Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 203
Filtrar
Más filtros

Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Z Gastroenterol ; 61(6): 680-682, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36470287

RESUMEN

Obstruction of the colon caused by a fecalith is not a rare condition, but endoscopic attempts at removal of the fecalith are often unsuccessful because of the size of the fecalith and its extremely hard stone-like consistency. We report a case of bowel obstruction of over two weeks' duration caused by a giant colonic fecalith. Conservative treatments including insertion of a gastric tube and enemas failed to resolve the obstruction. After an initial unsuccessful attempt at fecalith removal by colonoscopy using a snare, we successfully resolved the bowel obstruction over the course of subsequent colonoscopies with endoscopic fenestration of the fecalith and placement of a transrectal gastric tube for directed instillation of the enema fluid, and we were able to avoid surgical intervention in this case.


Asunto(s)
Impactación Fecal , Obstrucción Intestinal , Humanos , Impactación Fecal/diagnóstico , Impactación Fecal/diagnóstico por imagen , Obstrucción Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Obstrucción Intestinal/etiología , Colon , Colonoscopía/efectos adversos , Cateterismo/efectos adversos
2.
Pediatr Int ; 64(1): e15171, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35522799

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated the efficacy of ultrasonography (US) and abdominal radiography in assessing bladder and bowel dysfunction in children aged <24 months. We aimed to investigate the association between the risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) recurrence and fecal impaction using imaging findings. METHODS: The medical records of 121 children (aged <24 months) with initial febrile UTI (fUTI) who were admitted to the authors' institution from January 2004 to September 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. We evaluated the rectal diameters of children with suspected fecal impaction that were measured using transabdominal US, or the rectal diameters divided by the distance between the ischial spines that were measured using abdominal radiography. Based on previous reports, we defined fecal impaction as a transabdominal US score of >30 mm or an abdominal radiography score of >0.5. The definition of functional constipation was based on the child/adolescent Rome IV criteria - i.e., a maximum stool frequency of twice per week. RESULTS: The median age at initial fUTI diagnosis was 4 months. The occurrence of fecal impaction identified via imaging was significantly greater in patients with UTI recurrence than in those without recurrence: yes/no: 17/9 (65.4%) versus 35/60 (36.8%); P = 0.013. On the other hand, the occurrence rates of constipation based on stool frequency did not differ between the two groups. In multiple logistic analyses, fecal impaction detected via imaging was identified as an independent risk factor for fUTI recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Fecal impaction observed via US and abdominal radiography may be useful in predicting the recurrence of fUTI in children.


Asunto(s)
Impactación Fecal , Infecciones Urinarias , Adolescente , Niño , Estreñimiento/diagnóstico por imagen , Estreñimiento/epidemiología , Impactación Fecal/diagnóstico , Impactación Fecal/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Recto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Urinarias/complicaciones , Infecciones Urinarias/diagnóstico , Infecciones Urinarias/epidemiología
3.
Dig Dis Sci ; 64(5): 1320-1327, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30535766

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fecal impaction (FI) is defined as a large mass of stool in the rectum and/or colon that is unable to be evacuated. No study to date details demographics and outcomes in a sizeable sample of FI patients in the USA. AIMS: The present study aims to develop knowledge of FI by reporting descriptive measures and outcomes of patients presenting to a US emergency department (ED) with FI. METHODS: Medical charts coded with FI at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center from 2016 or 2017 were identified retrospectively. Patients diagnosed with FI in the ED or subsequent to direct hospital admission from the ED were included. Patient-specific demographics, visit-specific details, medical and medication histories, and hospital treatment and outcome measures were included in a database and analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (mean age of 72.9 years, 62.5% female) had a total of 42 ED visits with FI. Patients had an average of 8.7 diagnoses and 11.2 medications listed in their charts. 54.8% of patients were taking at least one commonly prescribed constipating medication. The median total length of stay for admitted patients was 3 days, with nearly 90% of the ED visits with FI requiring hospital admission. 40.6% of patients experienced serious FI-related morbidities, and 21.9% of patients with FI died in the hospital. CONCLUSION: Patients presenting with FI had high risk of morbidity and mortality, complex medical histories, and large numbers of active treatment regimens. Patients with FI should receive immediate treatment and close monitoring for morbidities and complications.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Impactación Fecal/diagnóstico , Impactación Fecal/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Impactación Fecal/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morbilidad , Mortalidad/tendencias , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr ; 67(5): 570-575, 2018 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29601443

