Treating cancerous large airway stenosis with staging radioactive particle implantation guided by computed tomography and fiber bronchoscopy: a clinical study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical effectiveness of staging radioactive particle implantation guided by computed tomography (CT) and fiber-optic bronchoscopy in treating cancerous large airway stenosis. METHODS: A total of 102 patients were included; 57 had undergone staging radioactive particle implantation guided by CT and fiber bronchoscopy and 45 did not. Patients were evaluated by CT and fiber-optic bronchoscopy to determine the feasibility of the implantation of radioactive seeds for the treatment of cancerous large airway stenosis. The treatment planning system (TPS) was used to plan the doses. Radioactive seeds were implanted using fiber-optic bronchoscopy. One week later, CT-guided implantation of radioactive seeds was performed. RESULTS: The clinical evaluation showed complete, partial, slight, and non-response in 38, 14, 5, and 0 patients, respectively. None of the patients were found with serious complications. The diameter of the affected airway, Karnofsky score, dyspnea index, survival, and quality of life of the patients in both groups was significantly higher and significantly different after the treatment (P < 0.05). The dyspnea index was significantly lower in the treatment group as compared with the control group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: CT- and fiber bronchoscopy-guided staging radioactive particle implantation has definite treatment effectiveness in treating cancerous large airway stenosis. It should be widely used in clinical practices.

Ablative therapies for central airway obstruction.

Central airway obstruction (CAO) is seen in malignant and nonmalignant airway disorders and can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Endobronchial ablative therapies are used in conjunction with mechanical debridement to achieve hemostasis and restore airway patency. These therapies can be classified into modalities with immediate or delayed effect. Therapies with immediate effect include heat therapies (such as electrocautery, argon plasma coagulation, and laser) and cryorecanalization using a cryoprobe for tissue extraction. These modalities can be used in severe CAO for immediate relief of obstruction. Therapies with delayed effect include cryotherapy, brachytherapy, and photodynamic therapy. These modalities should not be used for acutely symptomatic CAO, and typically require follow-up bronchoscopy for removal of debris from the airway. Multimodality approach typically leads to better outcomes.

A narrative review of oncologic emergencies in patients with head and neck cancers: initial management and the role of radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Head and neck cancers (HNCs) encompass a complex group of malignancies with high morbidity, often leading to critical emergencies such as pain crises, airway obstruction and hemorrhage. This review aims to outline an evidence-based approach to the multidisciplinary management of HNC oncologic emergencies with a focus on the role of emergent radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: A literature search was performed using Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases with a focus on three common oncological emergencies using the following keywords: "head and neck cancer", "radiation OR radiotherapy", "pain", "bleeding OR haemorrhage", and "airway obstruction". All English language articles published up to April 2022 were screened to identify studies pertaining to the management of oncologic emergencies in HNC. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: The management of oncologic emergencies in HNC present a unique set of challenges that require early recognition and aggressive treatment. In this narrative review, we summarize the evidence supporting the role of RT in the management of HNC patients presenting with pain crisis, malignant airway obstruction and acute haemorrhage. We demonstrate that while RT can be used as a primary or adjunct therapy, optimal management depends on the involvement of a multi-disciplinary team that includes head and neck surgeons, interventional radiology and palliative care. CONCLUSIONS: RT plays a critical role in the multidisciplinary management of HNC oncological emergencies. Further prospective and comparative studies are needed to assess optimal management strategies.

Therapeutic and prophylactic effects of radiation therapy in the management of recurrent granulation tissue induced tracheal stenosis: a review on the role of Endobronchial brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: Granulation tissue-induced tracheal stenosis (mainly secondary to intubation or lung transplantation) is one of the most common etiologies of benign airway obstructions. Recurrence rates after standard treatment options (surgical resection and/or endobronchial interventions) can inadvertently worsen the stricture through the stimulation of more granulation tissue generation (via increased fibroblast activity and roliferation). Low-dose radiotherapy could be a promising tool to prevent granulation tissue formation after surgery and/or endobronchial interventions regarding its established role in the treatment of keloids or hypertrophic scars, two benign diseases with similar a pathophysiology to tracheal stenosis. This study reviews case reports and small series that used endobronchial brachytherapy (EBBT) or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for the management of refractory granulation tissue-induced tracheal stenosis after surgery and/or endobronchial interventions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Case reports and series (published up to October 2022) that reported outcomes of patients with recurrent granulation tissue-induced tracheal stenosis (after surgery and/or endobronchial interventions) treated by EBBT or EBRT (in definitive or prophylactic settings) were eligible. RESULTS: Sixteen studies (EBBT: nine studies including 69 patients, EBRT: seven studies including 32 patients) were reviewed. The pooled success rate across all studies was 74% and 97% for EBBT and EBRT, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation therapy appears to be effective in the management of selected patients with recurrent/refractory tracheal stenosis. Response to this treatment is usually good, but further studies with a larger number of patients and long-term followup are necessary to determine the optimal technique, dose, and timing of radiation therapy, late complications, the durability of response, and criteria for patient selection.

HDR brachytherapy: an option for preventing nonmalignant obstruction in patients after lung transplantation.

PURPOSE: Interventional bronchoscopy is the main treatment modality in managing benign airway obstructions following lung transplantation. We analyzed the effect of intraluminal brachytherapy on preventing recurrence of hyperplastic tissue. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From September 2002 to September 2004, a total of 24 intraluminal brachytherapy applications were carried out on 12 lung transplant patients in 15 different locations. A single dose of 3 Gy was calculated at a 5-mm distance from the catheter surface; the target volume included a stenosis plus safety interval of 0.5-1.0 cm. RESULTS: All patients had a mean 10.6 local interventions (Argon plasma coagulation, balloon dilatations, stenting) over 4.4 months before the first application of endobronchial brachytherapy, with a mean amount of 2.4 applications per month. The mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) was 2,219 ml in the 3 months before application of brachytherapy. After endobronchial brachytherapy, all patients experienced improvement in clinical status and respiratory function. The mean level of FEV1 in the 3 months after application was 2,435 ml (p = 0.02), and the number of invasive interventions dropped to a mean rate of 5.2 interventions in the 5.1 months after the first intervention, with an amount of 1 application per month. No treatment-related complications were seen. Four patients were treated twice, 1 patient three times, and 1 patient four times at the same localization. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent symptomatic benign airway obstruction from hyperplastic tissue in the bronchus after lung transplantation can be successfully treated with intraluminal high-dose-rate brachytherapy with a dose of 3 Gy at a 5-mm distance from the catheter surface and a longitudinal safety margin of 1 cm.

Role of radiotherapy in the management of malignant airway obstruction.

BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of lung cancer patients suffer from malignant airway obstruction (MAO). Palliative external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is often used to control the symptoms caused by MAO. In this study, we report the effect of palliative EBRT on lung cancer with MAO and analyze the factors that influence it. METHODS: This study included 75 patients with MAO in lung cancer who underwent palliative EBRT, between 2009 and 2018 and were analyzed retrospectively. Change of dyspnea, tumor response, and overall survival (OS) were recorded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the prognostic factors for treatment outcomes. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 2.5 months, and median OS was 2.3 months. Out of 75 patients, dyspnea was improved in 46 patients (61.3%), and tumor was partially decreased in 39 patients (52%). Symptoms improved in all tumor responding patients. The symptom improvement was significantly affected by radiation dose and time to EBRT. The tumor response was significantly affected by pathology, radiation dose, and time to EBRT. CONCLUSIONS: Palliative EBRT is an effective and safe treatment option for patients with MAO in lung cancer. In particular, high-dose irradiation and prompt treatment can improve treatment results. KEY POINTS: SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS OF THE STUDY: In MAO patients, tumor response is an important factor for resolving dyspnea and improving survival rate. In order to increase the tumor response, high-dose irradiation and prompt treatment after symptoms occur are necessary. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: Our study reported the effects of EBRT and prognostic factors in MAO patients. We emphasize that palliative EBRT is a relatively safe and effective treatment in MAO patients, which is a complement to previous studies.

Recombinant human thyrotropin-stimulated radioiodine therapy of large nodular goiters facilitates tracheal decompression and improves inspiration.

INTRODUCTION: The impact on tracheal anatomy and respiratory function of recombinant human (rh)TSH-stimulated (131)I therapy in patients with goiter is not clarified. METHODS: In a double-blinded design, patients (age 37-87 yr) with a large multinodular goiter (range, 99-440 ml) were randomized to placebo (n = 15) or 0.3 mg rhTSH (n = 14) 24 h before (131)I therapy. The smallest cross-sectional area of the trachea (SCAT; assessed by magnetic resonance imaging) and the pulmonary function were determined before, 1 wk, and 12 months after therapy. RESULTS: Data on goiter reduction have been reported previously. In the placebo group, no significant changes in the lung function or SCAT were found throughout the study. In the rhTSH group, a slight decrease was observed in the forced vital capacity 1 wk after therapy, whereas the mean individual change in SCAT was significantly increased by 10.5% (95% confidence interval = 0.9-20.0%). A further increase in SCAT to 117 +/- 36 mm(2) (P = 0.005 compared with 92 +/- 38 mm(2) at baseline) was seen at 12 months, corresponding to a mean of 31.4% (95% confidence interval = 16.0-46.8%). The expiratory parameters did not change significantly, whereas forced inspiratory flow at 50% of the vital capacity (FIF50%) increased from initially 3.34 +/- 1.33 liters/sec to ultimately 4.23 +/- 1.88 liters/sec (P = 0.015) in the rhTSH group, corresponding to a median increase of 24.6%. By 12 months, the relative improvements in FIF50% and in SCAT were inversely correlated to the respective baseline values (FIF50%: r = -0.47, P = 0.012; SCAT: r = -0.57, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: On average, neither compression of the trachea nor deterioration of the pulmonary function was observed in the acute phase after rhTSH-augmented (131)I therapy. In the long term, tracheal compression is diminished, and the inspiratory capacity improved, compared with (131)I therapy alone.

High-dose-rate endobronchial brachytherapy for recurrent airway obstruction from hyperplastic granulation tissue.

PURPOSE: Benign endobronchial granulation tissue causes airway obstruction in up to 20% of patients after lung transplantation or stent placement. High-dose-rate endobronchial brachytherapy (HDR-EB) has been successful in some cases refractory to standard bronchoscopic interventions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between September 2004 and May 2005, 8 patients with refractory benign airway obstruction were treated with HDR-EB, using one to two fractions of Ir-192 prescribed to 7.1 Gy at a radius of 1 cm. Charts were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate subjective clinical response, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)), and frequency of therapeutic bronchoscopies over 6-month periods before and after HDR-EB. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 14.6 months, and median survival was 10.5 months. The mean number of bronchoscopic interventions improved from 3.1 procedures in the 6-month pretreatment period to 1.8 after HDR-EB. Mean FEV(1) improved from 36% predicted to 46% predicted. Six patients had a good-to-excellent subjective early response, but only one maintained this response beyond 6 months, and this was the only patient treated with HDR-EB within 24 h from the most recent bronchoscopic intervention. Five patients have expired from causes related to their chronic pulmonary disease, including one from hemoptysis resulting from a bronchoarterial fistula. CONCLUSION: High-dose-rate-EB may be an effective treatment for select patients with refractory hyperplastic granulation tissue causing recurrent airway stenosis. Performing HDR-EB within 24-48 h after excision of obstructive granulation tissue could further improve outcomes. Careful patient selection is important to maximize therapeutic benefit and minimize toxicity. The optimal patient population, dose, and timing of HDR-EB should be investigated prospectively.

A Novel Tracheobronchial Stent Loaded with 125I Seeds in Patients with Malignant Airway Obstruction Compared to a Conventional Stent: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel radioactive bare metal stent (RBMS) compared with a conventional bare metal stent (CBMS) in patients with inoperable malignant airway obstruction. METHODS: This prospective study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee, and informed consent was obtained from each participant. Patients with malignant airway obstruction who had dyspnea were randomly assigned to receive RBMS or CBMS placement. The primary endpoint was stenosis grade, while the secondary endpoints were technical success, overall survival, and complications. A p value of <0·05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Between September 2013 and July 2015, 66 patients with inoperable malignant airway obstruction received stent placement fluoroscopically (33 in either group). The median follow-up time was 154 days (range, 15-335 days). The baseline stenosis was immediately relieved in both groups after stent placement, and the stenosis grades in the RBMS group were significantly lower than that in the CBMS group since the second month (p < 0·05). The technical success rates of stent placement were 100% in both groups. The median survival in the RBMS group was significantly longer than that in the CBMS group (170 days vs. 123 days, p < 0·05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (p < 0·05). CONCLUSIONS: The placement of RBMS in patients with inoperable malignant airway obstruction is feasible and safe, and it significantly reduces restenosis and improves overall survival compared with the placement of CBMS.

Outcome of treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer with and without central airway obstruction.

OBJECTIVE: In patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with chemotherapy, we compared survival in patients with treated central airway obstruction to those who did not have central airway obstruction. METHODS: One hundred forty-four patients with advanced and inoperable NSCLC were included. These consisted of 52 consecutive patients treated with therapeutic bronchoscopy plus chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy (group A) and 92 consecutive patients who did not have central airway obstruction treated with chemotherapy alone (group B). Chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin or carboplatin, and one third-generation chemotherapy agent. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the survival of patients with and without central airway obstruction (p = 0.395). There was no influence of the histologic subtype on survival in both groups combined and also in each group separately. Median survival in patients belonging to group A was 8.4 months and those in group B was 8.2 months; 3-, 6-, and 12-month survival rates in patients in group A were 90%, 71%, and 40%, respectively, and those in group B were 82%, 63%, and 34%. CONCLUSION: Patients having advanced NSCLC with locally treated malignant central airway obstruction in combination with chemotherapy do not have a worse survival compared to those with advanced NSCLC without central airway obstruction. Therapeutic bronchoscopy should be offered to patients with NSCLC and central airway obstruction.

Endobronchial brachytherapy: an effective option for palliation of malignant bronchial obstruction.

Symptoms resulting from tumors extending to the endobronchial wall are common in patients with lung cancer and significantly impact quality of life. A number of treatment options are available for palliation, including endobronchial brachytherapy, stent placement, laser photoresection, external-beam radiation therapy, and photodynamic therapy. This review will focus on the methodology and role of endobronchial brachytherapy while discussing benefits of other treatment options as additions or alternatives to brachytherapy.

[Brachytherapy in the treatment of lung and tracheal cancer: current indications, methods, results]. / Brachyterapia raka pluca i tchawicy--wskazania, metody, wyniki leczenia.

Lack of improvement in treatment results of lung cancer leads to searching for new methods. One of the most distressing symptoms for lung cancer patients is airway obstruction due to the tumor, commonly resulting in dyspnea, postobstructive pneumonia, cough, or hemoptysis. Removal of endobronchial obstruction leads to quick improvement of clinical status and Quality of Life. Brachytherapy HDR of tracheal and lung cancer is a well-established method for the local treatment of patients with inoperable tumors of the tracheobronchial system. It seems that another promising treatment method of lung cancer is interstitial brachytherapy using permanent implants. The paper presents principles of brachytherapy, indications for this treatment and treatment results of tracheal and lung cancer. Indications for radical, palliative and interstitial treatment are discussed, respectively. Selected results of brachytherapy as an independent treatment and that combined with teletherapy, radical and, palliative are presented separately. Most commonly recognized complications are discussed which include: fatal pulmonary hemorrhage and fistula formation.

A prospective analysis of high-dose-rate endobronchial brachytherapy in the palliation of obstructive symptoms in lung cancer patients: A single-institution experience.

PURPOSE: Obstructive symptoms that affect quality of life (QOL) are commonly caused by endobronchial disease in many patients with locally advanced, inoperable lung cancer. High-dose-rate endobronchial brachytherapy (HDREBBT) has been used to palliate these symptoms, yet its role is not well defined in the literature. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ninety-eight patients with locally advanced, inoperable lung cancer received HDREBBT. They were prospectively followed for survival, QOL, and toxicity endpoints. QOL measures were captured using the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Lung Cancer 30 and -Lung Cancer 13. RESULTS: At 1-year follow-up, no significant toxicities were seen. Overall survival was 13.4% at 12 months (mean 192 days). Performance status, additional treatment after HDREBBT and treatment intent affected overall survival on univariate analysis (p < 0.05). Mean hemoptysis-free survival for all patients was 232.3 days, cough-free survival was 140.3 days, and dyspnea-free survival was 173.5 days. There was no impact of any treatment- or patient-related factors of these outcomes on multivariate analysis, including additional treatment modalities and HDREBBT dose. CONCLUSIONS: HDREBBT is a safe and effective way to palliate endobronchial symptoms. Additional external-beam radiation therapy, chemotherapy, or chemoradiation after HDREBBT improves survival, but does not affect QOL measures.

Endobronchial radiation therapy (EBRT) in the management of lung cancer.

Between October 1987 and November 1988, 19 endobronchial Iridium-192 line source placements were attempted in 17 patients with advanced incurable lung cancer. Approximately 30 Gy was delivered to the endobronchus using a low dose rate (LDR) afterloading technique delivering a mean dose of 70 cGy/hr at 5 mm. Improvement in subjective symptoms was noted in 67% of evaluable patients whereas objective responses defined by chest X ray and bronchoscopy were noted in 26% and 60%, respectively. No significant morbidity was observed. The radiation exposure to health care workers was low ranging from 10 to 40 mRem per treatment course with most of the staff receiving less than 10 mRem per treatment course (minimal detectable level 10 mRem). The results of this series are compared with selected series using low dose rate as well as intermediate dose rate (IDR) and high dose rate (HDR) endobronchial radiation therapy (EBRT). Based on bronchoscopic responses from the selected series reviewed, both HDR low total dose per treatment (range 7.5-10 Gy) and LDR high total dose per treatment (range 30-50 Gy) are effective in palliating the vast majority of patients with endobronchial lesions. Intermediate dose rate is also effective using fractions similar to high dose rate but total dose similar to low dose rate. The efficacy of endobronchial radiation therapy in the palliative setting suggest a possible role for endobronchial radiation therapy combined with external beam irradiation with or without chemotherapy in the initial management of localized lung cancer. Defining the optimal total dose, dose rate, and the exact role of endobronchial radiation therapy in the management of lung cancer will require large cooperative trials with standardization of techniques and definitions.

Endobronchial irradiation for malignant airway obstruction.

An afterloading endobronchial irradiation (EBRT) technique using Iridium-192 (Ir-192), was piloted for malignant airway obstruction. Under bronchoscopic guidance, a catheter is threaded distal to the lesion. Orthogonal radiographs and computerized tomographic (CT) scans are obtained for dosimetry. Forty implants in 38 patients have been performed. Thirty-two patients had lung cancer; 23 had received prior irradiation and eight had prior chemotherapy. Eight patients underwent pre-endobronchial irradiation laser excision. Median implant duration was 50.5 hr; median dose at 1 and 2 cm from source center was 50 and 20 Gy, respectively. The procedure was well tolerated with four long-term complications (10.5%). Twelve of 38 patients are currently alive with a median survival of 5+ months and a range of 1 to 21+ months. Changes in performance status (PS), symptom resolution, radiographic demonstration of re-aeration of atelectatic lung, changes in pulmonary function (PFT), and post-endobronchial irradiation bronchoscopy were used to assess response. Seventy percent of the patients' remaining life was rendered symptom-free or improved. A 70% radiographic response was noted. Fourteen patients underwent post-endobronchial irradiation bronchoscopy with 12 complete responses. Endobronchial irradiation, therefore, appears to be a safe, effective technique to palliate malignant airway obstruction.

IR-192, low dose rate endobronchial brachytherapy in the treatment of malignant airway obstruction.

PURPOSE: To assess the value of low-dose-rate endobronchial brachytherapy in the treatment of malignant airway obstruction. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between September 1986 and April 1989, 39 patients with malignant airway obstruction had 49 catheter placements for an afterloading, low-dose-rate Ir-192 endobronchial brachytherapy. A flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope with fluoroscopic guidance was used for positioning. Thirty-eight of 39 (97%) patients completed the prescribed treatments. Ninety-seven percent had received previous external radiation in doses ranging from 36-60 Gy. One patient had metastatic renal cell carcinoma; the remainder had recurrent lung cancer. Endobronchial laser treatments were given to three patients 2-3 weeks prior to endobronchial brachytherapy. All patients were followed until death. The median dose delivered in 48 of the 49 placements was 20 Gy at 1 cm. RESULTS: Follow-up bronchoscopy was performed in 28 (72%) of 39 patients. Of these, 13 (46%) had a complete response, 12 (43%) had a partial response, and 3 (17%) had a minor response. Dyspnea improved in 30 of 37 patients (82%); hemoptysis in 17 of 19 patients (89%); cough in 31 of 39 patients (79%); and postobstructive pneumonia in 21 of 23 patients (92%). The median survival for the entire group was 5 months (range 1-31 months). CONCLUSION: This technique is simple, well-tolerated and offered significant palliation.

High dose rate afterloading intraluminal brachytherapy in malignant airway obstruction of lung cancer.

PURPOSE: This is a retrospective study to review the palliation rate, survival rate and complications of high dose rate (HDR) intraluminal brachytherapy in the treatment of malignant airway obstruction of lung cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 225 high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy treatments were delivered to 76 patients with symptomatic malignant airway obstruction by remote afterloading technique. An average of 7 Gy at a radius of 1 cm from the center of the source was delivered by Iridium-192 (Ir-192) sources. The majority of the patients received 3 fractions at 2 week intervals. Fifty-four patients received HDR brachytherapy as part of their initial treatment; 20 patients presented as symptomatic endobronchial recurrence. Two patients received YAG laser photoresection to open up the obstruction to allow insertion of the brachytherapy catheter. Fifty-nine patients received concurrent external beam irradiation. Forty-two patients were given 60-70 Gy in 6-7 weeks with curative intent. Seventeen patients were given 20-59 Gy in 2-5 weeks as a palliative measure. Nine patients received a radiosensitizer. One patient received concurrent chemotherapy. RESULTS: The symptomatic response rates are as follows: dyspnea had an 87% response rate (59% partial response, 28% complete response), cough had a 79% response rate (47% partial response, 32% complete response), hemoptysis had a 95% response rate (38% partial response, 57% complete response), and postobstructive pneumonia had an 88% response rate (53% partial response, 35% complete response). Sixty-six patients had follow up endoscopic examination (1-3 months after brachytherapy). Their total response rate was 87% (52% partial response and 35% complete response). There were four acute complications: three cases of massive hemoptysis and one of mild hemoptysis. There are five late complications: three cases of radiation pneumonitis and two of esophagitis. At the time of this study, 55 patients have died with the maximum survival duration 113 months (9.4 years) from diagnosis date and 18 months from first HDR treatment. Twenty-one patients are still alive with a mean follow-up duration of 20 months from diagnosis date and 7.8 months from the first HDR treatment. CONCLUSION: HDR brachytherapy is an excellent modality for palliating symptomatic malignant airway obstruction with an acceptable complication rate; however, no definitive increase of survival rate was observed. Prospective clinical trials are needed to better define its merit regarding survival. This paper also includes a literature review and discussion of HDR brachytherapy on bronchogenic cancer.

