Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 267
Filtrar
Más filtros

Intervalo de año de publicación
3.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 101: 166-171, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30502361

RESUMEN

On 1 June 2007, the European Commission issued the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) to protect both the environment and human health. We analyzed the impact of REACH in the Italian market considering the presence of chemicals, their diversity, importation and production during the period 2011-2015, with particular attention to products with toxic or explosive properties. There was a reduction of the chemicals on the market, in terms of tons but also the absolute numbers of types of compounds. The production reduction was particularly noticeable for explosive chemicals: -14.7%. CMR products did not show any statistically significant reduction in term of tons: -2.3%.


Asunto(s)
Carcinógenos/provisión & distribución , Industria Química/legislación & jurisprudencia , Sustancias Explosivas/provisión & distribución , Sustancias Peligrosas/provisión & distribución , Mutágenos/provisión & distribución , Industria Química/estadística & datos numéricos , Comercio , Unión Europea , Regulación Gubernamental , Italia
4.
Altern Lab Anim ; 46(6): 347-373, 2018 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30657330

RESUMEN

It has now been 11 years since the EU's new chemicals legislation (Regulation No. 1907/2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals [REACH]) came into force. Two important statements in the REACH Regulation in relation to animal testing and alternatives are: Article 1(1), which states that one of its purposes is to promote alternative methods; and Article 25(1), which states that animal testing should be used as a last resort. This review looks at the mechanisms that were put in place within REACH to achieve these aims and asks, not only if they are being implemented properly, but also if they have been sufficient. Whilst the chemical industry has heavily used data-sharing and read-across, this review concludes that nevertheless over 2.2 million animals have already been used in new tests for REACH registrations. This equates to an annual average of 275,000 animals; 58,000 more per year than the best-case estimate made by the European Commission in 2004. The use of in vitro and (Q)SAR approaches as standalone replacements for animal tests has been relatively low. The levels of funding for research into alternative methods remain low, and there are concerns over the speed of formal adoption of those that have been validated. In addition, there have been issues with the recognition that testing as a last resort and the promotion of alternative methods applies to all parties, including the Commission, Member States and the agency responsible, the European Chemicals Agency. This review provides ten recommendations for better implementation of these two key aspirations, as well as lessons to be learned for future similar legislation.


Asunto(s)
Alternativas a las Pruebas en Animales/ética , Alternativas a las Pruebas en Animales/legislación & jurisprudencia , Industria Química , Pruebas de Toxicidad , Alternativas a las Pruebas en Animales/normas , Bienestar del Animal/normas , Bienestar del Animal/tendencias , Animales , Industria Química/ética , Industria Química/legislación & jurisprudencia , Industria Química/normas , Unión Europea , Investigación , Medición de Riesgo , Pruebas de Toxicidad/ética , Pruebas de Toxicidad/normas
8.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 110(21): 8375-80, 2013 May 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23671096

RESUMEN

Synthetic nitrogen (N) fertilizer has played a key role in enhancing food production and keeping half of the world's population adequately fed. However, decades of N fertilizer overuse in many parts of the world have contributed to soil, water, and air pollution; reducing excessive N losses and emissions is a central environmental challenge in the 21st century. China's participation is essential to global efforts in reducing N-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions because China is the largest producer and consumer of fertilizer N. To evaluate the impact of China's use of N fertilizer, we quantify the carbon footprint of China's N fertilizer production and consumption chain using life cycle analysis. For every ton of N fertilizer manufactured and used, 13.5 tons of CO2-equivalent (eq) (t CO2-eq) is emitted, compared with 9.7 t CO2-eq in Europe. Emissions in China tripled from 1980 [131 terrogram (Tg) of CO2-eq (Tg CO2-eq)] to 2010 (452 Tg CO2-eq). N fertilizer-related emissions constitute about 7% of GHG emissions from the entire Chinese economy and exceed soil carbon gain resulting from N fertilizer use by several-fold. We identified potential emission reductions by comparing prevailing technologies and management practices in China with more advanced options worldwide. Mitigation opportunities include improving methane recovery during coal mining, enhancing energy efficiency in fertilizer manufacture, and minimizing N overuse in field-level crop production. We find that use of advanced technologies could cut N fertilizer-related emissions by 20-63%, amounting to 102-357 Tg CO2-eq annually. Such reduction would decrease China's total GHG emissions by 2-6%, which is significant on a global scale.