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Guidelines on functional constipation recommend digital rectal examination (DRE) when constipation is doubtful or with a suspicion of organic etiology. The guidelines do not clarify if DRE is mandatory to diagnose impaction. This study aims to determine the frequency of impaction detectable only on DRE among children satisfying Rome III criteria without requiring DRE and also the inter-observer influences on impaction detection by DRE. METHODS: Children between 6 months to 13 years of age, presenting with history suggestive of constipation were assessed. After excluding those with suspicion of organic etiology, those who needed DRE for diagnosis of constipation and those who do not satisfy Rome III criteria without DRE, the rest who satisfied Rome III criteria were assessed for impaction by palpable fecoliths or constipation-associated fecal incontinence. Those without such impaction were randomized to 2 examiners for DRE to diagnose impaction, in the absence of contraindications. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-three children were assessed. One hundred and sixty-nine satisfied Rome III without needing DRE. Forty-eight (28.4%) had impaction detectable without DRE. Among the rest, 28 (30.1%) had impaction by DRE. There was no difference between the frequency of impaction detected by the 2 examiners. Clinical characteristics were similar (P > 0.05) between those with impaction detectable by DRE and those without. CONCLUSIONS: DRE does detect cases of impaction not discernible by other means. Such a finding may be comparable between examiners. These children may be identified by other clinical characteristics. The clinical significance of such a finding needs more understanding from the standpoint of therapeutic choices.


Asunto(s)
Estreñimiento/diagnóstico , Tacto Rectal/normas , Impactación Fecal/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
5.
Support Care Cancer ; 26(11): 3749-3754, 2018 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29736868

RESUMEN

The assessment of constipation symptoms is based on history and physical examination. However, the experience is highly subjective perhaps explaining why palliative medicine doctors continue to use plain abdominal radiographs as part of routine assessment of constipation. Previous studies have demonstrated poor agreement between clinicians with this work in palliative care, limited further by disparity of clinicians' experience and training. The aim of this work was to explore whether there was less variation in the assessments of faecal shadowing made by more experienced clinicians compared to their less experienced colleagues. This pragmatic study was conducted across six palliative care services in Sydney (NSW, Australia). Doctors of varying clinical experience were asked to independently report their opinions of the amount of shadowing seen on 10 plain abdominal radiographs all taken from cancer patients who self-identified themselves as constipated. There were 46 doctors of varying clinical experience who participated including qualified specialists, doctors in specialist training and lastly, doctors in their second- and third post-graduate years. Poor agreement was seen between the faecal shadowing scores allocated by doctors of similar experience and training (Fleiss's kappa (FK): RMO 0.05; registrar 0.06; specialist 0.11). Further, when the levels of agreement between groups were considered, no statistically significant differences were observed. Although the doctors did not agree on the appearance of the film, the majority felt they were able to extrapolate patients' experiences from the radiograph's appearance. As it remains challenging in palliative care to objectively assess and diagnose constipation by history and imaging, uniform and objective assessment and diagnostic criteria are required. It is likely that any agreed criteria will include a combination of imaging and history. The results suggest the use of radiographs alone to diagnose and assess constipation in palliative care represents low value care.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Estreñimiento/diagnóstico , Impactación Fecal/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos , Médicos , Radiografía Abdominal , Adulto , Australia/epidemiología , Competencia Clínica/normas , Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Estreñimiento/patología , Toma de Decisiones , Impactación Fecal/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Cuidados Paliativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos/normas , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Película para Rayos X
6.
Acta Chir Belg ; 118(2): 110-112, 2018 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28398135

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: We present a first description of faecal impaction (FI) causing occlusion of the pelvic venous system, resulting in a bilateral thrombosis of the external iliac vein. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our 76-year-old female patient was admitted with gradual swelling of both legs. Clinical evaluation revealed a painless abdominal distension and marked bilateral edema of the legs. A computed tomography (CT) scan showed gross dilatation of the colon and rectum, with FI. A short bilateral occlusion of the external iliac vein was seen, with thrombus in both pelvic veins. Doppler ultrasonography confirmed a thrombosis of the external iliac vein and common femoral vein on both sides. RESULTS: A conservative treatment consisting of manual evacuation, enema, laxatives and systemic anticoagulation was successfully applied. CONCLUSIONS: FI represents a common - yet preventable - health problem, mainly in the elderly. This case illustrates a rare complication of FI if left untreated.


Asunto(s)
Impactación Fecal/complicaciones , Vena Ilíaca , Pelvis/irrigación sanguínea , Trombosis de la Vena/etiología , Anciano , Impactación Fecal/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Ultrasonografía Doppler , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico
8.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 17(1): 129, 2017 Nov 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29179680

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Stercoral colitis is a rare inflammatory process involving the colonic wall secondary to fecal impaction with high morbidity and mortality; especially if complicated with ischemic colitis, stercoral ulcer formation and subsequent perforation. There are several case reports published on abdominal perforation resulting from stercoral colitis. However, stercoral colitis complicated by ischemic colitis is rare. The purpose of this case report is to describe the potential challenges in the diagnosis and management of stercoral colitis with ischemic colitis. CASE PRESENTATION: An 87 years old male with history of chronic constipation presents with severe abdominal pain to the emergency department. The patient was hemodynamically stable. On physical examination, the abdomen was mildly distended with moderate tenderness. Lab work was significant for leukocytosis and lactic acidosis. Abdominal CT scan revealed large amount of retained stool in the colon, bowel wall thickening and infiltration of peri-colonic fat, which were suggestive for stercoral colitis. Patient was started on IV fluids and antibiotics. He was given an enema, followed by laxative and manual disimpaction of stool. Colonoscopy was performed and biopsies were obtained. Tissue biopsy was significant for focal active colitis with regenerative glandular changes and neural hyperplasia. CONCLUSION: Elevated lactic acid level secondary to ischemia of the bowel wall with CT scan findings aid in establishing the diagnosis of stercoral colitis complicated with ischemic colitis. Urgent treatment with laxatives and fecal disimpaction is indicated to prevent perforation and peritonitis.


Asunto(s)
Colitis Isquémica/complicaciones , Colitis/complicaciones , Impactación Fecal/complicaciones , Acidosis Láctica/complicaciones , Acidosis Láctica/diagnóstico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biopsia , Colitis/diagnóstico , Colitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Colitis Isquémica/diagnóstico , Colitis Isquémica/tratamiento farmacológico , Colonoscopía , Impactación Fecal/diagnóstico , Impactación Fecal/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Laxativos/uso terapéutico , Leucocitosis/complicaciones , Leucocitosis/diagnóstico , Masculino , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
9.
Age Ageing ; 46(1): 119-124, 2017 01 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28181648

RESUMEN

Background: Faecal impaction (FI) is a common problem in old people living in nursing home. Its prevalence and associated factors remain unknown in the general population. Aim: To evaluate FI prevalence in the Spanish population older than 65 years and to assess the factors associated with it. Methods: A telephone survey was carried out of a Spanish population older than 65 years random sample (N = 1000). FI was assessed using a previously validated questionnaire. Results: A total of 28,128 calls were made; 1,431 subjects were eligible and 1,000 subjects were enrollled, mean aged 74.6 ± 7.3 (65­97); 57.5% were women. At least 53 people reported FI within the past year (5.3% (CI 95%: 3.9­6.7%)). Only 0.03% met criteria for chronic constipation and faecal incontinence. FI-associated factors were constipation, female gender, reduced physical activity, and chronic renal failure (CRF). Conclusion: FI is a prevalent problem in old Spanish population. Constipation and female gender are the main associated factors; low physical activity and CRF appear to play also a significant role. Further studies are required to confirm this association.


Asunto(s)
Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Envejecimiento , Comorbilidad , Estreñimiento/epidemiología , Impactación Fecal/diagnóstico , Impactación Fecal/fisiopatología , Incontinencia Fecal/epidemiología , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Masculino , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Conducta Sedentaria , Factores Sexuales , España/epidemiología
10.
Am J Emerg Med ; 35(10): 1490-1493, 2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28460807

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Constipation is a common cause of abdominal pain in children presenting to the emergency department (ED). The objectives of this study were to determine the diagnostic evaluation undertaken for constipation and to assess the association of the evaluation with final ED disposition. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of children presenting to the pediatric ED of a quaternary care children's hospital with abdominal pain that received a soap suds enema therapy. RESULTS: A total of 512 children were included, 270 (52.7%) were female, and the median age was 8.0 (IQR: 4.0-11.0). One hundred and thirty eight patients (27%) had a digital rectal exam (DRE), 120 (22.8%) had bloodwork performed, 218 (43%) had urinalysis obtained, 397 (77.5%) had abdominal radiographs, 120 (23.4%) had abdominal ultrasounds, and 18 (3.5%) had computed tomography scans. Children who had a DRE had a younger median age (6.0, IQR: 3.0-9.25 vs. 8.0, IQR: 4.0-12.0; p<0.001) and were significantly less likely to have radiologic imaging (OR=0.50, 95% CI 0.32-0.78; p=0.002), but did not have an increased odds of being discharged home. After adjusting for gender, ethnicity, and significant past medical history those with an abdominal radiograph were less likely to be discharged to home (aOR=0.56, 95% CI 0.31-1.01; p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic evaluation of children diagnosed with fecal impaction in the ED varied. Abdominal imaging may be avoided if children receive a DRE. When children presenting to the ED with abdominal pain had an abdominal radiograph, they were more likely to be admitted.


Asunto(s)
Estreñimiento/diagnóstico , Estreñimiento/terapia , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Impactación Fecal/diagnóstico , Impactación Fecal/terapia , Dolor Abdominal/diagnóstico , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Dolor Abdominal/terapia , Niño , Preescolar , Estreñimiento/complicaciones , Tacto Rectal , Enema , Impactación Fecal/complicaciones , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos
11.
Pediatr Int ; 59(4): 462-466, 2017 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27706882

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To assess the usefulness of rectal diameter measurement on ultrasonography as a diagnostic tool for fecal retention in children. METHODS: One hundred children (median age, 5.0 years), consisting of 80 with functional constipation and 20 without constipation, participated in the study. All patients underwent physical examination that included digital rectal examination. Forty-five children underwent ultrasonography in three differential planes: transection above the symphysis; under the ischial spine; and at the bladder neck. The measurement of the rectal diameter at the transection above the symphysis could most easily detect fecal retention and had the closest correlations with retention among the three planes. RESULTS: Rectal diameter was wider at all measuring points (35.2 vs 20.9 mm above the symphysis, P < 0.0001; 35.7 vs 24.0 mm under the ischial spine, P < 0.0001; and 19.4 vs 8.7 mm at the bladder neck, P < 0.0001) in children with fecal retention than in those with no fecal retention. With regard to presence of constipation, children with fecal retention had a wider rectal diameter above the symphysis than those with no fecal retention (children with functional constipation, 35.3 vs 20.0 mm, P < 0.0001; children without constipation: 32.6 vs 14.6 mm, P = 0.0026). The cut-off for the rectal diameter measured above the symphysis to identify fecal retention was 27 mm, with high sensitivity and specificity (95.5% and 94.1%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound rectal diameter measurement can be used to detect fecal retention in children.


Asunto(s)
Estreñimiento/diagnóstico por imagen , Impactación Fecal/diagnóstico por imagen , Recto/diagnóstico por imagen , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Estreñimiento/diagnóstico , Tacto Rectal , Impactación Fecal/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Recto/patología , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Ultrasonografía
12.
Eur J Pediatr ; 175(3): 421-5, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26319009

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a clinico-radiological entity characterized by variable associations of headaches, encephalopathy, seizures, vomiting, visual disturbance, and focal neurological signs. Neuroimaging shows cerebral edema of different patterns, classically involving the parieto-occipital white matter. PRES has been associated with several conditions predominantly hypertension, eclampsia, and immunosuppressive therapy. However, constipation has not been previously described in association with the development of PRES. In this report, we describe an 11-year-old child with history of severe functional constipation who developed PRES, as a consequence of renovascular hypertension from severe fecal impaction. Both hypertension and neurologic dysfunction resolved after resolution of fecal impaction. CONCLUSION: Severe functional constipation is a previously unrecognized cause of severe acute hypertension, resulting in life-threatening neurologic dysfunction. We highlight this unrecognized complication of severe functional constipation with fecal impaction that is potentially preventable if managed appropriately.


Asunto(s)
Estreñimiento/complicaciones , Hipertensión Renovascular/etiología , Polietilenglicoles/uso terapéutico , Síndrome de Leucoencefalopatía Posterior/etiología , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Catárticos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Estreñimiento/diagnóstico , Estreñimiento/tratamiento farmacológico , Impactación Fecal/complicaciones , Impactación Fecal/diagnóstico , Impactación Fecal/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Hipertensión Renovascular/diagnóstico , Hipertensión Renovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Intubación Gastrointestinal , Riñón/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Síndrome de Leucoencefalopatía Posterior/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Leucoencefalopatía Posterior/tratamiento farmacológico
13.
BMC Geriatr ; 16: 4, 2016 Jan 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26754969