High dose rate brachytherapy for nonmalignant airway obstruction: new treatment option.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: High dose rate (HDR) endobronchial brachytherapy is widely used as a palliative treatment for symptomatic airway obstruction by primary or secondary malignant tumors. We report on a successful use of HDR brachytherapy in patients with nonmalignant airway obstruction. DESIGN: Case series PATIENTS: Six patients received HDR brachytherapy for airway obstruction caused by granulation tissue around a metal stent placed for restoration of the airway patency for nonmalignant causes. In four patients, brachytherapy was performed following recurrent occlusion of the airway by granulation tissue formation; in two patients, it was done as a prophylactic procedure. INTERVENTION: HDR brachytherapy catheters were passed through the metal stents under direct fluoroscopic guidance. Simulation and computerized treatment planning were done, and a single dose of 10 Gy was administered using a brachytherapy remote afterloader with a (192)Ir source. The dose was prescribed to a distance of 1 cm from the center of the source, with a margin of 1 cm from the proximal and distal ends of the stent. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 15 months, moderate granulation tissue formation was observed in only one patient; in four others, it was categorized as minimal, 5 to 30 months from the procedure. Restoration of the lumen was complete in four patients, near complete in one patient, and partial in one patient. In one patient, previously treated by external radiotherapy, local tissue necrosis was evident. CONCLUSION: HDR brachytherapy can be used safely for nonmalignant airway obstruction. Further studies including more patients and longer follow-up are needed.

Effect of radiation therapy on bronchial obstruction due to bronchogenic carcinoma.

We evaluated the effect of radiation therapy in 57 patients with obstruction of a large bronchus with NSCC. Response with aeration of the atelectatic lung was seen in 12 patients (21 percent). Three patients (5 percent) showed partial response with persistent partial atelectasis, and nine patients (16 percent) showed good response with complete aeration of the atelectatic lung. In these patients the response appeared to be related to the dose of radiation. All of the patients who responded received more than 50 Gy. The difference in the response rate related to the dose of radiation was statistically significant (p less than 0.05). The rates were similar with all histologic types of NSCC. Regardless of the clinical response observed, bronchoscopy performed two to four months after completion of radiation therapy in 14 patients revealed persistent endobronchial tumor. There was no significant relationship between the persistence of endobronchial tumor, the dose of radiation therapy, and the tumor's histologic type. Of the 12 patients with radiographic improvement in atelectasis, fibrotic changes developed in four (33 percent) patients and pneumonitis in two (17 percent). Progression of disease with distant metastases occurred in 58 percent (seven) of the 12 patients who showed a clinical response of their bronchial obstruction. The median time to survival was nearly identical in responders and nonresponders.

Local determinants of response to endobronchial high-dose rate brachytherapy in bronchogenic carcinoma.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We evaluated bronchoscopic tumor appearance and tumor location as determinants of response to high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) in patients with symptomatic unresectable bronchogenic carcinoma previously treated with external-beam irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with symptomatic endobronchial bronchogenic carcinoma who had previously completed external irradiation were divided into two groups based on whether the initial bronchoscopic appearance showed an endoluminal mass or submucosal infiltration/extrinsic compression. Furthermore, patients were also classified based on tumor location: central (trachea or mainstem bronchi) and peripheral (lobar or segmental bronchi). Patients underwent three treatments of 800 cGy intraluminal irradiation at 2-week intervals, with follow-up evaluation 4 weeks later. We evaluated response in tumor extent based on bronchoscopic and chest radiograph appearance, as well as symptoms with standardized scales. RESULTS: Fifteen of 24 patients who underwent follow-up bronchoscopy had reductions in the degree of endobronchial obstruction. Seven of 24 patients had radiographic improvement in the extent of atelectasis. Patients with both tumor appearances (endoluminal and submucosal/extrinsic compression) had significant improvements following HDR-BT with regard to hemoptysis. Patients with submucosal disease also had improvement in cough. Patients with peripheral tumors had better rates of response for hemoptysis and cough than did those with central tumors. CONCLUSION: HDR-BT may result in symptomatic improvement in patients with bronchogenic carcinoma, whether characterized endoscopically as endoluminal projection or submucosal infiltration/extrinsic compression. Peripheral tumors have better rates of response than central tumors, possibly on the basis of less extensive disease.