Asunto(s)
Huella de Carbono , Industria Química/métodos , Industria Química/tendencias , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales/métodos , Fertilizantes , Efecto Invernadero/prevención & control , Nitrógeno , Industria Química/economía , Industria Química/legislación & jurisprudencia , China , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales/economía , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales/tendencias
9.
Med Confl Surviv ; 32(2): 138-152, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27748632

RESUMEN

Attempts through the US courts to hold the corporations responsible for the production of dioxin-contaminated herbicides used by the US military in the 1960s and early 1970s liable for their ongoing health consequences have failed. This article scrutinizes the most recent judgement - that of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York handed down in 2005 following a lawsuit brought by the Vietnam Association of Victims of Agent Orange/dioxin (VAVA). It is argued that despite this judgement there is the potential to bring a further legal case, with some prospect of success, on the basis of: (i) debatable legal judgements in the 2005 decision; (ii) new scientific evidence on the health effects of exposure to Agent Orange; and (iii) cases brought in other jurisdictions. The article concludes by noting the underfunding of ongoing remediation efforts, especially for the provision of assistance to affected individuals, and argues that it is desirable to oblige the producers of the herbicides to contribute financially to these efforts.


Asunto(s)
Ácido 2,4,5-Triclorofenoxiacético/efectos adversos , Ácido 2,4-Diclorofenoxiacético/efectos adversos , Industria Química/legislación & jurisprudencia , Defoliantes Químicos/efectos adversos , Responsabilidad Legal , Dibenzodioxinas Policloradas/efectos adversos , Agente Naranja , Causalidad , Humanos , Derecho Internacional , Estados Unidos , Veteranos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Guerra de Vietnam
10.
Waste Manag Res ; 34(6): 502-10, 2016 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27118737

RESUMEN

Illegal trade in hazardous waste and harmful chemicals has caused severe damage on human health and the environment, and brought big challenges to countries to meet their commitments to related multilateral environmental agreements. Synergy-building, like organising law enforcement operations, is critical to address illegal trade in waste and chemicals, and further improve the effectiveness of environmental enforcement. This article discusses how and why law enforcement operations can help countries to implement chemical and waste-related multilateral environmental agreements in a more efficient and effective way. The research explores key barriers and factors for organising law enforcement operations, and recommends methods to improve law enforcement operations to address illegal trade in hazardous waste and harmful chemicals.


Asunto(s)
Residuos Peligrosos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Cooperación Internacional , Administración de Residuos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Industria Química/legislación & jurisprudencia , Industria Química/organización & administración , Residuos Electrónicos , Contaminación Ambiental/legislación & jurisprudencia , Contaminación Ambiental/prevención & control , Plaguicidas , Plásticos , Administración de Residuos/economía , Administración de Residuos/métodos
11.
Environ Sci Technol ; 49(2): 742-9, 2015 Jan 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25517452

RESUMEN

To achieve the ultimate goal of sustainable chemicals management policy­the transition to safer chemicals, materials, products, and processes­current chemicals management approaches could benefit from a broader perspective. Starting with considerations of function, rather than characterizing and managing risks associated with a particular chemical, may provide a different, solutions-oriented lens to reduce risk associated with the uses of chemicals. It may also offer an efficient means, complementing existing tools, to reorient chemicals management approaches from time-intensive risk assessment and risk management based on single chemicals to comparative evaluation of the best options to fulfill a specific function. This article describes a functional approach to chemicals management we call "functional substitution" that encourages decision-makers to look beyond chemical by chemical substitution to find a range of alternatives to meet product performance. We define functional substitution, outline a rationale for greater use of this concept when considering risks posed by uses of chemicals, and provide examples of how functional approaches have been applied toward the identification of alternatives. We also discuss next steps for implementing functional substitution in chemical assessment and policy development.