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fecal impaction (FI) is a common problem in the elderly and other at-risk groups, such as patients with a neuro-psychiatric disease. It has been associated with medical problems and high morbi-mortality. A systematic review of this topic might be useful to improve the knowledge in this area and helpful to make an appropriate and early diagnosis. METHODS: A PubMed systematic search was performed using relevant keywords. Case reports published in English, Spanish or French till June 2014 were included if they had a diagnosis of FI and a medical complication secondary to it. Each case was classified based on its principal complication. The main objective is to create a classification of FI complications based on published clinical cases. RESULTS: 188 articles met inclusion criteria, comprising 280 clinical cases. Out of the total, 43,5% were over 65 years old, 49% suffered from chronic constipation, 29% had an underlying neuropsychiatric disease and 15% were hospitalised or institutionalised. A total of 346 medical complications secondary to FI were collected. They were divided according to gastrointestinal tract involvement and then classified based on their anatomical and pathophysiological mechanism into three groups: Complications secondary to fecaloma effect on the intestinal wall (73.4%), on the intestinal lumen (14%) and on adjacent structures (12.6%). CONCLUSIONS: FI causes complications that might be fatal. The elderly, underlying neuropsychiatric disease and hospitalised or institutionalised patients integrate the high-risk group in which FI must be suspected. The first FI complications classification is presented to improve the knowledge about this entity.


Asunto(s)
Impactación Fecal , Anciano , Diagnóstico Precoz , Intervención Médica Temprana , Impactación Fecal/complicaciones , Impactación Fecal/diagnóstico , Impactación Fecal/mortalidad , Impactación Fecal/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pronóstico , Medición de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia
15.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 58(10): 994-8, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26347972

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Little is known about how obstructive defecation and colonic inertia symptoms contribute to constipation-related quality of life. OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize the differences in quality of life in patients with severe obstructive defecation and colonic inertia symptoms. DESIGN: This study was a cross-sectional analysis of a prospective database. SETTING: Patients were enrolled at a single tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: We included consecutive adults with severe symptoms of obstructive defecation (n = 115) or colonic inertia (n = 90) as measured by the Constipation Severity Instrument. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, Constipation-Related Quality of Life instrument, Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire, and 12-item Short Form Health Survey. RESULTS: Although physical examination and anorectal physiology testing were similar between groups, patients with severe obstructive defecation symptoms reported worse pain, distress, and constipation-specific quality of life than patients with severe colonic inertia symptoms (all p < 0.001). Specifically, patients with severe obstructive defecation symptoms showed greater quality-of-life impairment related to eating, bathroom habits, and social functioning (all p ≤ 0.01). Furthermore, patients with severe obstructive defecation symptoms had inferior global quality of life on the 12-item Short Form Health Survey physical component score (p = 0.03) and mental component score (p = 0.06). LIMITATIONS: The use of patient self-report instruments resulted in a proportion of patients with incomplete data. CONCLUSION: Quality of life was impaired in both groups of patients; however, patients with severe obstructive defecation symptoms were affected to a significantly greater extent. The fact that there were no differences in objective findings on physical examination or anorectal physiology studies highlights the importance of assessing quality of life during the evaluation and treatment of constipated patients.


Asunto(s)
Estreñimiento , Impactación Fecal , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Adulto , Colon/fisiopatología , Estreñimiento/diagnóstico , Estreñimiento/fisiopatología , Estreñimiento/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Impactación Fecal/diagnóstico , Impactación Fecal/fisiopatología , Impactación Fecal/psicología , Femenino , Motilidad Gastrointestinal , Humanos , Masculino , Diafragma Pélvico/fisiopatología , Estudios Prospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Evaluación de Síntomas/métodos
16.
Georgian Med News ; (240): 11-4, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25879551

RESUMEN

Chronic constipation is a very common complaint at outpatient clinics. It can progress to fecal impaction, and rarely to fecalomas if not managed promptly. Fecaloma is characterized by a hardened large mass of feces frequently localized in sigmoid colon and rectum and is difficult to discharge. Fecaliths, stagnating and hardening by time, may cause intestinal obstruction,ulcer development and colonic wall perforation. We present the case of a 24-year-old woman who admitted to our hospital with complaints of severe constipation with 1 bowel movement every third-fifth day with passage of hard stools only with using laxatives and meteorism. This is a rare case of fecalomas and megacolon, when conservative measures were absolutely ineffective and surgical treatment was needed. Therefore, diagnosis of fecaloma must be considered in patients presenting with chronic constipation and abdominal mass.Further investigations are mandatory to delineate guidelines for clinical management of megacolon especially in women of childbearing age.


Asunto(s)
Estreñimiento/fisiopatología , Impactación Fecal/fisiopatología , Obstrucción Intestinal/fisiopatología , Adulto , Estreñimiento/complicaciones , Impactación Fecal/diagnóstico , Impactación Fecal/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Obstrucción Intestinal/diagnóstico , Obstrucción Intestinal/etiología , Megacolon/fisiopatología , Recto/fisiopatología
17.
Curr Gastroenterol Rep ; 16(9): 404, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25119877

RESUMEN

Fecal impaction (FI) is a common and potentially serious medical condition that occurs in all age groups. Children, incapacitated patients, and the institutionalized elderly are considered the highest at-risk populations. FI usually occurs in the setting of chronic or severe constipation, anatomic anorectal abnormalities, and neurogenic or functional gastrointestinal disorders. Generally, FI is a preventable disorder, and early recognition is important, as it is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and high health care costs. Evaluation with a careful history and physical examination, in conjunction with radiologic imaging, such as an acute abdominal series or computed tomography (CT), is imperative. Prompt identification and treatment minimize the risk of complications attributable to FI, which may include bowel obstruction leading to stercoral ulcer, perforation, peritonitis, or cardiopulmonary collapse with hemodynamic instability. Treatment options include manual fragmentation and extraction of the fecal mass, distal colonic cleansing using enemas and rectal lavage with the aid of a sigmoidoscope, and/or using water-soluble contrast media such as Gastrografin to both identify the extent of the impaction and aid in cleansing and removal. Surgical resection of the involved colon or rectum is reserved for peritonitis resulting from bowel perforation. Since recurrence is common, implementing preventive measures such as increasing daily water and fiber intake, limiting medications that decrease colonic motility, using secretagogues or prokinetic agents, and treating underlying anatomic defects are highly important.


Asunto(s)
Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Impactación Fecal/diagnóstico , Impactación Fecal/terapia , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo
18.
BMC Vet Res ; 10 Suppl 1: S2, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25238179

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Large colon impactions are a common cause of colic in the horse. There are no scientific reports on the clinical presentation, diagnostic tests and treatments used in first opinion practice for large colon impaction cases. The aim of this study was to describe the presentation, diagnostic approach and treatment at the primary assessment of horses with large colon impactions. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively from veterinary practitioners on the primary assessment of equine colic cases over a 12 month period. Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of primary large colon impaction and positive findings on rectal examination. Data recorded for each case included history, signalment, clinical and diagnostic findings, treatment on primary assessment and final case outcome. Case outcomes were categorised into three groups: simple medical (resolved with single treatment), complicated medical (resolved with multiple medical treatments) and critical (required surgery, were euthanased or died). Univariable analysis using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test, Kruskal Wallis with Dunn's post-hoc test and Chi squared analysis were used to compare between different outcome categories. RESULTS: 1032 colic cases were submitted by veterinary practitioners: 120 cases met the inclusion criteria for large colon impaction. Fifty three percent of cases were categorised as simple medical, 36.6% as complicated medical, and 9.2% as critical. Most cases (42.1%) occurred during the winter. Fifty nine percent of horses had had a recent change in management, 43% of horses were not ridden, and 12.5% had a recent / current musculoskeletal injury. Mean heart rate was 43 bpm (range 26-88) and most cases showed mild signs of pain (67.5%) and reduced gut sounds (76%). Heart rate was significantly increased and gut sounds significantly decreased in critical compared to simple medical cases (p<0.05). Fifty different treatment combinations were used, with NSAIDs (93%) and oral fluids (71%) being administered most often. CONCLUSIONS: Large colon impactions typically presented with mild signs of colic; heart rate and gut sounds were the most useful parameters to distinguish between simple and critical cases at the primary assessment. The findings of seasonal incidence and associated management factors are consistent with other studies. Veterinary practitioners currently use a wide range of different treatment combinations for large colon impactions.


Asunto(s)
Cólico/veterinaria , Enfermedades del Colon/veterinaria , Impactación Fecal/veterinaria , Enfermedades de los Caballos/diagnóstico , Veterinarios , Animales , Cólico/diagnóstico , Cólico/terapia , Enfermedades del Colon/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Colon/terapia , Recolección de Datos , Impactación Fecal/diagnóstico , Impactación Fecal/terapia , Enfermedades de los Caballos/terapia , Caballos , Humanos , Estaciones del Año
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA