Telomere Loop Dynamics in Chromosome End Protection.

Telomeres regulate DNA damage response (DDR) and DNA repair activity at chromosome ends. How telomere macromolecular structure contributes to ATM regulation and its potential dissociation from control over non-homologous end joining (NHEJ)-dependent telomere fusion is of central importance to telomere-dependent cell aging and tumor suppression. Using super-resolution microscopy, we identify that ATM activation at mammalian telomeres with reduced TRF2 or at human telomeres during mitotic arrest occurs specifically with a structural change from telomere loops (t-loops) to linearized telomeres. Additionally, we find the TRFH domain of TRF2 regulates t-loop formation while suppressing ATM activity. Notably, we demonstrate that ATM activation and telomere linearity occur separately from telomere fusion via NHEJ and that linear DDR-positive telomeres can remain resistant to fusion, even during an extended G1 arrest, when NHEJ is most active. Collectively, these results suggest t-loops act as conformational switches that specifically regulate ATM activation independent of telomere mechanisms to inhibit NHEJ.

CDK phosphorylation of TRF2 controls t-loop dynamics during the cell cycle.

The protection of telomere ends by the shelterin complex prevents DNA damage signalling and promiscuous repair at chromosome ends. Evidence suggests that the 3' single-stranded telomere end can assemble into a lasso-like t-loop configuration1,2, which has been proposed to safeguard chromosome ends from being recognized as DNA double-strand breaks2. Mechanisms must also exist to transiently disassemble t-loops to allow accurate telomere replication and to permit telomerase access to the 3' end to solve the end-replication problem. However, the regulation and physiological importance of t-loops in the protection of telomere ends remains unknown. Here we identify a CDK phosphorylation site in the shelterin subunit at Ser365 of TRF2, whose dephosphorylation in S phase by the PP6R3 phosphatase provides a narrow window during which the RTEL1 helicase can transiently access and unwind t-loops to facilitate telomere replication. Re-phosphorylation of TRF2 at Ser365 outside of S phase is required to release RTEL1 from telomeres, which not only protects t-loops from promiscuous unwinding and inappropriate activation of ATM, but also counteracts replication conflicts at DNA secondary structures that arise within telomeres and across the genome. Hence, a phospho-switch in TRF2 coordinates the assembly and disassembly of t-loops during the cell cycle, which protects telomeres from replication stress and an unscheduled DNA damage response.

NBS1 Phosphorylation Status Dictates Repair Choice of Dysfunctional Telomeres.

Telomeres employ TRF2 to protect chromosome ends from activating the DNA damage sensor MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 (MRN), thereby repressing ATM-dependent DNA damage checkpoint responses. How TRF2 prevents MRN activation at dysfunctional telomeres is unclear. Here, we show that the phosphorylation status of NBS1 determines the repair pathway choice of dysfunctional telomeres. The crystal structure of the TRF2-NBS1 complex at 3.0 Å resolution shows that the NBS1 429YQLSP433 motif interacts specifically with the TRF2TRFH domain. Phosphorylation of NBS1 serine 432 by CDK2 in S/G2 dissociates NBS1 from TRF2, promoting TRF2-Apollo/SNM1B complex formation and the protection of leading-strand telomeres. Classical-NHEJ-mediated repair of telomeres lacking TRF2 requires phosphorylated NBS1S432 to activate ATM, while interaction of de-phosphorylated NBS1S432 with TRF2 promotes alternative-NHEJ repair of telomeres lacking POT1-TPP1. Our work advances understanding of how the TRF2TRFH domain orchestrates telomere end protection and reveals how the phosphorylation status of the NBS1S432 dictates repair pathway choice of dysfunctional telomeres.

TRF2-Mediated Control of Telomere DNA Topology as a Mechanism for Chromosome-End Protection.

The shelterin proteins protect telomeres against activation of the DNA damage checkpoints and recombinational repair. We show here that a dimer of the shelterin subunit TRF2 wraps ∼ 90 bp of DNA through several lysine and arginine residues localized around its homodimerization domain. The expression of a wrapping-deficient TRF2 mutant, named Top-less, alters telomeric DNA topology, decreases the number of terminal loops (t-loops), and triggers the ATM checkpoint, while still protecting telomeres against non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). In Top-less cells, the protection against NHEJ is alleviated if the expression of the TRF2-interacting protein RAP1 is reduced. We conclude that a distinctive topological state of telomeric DNA, controlled by the TRF2-dependent DNA wrapping and linked to t-loop formation, inhibits both ATM activation and NHEJ. The presence of RAP1 at telomeres appears as a backup mechanism to prevent NHEJ when topology-mediated telomere protection is impaired.

TPP1 Blocks an ATR-Mediated Resection Mechanism at Telomeres.

The regulation of 5' end resection at DSBs and telomeres prevents genome instability. DSB resection is positively and negatively regulated by ATM signaling through CtIP/MRN and 53BP1-bound Rif1, respectively. Similarly, telomeres lacking TRF2 undergo ATM-controlled CtIP-dependent hyper-resection when the repression by 53BP1/Rif1 is alleviated. However, telomere resection in the absence of 53BP1/Rif1 is more extensive upon complete removal of shelterin, indicating additional protection against resection by shelterin. Here we show that TPP1 and POT1a/b in shelterin block a resection pathway distinct from that repressed by TRF2. This second pathway is regulated by ATR signaling, involves Exo1 and BLM, and is inhibited by 53BP1/Rif1. Thus, mammalian cells have two distinct 5' end-resection pathways that are regulated by DNA damage signaling, in part through Rif1-mediated inhibition. The data show that telomeres are protected from hyper-resection through the repression of the ATM and ATR kinases by TRF2 and TPP1-bound POT1a/b, respectively.

Increase in lamin B1 promotes telomere instability by disrupting the shelterin complex in human cells.

Telomere maintenance is essential to preserve genomic stability and involves telomere-specific proteins, DNA replication and repair proteins. Lamins are key components of the nuclear envelope and play numerous roles, including maintenance of the nuclear integrity, regulation of transcription, and DNA replication. Elevated levels of lamin B1, one of the major lamins, have been observed in some human pathologies and several cancers. Yet, the effect of lamin B1 dysregulation on telomere maintenance remains unknown. Here, we unveil that lamin B1 overexpression drives telomere instability through the disruption of the shelterin complex. Indeed, lamin B1 dysregulation leads to an increase in telomere dysfunction-induced foci, telomeric fusions and telomere losses in human cells. Telomere aberrations were preceded by mislocalizations of TRF2 and its binding partner RAP1. Interestingly, we identified new interactions between lamin B1 and these shelterin proteins, which are strongly enhanced at the nuclear periphery upon lamin B1 overexpression. Importantly, chromosomal fusions induced by lamin B1 in excess were rescued by TRF2 overexpression. These data indicated that lamin B1 overexpression triggers telomere instability through a mislocalization of TRF2. Altogether our results point to lamin B1 as a new interacting partner of TRF2, that is involved in telomere stability.

Non-duplex G-Quadruplex DNA Structure: A Developing Story from Predicted Sequences to DNA Structure-Dependent Epigenetics and Beyond.

The story of the non-duplex DNA form known as the G-quadruplex (G4) has traversed a winding path. From initial skepticism followed by debate to a surge in interest, the G4 story intertwines many threads. Starting with computational predictions of a gene regulatory role, which now include epigenetic functions, our group was involved in many of these advances along with many other laboratories. Following a brief background, set in the latter half of the last century when the concept of the G4 as a structure took ground, here we account the developments. This is through a lens that though focused on our groups' research presents work from many other groups that played significant roles. Together these provide a broad perspective to the G4 story. Initially we were intrigued on seeing potential G4 (pG4)-forming sequences, then known to be found primarily at the telomeres and immunoglobin switch regions, occurring throughout the genome and being particularly prevalent in promoters of bacteria. We further observed that pG4s were not only prevalent but also conserved through evolution in promoters of human, chimpanzee, mouse and rat genomes. This was between 2005 and 2007. Encouraged by these partly and partly in response to the view held by many that genome-wide presence of G4s were genomic "accidents", the focus shifted to seeking experimental evidence.In the next year, 2008, two independent findings showed promise. First, on treating human cancer cells with G4-binding ligands, we observed widespread change in gene expression. Second, our search for the missing G4-specific transcription factor, without which, importantly, G4s in promoters posed only half the story, yielded results. We determined how NM23-H2 (also known as NME2 or NDPK-B) interacts with G4s and how interaction of NM23-H2 with a G4 in the promoter of the oncogene c-myc was important for regulation of c-myc transcription. NM23-H2, and subsequently many other similar factors discovered by multiple groups, is possibly giving shape to what might be the "G4-transcriptome". Later, a close look at NM23-H2-G4 interaction in regulation of the human reverse transcriptase gene (hTERT) revealed the role of G4s in local epigenetic modifications. Meanwhile work from others showed how G4s impact histone modifications following replication. Together these show the intrinsic role of DNA sequence, through formation of DNA structure, in epigenetics.More recent work, however, was waiting to reveal aspects that tend to bring forth a completely new understanding of G4s. We observed that the telomere-repeat-binding-factor-2 (TRF2), known canonically to be telomere-associated, binds extensively outside telomeres throughout the genome. Moreover, a large fraction of the non-telomeric TRF2 sites comprise G4s. Second, the extent of non-telomeric TRF2 binding at promoters was dependent on telomere length. Thereby TRF2-induced epigenetic gene regulation was telomere-dependent. Together these implicate underlying connections that show signs of addressing an intriguing unanswered question that takes us back to the beginning: Why are G4s prevalent in two distinct regions, the telomeres and gene promoters?

Transcriptional regulation of telomeric repeat-containing RNA by acridine derivatives.

Telomere is a specialized DNA-protein complex that plays an important role in maintaining chromosomal integrity. Shelterin is a protein complex formed by six different proteins, with telomeric repeat factors 1 (TRF1) and 2 (TRF2) binding to double-strand telomeric DNA. Telomeric DNA consists of complementary G-rich and C-rich repeats, which could form G-quadruplex and intercalated motif (i-motif), respectively, during cell cycle. Its G-rich transcription product, telomeric repeat-containing RNA (TERRA), is essential for telomere stability and heterochromatin formation. After extensive screening, we found that acridine derivative 2c and acridine dimer DI26 could selectively interact with TRF1 and telomeric i-motif, respectively. Compound 2c blocked the binding of TRF1 with telomeric duplex DNA, resulting in up-regulation of TERRA. Accumulated TERRA could bind with TRF1 at its allosteric site and further destabilize its binding with telomeric DNA. In contrast, DI26 could destabilize telomeric i-motif, resulting in down-regulation of TERRA. Both compounds exhibited anti-tumour activity for A549 cells, but induced different DNA damage pathways. Compound 2c significantly suppressed tumour growth in A549 xenograft mouse model. The function of telomeric i-motif structure was first studied with a selective binding ligand, which could play an important role in regulating TERRA transcription. Our results showed that appropriate level of TERRA transcript could be important for stability of telomere, and acridine derivatives could be further developed as anti-cancer agents targeting telomere. This research increased understanding for biological roles of telomeric i-motif, TRF1 and TERRA, as potential anti-cancer drug targets.

The Long Linker Region of Telomere-Binding Protein TRF2 Is Responsible for Interactions with Lamins.

Telomere-binding factor 2 (TRF2) is part of the shelterin protein complex found at chromosome ends. Lamin A/C interacts with TRF2 and influences telomere position. TRF2 has an intrinsically disordered region between the ordered dimerization and DNA-binding domains. This domain is referred to as the long linker region of TRF2, or udTRF2. We suggest that udTRF2 might be involved in the interaction between TRF2 and lamins. The recombinant protein corresponding to the udTRF2 region along with polyclonal antibodies against this region were used in co-immunoprecipitation with purified lamina and nuclear extracts. Co-immunoprecipitation followed by Western blots and mass spectrometry indicated that udTRF2 interacts with lamins, preferably lamins A/C. The interaction did not involve any lamin-associated proteins, was not dependent on the post-translation modification of lamins, nor did it require their higher-order assembly. Besides lamins, a number of other udTRF2-interacting proteins were identified by mass spectrometry, including several heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNP A2/B1, hnRNPA1, hnRNP A3, hnRNP K, hnRNP L, hnRNP M), splicing factors (SFPQ, NONO, SRSF1, and others), helicases (DDX5, DHX9, and Eif4a3l1), topoisomerase I, and heat shock protein 71, amongst others. Some of the identified interactors are known to be involved in telomere biology; the roles of the others remain to be investigated. Thus, the long linker region of TRF2 (udTRF2) is a regulatory domain responsible for the association between TRF2 and lamins and is involved in interactions with other proteins.

A two-step mechanism for TRF2-mediated chromosome-end protection.

Mammalian telomeres repress DNA-damage activation at natural chromosome ends by recruiting specific inhibitors of the DNA-damage machinery that form a protective complex termed shelterin. Within this complex, TRF2 (also known as TERF2) has a crucial role in end protection through the suppression of ATM activation and the formation of end-to-end chromosome fusions. Here we address the molecular properties of TRF2 that are both necessary and sufficient to protect chromosome ends in mouse embryonic fibroblasts. Our data support a two-step mechanism for TRF2-mediated end protection. First, the dimerization domain of TRF2 is required to inhibit ATM activation, the key initial step involved in the activation of a DNA-damage response (DDR). Next, TRF2 independently suppresses the propagation of DNA-damage signalling downstream of ATM activation. This novel modulation of the DDR at telomeres occurs at the level of the E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF168 (ref. 3). Inhibition of RNF168 at telomeres involves the deubiquitinating enzyme BRCC3 and the ubiquitin ligase UBR5, and is sufficient to suppress chromosome end-to-end fusions. This two-step mechanism for TRF2-mediated end protection helps to explain the apparent paradox of frequent localization of DDR proteins at functional telomeres without concurrent induction of detrimental DNA-repair activities.

Basic domain of telomere guardian TRF2 reduces D-loop unwinding whereas Rap1 restores it.

Telomeric repeat binding factor 2 (TRF2) folds human telomeres into loops to prevent unwanted DNA repair and chromosome end-joining. The N-terminal basic domain of TRF2 (B-domain) protects the telomeric displacement loop (D-loop) from cleavage by endonucleases. Repressor activator protein 1 (Rap1) binds TRF2 and improves telomeric DNA recognition. We found that the B-domain of TRF2 stabilized the D-loop and thus reduced unwinding by BLM and RPA, whereas the formation of the Rap1-TRF2 complex restored DNA unwinding. To understand how the B-domain of TRF2 affects DNA binding and D-loop processing, we analyzed DNA binding of full-length TRF2 and a truncated TRF2 construct lacking the B-domain. We quantified how the B-domain improves TRF2's interaction with DNA via enhanced long-range electrostatic interactions. We developed a structural envelope model of the B-domain bound on DNA. The model revealed that the B-domain is flexible in solution but becomes rigid upon binding to telomeric DNA. We proposed a mechanism for how the B-domain stabilizes the D-loop.

SIRT6 interacts with TRF2 and promotes its degradation in response to DNA damage.

Telomere repeat binding factor 2 (TRF2) has been increasingly recognized to be involved in telomere maintenance and DNA damage response. Here, we show that TRF2 directly binds SIRT6 in a DNA independent manner and that this interaction is increased upon replication stress. Knockdown of SIRT6 up-regulates TRF2 protein levels and counteracts its down-regulation during DNA damage response, leading to cell survival. Moreover, we report that SIRT6 deactetylates in vivo the TRFH domain of TRF2, which in turn, is ubiquitylated in vivo activating the ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis. Notably, overexpression of the TRF2cT mutant failed to be stabilized by SIRT6 depletion, demonstrating that the TRFH domain is required for its post-transcriptional modification. Finally, we report an inverse correlation between SIRT6 and TRF2 protein expression levels in a cohort of colon rectal cancer patients. Taken together our findings describe TRF2 as a novel SIRT6 substrate and demonstrate that acetylation of TRF2 plays a crucial role in the regulation of TRF2 protein stability, thus providing a new route for modulating its expression level during oncogenesis and damage response.

Functional Comparison of Short and Long Isoforms of the TRF2 Protein in Drosophila melanogaster.

TRF2 protein (TBP-related factor 2) can substitute for TBP forming alternative transcription initiation complexes on TATA-less promoters, including the promoters of histone H1 and piRNA clusters required for transposon repression. The Drosophilatrf2 gene codes for two isoforms: a "short" and a "long" one, in which the same short TRF2 sequence is preceded by a long N-terminal domain. Here, we demonstrated that the long TFR2 isoform has a greater functional activity than the short isoform by expressing each of them at a reduced rate under the endogenous promoters. Expression of the long isoform alone affects neither the flies' viability nor the sex ratio. Expression of the short isoform alone leads to the phenotype described for the trf2 gene insufficiency and derepression of transposable elements, that is, decreased viability, disturbance of homologous chromosome pairing and segregation, and apparent female-biased sex ratio.

TRF2 recruits ORC through TRFH domain dimerization.

