they have long-term harms were not clear. hCG and LHRH can effectively increase TCDR and there was no significant difference between them. However, the hormones cannot be recommended for everyone because of their low success rates and potential long-term harms. Further studies are needed to determine the efficacy of hormonal treatment for subtypes of cryptorchidism.

GnRH agonist with low-dose hCG (dual trigger) is associated with higher risk of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome compared to GnRH agonist alone.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare rates of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) after using gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) alone and GnRHa in combination with low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG, dual trigger) for final oocyte maturation in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at an academic center. Study population included 108 women who received GnRHa trigger and 66 women who received dual trigger (GnRHa + low-dose [1000 IU] hCG trigger). The main outcome measure was OHSS. Secondary outcomes included total oocyte yield and oocyte maturity. RESULTS: The incidence of early OHSS was significantly higher after dual trigger than GnRHa trigger (8.6 vs 0 %). Moreover, four of the six patients that developed OHSS developed severe OHSS. Logistic modeling revealed that the combination of age, BMI, baseline AFC, and E2 >4000 pg/mL was predictive of OHSS with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.84 and was superior to each factor alone. Adjusted analyses revealed that dual trigger was associated with a higher number of total oocytes (adjusted OR 1.27; 95 % confidence interval, 1.18, 1.38) and percentage of mature oocytes (AOR 1.10; 95 % confidence interval, 1.03, 1.17) obtained compared to GnRHa trigger alone. CONCLUSIONS: Dual trigger for final oocyte maturation using GnRHa and low-dose hCG is associated with a significantly increased risk of severe OHSS compared to GnRH alone. However, dual trigger may be associated with a modest increase in oocyte yield, both in terms of number and maturity.

Severe gastrointestinal dysmotility developed after treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs.

BACKGROUND: Sporadic cases of abdominal pain and dysmotility has been described after treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogs. The aim of the present study was to scrutinize for patients with severe gastrointestinal complaints after treatment with GnRH analogs, to describe the expression of antibodies against progonadoliberin-2, GnRH1, GnRH receptor (GnRHR), luteinizing hormone (LH), and LH receptor in serum in these patients, and to search for possible triggers and genetic factors behind the development of this dysmotility. METHODS: Patients suffering from prolonged gastrointestinal complaints after treatment with GnRH analogs at the Department of Gastroenterology, Skåne University Hospital, were included. GnRHR and LH receptor (LHCGR) genes were exome-sequenced. Serum was analyzed by enzyme-linked immune sorbent assays for the presence of antibodies. Healthy blood donors and women treated with GnRH analogs because of in vitro fertilization (IVF) were used as controls. RESULTS: Seven patients with severe gastrointestinal complaints after GnRH treatment were identified, of whom six suffered from endometriosis. Several variants were found within the 11 exons of LHCGR. The minor allele G, at the single nucleotide polymorphism rs6755901, was detected in homozygosity in two patients (28.5%) who had developed chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction and in 5.5% of the IVF controls. Three patients expressed IgM antibodies against progonadoliberin-2 and three against GnRH1 (42.9%) when cut off was set to a titer >97.5th percentile in blood donors. CONCLUSION: A high prevalence of endometriosis, polymorphism in the LHCGR and GnRH1 and progonadoliberin-2 antibodies in serum was found among the patients with severe dysmotility after treatment with GnRH analogs.

Endometrial thickness affects the outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in normal responders after GnRH antagonist administration.

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to assess the association between endometrial thickness on the chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) day and in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) outcome in normal responders after GnRH antagonist administration. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed in normal responders with GnRH antagonist administration from January 2011-December 2013. Patients were divided into four groups according to endometrial thickness, as follows: <7 mm (group 1), > = 7- < 8 mm (group 2), > = 8- < 14 mm (group 3), and > =14 mm (group 4). RESULTS: A total of 2106 embryo transfer cycles were analyzed. The pregnancy rate (PR) was 44.87%.The clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate and the implantation rate (17.28%, 13.79%, 10.17%, respectively) were significantly lower in group 1 compared to the other three groups (p < 0.05). The miscarriage rate was higher in patients with endometrial thickness less than 7 mm. The clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate and implantation rate were highest in patients with endometrial thickness higher than 14 mm, but showed no difference in patients with those of endometrial thickness between 8-14 mm. CONCLUSIONS: There is a correlation between endometrial thickness measured on hCG day and clinical outcome in normal responders with GnRH antagonist administration. The pregnancy rate was lower in patients with endometrial thickness less than 7 mm compared with patients with endometrial thickness more than 7 mm.

Clinical pharmacology and regulatory consequences of GnRH analogues in prostate cancer.

INTRODUCTION: GnRH (gonadotropin-releasing hormone) analogues are long-term known to be safe and effective in the clinical management of hormone-dependent advanced prostate cancer. However, their unusual mechanism of action of de-sensitizing pituitary receptors makes generic market entry challenging. In addition, safety aspects like initial flare-up, breakthrough escape, and miniflares render planning and organization of clinical registration trials a complex project. REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS THERAPEUTIC EQUIVALENCE: Regulatory requirements are high as these medicines are compared to bilateral surgical castration with a 100% success rate. GnRH analogues will be used probably even wider in the near future due to demographic development and extension of indications. However, they are challenged by their antagonistic counterparts, which are avoiding flare-up phenomena. The following article deals with regulatory requirements of GnRH analogues in regard to their clinical characteristics.

Non-steroidal antiandrogen monotherapy compared with luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonists or surgical castration monotherapy for advanced prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Non-steroidal antiandrogens and castration are the main therapy options for advanced stages of prostate cancer. However, debate regarding the value of these treatment options continues. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of non-steroidal antiandrogen monotherapy compared with luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonists or surgical castration monotherapy for treating advanced stages of prostate cancer. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Prostatic Diseases and Urologic Cancers Group Specialized Register (PROSTATE), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science with Conference Proceedings, three trial registries and abstracts from three major conferences to 23 December 2013, together with reference lists, and contacted selected experts in the field and manufacturers. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials comparing non-steroidal antiandrogen monotherapy with medical or surgical castration monotherapy for men in advanced stages of prostate cancer. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One review author screened all titles and abstracts; only citations that were clearly irrelevant were excluded at this stage. Then, two review authors independently examined full-text reports, identified relevant studies, assessed the eligibility of studies for inclusion, assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted the study authors to request additional information. We used Review Manager 5 for data synthesis and used the fixed-effect model for heterogeneity less than 50%; we used the random-effects model for substantial or considerable heterogeneity. MAIN RESULTS: Eleven studies involving 3060 randomly assigned participants were included in this review. The quality of evidence is hampered by risk of bias. Use of non-steroidal antiandrogens decreased overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05 to 1.48, six studies, 2712 participants) and increased clinical progression (one year: risk ratio (RR) 1.25, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.45, five studies, 2067 participants; 70 weeks: RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.45, six studies, 2373 participants; two years: RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.25, three studies, 1336 participants), as well as treatment failure (one year: RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.38, four studies, 1539 participants; 70 weeks: RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.52, five studies, 1845 participants; two years: RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.24, two studies, 808 participants), compared with medical or surgical castration. The quality of evidence for overall survival, clinical progression and treatment failure was rated as moderate according to GRADE. Predefined subgroup analyses showed that use of non-steroidal antiandrogens, compared with castration, was less favourable for overall survival, clinical progression (at one year, 70 weeks, two years) and treatment failure (at one year, 70 weeks, two years) in men with metastatic disease. Use of non-steroidal antiandrogens also increased the risk for treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (RR 1.82, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.94, eight studies, 1559 participants), including events such as breast pain (RR 22.97, 95% CI 14.79 to 35.67, eight studies, 2670 participants), gynaecomastia (RR 8.43, 95% CI 3.19 to 22.28, nine studies, 2774 participants) and asthenia (RR 1.77, 95% CI 1.36 to 2.31, five studies, 2073 participants). The risk of other adverse events, such as hot flashes (RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.27, nine studies, 2774 participants), haemorrhage (RR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.54, two studies, 546 participants), nocturia (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.69, one study, 480 participants), fatigue (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.88, one study, 51 participants), loss of sexual interest (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.83, one study, 51 participants) and urinary frequency (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.47, one study, 480 participants) was decreased when non-steroidal antiandrogens were used. The quality of evidence for breast pain, gynaecomastia and hot flashes was rated as moderate according to GRADE. The effects of non-steroidal antiandrogens on cancer-specific survival and biochemical progression remained unclear. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Currently available evidence suggests that use of non-steroidal antiandrogen monotherapy compared with medical or surgical castration monotherapy for advanced prostate cancer is less effective in terms of overall survival, clinical progression, treatment failure and treatment discontinuation due to adverse events. Evidence quality was rated as moderate according to GRADE. Further research is likely to have an important impact on results for patients with advanced but non-metastatic prostate cancer treated with non-steroidal antiandrogen monotherapy. However, we believe that research is likely not necessary on non-steroidal antiandrogen monotherapy for men with metastatic prostate cancer. Only high-quality, randomised controlled trials with long-term follow-up should be conducted. If further research is planned to investigate biochemical progression, studies with standardised follow-up schedules using measurements of prostate-specific antigen based on current guidelines should be conducted.