RESUMEN
Vascular graft infection (VGI) is one of the most serious complications following arterial reconstructive surgery. VGI has received increasing attention over the past decade, but many questions remain regarding its diagnosis and management. In this review, we describe our approach to VGI through multidisciplinary collaboration and discuss decision-making for challenging presentations. This document will concentrate on VGI that impacts both aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms excluding the ascending thoracic aorta.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Injerto Vascular/efectos adversos , Literatura de Revisión como AsuntoRESUMEN
The optimal treatment of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains uncertain. Patients undergoing debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) receive extended antimicrobial treatment, and some experts leave patients at perceived highest risk of relapse on suppressive antibiotic therapy (SAT). In this narrative review, we synthesize the literature concerning the role of SAT to prevent treatment failure following DAIR, attempting to answer 3 key questions: (1) What factors identify patients at highest risk for treatment failure after DAIR (ie, patients with the greatest potential to benefit from SAT), (2) Does SAT reduce the rate of treatment failure after DAIR, and (3) What are the rates of treatment failure and adverse events necessitating treatment discontinuation in patients receiving SAT? We conclude by proposing risk-benefit stratification criteria to guide use of SAT after DAIR for PJI, informed by the limited available literature.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Infecciosa , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Desbridamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Artritis Infecciosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugíaRESUMEN
Vascular graft infection (VGI) is one of the most serious complications following arterial reconstructive surgery. VGI has received increasing attention over the past decade, but many questions remain regarding its diagnosis and management. In this review, we describe our approach to VGI through multidisciplinary collaboration and discuss decision making for challenging presentations. This review will concentrate on VGI that impacts both aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms excluding the ascending thoracic aorta.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Aneurisma Falso/cirugía , Aneurisma Falso/etiología , Arterias/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The management of prosthetic joint infection usually consists of a combination of surgery and antimicrobial therapy. The appropriate duration of antimicrobial therapy for this indication remains unclear. METHODS: We performed an open-label, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial to compare 6 weeks with 12 weeks of antibiotic therapy in patients with microbiologically confirmed prosthetic joint infection that had been managed with an appropriate surgical procedure. The primary outcome was persistent infection (defined as the persistence or recurrence of infection with the initial causative bacteria, with an antibiotic susceptibility pattern that was phenotypically indistinguishable from that at enrollment) within 2 years after the completion of antibiotic therapy. Noninferiority of 6 weeks of therapy to 12 weeks of therapy would be shown if the upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval for the absolute between-group difference (the value in the 6-week group minus the value in the 12-week group) in the percentage of patients with persistent infection within 2 years was not greater than 10 percentage points. RESULTS: A total of 410 patients from 28 French centers were randomly assigned to receive antibiotic therapy for 6 weeks (205 patients) or for 12 weeks (205 patients). Six patients who withdrew consent were not included in the analysis. In the main analysis, 20 patients who died during follow-up were excluded, and missing outcomes for 6 patients who were lost to follow-up were considered to be persistent infection. Persistent infection occurred in 35 of 193 patients (18.1%) in the 6-week group and in 18 of 191 patients (9.4%) in the 12-week group (risk difference, 8.7 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, 1.8 to 15.6); thus, noninferiority was not shown. Noninferiority was also not shown in the per-protocol and sensitivity analyses. We found no evidence of between-group differences in the percentage of patients with treatment failure due to a new infection, probable treatment failure, or serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with microbiologically confirmed prosthetic joint infections that were managed with standard surgical procedures, antibiotic therapy for 6 weeks was not shown to be noninferior to antibiotic therapy for 12 weeks and resulted in a higher percentage of patients with unfavorable outcomes. (Funded by Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique, French Ministry of Health; DATIPO ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01816009.).
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Prótesis de Cadera/efectos adversos , Prótesis de la Rodilla/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Terapia Combinada , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Insuficiencia del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Infective endocarditis (IE) following cardiac valve surgery is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Data on the impact of iatrogenic healthcare exposures on this risk are sparse. This study aimed to investigate risk factors including healthcare exposures for post open-heart cardiac valve surgery endocarditis (PVE). METHODS: In this population-linkage cohort study, 23,720 patients who had their first cardiac valve surgery between 2001 and 2017 were identified from an Australian state-wide hospital-admission database and followed-up to 31 December 2018. Risk factors for PVE were identified from multivariable Cox regression analysis and verified using a case-crossover design sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: In 23,720 study participants (median age 73, 63% male), the cumulative incidence of PVE 15 years after cardiac valve surgery was 7.8% (95% CI 7.3-8.3%). Thirty-seven percent of PVE was healthcare-associated, which included red cell transfusions (16% of healthcare exposures) and coronary angiograms (7%). The risk of PVE was elevated for 90 days after red cell transfusion (HR = 3.4, 95% CI 2.1-5.4), coronary angiogram (HR = 4.0, 95% CI 2.3-7.0), and healthcare exposures in general (HR = 4.0, 95% CI 3.3-4.8) (all p < 0.001). Sensitivity analysis confirmed red cell transfusion (odds ratio [OR] = 3.9, 95% CI 1.8-8.1) and coronary angiogram (OR = 2.6, 95% CI 1.5-4.6) (both p < 0.001) were associated with PVE. Six-month mortality after PVE was 24% and was higher for healthcare-associated PVE than for non-healthcare-associated PVE (HR = 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.5, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of PVE is significantly higher for 90 days after healthcare exposures and associated with high mortality.
Asunto(s)
Endocarditis , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Cohortes , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Australia/epidemiología , Válvulas Cardíacas , Endocarditis/epidemiología , Endocarditis/etiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Vascular graft and endograft infections (VGEIs) are complicated by high morbidity, mortality, and recurrence rates, notably due to biofilm formation on the graft surface, hardly dislodgeable by the sole anti-infectious treatment. The characteristics of this biofilm are still poorly documented. The aim of this study was to evaluate ex vivo biofilm on removed infected vascular grafts and endografts (VGEs). METHODS: Explanted VGEs were prospectively collected from 2019 to 2022 at Bordeaux University Hospital, France. Two samples per graft were used for scanning electron microscopy imaging; one was sonicated, and both grafts' sides were imaged. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients were included, 18 with VGEI, eight without any infection (endoleak and/or thrombosis), and 29 VGEs were collected. Microbial documentation was obtained in 83% of VGEIs. A thick layer of fibrin was visible on almost all grafts, mixed with a dense biofilm matrix on infected grafts visible as early as 1 month after the onset of infection. Bacteria were not always visualized on infected grafts' surface (80% on outer side and 85% on luminal side) but were surprisingly present on one-third of non-infected grafts. There was no significant difference between biofilm, fibrin, and microorganisms' distribution between the two grafts' sides. However, there were clear differences between infected and non-infected grafts, since immune cells, bacteria and biofilm were more frequently visualized on both sides of infected grafts (P < .05). Bacteria and immune cells although still visible, were significantly less present after sonication; the number of other elements including biofilm was not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: The persistence of a thick layer of fibrin and biofilm embedding microorganisms on both sides of infected VGE even after 1 month of infection could be the explanation for the low success rates of conservative management and the usual need for graft removal to treat VGEIs.
Asunto(s)
Biopelículas , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Prótesis Vascular , Microscopía Electrónica de Rastreo , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Biopelículas/crecimiento & desarrollo , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Remoción de Dispositivos , Francia , Factores de Tiempo , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bacterias/aislamiento & purificaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Infected native aneurysms (INAs) of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries are uncommon, but potentially fatal. Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has recently been introduced as a durable treatment option, with outcomes comparable to those yielded by conventional open repair. However, owing to the rarity of the disease, the strengths and limitations of each treatment remain uncertain. The present study aimed to separately assess post-open repair and post-EVAR outcomes and to clarify factors affecting the short-term and late prognosis after each treatment. METHODS: Using a nationwide clinical registry, we investigated 600 patients treated with open repair and 226 patients treated with EVAR for INAs of the abdominal aorta and/or common iliac artery. The relationships between preoperative or operative factors and postoperative outcomes, including 90-day and 3-year mortality and persistent or recurrent aneurysm-related infection, were examined. RESULTS: Prosthetic grafts were used in >90% of patients treated with open repair, and in situ and extra-anatomic arterial reconstruction was performed in 539 and 57 patients, respectively. Preoperative anemia and imaging findings suggestive of aneurysm-enteric fistula were independently associated with poor outcomes in terms of both 3-year mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-2.62; P = .046, and HR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.12-4.46; P = .022, respectively) and persistent or recurrent infection (odds ratio [OR], 2.16; 95% CI, 1.04-4.49; P = .039, and OR, 4.96; 95% CI, 1.81-13.55; P = .002, respectively) after open repair, whereas omental wrapping or packing and antibiotic impregnation of the prosthetic graft for in situ reconstruction contributed to improved 3-year survival (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.39-0.92; P = .019, and HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32-0.88; P = .014, respectively). Among patients treated with EVAR, abscess formation adjacent to the aneurysm was significantly associated with the occurrence of persistent or recurrent infection (OR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.06-4.72; P = .034), whereas an elevated preoperative white blood cell count was predictive of 3-year mortality (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.00-3.13; P = .048). CONCLUSIONS: Profiles of prognostic factors differed between open repair and EVAR in the treatment of INAs of the abdominal aorta and common iliac artery. Open repair may be more suitable than EVAR for patients with concurrent abscess formation.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Infectado , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Aneurisma Ilíaco , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Masculino , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Anciano , Aneurisma Ilíaco/cirugía , Aneurisma Ilíaco/mortalidad , Aneurisma Ilíaco/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma Ilíaco/microbiología , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Aneurisma Infectado/cirugía , Aneurisma Infectado/microbiología , Aneurisma Infectado/mortalidad , Aneurisma Infectado/diagnóstico por imagen , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/mortalidad , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Recurrencia , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Right-side infective endocarditis (RSIE) is caused by microorganisms and develops into intracardiac and extracardiac complications with high in-hospital and 1-year mortality. Treatments involve antibiotic and surgical intervention. However, those presenting with extremes e.g. heart failure, or septic shock who are not ideal candidates for conventional medical therapy might benefit from minimally invasive procedures. OBJECTIVE: This review summarizes existing observational studies that reported minimally invasive procedures to debulk vegetation due to infective endocarditis either on valve or cardiac implantable electronic devices. METHODS: A targeted literature review was conducted to identify studies published in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Database from January 1, 2015 to June 5, 2023. The efficacy and/or effectiveness of minimally invasive procedural interventions to debulk vegetation due to RSIE were summarized following PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies with 208 RSIE patients were included. There were 9 studies that assessed the effectiveness of the AngioVac system and 2 assessed the Penumbra system. Overall procedure success rate was 87.9%. Among 8 studies that reported index hospitalization, 4 studies reported no death, while the other 4 studies reported 10 deaths. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that multiple systems can provide minimally invasive procedure options for patients with RSIE with high procedural success. However, there are mixed results regarding complications and mortality rates. Further large cohort studies or randomized clinical trials are warranted to assess and/or compare the efficacy and safety of these systems.
Asunto(s)
Endocarditis Bacteriana , Humanos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentación , Cateterismo Cardíaco/mortalidad , Endocarditis/cirugía , Endocarditis/mortalidad , Endocarditis Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Endocarditis Bacteriana/mortalidad , Endocarditis Bacteriana/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/mortalidad , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/mortalidad , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study examines outcome and durability of physician made bovine pericardial tube grafts in aortic infections in all anatomical locations. METHODS: This was a retrospective and prospective international multicentre study. Peri-operative and long term outcomes of patients undergoing in situ aortic reconstruction for native or graft infections with physician made bovine pericardial tube grafts between January 2008 and December 2020 in four European tertiary referral centres were analysed. The primary endpoint was recurrent aortic infection. Secondary endpoints were persistent infection, aortic re-operation for infection, graft related complications, and death. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty eight patients (77% male, mean age 67 ± 11 years) were identified: 38 (23%) with native and 130 (77%) with aortic graft infection. The thirty day mortality rate was 15% (n = 26) overall, 11% (n = 4), and 17% (n = 22) for native and aortic graft infections, respectively (p = .45). Median follow up was 26 months (interquartile range [IQR] 10, 51). Estimated survival at one, two, three, and five years was 64%, 60%, 57%, and 50%, and significantly better for native (81%, 77%, 77%, and 69%) than for graft infections (58%, 55%, 51%, and 44%; p = .011). Nine patients (5.3%) had persistent infection and 10 patients (6%) had aortic re-infection after a median of 10 months (IQR 5, 22), resulting in an estimated freedom from re-infection at one, two, three, and five years of 94%, 92%, 90%, and 86%. Estimated freedom from graft complications at one, two, three, and five years was 91%, 89%, 87%, and 87%. CONCLUSION: This multicentre study demonstrates low re-infection rates when using physician made bovine pericardial tube grafts, comparable to those of other biological grafts. The rate of graft complications, mainly anastomotic aneurysms and stenoses, was low, while graft degeneration was absent. Physician made bovine pericardial tube grafts are an excellent tool for in situ reconstruction in the setting of native aortic infection or aortic graft infection.
Asunto(s)
Bioprótesis , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Prótesis Vascular , Pericardio , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Reoperación , Humanos , Masculino , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/mortalidad , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Anciano , Femenino , Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Bovinos , Pericardio/trasplante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Europa (Continente) , Bioprótesis/efectos adversos , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Prospectivos , Animales , Resultado del Tratamiento , Recurrencia , Diseño de Prótesis , Aorta/cirugía , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
AIMS: Debulking of infective mass to reduce the burden if infective material is a fundamental principle in the surgical management of infection. The aim of this study was to investigate the validity of this principle in patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction in the context of bloodstream infection (BSI). METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed an observational single-centre study on patients that underwent transvenous lead extraction due to a BSI, with or without lead-associated vegetations, in combination with a percutaneous aspiration system during the study period 2015-22. One hundred thirty-seven patients were included in the final analysis. In patients with an active BSI at the time of intervention, the use of a percutaneous aspiration system had a significant impact on survival (log-rank: P = 0.0082), while for patients with a suppressed BSI at the time of intervention, the use of a percutaneous aspiration system had no significant impact on survival (log-rank: P = 0.25). CONCLUSION: A reduction of the infective burden by percutaneous debulking of lead vegetations might improve survival in patients with an active BSI.
Asunto(s)
Remoción de Dispositivos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Remoción de Dispositivos/métodos , Anciano , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Desfibriladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Succión , Marcapaso Artificial/efectos adversos , Marcapaso Artificial/microbiología , Endocarditis Bacteriana/cirugía , Endocarditis Bacteriana/microbiología , Endocarditis Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Endocarditis Bacteriana/mortalidad , Endocarditis Bacteriana/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Factores de Riesgo , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
BACKGOUND: Infections of the left ventricular assist device (LVAD) driveline are a dreaded complication that results in high mortality and morbidity. METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed five consecutive patients with severe continuous-flow LVAD (HVAD, Heartmate 2, and Heartmate 3) driveline infection. These infections, which developed on an average of 960.4 ± 843.9 days after LVAD placement, were refractory to systemic antibiotics and local wound care. All were treated with extensive surgical debridement, local installation of absorbable antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate beads (vancomycin and tobramycin), primary wound closure, and 6 weeks of systemic antibiotics after surgery. RESULTS: Four patients had resolution of DLI, and one had a recurrent infection at another part of the driveline 7 months after the complete resolution of the previous site. This patient was successfully treated with debridement and bead placements. Three patients still have their LVADs, while two received orthotopic heart transplants. At the time of the transplant, there was no evidence of gross infection of the LVAD drivelines or pumps. At the average follow-up time of 425.8 ± 151 days, no patients have an active infection. CONCLUSION: Treatment of LVAD driveline infection with absorbable antibiotic beads with primary wound closure is a viable option and merits further investigation.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Corazón Auxiliar , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Corazón Auxiliar/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Vancomicina , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the eventual added benefit of antigranulocyte monoclonal antibodies scintigraphy for the diagnostic imaging of aortic graft infection (AGI) and its role in evaluation of treatment outcome. METHODS: A population-based, retrospective, register-based analysis was carried out of all patients with infected aortic grafts after treatment for aneurysmal or aortoiliac occlusive disease at Karolinska University Hospital, covering the greater Stockholm area during November 2012-December 2020. Cases were based on the definitions in the 2016 Management of Aortic Graft Infection Collaborations consensus. Using the in-hospital electronic patient registry (Take Care®) and the Swedish National Registry for Vascular Surgery (Swedvasc), 835 patients who had been treated for aortic aneurysms or aortoiliac occlusive disease were identified. The diagnostic arsenal of laboratory tests, computed tomography (CT), and clinical signs has been supplemented by antigranulocyte monoclonal antibodies (anti-G mAb) scintigraphy. Data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics. RESULTS: Eighteen cases of AGI out of 835 operations incorporating aortic grafts during the period were identified. Fourteen patients (78%) were categorized as diagnosed AGI (AGI-D), and the remaining 4 (22%) were classified as suspected AGI (AGI-S). In the AGI-D group (n = 14), 10 patients (71%) had positive CTs and 4 (29%) had low-probability CTs. In the group of 10 positive CTs, 9 patients also had positive scintigraphy scans with only one negative scintigraphy scan. There were no negative scintigraphy scans without ongoing antibiotic treatment at the time of investigation. In 15 of 18 cases, a culprit agent was identified, either preoperatively or perioperatively. Thirteen of the 18 patients were treated solely by antibiotics, whereas 5 underwent surgical treatment in addition to antibiotic treatment. The outcome has been divided into 3 groups: infection-free (n = 6; 33%), lifelong antibiotic treatment (n = 7; 39%), and deceased (n = 5; 28%). CONCLUSIONS: The imaging modalities in AGI diagnostics are a cornerstone of the investigative work-up, complemented by clinical signs and laboratory methods. The main advantage conveyed by anti-G mAb scintigraphy is in postoperative imaging and its ability to differentiate between infection and general postoperative changes in the areas of concern. We have identified 6 patients in our cohort in whom antibiotic therapy was discontinued after a negative anti-G mAb scintigraphy scan. Anti-G mAb scintigraphy may fulfill a unique need for diagnosis in suspected cases, evaluation of therapeutic efficacy in patients requiring long-term antibiotic treatment, and aiding in the decision to discontinue antibiotic therapy.
Asunto(s)
Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/métodos , Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico por imagen , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cintigrafía , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Infected aortic grafts and mycotic aneurysms represent one of the most complex challenges faced by vascular surgeons. Treatment has progressed from extra-anatomical bypass to in situ reconstruction. Additionally, bovine pericardium reconstruction (BPR) has increased, due to accessibility and reduced lower limb morbidity. There remains, however, limited evidence for its use. The aim is to pool all known data to understand outcomes following BPR of mycotic aneurysms or infected vascular grafts. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in November 2021 with subsequent computerized meta-analysis of the pooled results and a final search in March 2022. Three databases, Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and National Institutes of Health PubMed (PubMed), were searched for the search term "(bovine OR xenoprosthetic) AND (aneurysm)", according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RESULTS: From 9 studies, there were 133 patients: 67% graft infections and 33% mycotic aneurysms. Fifty-seven percent of reconstructions were in the abdominal aorta and 33% were in the thoracic aorta. One hundred fifty-eight pathogens were identified, including Staphylococcus aureus (23%), Candida albicans (13%), and Escherichia coli (13%). In 12%, no microorganisms were identified. Thirty-day mortality was 19.14% (CI 10.83-28.71), late mortality was 19.08% (confidence interval [CI] 7.76-32.83), and overall mortality was 40.20% (CI 29.82-50.97). One patient died intraoperatively. There were a total of 151 in-hospital complications after 30 days postoperation. Common complications were acute renal failure (17%), pneumonia (14%), delirium (12%), respiratory insufficiency (11%) and renal insufficiency (7%). Lower limb ischemia was low, occurring in 5.66% (CI 0.54-13.82) of patients. Loss of graft patency leading to reintervention occurred in 1.20% (CI 0.00-7.71) of the grafts. Reinfection rate was 0.00% (CI 0.00-1.21). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis highlights low reinfection and high graft patency using BPR with medium-length follow-up; however, there remain limited long-term and comparative data regarding options for aortic reconstruction. As expected in this complex cohort, the complication rate and 30-day mortality remain high.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Infectado , Bioprótesis , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Prótesis Vascular , Xenoinjertos , Pericardio , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Aneurisma Infectado/cirugía , Aneurisma Infectado/microbiología , Aneurisma Infectado/mortalidad , Aneurisma Infectado/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Animales , Pericardio/trasplante , Resultado del Tratamiento , Bovinos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/mortalidad , Factores de Riesgo , Masculino , Femenino , Factores de Tiempo , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta/microbiología , Aneurisma de la Aorta/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Medición de Riesgo , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The use of biological grafts provides acceptable mid- and long-term results in native or prosthetic vascular infections. Several reports describe the successful use of bovine pericardium in case of vascular infections, mainly as a large patch to be sutured as a tubular graft. Recently, a novel prefabricated bovine pericardium graft (Biointegral Surgical No-React® Inc, Mississauga, ON, Canada) has been introduced in clinical practice with promising results. In this study, we report our preliminary experience utilizing Biointegral Surgical graft in case of native and or prosthetic aorto-iliac and infrainguinal infection. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 20 patients with native or prosthetic aorto-iliac and infrainguinal infection who underwent in situ reconstruction (ISR) with a Biointegral Surgical No-React bovine pericardium prosthesis between October 2020 and February 2023 at the Vascular Surgery Unit of the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Gemelli - IRCCS in Rome, Italy. All patients followed a standardized protocol including postoperative anticoagulation and long-term intravenous antibiotics. RESULTS: The indication for surgery was: mycotic aortic aneurysm in 4 patients (20%), graft infection after abdominal aortic repair in 11 patients (55%), peripheral graft infection in 5 patients (25%). Complete excision of the infected aorta or prosthetic graft, surgical debridement and ISR were performed in all patients. Hospital mortality rate was 5% (n = 1) and graft-related mortality of 0%. During follow-up (median 13 months, range 6-34 months), reinfection was 5.2% and primary graft patency 94.7%. CONCLUSIONS: The use of prefabricated bovine pericardial grafts represents a promising option for the treatment of native and prosthetic aorto-iliac and infrainguinal infections. The application of this biological graft with a standardized postoperative protocol has been associated with a satisfactory patency and reinfection rate without increased bleeding complications.
Asunto(s)
Bioprótesis , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Prótesis Vascular , Pericardio , Diseño de Prótesis , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/mortalidad , Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pericardio/trasplante , Masculino , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Animales , Bovinos , Factores de Tiempo , Xenoinjertos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Arteria Ilíaca/cirugía , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Factores de Riesgo , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Aneurisma Infectado/cirugía , Aneurisma Infectado/microbiología , Aneurisma Infectado/mortalidad , Aneurisma Infectado/diagnóstico por imagen , ReoperaciónRESUMEN
Groin wound dehiscence and infection are a common complication of femoral artery exposure. In patients with prosthetic conduits placed in the groin, these complications can lead to graft infection or anastomotic dehiscence with hemorrhage. Sartorius flaps can be useful in preventing graft infections or anastomotic breakdown in the setting of wound infections. Prophylactic sartorius flaps have been suggested to be a useful adjunct in patients who are at high risk for groin complications. Standard sartorius flaps can be difficult to perform and increase the operative time. We present our experience with a modified sartorius flap, a Transversely Hemisected Sartorius (THT), which avoids dissection to the anterior superior iliac spine. Patients who received femoral artery exposure and a modified prophylactic sartorius flap were included in this case series. The Penn Groin Assessment Scale (PGAS) was calculated for each patient and our primary outcome was the rate of deep space wound infections. Fifteen patients received a THT muscle flap. The average age of the cohort was 67.5 (35-86) years. Eight (50%) were male. The mean PGAS was 2.5 (0-6). Eight (50%) groins had a prosthetic conduit underlying the flap. Four (25%) patients had infrainguinal bypass, 3 (18.8%) for femoral-femoral bypass, and 1 (6.3%) patient received aortic-bifemoral bypass. Eight (50%) patients received sartorius flap after femoral artery exposure for thromboembolectomy, endarterectomy, or access complications. Six (37.5%) patients developed superficial surgical site infections however no deep space infections or prosthetic graft excisions resulted. This procedure was effective in preventing graft infections in all patients with high-risk features for groin infection in our retrospective case series. The segmental blood supply is maintained while providing good coverage of the femoral vessels with this rotational flap.
Asunto(s)
Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Arteria Femoral , Ingle , Colgajos Quirúrgicos , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Ingle/irrigación sanguínea , Ingle/cirugía , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Arteria Femoral/cirugía , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Colgajos Quirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/cirugía , Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Dehiscencia de la Herida Operatoria/prevención & control , Dehiscencia de la Herida Operatoria/etiología , Dehiscencia de la Herida Operatoria/cirugía , Factores de Tiempo , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/prevención & control , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Músculo Esquelético/irrigación sanguíneaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The question of whether dental procedures increase the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients who have undergone total joint arthroplasty (TJA) remains controversial. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Are dental procedures associated with an increased incidence of PJI in the setting of either primary or revision TKA after controlling for relevant potentially confounding variables? (2) Is the administration of prophylactic antibiotics before dental procedures associated with any differences in this risk? (3) Which factors are associated with increased incidence of PJI after dental procedures? METHODS: This nationwide, retrospective, comparative, large-database study evaluated 591,602 patients who underwent unilateral primary or revision TKA between 2009 and 2019 using the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service data in South Korea, in which all people in South Korea were registered and to which all medical institutions must charge any procedures they performed. The study population was divided into 530,156 patients with dental procedures and 61,446 patients without dental procedures based on whether the patients underwent a dental procedure at least 1 year after the index surgery. After propensity score matching, patients were classified into a dental (n = 182,052) and a nondental cohort (n = 61,422). The dental cohort was then divided into two groups: 66,303 patients with prophylactic antibiotics and 115,749 patients without prophylactic antibiotics based on prophylactic antibiotic use. After propensity score matching, patients were categorized into prophylactic (n = 66,277) and nonprophylactic (n = 66,277) cohorts. Propensity score matching was used to control for covariates including posttraumatic arthritis associated with PJI risk according to the dental procedure and prophylactic antibiotic use among the cohorts. After propensity score matching, the standardized mean difference was confirmed to be less than 0.1 for all variables. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: Dental procedures were not associated with an increase in PJI risk after primary (adjusted HR 1.56 [95% CI 0.30 to 8.15]; p = 0.60) or revision TKA (adjusted HR 1.74 [95% CI 0.90 to 3.34]; p = 0.10). Additionally, use of prophylactic antibiotics was not associated with a reduced PJI risk after the index surgery, either for primary (adjusted HR 1.28 [95% CI 0.30 to 5.42]; p = 0.74) or revision TKA (adjusted HR 0.74 [95% CI 0.45 to 1.23]; p = 0.25). Although surgery type and prophylactic antibiotic use exhibited no influence on PJI occurrence after dental procedures, posttraumatic arthritis was associated with PJI. The adjusted HR for posttraumatic arthritis was 4.54 (p = 0.046). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that dental procedures were not associated with an increased risk of PJI for up to 2 years after the dental procedure in patients who underwent either primary or revision TKA. Based on these findings, there is insufficient rationale for the use of prophylactic antibiotics before dental procedures in patients who have undergone primary or revision TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Infecciosa , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Puntaje de Propensión , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Artritis Infecciosa/etiología , Odontología , Reoperación/efectos adversos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a major challenge in clinical practice. The role of neutrophils in fighting infection has been increasingly understood, and one mechanism of action of these cells is neutrophil extracellular traps. However, little is known about this process in PJI. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Are the biomarkers of neutrophil extracellular trap formation (citrullinated histone H3 [H3Cit], cell-free DNA [cf-DNA], and myeloperoxidase [MPO]) increased in the synovial fluid of patients with PJI? (2) What is the diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers of neutrophil extracellular trap formation for PJI? METHODS: Between May 2020 and March 2021, 43 patients who underwent revision THA or TKA were enrolled in this study. Eleven patients were excluded and 32 patients were categorized into the PJI group (n = 16) or non-PJI group (n = 16) according to the 2018 Second International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection criteria. There were 15 men and 17 women in this study, with a median (range) age of 70 years (60 to 80 years). Twenty-seven patients had TKA and five had THA. We measured cf-DNA, MPO, and H3Cit in synovial fluid. The sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated for each biomarker using the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria as the gold standard for diagnosis and considering a clinical surveillance of 2 years for patients in the non-PJI group. RESULTS: Patients with PJI had higher levels of synovial fluid cf-DNA (median [range] 130 ng/µL [18 to 179] versus 2 ng/µL [0 to 6]; p < 0.001), MPO (1436 ng/µL [55 to 3996] versus 0 ng/µL [0 to 393]; p < 0.001), and H3Cit (2115 ng/µL [5 to 2885] versus 3 ng/µL [0 to 87]; p < 0.001) than those in the non-PJI group. In receiver operating characteristic curve analyses, we observed near-perfect performance for all biomarkers evaluated, with an area under the curve of 1 (95% CI 0.9 to 1), 0.98 (95% CI 0.9 to 1), and 0.94 (95% CI 0.8 to 0.99) for cf-DNA, MPO, and H3Cit, respectively. The sensitivity for detecting PJI using synovial fluid was 100% for cf-DNA, 94% for MPO, and 88% for H3Cit. The specificity was 100% for cf-DNA and MPO, and 88% for H3Cit. CONCLUSION: Our results show that neutrophils in the periprosthetic microenvironment release neutrophil extracellular traps as part of the bactericidal arsenal to fight infection. These results allow a better understanding of the cellular and molecular processes that occur in this microenvironment, enabling the design of more assertive strategies for identifying new biomarkers and improving the available ones. Novel studies are needed to define whether and how neutrophil extracellular trap-related biomarkers can be useful for diagnosing PJI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, diagnostic study.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Infecciosa , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Trampas Extracelulares , Prótesis de la Rodilla , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/métodos , Trampas Extracelulares/química , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Prótesis de la Rodilla/efectos adversos , Líquido Sinovial/química , Biomarcadores/análisis , Artritis Infecciosa/diagnóstico , ADN , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a severe complication of joint arthroplasty that causes significant pain and economic loss. This study aimed to determine whether the current evidence supports single-stage revision for PJI based on reinfection and reoperation rates. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, EBSCO, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to 30 May 2023 to identify studies that compared single-stage revision and two-stage revision for PJI. Data on reinfection and reoperation rates were pooled. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included a total of 40 studies with 8711 patients. Overall, there was no significant difference between single- and two-stage revision regarding the postoperative reinfection rate and reoperation rate. Subgroup analysis by surgery period and different surgical sites revealed no difference between the two groups in the reinfection and reoperation rates. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the available evidence, our study did not identify a significant difference in reinfection and reoperation rates between single- and two-stage revision for PJI. Given the limitations in inclusion/exclusion criteria and the observed heterogeneity, we acknowledge the complexity of drawing strong conclusions. Therefore, we suggest that the choice between single- and two-stage revision should be carefully considered on an individual basis, taking into account patient-specific factors and further research developments.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Reoperación , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Reinfección , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic values of serum platelet count (PC), mean platelet volume ratio (MPV), platelet count to mean platelet volume ratio (PVR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), platelet to neutrophil ratio (PNR), PC/Albumin-globulin ratio (PC/AGR), and PC/C-reactive protein (PC/ CRP) in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). METHODS: The medical records were retrospectively analyzed of the 158 patients who had undergone hip or knee revisions from January 2018 to May 2022. Of them, 79 cases were diagnosed with PJI and 79 with aseptic loosening (AL). PJI was defined using the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. The plasma levels of CRP, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), PC, MPV, PVR, PLR, PNR, PC/AGR, and PC/CRP in the 2 groups were recorded and analyzed. In addition, tests were performed according to different joint types. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of each indicator. The diagnostic value for each indicator was calculated according to the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: The PC, PVR, PLR and PC/AGR levels in the PJI group were significantly higher than those in the AL group, while PC/CRP levels were significantly lower (P < 0.001). The AUC for PC/CRP, and PC/AGR was 0.804 and 0.802, respectively, which were slightly lower than that of CRP (0.826) and ESR (0.846). ROC analysis for PC/CRP, and PC/AGR revealed a cut-off value of 37.80 and 160.63, respectively, which provided a sensitivity of 73.42% and 84.81% and a specificity of 75.95% and 65.82% for PJI. The area under the curve of PLR and PC was 0.738 and 0.702. The area under the curve values for PVR, PNR, and MPV were 0.672, 0.553, and 0.544, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that PC, PLR, PC/CRP, and PC/AGR values do not offer significant advantages over ESR or CRP values when employed for the diagnosis of PJI. PVR, PNR, and MPV were not reliable in the diagnosis of PJI.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Infecciosa , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Biomarcadores , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Artritis Infecciosa/cirugía , Sedimentación SanguíneaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The optimal timing for reimplantation for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has not been established and varies from a few weeks to several months. The aim of this study was to assess the commendable time between implant removal and reimplantation in patients who underwent two-stage exchange arthroplasty for PJI. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 361 patients who were treated with two-stage exchange arthroplasty for hip and knee chronic PJI at our institution between January 2000 and December 2018. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, surgical variables, microbiology data, and time to reimplantation were recorded. All patients were followed for a minimum of one year. Treatment failure was defined by Delphi criteria. Logistic regression analyses were used to calculate survival rates and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of treatment failure. RESULTS: In final analysis, 27 (7.5%) had treatment failure. Factors related to treatment failure including interim spacer exchange (OR, 3.13; confidence interval (CI), 1.04-9.09, p = 0.036), higher ESR level at reimplantation (OR, 1.85; CI, 1.05-3.57; p = 0.04), and time to reimplantation (OR, 1.00; CI, 1.003-1.005, p = 0.04). Performing revision arthroplasty surgery from 16 to 20 weeks had highest successful rate. The reimplantation over 24 weeks had a lower successful rate. However, no statistical significance in comparing each interval group. CONCLUSION: Our study emphasized the importance of timely reimplantation in achieving successful outcomes. Factors such as ESR levels, spacer exchange, and the duration of time to reimplantation influenced the likelihood of treatment failure in two-stage exchange arthroplasty for hip and knee PJI.