Asunto(s)
Industria Química/normas , Seguridad de Productos para el Consumidor , Sustancias Peligrosas , Industria Química/legislación & jurisprudencia , Industria Química/organización & administración , Contaminación Ambiental/prevención & control , Gobierno Federal , Sustancias Peligrosas/química , Sustancias Peligrosas/provisión & distribución , Formulación de Políticas , Medición de Riesgo , Gestión de Riesgos , Estados Unidos
12.
Ann Occup Hyg ; 59(4): 416-38, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25471229

RESUMEN

The European REACH regulation places responsibility for providing safety information, including derived no-effect levels (DNELs), on chemicals and chemical products on 'industry', i.e. manufacturers and importers. We compared long-term inhalation worker-DNELs (wDNELs) presented by industry with the corresponding Swedish occupational exposure limits (OELs), and for a subset, with wDNELs derived by us. Our wDNELs were derived using toxicological evaluations published by the Swedish Criteria Group and our interpretation of the REACH Guidance. On average, industry's wDNELs were the same as the Swedish OELs (median of wDNEL-OEL ratios: 0.98, n = 235). However, the variation was huge, the extremes being up to 450 times higher, and up to 230 times lower than the corresponding OEL. Nearly one-fifth of the wDNELs were ≥2 times higher and one-third ≥2 times lower than the OEL. No time trend was seen in the wDNEL/OEL ratios, suggesting that older OELs were not systematically higher than the more recent ones. Industry's wDNELs varied widely and were generally higher (median 4.2 times, up to 435 times higher, down to 13 times lower, n = 23) also compared to our wDNELs. Only five industry wDNELs were equal to or lower than ours. The choices of key studies, dose descriptors, and assessment factors all seemed to contribute to the discrepancies. We conclude that although the REACH guidance is detailed, many choices that will influence the wDNEL lack firm instructions. A major problem is that little advice is given on when and how to depart from default assessment factors.


Asunto(s)
Industria Química/legislación & jurisprudencia , Regulación Gubernamental , Exposición por Inhalación , Nivel sin Efectos Adversos Observados , Valores Limites del Umbral , Industria Química/normas , Unión Europea , Sustancias Peligrosas/normas , Humanos , Concentración Máxima Admisible , Exposición Profesional/normas , Salud Laboral/normas , Medición de Riesgo
13.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 71(1): 114-24, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25445002

RESUMEN

The two-generation study (OECD TG 416) is the standard requirement within REACH to test reproductive toxicity effects of chemicals with production volumes >100 tonnes. This test is criticized in terms of scientific relevance and animal welfare. The Extended One Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study (EOGRTS), incorporated into the OECD test guidelines in 2011 (OECD TG 443) has the potential to replace TG 416, while using only one generation of rats and being more informative. However, its regulatory acceptance proved challenging. This article reconstructs the process of regulatory acceptance and use of the EOGRTS and describes drivers and barriers influencing the process. The findings derive from literature research and expert interviews. A distinction is made between three sub-stages; The stage of Formal Incorporation of the EOGRTS into OECD test guidelines was stimulated by retrospective analyses on the value of the second generation (F2), strong EOGRTS advocates, animal welfare concern and changing US and EU chemicals legislation; the stage of Actual Regulatory Acceptance within REACH was challenged by legal factors and ongoing scientific disputes, while the stage of Use by Industry is influenced by uncertainty of registrants about regulatory acceptance, high costs, the risk of false positives and the manageability of the EOGRTS.


Asunto(s)
Industria Química/legislación & jurisprudencia , Regulación Gubernamental , Guías como Asunto , Reproducción/efectos de los fármacos , Pruebas de Toxicidad/métodos , Europa (Continente)
15.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 70(2): 474-81, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25128672

RESUMEN

The REACH Regulation represents a major piece of chemical legislation in the EU and requires manufacturers and importers of chemicals to assess the safety of their substances. The classification of substances for their hazards is one of the crucial elements in this process. We analysed the effect of REACH on classification for human health endpoints by comparing information from REACH registration dossiers with legally binding, harmonised classifications. The analysis included 142 chemicals produced at very high tonnages in the EU, the majority of which have already been assessed in the past. Of 20 substances lacking a harmonised classification, 12 chemicals were classified in REACH registration dossiers. More importantly, 37 substances with harmonised classifications for human health endpoints had stricter classifications in registration dossiers and 29 of these were classified for at least one additional endpoint not covered by the harmonised classification. Substance-specific analyses suggest that one third of these additional endpoints emerged from experimental studies performed to fulfil information requirements under REACH, while two thirds resulted from a new assessment of pre-REACH studies. We conclude that REACH leads to an improved hazard characterisation even for substances with a potentially good data basis.


Asunto(s)
Industria Química/legislación & jurisprudencia , Sustancias Peligrosas/efectos adversos , Sustancias Peligrosas/clasificación , Unión Europea , Humanos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos
16.
Ann Work Expo Health ; 68(6): 557-561, 2024 Jul 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38761129

RESUMEN

In 2006, the revised chemicals management legislation mandated that manufacturers of hazardous chemical substances conduct risk assessments for the entire substance life cycle. Additionally, they must communicate use-specific safe handling advice (exposure scenarios) to their customer, as annex to the Safety Data Sheet (SDS). Despite significant efforts to develop workable solutions for chemical mixtures, this goal has not yet been fully achieved. Therefore, a Cefic research project (LRI B23) was commissioned on how to ensure meaningful health risk communication for workers across supply chains. The research project determined that risk-based safe use advice generated by manufacturers, often does not reach the intended end-user and was seen as not tailored to specific user needs. Recipients of the advice are also not prepared to act based on information developed by suppliers. From an industry perspective, the complexity of supply chains and substance life cycles are considered major barriers for effective safe use communication. Exposure scenarios for substance use in industrial work environments are often perceived as adding little value compared to existing safe use arrangements required by other health, safety, and environmental legislation applicable to employers and duty-holders. To attain meaningful use-specific safe handling advice for workers, including those at non-industrial premises who may benefit most from such advice, knowledge transfer and close collaboration between manufacturers and formulators remain key elements, supported by enhanced regulatory appreciation.


Asunto(s)
Exposición Profesional , Salud Laboral , Humanos , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Salud Laboral/legislación & jurisprudencia , Industria Química/legislación & jurisprudencia , Comunicación , Sustancias Peligrosas , Medición de Riesgo , Europa (Continente)
18.
G Ital Med Lav Ergon ; 35(4): 233-5, 2013.
Artículo en Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24303702

RESUMEN

The European Union adopted regulations (EC) 1907/2006 REACH e (EC)1272/2008 CLP, to manage chemicals. REACH requires for evaluation and management of risks connected to the use of chemical substances, while o CLP provides for the classification, labelling and packagings of dangerous substances and mixtures by implementing in the EU the UN Globally Harmonised System of Classification and Labelling applying the building block approach, that is taking on board the hazard classes and categories which are close to the existing EU system in order to maintain the level of protection of human health and environment. This regulation provides also for the notification of the classification and labelling of substances to the Classification & Labelling Inventory established by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). Some european downstream regulations making reference to the classification criteria, as the health and safety laws at workplace, need to be adapted to these regulations.


Asunto(s)
Industria Química/legislación & jurisprudencia , Industria Química/normas , Unión Europea
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA