Exploring approaches to pulp vitality assessment: A scoping review of nontraditional methods.

INTRODUCTION: Diagnostic procedures for pulp vitality assessment are a crucial aspect of routine dental practice. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of nontraditional techniques and methodologies for assessing pulp vitality, specifically exploring promising approaches that are currently not used in dental practice. METHODS: The study protocol was registered a priori (https://osf.io/3m97z/). An extensive electronic search was conducted across multiple databases, including MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase. Inclusion criteria were guided by the research question based on the PCC model as follows: "What are the potential nontraditional techniques (Concept) for assessing pulp vitality (Population) in the field of endodontics or clinical practice (Context)?" Studies were included that explored possible approaches to pulp vitality assessment, utilizing a range of techniques, whilst any studies using traditional pulp tests (cold, heat, and electric stimulation) or well-known methods (pulse oximetry and laser Doppler flowmetry) were excluded. Reviewers independently screened articles and extracted data. A patent search was also performed. RESULTS: Of 3062 studies, 65 were included that described nontraditional approaches for assessing pulp vitality. These included a range of optical diagnostic methods, ultrasound Doppler flowmetry (UDF), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), terahertz imaging, tooth temperature measurements, as well as invasive methodologies, including 133xenon washout, radioisotope-labelled tracers, hydrogen gas desaturation, intravital microscopy and fluorescent microspheres isotope clearance. The patent search included artificial intelligence and biomarkers methods. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides details for potential innovative tests that may directly describe pulp vitality. Importantly, these methods range from clinically impractical through to promising methods that may transform clinical practice. Several nontraditional techniques have the potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy and could provide valuable insights into the assessment of pulp vitality in challenging clinical scenarios.

Comparison of the vitality test with sensitivity tests in mature and immature teeth: clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: One of the most important steps in deciding on the treatment of a tooth is to determine the vitality and health status of the pulp. Since immature teeth innervation is not completed, the response to sensitivity tests may not yield definite results. Pulse oximetry (PO) which is considered as a vitality test, measures the arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2). This study aims to compare PO, electric pulp test (EPT) and cold test in mature and immature permanent teeth. METHODS: 20 immature and 20 mature permanent incisors of 6-12-year-old ASA1 children who did not use any analgesics, were included in the study. Pulp vitality of the teeth was determined by EPT, cold test and PO. An infant probe of PO device (CMS60D, Contec Medical Systems Co. Ltd, China) was used to determine the SpO2 of the teeth. The SpO2 level is controlled on the patient's finger by a children's probe and an infant probe of PO. Shapiro-Wilk, Spearman rank correlation test and Kruskal-Wallis test/Dunn post-hoc analysis were used for statistical comparisons. RESULTS: There was no significant correlation between finger SpO2 and the mature/immature teeth SpO2 (r=-0.026, r = 0.253). Arterial oxygen saturation values in the immature teeth were significantly higher than in the mature teeth (p = 0.002). There was a high correlation between the vitality response of the EPT, cold test and PO. CONCLUSIONS: Pulse oximetry can be used as an effective vitality test compared to sensitivity tests in both immature and mature permanent incisors.

Accuracy of vitality and sensibility testing in mature and immature anterior teeth: a clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Determining the health the status of the pulp is crucial in treatment planning. Both sensibility and vitality testing techniques may be employed. Sensibility testing may be inaccurate in teeth with incomplete root apices. This study intends to compare the accuracy of cold testing (CT), electric pulp testing (EPT) and pulse oximetry (PO) in determining pulpal status of mature and immature anterior teeth. METHODS: 20 mature and 20 immature maxillary permanent incisors of healthy 6-12-year-olds were included. Teeth were categorised as mature permanent central incisors, immature permanent central incisors, and a negative control group with endodontically treated incisors. Vitality and sensitivity tests were performed using EPT, CT, and PO, with measurements taken thrice per tooth. PO was measured with infant pulse oximetry probe sensors placed on the tooth surfaces and fingers. Descriptive statistics were computed, and data distribution was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. The Spearman correlation coefficient analysed correlations between dental and finger SpO2 measurements, while the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn post-hoc analysis compared SpO2 and EPT measurements across tooth development stages, with a significance threshold set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: SpO2 values were significantly higher in immature teeth compared to mature teeth (p < 0.05), and both were significantly higher than in the negative control group. There was no significant correlation between SpO2 values measured from fingers and teeth. EPT values were significantly higher in immature teeth compared to mature teeth (p < 0.001). The accuracy rate of PO, EPT, and cold tests was 100% in this study, with no false positive or negative responses in the control group. The SpO2 values in mature and immature vital teeth ranged between 80-92%. CONCLUSIONS: PO is a reliable and non-invasive method for determining pulp vitality in both mature and immature teeth, comparable to traditional sensitivity tests like EPT and CT. PO can be considered an alternative vitality test, especially useful in paediatric dental patients due to its atraumatic and objective nature. Further studies with larger sample sizes and additional vitality tests like doppler flowmetry are recommended to enhance the clinical diagnosis of pulp vitality in anterior and posterior teeth.

Oxygen saturation and perfusion index from pulse oximetry in adult volunteers with viable incisors.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of pulp vitality is an important diagnostic procedure in dentistry. Conventional techniques for measurement of pulp vitality, including thermal stimulation, electrical stimulation, or direct dentin stimulation, are frequently associated with false positive or false negative results. Recently, oxygen saturation from pulse oximetry has been utilized in the evaluation of pulp vitality. Perfusion index (PI) data calculated from photoplethysmography have been widely used to evaluate peripheral perfusion. The combination of oxygen saturation and PI may aid in the accurate measurement of pulp vitality. We aimed to investigate the baseline values of oxygen saturation and PI using pulse oximetry in adult volunteers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifteen adult volunteers with viable incisors were tested. To measure PI, a fabricated oxygen sensor was applied to an incisor without a pulp lesion while oxygen saturation was simultaneously measured in the finger. Oxygen saturation and PI were continuously measured with customized software. The normal reference values of oxygen saturation and PI were obtained by analyzing the recorded data. RESULTS: Pulse oximetry showed relatively stable, objective, and accurate oxygen saturation results. The tooth oxygen saturation ranged from 97% to 100%. The PI ranged from 0.3% to 0.5%, and PI and oxygen saturation showed relatively consistent values across subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Although there are some limitations to our study, these results may prove useful for detecting teeth with impaired vitality and non-invasively differentiating between necrotic and vital pulp.

Estimates of sensitivity and specificity of electric pulp testing depend on pulp disease spectrum: a modelling study.

AIM: To demonstrate how the spectrum of diseased pulps may influence sensitivity and specificity in diagnostic studies on pulp status. METHODOLOGY: An original sample from a previous study consisting of 59 teeth scheduled for root canal treatment was used where the relationship between the response to electric pulp testing and the visual status of the pulp was evaluated. To alter the spectrum of diseased pulps, a hypothetical sample of asymptomatic teeth with deep caries lesions was added to the original sample. Sensitivity and specificity were then compared for the two samples. RESULTS: In the original sample of 59 teeth, sensitivity was 72% and specificity 90%. When the spectrum of diseased pulps was altered, sensitivity decreased to 67% and specificity increased to 97%. The change in disease spectrum also decreased the prevalence of necrotic pulps. CONCLUSIONS: The spectrum of diseased pulps included in a diagnostic study on the accuracy of electric pulp testing, and indirectly also disease prevalence (here pulp necrosis), influences estimates of sensitivity and specificity. This implies that estimates of diagnostic accuracy from one study with a particular tooth population spectrum may not apply to another tooth population with a different disease spectrum.

ARE PULP SENSIBILITY TESTS STILL SENSIBLE?

BACKGROUND: Electric and thermal tests are the most commonly employed methods for the diagnosis of pulp health status. The objectives of our study are to assess the validity, yield and accuracy of cold and electric pulp tests in determining the vitality of teeth requiring endodontic treatment. METHODS: A cross sectional study was carried out at the Dental Clinic of Aga Khan University Hospital on 75 patients requiring endodontic treatment. Before commencement of endodontic treatment, a provisional diagnosis of pulp status was made using an electric pulp tester and cold test. The tooth was then labelled as either vital or necrotic. Then an access openings was made and tooth's actual pulp status (vital/necrotic) was determined by observing bleeding in the pulp chamber. The validity, yield and accuracy were calculated on the basis of these findings. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of cold test were 84%, 88%, 93% and 73% respectively. The sensitivity & specificity of electric test were 82% and 88% respectively whereas the positive predictive value negative predictive value of electric test were 93% and 71% respectively. The accuracy of cold and electric pulp test was 85% and 84% respectively. CONCLUSION: Both cold test and EPT have similar sensitivity, specificity and accuracy values. Although vitality tests have a promising future in the diagnosis of pulp health status but within limitation of this study we found that sensibility tests have satisfactory validity and accuracy values to be used routinely prior to endodontic and restorative treatments especially when used in conjunction with one each other.

Laser light passage through restored and carious posterior teeth.

Laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) has been used to investigate pulpal blood flow as a means of pulp vitality testing. Transmission of laser light from the tooth surface to the pulp space may be influenced by caries and restorations. One hundred and twenty-two first and second molars that had caries into dentine, restorations or significant loss of coronal tissue were sectioned in half axio-bucco-lingually. The two sections were illuminated with a laser from their buccal and lingual aspects 2 mm coronal to the amelocemental junction. Light reaching the pulp space was recorded. Buccal and lingual illumination sites were equally effective for 67 teeth (55%). Buccal sites alone were effective for 35 teeth (29%), despite over one-third of these surfaces being restored or featuring enamel or dentine caries. A lingual position alone was effective for 20 teeth (16%). Caries affected light transmission, but for over half the teeth, the pulp could be illuminated from all four probe positions. No effect was found when the influence of mesial and distal restorations on transmission into the corresponding tooth section was examined. The pulp spaces of most (84%) restored, and carious posterior teeth could be illuminated by laser light from their buccal aspect and these teeth could potentially be vitality tested using LDF.

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Pulp Sensitivity Testing Results Using a New Pulp Testing Device versus Some Commonly Used Methods: A Crossover Study.

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy and safety of a single novel electronic pulp sensitivity tester with a transilluminator (PSTT) capable of providing 4 different tests was compared with gold standard (GS) pulp testing methods. METHODS: Four hundred eighty teeth, including 3 from each quadrant and their contralateral and opposing teeth, were randomly assessed using the PSTT or GS methods. Seven days later, the same teeth were assessed using the method not used earlier so that all teeth were evaluated using both methods. Sixty previously root canal-treated teeth, serving as negative controls, were assessed identically to the experimental groups. Results were analyzed using IBM SPSS software (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY) (P < .05). RESULTS: A higher percentage of teeth responded to cold and electricity using GS methods compared with the PSTT (99.4 vs 93.1 and 99.6 vs 97.3, respectively). A lower percentage of teeth responded to heat using the GS method compared with the PSTT (50.0 vs 68.1). Chi-square tests determined differences in the proportion of sensitivity to temperature, and electric testing methods were statistically significant (P < .001 and P = .004, respectively). No difference in the proportion of sensitivity was observed for transillumination. The Wilcoxon signed rank test determined significantly shorter cold testing times using the GS method (P = .024). Shorter testing times were observed using the PSTT for heat (P < .001), electric pulp testing (P = .048), and transillumination (P = .001). The overall PSTT testing time was significantly shorter than the GS testing time (P = .03). Tissue injury was not observed. CONCLUSIONS: The PSTT efficiently and safely provided heat and transillumination for pulpal diagnosis. Improvements are needed to enhance the cold and electric stimulus efficacy.

Prospective clinical assessment of pulp sensitivity after chin bone harvesting.

PROPOSAL: Evaluate pulp vitality of mandibular teeth after chin bone harvesting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients underwent chin bone harvesting and accompanied for 12 months, being submitted to testing for pulp vitality with Endo Ice refrigerant spray to produce a local temperature of -50 °C. The statistical analysis was executed with McNemar test with P value < 0.05. RESULTS: Results show that canine teeth are most susceptible to alterations; 68.82% (181) of the teeth tested showed no loss of pulp sensitivity to cold 30 days after surgery (P < 0.05), and at the end of the study, that figure had risen to 100% (263) of all teeth included in the sample. CONCLUSIONS: Pulp vitality testing showed that 31.18% (82) of teeth experienced some loss of sensitivity, but by 12 months after surgery, all teeth had recuperated their pulp sensitivity to cold unaided.