Telomeres are specialized chromatin structures that prevent the degradation and instability of the ends of linear chromosomes. While telomerase maintains long stretches of the telomeric repeat, the majority of telomeric DNA is duplicated by conventional DNA replication. A fundamental step in eukaryotic DNA replication involves chromatin binding of the origin recognition complex (ORC). In human cells, telomeric repeat binding factor 2 (TRF2) is thought to play a role in the recruitment of ORC onto telomeres. To better understand the mechanism of TRF2-mediated ORC recruitment, we utilized a lacO-LacI protein tethering system in U2OS cells and found that ectopically targeted TRF2, but not TRF1, can recruit ORC onto the lacO array. We further found that the TRF homology (TRFH) dimerization domain of TRF2, but not its mutant defective in dimerization, is sufficient for ORC and minichromosome maintenance (MCM) recruitment. Mutations impairing the dimerization also compromised ORC recruitment by full-length TRF2. Similar results were obtained using immunoprecipitation and GST pull-down assays. Together, these results suggest that dimerized TRF2 recruits ORC and stimulates pre-replication complex (pre-RC) formation at telomeres through the TRFH domain.

Extratelomeric Binding of the Telomere Binding Protein TRF2 at the PCGF3 Promoter Is G-Quadruplex Motif-Dependent.

Telomere repeat binding factor 2 (TRF2) is critical for the protection of chromosome ends. Mounting evidence suggests that TRF2 associates with extratelomeric sites and TRF2 functions may not be limited to telomeres. Here, we show that the PCGF3 promoter harbors a sequence capable of forming the DNA secondary structure G-quadruplex motif, which is required for binding of TRF2 at the PCGF3 promoter. We demonstrate that promoter binding by TRF2 mediates PCGF3 promoter activity, and both the N-terminal and C-terminal domains of TRF2 are necessary for promoter activity. Altogether, this shows for the first time that a telomere binding factor may regulate a component of the polycomb group of proteins.

The structurally similar TRFH domain of TRF1 and TRF2 dimers shows distinct behaviour towards TIN2.

The telomere repeat binding-factor 1 and 2 (TRF1 and TRF2) proteins of the shelterin complex bind to duplex telomeric DNA as homodimers, and the homodimerization is mediated by their TRFH (TRF-homology) domains. We performed molecular dynamic (MD) simulations of the dimer forms of TRF1TRFH and TRF2TRFH in the presence/absence of the TIN2TBM (TIN2, TRF-interacting nuclear protein 2, TBM, TRF-binding motif) peptide. The MD results suggest that TIN2TBM is necessary to ensure the stability of TRF1TRFH homodimer but not the TRF2TRFH homodimer. In TRF1-TIN2-TRF2 complex, the peptide enhances the protein-protein interactions to yield a stable heterodimer. Both monomers in TRF1TRFH homodimer interact almost equally with the peptide, whereas in TRF2TRFH homodimer, monomer TRF2TRFH(M1) exhibits more dominant interactions than the TRF2TRFH(M2). The common residues of TRF1/2TRFH(M1) that form interactions with TIN2TBM in all peptide-bound systems originate from the H3 (helix) and L3 (loop) regions. Additionally, in the homodimer systems, residues of TRF1/2TRFH(M2) also interact with the peptide. The residue pair E71-K213 is responsible for different conformations of TRF1TRFH homodimers; specifically, this residue pair enhances the protein-peptide/protein interactions in peptide-bound/unbound systems, respectively. TRF1TRFH and TRF2TRFH proteins have a conserved but different interface responsible for the protein-protein/peptide interactions that exist in the corresponding dimers.

A higher-order entity formed by the flexible assembly of RAP1 with TRF2.

Telomere integrity is essential to maintain genome stability, and telomeric dysfunctions are associated with cancer and aging pathologies. In human, the shelterin complex binds TTAGGG DNA repeats and provides capping to chromosome ends. Within shelterin, RAP1 is recruited through its interaction with TRF2, and TRF2 is required for telomere protection through a network of nucleic acid and protein interactions. RAP1 is one of the most conserved shelterin proteins although one unresolved question is how its interaction may influence TRF2 properties and regulate its capacity to bind multiple proteins. Through a combination of biochemical, biophysical and structural approaches, we unveiled a unique mode of assembly between RAP1 and TRF2. The complete interaction scheme between the full-length proteins involves a complex biphasic interaction of RAP1 that directly affects the binding properties of the assembly. These results reveal how a non-DNA binding protein can influence the properties of a DNA-binding partner by mutual conformational adjustments.

Molecular Architecture of Full-length TRF1 Favors Its Interaction with DNA.

