Role of sentinel lymph node evaluation during hysterectomy for preoperative pathology diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia in a community hospital setting.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of sentinel lymph node (SLN) evaluation during hysterectomy for endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) in a community hospital setting and identify descriptive trends among pathology reports from those diagnosed with endometrial cancer (EC). METHODS: We reviewed patients who underwent hysterectomy from January 2015 to July 2022 for a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of EIN obtained by endometrial biopsy (EMB) or dilation and curettage. Data was obtained via detailed chart review. Statistical testing was utilized for between-group comparisons and multivariate logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: Of the 177 patients with EIN who underwent hysterectomy during the study period, 105 (59.3%) had a final diagnosis of EC. At least stage IB disease was found in 29 of these patients who then underwent adjuvant therapy. Pathology report descriptors suspicious for cancer and initial specimen type obtained by EMB were independently and significantly associated with increased odds of EC diagnosis (aOR 8.192, p < 0.001;3.746, p < 0.001, respectively). Operative times were not increased by performance of SLN sampling while frozen specimen evaluation added an average of 28 min to procedure length. Short-term surgical outcomes were also similar between groups. CONCLUSION: Patients treated for EIN at community-based institutions might be more likely to upstage preoperative EIN diagnoses and have an increased risk of later stage disease than previous research suggests. Given no surgical time or short-term outcome differences, SLN evaluation should be more strongly considered in this practice setting, especially for patients diagnosed by EMB or with pathology reports indicating suspicion for EC.

Clinical characteristics, appropriateness of empiric antibiotic therapy, and outcome of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia across multiple community hospitals.

There is relatively little contemporary information regarding clinical characteristics of patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia (PAB) in the community hospital setting. This was a retrospective, observational cohort study examining the clinical characteristics of patients with PAB across several community hospitals in the USA with a focus on the appropriateness of initial empirical therapy and impact on patient outcomes. Cases of PAB occurring between 2016 and 2019 were pulled from 8 community medical centers. Patients were classified as having either positive or negative outcome at hospital discharge. Several variables including receipt of active empiric therapy (AET) and the time to receiving AET were collected. Variables with a p value of < 0.05 in univariate analyses were included in a multivariable logistic regression model. Two hundred and eleven episodes of PAB were included in the analysis. AET was given to 81.5% of patients and there was no difference in regard to outcome (p = 0.62). There was no difference in the median time to AET in patients with a positive or negative outcome (p = 0.53). After controlling for other variables, age, Pitt bacteremia score ≥ 4, and septic shock were independently associated with a negative outcome. A high proportion of patients received timely, active antimicrobial therapy for PAB and time to AET did not have a significant impact on patient outcome.

Disparate Practice Patterns and Survival Outcomes: The Impact of Centralization of Cancer Care for Adrenocortical Carcinoma in the United States.

PURPOSE: Adrenocortical carcinoma is a rare but aggressive malignancy. While centralization of care to referral centers improves outcomes across common urological malignancies, there exists a paucity of data for low-incidence cancers. We sought to evaluate differences in practice patterns and overall survival in patients with adrenocortical carcinoma across types of treating facilities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified all patients diagnosed with adrenocortical carcinoma from 2004-2016 in the National Cancer Database. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate overall survival and multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to investigate independent predictors of overall survival. The chi-square test was used to analyze differences in practice patterns. RESULTS: We identified 2,886 patients with adrenocortical carcinoma. Median overall survival was 21.8 months (95% CI 19.8-23.8). Academic centers had improved overall survival versus community centers on unadjusted Kaplan-Meier analysis (p <0.05) and had higher rates of adrenalectomy or radical en bloc resection (p <0.001), performed more open surgery (p <0.001), administered more systemic therapy (p <0.001) and had lower rates of positive surgical margins (p=0.03). On multivariable analysis, controlling for treatment modality, academic centers were associated with significantly decreased risk of death (HR 0.779, 95% CI 0.631-0.963, p=0.021). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma at an academic center is associated with improved overall survival compared to community programs. There are significant differences in practice patterns, including more aggressive surgical treatment at academic facilities, but the survival benefit persists on multivariable analysis controlling for treatment modality. Further studies are needed to identify the most important predictors of survival in this at-risk population.

Transfusion practices in a large cohort of hospitalized children.

BACKGROUND: While previous studies have described the use of blood components in subsets of children, such as the critically ill, little is known about transfusion practices in hospitalized children across all departments and diagnostic categories. We sought to describe the utilization of red blood cell, platelet, plasma, and cryoprecipitate transfusions across hospital settings and diagnostic categories in a large cohort of hospitalized children. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The public datasets from 11 US academic and community hospitals that participated in the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute Recipient Epidemiology and Donor Evaluation Study-III (REDS-III) were accessed. All nonbirth inpatient encounters of children 0-18 years of age from 2013 to 2016 were included. RESULTS: 61,770 inpatient encounters from 41,943 unique patients were analyzed. Nine percent of encounters involved the transfusion of at least one blood component. RBC transfusions were most common (7.5%), followed by platelets (3.9%), plasma (2.5%), and cryoprecipitate (0.9%). Children undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass were most likely to be transfused. For the entire cohort, the median (interquartile range) pretransfusion laboratory values were as follows: hemoglobin, 7.9 g/dl (7.1-10.4 g/dl); platelet count, 27 × 109 cells/L (14-54 × 109 cells/L); and international normalized ratio was 1.6 (1.4-2.0). Recipient age differences were observed in the frequency of RBC irradiation (95% in infants, 67% in children, p < .001) and storage duration of RBC transfusions (median storage duration of 12 [8-17] days in infants and 20 [12-29] days in children, p < .001). CONCLUSION: Based on a cohort of patients from 2013 to 2016, the transfusion of blood components is relatively common in the care of hospitalized children. The frequency of transfusion across all pediatric hospital settings, especially in children undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass, highlights the opportunities for the development of institutional transfusion guidelines and patient blood management initiatives.

Identification of Functional Limitations and Discharge Destination in Patients With COVID-19.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to identify functional limitations in patients with coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) admitted to acute care hospitals; to evaluate functional limitations by demographic, medical, and encounter characteristics; and to examine functional limitations in relation to discharge destination. DESIGN: and Setting:This is a cross-sectional, retrospective study of adult patients with COVID-19 who were discharged from 2 different types of hospitals (academic medical center and a community hospital) within 1 health care system from January 1 to April 30, 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Patients were identified from the Cedars-Sinai COVID-19 data registry who had a new-onset positive test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. A total of 273 patients were identified, which included 230 patients who were discharged alive and 43 patients who died and were excluded from the study sample. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional limitations in patients with COVID-19 in acute care hospitals and the predictors for discharge disposition. RESULTS: A total of 230 records were analyzed including demographic, encounter, medical, and functional variables. In a propensity score-matched cohort based on age and comorbidity, 88.2% had functional physical health deficits, 72.5% had functional mental health deficits, and 17.6% experienced sensory deficits. In the matched cohort, individuals discharged to an institution experienced greater physical (62.7% vs 25.5%, P<.001) and mental health (49.0% vs 23.5%, P=.006) deficits than patients discharged home. Marital status (odds ratio, 3.17; P=.011) and physical function deficits (odds ratio, 3.63; P=.025) were associated with an increase odds ratio of discharge to an institution. CONCLUSIONS: This research highlights that functional status is a strong predictor for discharge destination to an institution for patients with COVID-19. Patients who were older, in the acute care hospital longer, and with comorbidities were more likely to be discharged to an institution. Rehabilitation is a significant aspect of the health care system for these vulnerable patients. The challenges of adjusting the role of rehabilitation providers and systems during the pandemic needs further exploration. Moreover, additional research is needed to look more closely at the many facets and timing of functional status needs, to shed light in use of interdisciplinary rehabilitation services, and to guide providers and health care systems in facilitating optimal recovery and patient outcomes.

Introducing oncoplastic breast surgery in a community hospital.

Oncoplastic breast surgery (OPBS) has been shown to increase breast-conserving surgery with improved oncologic and cosmetic outcomes, but access to OPBS in Canada varies greatly. This article summarizes the impact of introducing OPBS in a community hospital. All breast oncology surgery cases performed before and after the introduction of OPBS by a single surgeon were reviewed. After implementing OPBS in our centre, breast conservation increased from 30% to 50%, and the positive margin rate decreased from 25% to 10%. The completion mastectomy rate was lower in patients who received OPBS, and this group had a slightly higher readmission rate for postoperative hematoma. This review suggests OPBS can be performed safely in the community setting with appropriate training and improve outcomes in breast surgery for patients in smaller centres.

Overall Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Interventional Radiology Services: A Canadian Perspective.

PURPOSE: The aim of this national survey was to assess the overall impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the provision of interventional radiology (IR) services in Canada. METHODS: An anonymous electronic survey was distributed via national and regional radiology societies, exploring (1) center information and staffing, (2) acute and on-call IR services, (3) elective IR services, (4) IR clinics, (5) multidisciplinary rounds, (6) IR training, (7) personal protection equipment (PPE), and departmental logistics. RESULTS: Individual responses were received from 142 interventional radiologists across Canada (estimated 70% response rate). Nearly half of the participants (49.3%) reported an overall decrease in demand for acute IR services; on-call services were maintained at centers that routinely provide these services (99%). The majority of respondents (73.2%) were performing inpatient IR procedures at the bedside where possible. Most participants (88%) reported an overall decrease in elective IR services. Interventional radiology clinics and multidisciplinary rounds were predominately transitioned to virtual platforms. The vast majority of participants (93.7%) reported their center had disseminated an IR specific PPE policy; 73% reported a decrease in case volume for trainees by at least 25% and a proportion of trainees will either have a delay in starting their careers as IR attendings (24%) or fellowship training (35%). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on IR services in Canada, particularly for elective cases. Many centers have utilized virtual platforms to provide multidisciplinary meetings, IR clinics, and training. Guidelines should be followed to ensure patient and staff safety while resuming IR services.

Primary Liver Cancer: An NCDB Analysis of Overall Survival and Margins After Hepatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) constitute the majority of primary liver cancers. This retrospective review aimed to determine whether site of care is a significant predictor of patient outcome after hepatectomy as measured by overall survival, hazard ratios (HRs), and resection margin status. METHODS: Data regarding patients with a new diagnosis of ICC and HCC who underwent hepatectomy were analyzed from the national cancer database. The patients were divided into two cohorts: those receiving treatment at academic cancer centers (ACCs) and those receiving treatment at community cancer centers (CCCs). The study adjusted for confounding variables and selection bias using propensity score matching. Median overall survival (months), hazard ratios, and resection margin status (R0, R1/R2, unknown) were examined. RESULTS: The inclusion criteria were met by 10,463 patients. After propensity matching, 5600 patients remained, with half receiving treatment at ACCs and half at CCCs. Median overall survival from the date of diagnosis for patients undergoing hepatectomy was longer at ACCs than at CCCs (28.3 vs 24.8 months; p < 0.001). Additionally, multivariable Cox proportional hazards models showed that treatment at CCCs was associated with poorer survival than treatment at ACCs (HR, 1.226; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.142-1.316; p < 0.0001). Treatment facility designation also was a predictive indicator of resection margin status, with patients at CCCs exhibiting higher odds of R1/R2 resections (odds ratio [OR], 1.41; 95% CI, 1.19-1.67; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Hepatectomy for ICC and HCC performed at ACCs was associated with improved outcomes compared with CCCs. Centralization of care to ACCs may lead to improved patient outcomes.

Thyroid Ultrasound Reports: Will the Thyroid Imaging, Reporting, and Data System Improve Natural Language Processing Capture of Critical Thyroid Nodule Features?

BACKGROUND: Critical thyroid nodule features are contained in unstructured ultrasound (US) reports. The Thyroid Imaging, Reporting, and Data System (TI-RADS) uses five key features to risk stratify nodules and recommend appropriate intervention. This study aims to analyze the quality of US reporting and the potential benefit of Natural Language Processing (NLP) systems in efficiently capturing TI-RADS features from text reports. MATERIALS AND METHOD: This retrospective study used free-text thyroid US reports from an academic center (A) and community hospital (B). Physicians created "gold standard" annotations by manually extracting TI-RADS features and clinical recommendations from reports to determine how often they were included. Similar annotations were created using an automated NLP system and compared with the gold standard. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-two reports contained 409 nodules at least 1-cm in maximum diameter. The gold standard identified three nodules (0.7%) which contained enough information to calculate a complete TI-RADS score. Shape was described most often (92.7% of nodules), whereas margins were described least often (11%). A median number of two TI-RADS features are reported per nodule. The NLP system was significantly less accurate than the gold standard in capturing echogenicity (27.5%) and margins (58.9%). One hundred eight nodule reports (26.4%) included clinical management recommendations, which were included more often at site A than B (33.9 versus 17%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a gap between current US reporting styles and those needed to implement TI-RADS and achieve NLP accuracy. Synoptic reporting should prompt more complete thyroid US reporting, improved recommendations for intervention, and better NLP performance.

Predictors of Delayed Emergency Department Throughput Among Blunt Trauma Patients.

BACKGROUND: Delayed emergency department (ED) LOS has been associated with increased mortality and increased hospital length of stay (LOS) for various patient populations. Trauma patients often require significant effort in evaluation, workup, and disposition; however, patient and hospital characteristics associated with increased LOS in the ED for trauma patients remain unclear. METHODS: The Trauma Quality Improvement Project database (2014-2016) was queried for all adult blunt trauma patients. Patients discharged from the ED to the operating room were excluded. Univariate and multivariable linear regression analysis was conducted to identify independent predictors of ED LOS, controlling for patient characteristics (age, gender, race, insurance status), hospital characteristics (teaching status, ACS trauma verification level, geographic region), abbreviated injury scale and comorbid status. RESULTS: 412,000 patients met inclusion criteria for analysis. When controlling for covariates, an increase in age by 1 y resulted in 0.63 increased minutes in the ED (P < 0.001). In multivariable linear regression controlling for injury severity and comorbid conditions, non-white race groups, university status, and northeast region were associated with increased ED LOS. Black and Hispanic patients spent on average 41 and 42 more minutes, respectively, in the ED room when compared with white patients (P < 0.001). Patients seen at University hospitals spent 52 more minutes in the ED when compared with community hospitals, whereas patients at nonteaching hospitals spent 31 fewer minutes (P < 0.001). Patients seen in the Midwest spent the least amount of time in the ED, with patients in the South, West, and Northeast spending 45, 36, and 89 more minutes, respectively (P < 0.001). Non-Medicaid patients at level 1 trauma centers and those requiring intensive care admission had significantly decreased ED LOS. Medicaid patients took the longest to move through the ED with Medicare, BlueCross, and Private insurance outpacing them by 17, 23, and 23 min, respectively (P < 0.001). ACS level 1 trauma centers moved patients through the ED fastest, whereas ACS level II trauma centers and level III trauma centers moved patients through 50 and 130 min slower when compared with ACS level 1 trauma centers (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ED LOS varied significantly by patient and hospital characteristics. Medicaid patients and those patients at university hospitals were associated with significantly higher ED LOS, whereas ACS trauma verification level status had strong correlation with ED LOS. These results may allow targeted quality improvement programs to enhance ED LOS.

Treatment at Academic Centers Increases Likelihood of Reconstruction After Mastectomy for Breast Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Mastectomy rates continue to increase in women diagnosed with breast cancer (BC). There are limited data regarding reconstruction rates at academic centers (AC) versus community hospitals (CH). We aim to determine the effect of facility type on reconstruction rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for BC patients treated with mastectomy from 2004 to 2014. Clinical characteristics and type of reconstruction were compared between treatment at AC or CH. RESULTS: A total of 860,509 patients were included. Patients treated at AC were younger (58.7 ± 12 y AC versus 61.6 ± 13 y CH; P < 0.001) and traveled farther to their treatment center (33.1 ± 122.8 miles AC versus 20 ± 75.3 miles CH; P < 0.001). Patients undergoing surgery at AC were more likely to have reconstruction than those at CH (43.7% AC versus 32.5% CH; P < 0.001). This trend remained across all reconstruction types including expander/implant-based reconstruction (immediate breast reconstruction) (14.4% AC versus 9.9% CH), autologous reconstruction (14.9% AC versus 11.7% CH), mixed reconstruction (5.2% AC versus 3.6% CH), and other reconstructions (9.2% AC versus 7.3% CH) (all P < 0.001). Patients in all age categories, across insurance statuses, and with comorbidities were more likely to receive reconstruction if treated at AC compared with CH. In multivariate analysis, having a mastectomy at AC was an independent predictor of reconstruction (adjusted odds ratio, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.49-1.51; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Undergoing mastectomy at AC results in higher rate of reconstruction compared with CH.

Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Hospital Type Drives Utilization and Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasingly common; however, uptake has differed by hospital type. It is unknown how these trends have evolved for laparoscopic or robotic approaches in different types of hospitals. This study assesses temporal trends for MIS utilization and examines differences in surgical outcomes by hospital type. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients who underwent CRC surgery between 2010 and 2015. Time-trend analysis of MIS utilization was performed for both approaches by hospital type (community, comprehensive community, integrated network, academic). Multivariate logistic regression models were used to examine MIS utilization, differences in case severity, and surgical outcomes by hospital type, after controlling for patient characteristics. RESULTS: Across all hospital types, community hospitals had the lowest rate of laparoscopic (36.8%) and robotic (3.3%) procedures for CRC (P < 0.001). Community hospitals also exhibited a significant lag in adoption rate of robotic surgery (colon = 0.84% versus 1.41%/y; rectum = 2.14% versus 3.88 %/y). Community hospitals performing MIS had worse outcomes, including the most frequent conversions to open (colon = 15.2%; rectal = 17.1%) and highest 90-day mortality (colon = 6%; rectal = 3.2%) (P < 0.001). Finally, compared with laparoscopic colon surgery at academic centers, community centers treated lower grade tumors (OR 0.938, P < 0.05) with higher 30-day (OR 1.332, P < 0.05) and 90-day mortality (OR 1.210, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: MIS for CRC lags at the community level and experiences worse postoperative outcomes. Future initiatives must focus on understanding and correcting this trend to ensure uniform access to high-quality surgical care.

Comparison of overall survival in gallbladder carcinoma at academic versus community cancer centers: An analysis of the National Cancer Data Base.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) has a poor prognosis. Studies demonstrated that teaching facilities may provide a lower risk of mortality in patients undergoing pancreatic and colon resection vs nonteaching facilities. We hypothesized that survival rates are higher in academic cancer centers (ACCs) vs community cancer centers (CCCs). METHODS: Patients with all stages of GBC were identified from the National Cancer Database (2007-2012). Propensity score matching adjusted for selection bias. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all variables. Overall survival (OS) was compared by facility type (ACC vs CCC) and case volume (low vs high) via multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: A total of 7967 patients met the inclusion criteria. Following propensity matching, 2801 patients were analyzed from each facility type. Median OS following surgery was higher for ACC (20.99 months, 95% confidence interval [CI], 19.61-22.64, P = .002) than CCC (17.68 months, 95% CI, 16.46-19.25). Following Cox modeling, GBC treatment at ACCs was a protective factor for OS (adjusted hazard ratio 0.876, 95% CI, 0.801-0.958, P = .004). DISCUSSION: GBC treatment at ACCs is an independent predictor of OS. High volume ACCs are associated with improved OS compared with low volume ACCs. The site of care and case volume in ACCs may contribute to improved survival outcomes.

Treating Opioid Withdrawal With Buprenorphine in a Community Hospital Emergency Department: An Outreach Program.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We assess the feasibility of using our community hospital emergency department (ED) as an immediate portal to medication-assisted treatment for patients in opioid withdrawal. METHODS: This was a prospective observational cohort study. In collaboration with an outpatient substance abuse treatment center, we alerted the public through media outlets that individuals could receive immediate buprenorphine treatment for opioid withdrawal in the ED, with rapid referral for medication-assisted treatment. If medication-assisted treatment intake was delayed, patients could return for up to 2 more days for buprenorphine administration to treat their withdrawal symptoms. We measured compliance with initial follow-up and continued treatment engagement at 30 and 90 days. RESULTS: The study was conducted during 12 months. A total of 62 patients were enrolled, evaluated for buprenorphine criteria, and referred for medication-assisted treatment. Fifty subjects were compliant with their first medication-assisted treatment follow-up visit (81% [95% confidence interval 71% to 91%]), and 43 of these 50 patients were still engaged in medication-assisted treatment at 30 days (86% [95% confidence interval 76% to 96%]), with 33 of the 50 still engaged at 90 days (66% [95% confidence interval 53% to 79%]). We observed no instances of precipitated withdrawal or other adverse reactions in the ED. CONCLUSION: A substantial number of patients responded to this program and received accelerated engagement in medication-assisted treatment. Such a program is feasible in the community hospital ED and may prevent some individuals from relapsing into high-risk illicit drug use when immediate medication-assisted treatment is not otherwise available.

"All boats will rise": Physicians' perspectives on multidisciplinary lung cancer care in a community-based hospital setting.

PURPOSE: We explored the perceived strengths, barriers to implementation, and suggestions for sustainable implementation of a multidisciplinary model within a community-based hospital system from the physicians' perspectives. METHODS: We conducted 9 focus groups with 37 physicians involved in the care of lung cancer patients. Grounded theory methodology guided the identification of recurrent themes that emerged from the qualitative data analysis. RESULTS: The majority of study participants agreed that the multidisciplinary model could benefit patients by promoting high quality, efficient, and well-coordinated care. Co-location, financial disincentives, and time constraints were identified as major deterrents to full participation in a multidisciplinary clinic. Other perceived challenges were the integration of a multidisciplinary care model into the existing healthcare system, maintenance of referral streams, and designation of the physician primarily responsible for a patient's care. Educating physicians about the availability of a multidisciplinary clinic, establishing efficient processes for initial consultations, implementing technology for virtual participation, and using a nurse navigator with reliable closed-loop communication were suggested to improve the implementation of the multidisciplinary model. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians generally agreed that the multidisciplinary model could improve lung cancer care, but they perceived significant personal, institutional, and system-level barriers that need to be addressed for its successful implementation in a community healthcare setting.

Older adult experience of care and staffing on hospital and community wards: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Recent major concerns about the quality of healthcare delivered to older adults have been linked to inadequate staffing and a lack of patient-centred care. Patient experience is a key component of quality care - yet there has been little research on whether and how staffing levels and staffing types affect satisfaction amongst older adult hospital inpatients. This study aimed to evaluate the association between registered nurse and healthcare assistant staffing levels and satisfaction with care amongst older adult hospital inpatients, and to test whether any positive effect of higher staffing levels is mediated by staff feeling they have more time to care for patients. METHODS: Survey data from 4928 inpatients aged 65 years and older and 2237 medical and nursing staff from 123 acute and community medical wards in England, United Kingdom (UK) was collected through the Royal College of Psychiatrist's Elder Care Quality Mark. The cross-sectional association between staffing ratios and older adult patient satisfaction, and mediation by staff perceived time to care, was evaluated using multi-level modelling, adjusted for ward type and with a random effect for ward identity. RESULTS: Higher numbers of patients per healthcare assistant were associated with poorer patient satisfaction (adjusted ß = - 0.32, 95% CI - 0.55 to 0.10, p < 0.01), and this was found to be partially mediated by all ward staff reporting less time to care for patients (adjusted ß = - 0.10, bias-corrected 95% CI - 1.16 to - 0.02). By contrast, in both unadjusted and adjusted models, the number of patients per registered nurse was not associated with patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Older adult hospital patients may particularly value the type of care provided by healthcare assistants, such as basic personal care and supportive communication. Additionally, higher availability of healthcare assistants may contribute to all ward staff feeling more able to spend time with patients. However, high availability of registered nurses has been shown in other research to be vital for ensuring quality and safety of patient care. Future research should seek to identify the ideal balance of registered nurses and healthcare assistants for optimising a range of outcomes amongst older adult patients.

The Influence of Academic Hospitalists on Labor and Delivery Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Our goal was to examine differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes following the transition from a private practice to an academic model at a community hospital. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of a high-volume community hospital labor and delivery unit. A private practice hospitalist group was replaced with academic hospitalists. Maternal and neonatal outcomes for patients cared for by these groups were compared. The primary outcome was a composite of maternal morbidity that included blood transfusion, anal sphincter injuries, dilation and curettage, hysterectomy, chorioamnionitis, endometritis, wound infection, intensive care unit admission, and readmission. The secondary outcomes were cesarean delivery rate and a composite of neonatal morbidity that included Apgar score ≤3 at 5 min, shoulder dystocia, birth trauma, seizure, sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular hemorrhage, or mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: 245 patients were delivered by private physicians and 447 by academic physicians over the study period. No difference in the composite maternal morbidity between private and academic hospitalist groups was identified (21 vs. 25%; aOR 1.37, 95% CI: 0.36-5.21). The academic hospitalist group had a higher cesarean delivery rate compared to the private group (25 vs. 18%; aOR 2.03, 95% CI: 1.17-3.53). There was no difference in a composite neonatal morbidity (9 vs. 8%; aOR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.052-1.63). CONCLUSION: Women cared for by academic hospitalists were more likely to have a cesarean delivery, but there was no difference in maternal or neonatal morbidity in patients delivered by private or academic hospitalists.

Sustainability of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery initiative for elective colorectal resections in a community hospital.

Background: In March 2016, an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) initiative was implemented for all elective colorectal resections at an urban hospital in St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. An ERAS coordinator supervised and enforced guideline compliance for 6 months. The aim of this study was to evaluate the sustainability of the ERAS program after supervision of guideline compliance was eliminated. Methods: Patient outcomes and guideline compliance were compared between surgeries performed under standard practice (April 2014 to March 2015) and those performed during and after the implementation of the ERAS initiative (March 2016 to August 2016 was the implementation phase and September 2016 to February 2017 was the sustainability phase). Results: Hospital length of stay decreased from 7.26 days at baseline to 5.44 days during the implementation phase of the ERAS program (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between length of stay at baseline and during the 6-month sustainability phase of the ERAS program (7.10 d). There were no significant differences in rates of readmission or mortality during and after implementation. Rate of ileus decreased significantly from 13.8% during the implementation phase to 4.6% during the sustainability phase (p = 0.036). Total guideline compliance increased from 52.2% at baseline to 80.7% during the implementation phase (p < 0.001), and decreased to 74.7% during the sustainability phase (p < 0.001). Adherence to postoperative guidelines regressed: 79.2% in the implementation phase and 68.6% in the sustainability phase (p < 0.001). Conclusion: La durée des séjours à l'hôpital a diminué après l'adoption du programme de RAAC, lorsque le coordonnateur du programme était présent. Les méthodes de maintien des lignes directrices après leur adoption seront cruciales au succès de programmes similaires à l'avenir.

Contexte: En mars 2016, une initiative de récupération améliorée après la chirurgie (RAAC) a été mise en place pour toutes les résections colorectales électives effectuées dans un hôpital urbain de St. John's, à Terre-Neuve-et-Labrador, au Canada. Un coordonnateur du projet de RAAC a supervisé l'application des directives pendant 6 mois. Cette étude visait à évaluer la viabilité du programme une fois que l'application des directives n'était plus surveillée. Méthodes: Nous avons comparé les issues pour les patients et le respect des directives pour les chirurgies réalisées selon les pratiques habituelles (avril 2014 à mars 2015) et pour celles réalisées pendant et après l'adoption du programme de RAAC (mars 2016 à août 2016 ­ mise en oeuvre ­ et septembre 2016 à février 2017 ­ évaluation de la viabilité). Résultats: La durée du séjour à l'hôpital est passée de 7,26 jours à 5,44 jours pendant la phase de mise en oeuvre du programme (p < 0,001). Il n'y avait pas de différence significative entre la durée du séjour au début du programme et pendant les 6 mois de la phase d'évaluation de la viabilité (7,10 jours). Les taux de réadmission et de mortalité avant et après la mise en place du programme n'ont pas changé de manière significative. Le taux d'iléus a connu une baisse significative, passant de 13,8 % pendant la phase de mise en oeuvre à 4,6 % pendant l'évaluation de la viabilité (p = 0,036). Le respect des directives est passé de 52,2 % au début de la mise en oeuvre à 80,7 % pendant cette même phase (p < 0,001), pour ensuite descendre à 74,7 % pendant la phase suivante (p < 0,001). Le respect de lignes directrices postopératoires a régressé : il était de 79,2 % pendant la phase de mise en oeuvre et de 68,6 % pendant la phase d'évaluation de la viabilité (p < 0,001). Conclusion: La durée des séjours à l'hôpital a augmenté après l'adoption du programme de RAAC, lorsque le coordonnateur du programme était présent. Les méthodes de maintien des lignes directrices après leur adoption seront cruciales au succès de programmes similaires à l'avenir.

The predictors of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery utilization and practice variations in elective colorectal surgery: a provincial survey.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols use evidence-based perioperative practices that reduce morbidity and length of stay and improve patient satisfaction. ERAS is considered standard of care; however, utilization remains low and substantial practice variation exists. The aim of this study was to pragmatically characterize variation in colorectal surgery practice and identify predictors of ERAS utilization. METHODS: A survey of general surgeons identified using the Ontario College of Physicians and Surgeons database was conducted. Information on basic demographic characteristics, utilization of ERAS and predictors of ERAS implementation was collected. Nine ERAS behaviours were analyzed. Multivariable analysis was used to determine effects of demographic, hospital and surgeon covariates on ERAS utilization. RESULTS: Seven hundred and ninety-seven general surgeons were invited to participate in the survey, and 235 general surgeons representing 84 Ontario hospitals responded (30% response rate). Surgeons practising in academic settings and in large community hospitals represented 30% and 47% of the respondents, respectively. A total of 20% of the respondents used all 9 ERAS behaviours consistently. Rates of diet advancement on postoperative day 0, intravenous fluid restriction and having catheter and line procedures were significantly higher among respondents who adhered to ERAS protocols than among those who did not (74% v. 54%, p = 0.004; 92% v. 80%, p = 0.01; and 91% v. 41%, p < 0.001, respectively). Respondents from academic settings reported practising nearly 1 more ERAS behaviour than those from small community hospitals (odds ratio [OR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42 to 1.31, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that colorectal fellowship training or exposure to ERAS during training did not significantly affect ERAS behaviour utilization (OR 0.32, 95% CI -0.31 to 0.94, p = 0.16; OR 0.28, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.82, p = 0.16, respectively). CONCLUSION: Substantial practice variation in colorectal surgery still exists. Individual ERAS principles are commonly followed; however, ERAS behaviours are not widely formalized into hospital protocols.

CONTEXTE: Les protocoles de récupération optimisée après une chirurgie (ou ERAS, pour enhanced recovery after surgery) utilisent des pratiques périopératoires fondées sur des données probantes pour réduire la morbidité, abréger la durée des séjours hospitaliers et améliorer la satisfaction des patients. Les protocoles ERAS sont considérés comme une norme thérapeutique; toutefois, leur utilisation reste faible et on note une importante variation dans leur application. Le but de cette étude était de caractériser dans les faits les variations des pratiques en chirurgie colorectale et d'identifier les prédicteurs de l'utilisation des protocoles ERAS. MÉTHODES: Un sondage a été effectué auprès des chirurgiens généraux de la base de données du Collège des médecins et chirurgiens de l'Ontario. On a recueilli des données sur les caractéristiques démographiques de base, l'utilisation des protocoles ERAS et les prédicteurs de leur déploiement. Neuf pratiques ERAS ont été analysées. L'analyse multivariée a permis de déterminer les effets des covariables démographiques, hospitalières et celles des chirurgiens sur le recours aux protocoles ERAS. RÉSULTATS: Nous avons invité 797 chirurgiens généraux à participer au sondage, et 235 d'entre eux représentant 84 hôpitaux ontariens y ont répondu (taux de réponse 30 %). Les chirurgiens des établissements universitaires et des grands hôpitaux communautaires ont représenté respectivement 30 % et 47 % des répondants. En tout, 20 % des répondants ont déclaré appliquer les 9 pratiques ERAS de manière constante. L'alimentation précoce au Jour 0 postopératoire, la restriction des liquides intraveineux et les directives concernant les cathéters et les sondes étaient significativement mieux observées chez les répondants qui adhéraient aux protocoles ERAS que chez ceux qui n'y adhéraient pas (74 % c. 54 %, p = 0,004; 92 % c. 80 %, p = 0,01; et 91 % c. 41 %, p < 0,001, respectivement). Les répondants des milieux universitaires ont indiqué appliquer près de 1 comportement ERAS de plus que ceux des petits hôpitaux communautaires (rapport des cotes [RC] 0,86, intervalle de confiance [IC] de 95 % de 0,42 à 1,31, p < 0,001). L'analyse multivariée a démontré que la spécialisation en chirurgie colorectale ou l'exposition aux protocoles ERAS en cours de formation n'ont pas significativement influé sur l'application des pratiques ERAS (RC 0,32, IC de 95 % de ­0,31 à 0,94, p = 0,16; RC 0,28, IC de 95 % de ­0,26 à 0,82, p = 0,16, respectivement). CONCLUSION: On continue d'observer une importante variation des pratiques en chirurgie colorectale. Les principes ERAS individuels sont généralement suivis, mais ils ne sont pas formellement intégrés aux protocoles hospitaliers.

Comparing Rates of Adverse Events and Medical Errors on Inpatient Psychiatric Units at Veterans Health Administration and Community-based General Hospitals.

OBJECTIVE: There is limited knowledge about how general hospitals and Veterans Health Administration (VHA) hospitals fare relative to each other on a broad range of inpatient psychiatry-specific patient safety outcomes.This research compares data from 2 large-scale epidemiological studies of adverse events (AEs) and medical errors (MEs) in inpatient psychiatric units, one in VHA hospitals and the other in community-based general hospitals. METHOD: Retrospective medical record reviews assessed the prevalence of AEs and MEs in a sample of 4371 discharges from 14 community-based general hospitals (derived from 69,081 discharges at 85 hospitals) and a sample of 8005 discharges from 40 VHA hospitals (derived from 92,103 discharges at 105 medical centers). Rates of AEs and MEs across hospital systems were calculated, controlling for relevant patient and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: The overall rate of AEs and MEs in inpatient psychiatric units of VHA hospitals was 7.11 and 1.49 per 100 patient discharges; at community-based acute care hospitals, these rates were 13.48 and 3.01 per 100 patient discharges. The adjusted odds ratio of a patient experiencing an AE and a ME at community-based hospitals as compared with VHA hospitals was 2.11 and 2.08, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although chart reviews may not document the complete nature and outcomes of care, even after controlling for differences in patient and hospital characteristics, psychiatric inpatients at community-based hospitals were twice as likely to experience AEs or MEs as inpatients at VHA hospitals. While community-based hospitals may lag behind VHA hospitals, both hospital systems should continue to pursue evidence-based improvements in patient safety. Future research aimed at changing hospital practices should draw on established strategies for bridging the gap from research to practice in order to improve the quality of care for this vulnerable patient population.