Anesthetic efficacy of a combination of 0.5 M mannitol plus 127.2 mg of lidocaine with 50 µg epinephrine in inferior alveolar nerve blocks: a prospective randomized, single-blind study.

The purpose of this prospective, randomized, single-blind study was to determine the anesthetic efficacy of 127.2 mg lidocaine with 50 µg epinephrine compared to 127.2 mg lidocaine with 50 µg epinephrine plus 0.5 M mannitol in inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) blocks. Forty subjects randomly received 2 IAN blocks consisting of a 3.18 mL formulation of 127.2 mg lidocaine with 50 µg epinephrine and a 5 mL formulation of 127.2 mg lidocaine with 50 µg epinephrine (3.18 mL) plus 0.5 M mannitol (1.82 mL) in 2 separate appointments spaced at least 1 week apart. Mandibular anterior and posterior teeth were blindly electric pulp tested at 4-minute cycles for 60 minutes postinjection. Pain of solution deposition and postoperative pain were also measured. No response from the subject to the maximum output (80 reading) of the pulp tester was used as the criterion for pulpal anesthesia. Total percent pulpal anesthesia was defined as the total of all the times of pulpal anesthesia (80 readings) over the 60 minutes. One hundred percent of the subjects had profound lip numbness with both inferior alveolar nerve blocks. The results demonstrated that a 5 mL formulation of 127.2 mg lidocaine with 50 µg epinephrine plus 0.5 M mannitol was significantly better than the 3.18 mL formulation of 127.2 mg lidocaine with 50 µg epinephrine for all teeth. Solution deposition pain and postoperative pain were not statistically different between the lidocaine/mannitol formulation and the lidocaine formulation without mannitol. We concluded that adding 0.5 M mannitol to a lidocaine with epinephrine formulation was significantly more effective in achieving a greater percentage of total pulpal anesthesia than a lidocaine formulation without mannitol.

A review of the questions and needs in endodontic diagnosis.

The current diversity of opinions in endodontic diagnosis has been a source of interest and academic debate by clinicians and researchers. Currently, no single pulp testing technique can reliably diagnose all pulpal conditions neither it has been proven to be superior in all aspects. Despite improvements of various aspects of this process, there are no historically dramatic changes, or consensus for pulpal status in health or disease in addition to a lack of relative systematic reviews. In this review, the past, present and future most debated and critically questioned issues of endodontic diagnosis are discussed. The aim of this review is to provide insights in future diagnostic modalities and areas for further study in endodontic practice pertinent to diagnosis.

Making sense of sensibility: part 2.

To reach an accurate endodontic diagnosis, it is important for clinicians to understand how to undertake pulpal sensibility tests correctly, how to interpret their results and how to understand their limitations. Part one of this series defined different terms relevant to pulp testing and detailed the diagnostic uses and diagnostic accuracy of pulp testing methods. This section describes clinical techniques for commonly used pulp tests and highlights their limitations and correct interpretation of their results. Applying these principles and techniques will enable accurate endodontic diagnosis in different clinical scenarios.

An evaluation of the repeatability of electric pulp sensibility tests.

The accuracy, reliability and reproducibility of electric pulp tests (EPT) have been investigated but there is conflicting information about their repeatability. The aim of this study was to investigate whether EPT are repeatable over time. EPT results from 180 healthy teeth in 39 patients with 2-10 readings per tooth (total 692 readings) were analysed. Single measures intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) ranged from 0.776 to 0.845 in teeth with 2-7 repeated measures (P < 0.001), indicating good repeatability. With eight or more measures per tooth, the ICC was low, indicating poor repeatability over longer follow-up times, but only seven teeth in two subjects were included in this analysis. The Pearson correlation showed no statistically significant correlation for 2-7 readings but when all readings were included, there was a statistically significant negative correlation. Hence, EPT has good repeatability.