Telomeres are specific DNA-protein structures found at both ends of eukaryotic chromosomes that protect the genome from degradation and from being recognized as double-stranded breaks. In vertebrates, telomeres are composed of tandem repeats of the TTAGGG sequence that are bound by a six-subunit complex called shelterin. Molecular mechanisms of telomere functions remain unknown in large part due to lack of structural data on shelterins, shelterin complex, and its interaction with the telomeric DNA repeats. TRF1 is one of the best studied shelterin components; however, the molecular architecture of the full-length protein remains unknown. We have used single-particle electron microscopy to elucidate the structure of TRF1 and its interaction with telomeric DNA sequence. Our results demonstrate that full-length TRF1 presents a molecular architecture that assists its interaction with telometic DNA and at the same time makes TRFH domains accessible to other TRF1 binding partners. Furthermore, our studies suggest hypothetical models on how other proteins as TIN2 and tankyrase contribute to regulate TRF1 function.

Disruption of direct 3D telomere-TRF2 interaction through two molecularly disparate mechanisms is a hallmark of primary Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg cells.

In classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (cHL), specific changes in the 3D telomere organization cause progression from mononuclear Hodgkin cells (H) to multinucleated Reed-Sternberg cells (RS). In a post-germinal center B-cell in vitro model, permanent latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) expression, as observed in Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated cHL, results in multinuclearity and complex chromosomal aberrations through downregulation of key element of the shelterin complex, the telomere repeat binding factor 2 (TRF2). Thus, we hypothesized that the three-dimensional (3D) telomere-TRF2 interaction was progressively disturbed during transition from H to RS cells. To this end, we developed and applied for the first time a combined quantitative 3D TRF2-telomere immune fluorescent in situ hybridization (3D TRF2/Telo-Q-FISH) technique to monolayers of primary H and RS cells, and adjacent benign internal control lymphocytes of lymph node biopsy suspensions from diagnostic lymph node biopsies of 14 patients with cHL. We show that H and RS cells are characterized by two distinct patterns of disruption of 3D telomere-TRF2 interaction. Disruption pattern A is defined by massive attrition of telomere signals and a considerable increase of TRF2 signals not associated with telomeres. This pattern is restricted to EBV-negative cHL. Disruption pattern B is defined by telomere de-protection due to an impressive loss of TRF2 signals, physically linked to telomeres. This pattern is typical of, but is not restricted to, LMP1+EBV-associated cHL. In the disruption pattern B group, so-called 'ghost' end-stage RS cells, void of both TRF2 and telomere signals, were identified, whether or not associated with EBV. Our findings demonstrate that two molecularly disparate mechanisms converge on the level of 3D telomere-TRF2 interaction in the formation of RS cells.

Molecular basis and quantitative assessment of TRF1 and TRF2 protein interactions with TIN2 and Apollo peptides.

Shelterin is a six-protein complex (TRF1, TRF2, POT1, RAP1, TIN2, and TPP1) that also functions in smaller subsets in regulation and protection of human telomeres. Two closely related proteins, TRF1 and TRF2, make high-affinity contact directly with double-stranded telomeric DNA and serve as a molecular platform. Protein TIN2 binds to TRF1 and TRF2 dimer-forming domains, whereas Apollo makes interaction only with TRF2. To elucidate the molecular basis of these interactions, we employed molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of TRF1TRFH-TIN2TBM and TRF2TRFH-TIN2TBM/ApolloTBM complexes and of the isolated proteins. MD enabled a structural and dynamical comparison of protein-peptide complexes including H-bond interactions and interfacial residues that may regulate TRF protein binding to the given peptides, especially focusing on interactions described in crystallographic data. Residues with a selective function in both TRF1TRFH and TRF2TRFH and forming a stable hydrogen bond network with TIN2TBM or ApolloTBM peptides were traced. Our study revealed that TIN2TBM forms a well-defined binding mode with TRF1TRFH as compared to TRF2TRFH, and that the binding pocket of TIN2TBM is deeper for TRF2TRFH protein than ApolloTBM. The MD data provide a basis for the reinterpretation of mutational data obtained in crystallographic work for the TRF proteins. Together, the previously determined X-ray structure and our MD provide a detailed view of the TRF-peptide binding mode and the structure of TRF1/2 binding pockets. Particular TRF-peptide interactions are very specific for the formation of each protein-peptide complex, identifying TRF proteins as potential targets for the design of inhibitors/drugs modulating telomere machinery for anticancer therapy.