Reliability of Electric Pulp Test, Cold Pulp Test or Tooth Transillumination to Assess Pulpal Health in Permanent Dog Teeth.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of electric pulp test (EPT), cold pulp test (CPT) and tooth transillumination (TTI) in the assessment of pulpal health in dog teeth. Forty-five client-owned dogs requiring tooth extraction or pulpectomy were included. For each patient, one affected and two control healthy teeth were evaluated with EPT, followed by CPT and TTI. Direct pulp inspection was used as a gold standard. The real pulpal health (vital or necrotic) was determined by the presence or absence of bleeding after creating access to the pulp chamber. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of EPT, CPT and TTI were obtained for each pulp test using the binomial Clopper-Pearson exact method to establish confidence intervals. Forty-five affected teeth were tested. Forty-three were tested with EPT, CPT, and TTI, and two were tested solely with EPT and CPT. All dogs tested with EPT and TTI were included in the study whereas 21 out of 45 (47%) dogs tested with CPT were excluded. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy were respectively 0.96, 1.00, 1.00, 0.96 and 0.98 for EPT; 1.00, 0.89, 0.92, 1.00 and 0.95 for CPT; and 0.59, 0.95, 0.94, 0.67 and 0.76 for TTI. This study concluded that EPT is a highly reliable diagnostic test to evaluate pulpal health in dogs. The high accuracy of CPT is conditional on the patient's responsiveness to stimulation applied to its control healthy teeth. TTI was the least reliable test in the study.

Assesment of radiotherapy effects on the blood flow in gingiva and dental pulp - a laser Doppler flowmetry study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine and compare the dental pulp and gingival blood flow in patients referred for oropharyngeal radiotherapy (RT) at three different time points: before the start, immediately after, and six months following the completion of RT. The aim is also to evaluate the dependence of the pulp and gingival blood flow on the radiation dose. METHODOLOGY: A prospective study included 10 patients referred for intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) in the oropharyngeal region, with at least one intact tooth surrounded by a healthy gingiva. The dose received by each selected tooth and adjacent gingiva was determined according to the map of treatment planning and computer systems. The blood flow measurements were performed using the laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) method. RESULTS: Comparing vascular flows at three different time points, the median blood flow in the dental pulp showed no statistically significant difference (p=0.325), contrary to gingiva (p=0.011). Immediately after RT completion, the gingival flow significantly increased compared to its starting point (p=0.012). The pulp flow correlated negatively with the radiation dose, whereas a strong correlation was noted 6 months following the RT completion. CONCLUSIONS: RT caused a significant acute gingival blood flow increase, followed by a long-term (over six months) tendency to return to the starting levels. The dental pulp blood flow is differently affected by higher radiation doses (over 50Gy) in comparison to lower doses (below 50Gy). During RT planning, considering the possibility of protecting the teeth localized near the Gross Tumor Volume as a sensitive organ is recommended.

Responses of pulp sensibility tests during orthodontic treatment and retention.

AIM: To investigate the effect of orthodontic tooth movement involving the six maxillary anterior teeth on the pulp response to both thermal and electric stimuli during active orthodontic treatment and retention. METHODOLOGY: Forty-seven subjects who required fixed orthodontic appliances were used as a study group with 23 non-orthodontic subjects recruited as a control group. Cold and electrical stimuli were applied to the maxillary incisors and canines immediately before and after the placement of fixed appliances and at regular intervals for both groups during active treatment and 12 months into retention. The numbers of negative responses for each tooth at each time interval were recorded for both groups. The data were collected and tabulated, and chi-square tests were used to determine significant difference between the numbers of negative responses for the two types of tests used on the same tooth and between different teeth. The mean values of the electric pulp testing (EPT) thresholds were also obtained and used to assist in analysing the results. RESULTS: In the control group, all teeth tested positively to the EPT and thermal pulp tests at all time intervals. In the orthodontic group, two teeth failed to respond to EPT and only one tooth to thermal testing at baseline (Time 0). After that, the number of negative responses to both tests increased gradually at each time interval reaching a peak after 2 months of active treatment (Time 3) and then declined gradually towards the end of observation period (Time 14). At baseline, response thresholds to electric testing were typically higher for orthodontic subjects, particularly for the maxillary lateral incisor tooth. For the control group, the response threshold over the study period was relatively constant. For the orthodontic group, application of force immediately increased the response threshold to EPT (Time 1), which peaked after 2 months (Time 3) and then gradually reduced. At the end of the active treatment, response thresholds remained elevated, but they returned to pre-treatment values towards the end of the retention phase. CONCLUSION: Dental practitioners should interpret responses to electrical pulp testing cautiously in orthodontic patients; thermal testing may be more reliable.

Comparison of the reliability of laser Doppler flowmetry, pulse oximetry and electric pulp tester in assessing the pulp vitality of human teeth.

This study was designed to evaluate and compare the reliability of laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF), pulse oximetry (PO) and electric pulp tester (EPT) for assessing the pulpal status as a vitality test method by calculating their sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. Data were collected from 59 pairs of maxillary anterior teeth (38 pairs of central, 21 pairs of lateral incisors) in 51 patients (range 12-18years, mean age 14·6±1·73years, 28 women, 23 men). The teeth with complete endodontic fillings constituted the study group, and the healthy, contralateral teeth of the same patients were constituted the control group. The calculated sensitivity was 0·915 for the EPT and 0·813 for the PO. And the specificity of EPT was 0·881 and PO was 0·949. The difference between the LDF values obtained from the study, and control group was statistically significant (P=0·0001). The findings of this study indicated that LDF can reliably discriminate the vitality of the teeth with a sensitivity and specificity of 1·0 for this sample. Laser Doppler flowmetry was found to be a more reliable and effective method than PO and EPT of assessing the pulpal status of human teeth.

The ability of pulp sensibility tests to evaluate the pulp status in primary teeth.

BACKGROUND. Accurate determination of the pulp status is the most important part of conservative pulp therapy. AIM. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of thermal and electrical pulp tests to assess the pulp status in primary teeth. DESIGN. Seventy-eight primary molar teeth in 36 children were investigated. Fifty-six teeth had unknown pulp status in need of endodontic treatment, and 22 were intact teeth with no signs of pulp disease. Cold, hot and electrical pulp testing (EPT) were performed on each tooth. The gold standard was established by direct inspection of the pulp after an access cavity had been made. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for each test and different sequential combinations of pulp testing were calculated. Sequential combination test analysis was used for data analysis. RESULTS. The highest accuracy was found for EPT, followed by heat and cold tests. No significant difference was found between the accuracy of EPT and the heat test (P-values > 0.05); however, the accuracy of EPT was significantly higher than that of the cold test (P-value< 0.05). CONCLUSION. Based on this study, EPT can be used as a reliable test for diagnosing the pulp status in primary teeth.

Review of pulp sensibility tests. Part I: general information and thermal tests.

A major, and essential, part of the diagnostic process for pulp disease is the use of pulp sensibility tests. When diagnosing pulp pain, these tests can be used to reproduce the symptoms reported by the patient to diagnose the diseased tooth as well as the disease state. However, a major shortcoming with these tests is that they only indirectly provide an indication of the state of the pulp by measuring a neural response rather than the vascular supply, so both false positive and false negative results can occur. The relevant literature on pulp sensibility tests in the context of endodontics up to January 2009 was reviewed using PubMed and MEDLINE database searches. This search identified papers published between November 1964 and January 2009 in all languages. Thermal tests have been used as an integral part of dental examinations. Two types of thermal tests are available, one uses a cold stimulus and the other uses a hot stimulus, and each has various methods of delivery. If these tests are used properly, injury to the pulp is highly unlikely. A review of the literature regarding the rationale, indications, limitations, and interpretation of thermal tests, the value of these diagnostic tests, as well as a discussion of the important points about each of these tests is presented.

Review of pulp sensibility tests. Part II: electric pulp tests and test cavities.

The electric pulp test (EPT) is one type of pulp sensibility test that can be used as an aid in the diagnosis of the status of the dental pulp. However, like thermal pulp sensibility tests, it does not provide any direct information about the vitality (blood supply) of the pulp or whether the pulp is necrotic. The relevant literature on pulp sensibility tests in the context of endodontics up to January 2009 was reviewed using PubMed and MEDLINE database searches. This search identified articles published between November 1964 and January 2009 in all languages. The EPT is technique sensitive, and false responses may occur. Various factors can affect the test results, and therefore it is important that dental practitioners understand the nature of these tests and how to interpret them. Test cavities have been suggested as another method for assessing the pulp status; however, the use of this technique needs careful consideration because of its invasive and irreversible nature. In addition, it is unlikely to be useful in apprehensive patients and should not be required because it provides no further information beyond what thermal and electric pulp sensibility tests provide - that is, whether the pulp is able to respond to a stimulus. A review of the literature and a discussion of the important points regarding these two tests are presented.