Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 555
Filtrar
Más filtros

Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 33(6): e5845, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38825961

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Medications are commonly used during pregnancy to manage pre-existing conditions and conditions that arise during pregnancy. However, not all medications are safe to use in pregnancy. This study utilized privacy-preserving record linkage (PPRL) to examine medications dispensed under the national Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) to pregnant women in Western Australia (WA) overall and by medication safety category. METHODS: In this retrospective, cross-sectional, population-based study, state perinatal records (Midwives Notification Scheme) were linked with national PBS dispensing data using PPRL. Live and stillborn neonates born between 2012 and 2019 in WA were included. The proportion of pregnancies during which the mother was dispensed a PBS medication was calculated, overall and by medication safety category. Factors associated with PBS medication dispensing were examined using logistic regression. RESULTS: PPRL linkage identified matching records for 97.4% of women with perinatal records. A total of 271 739 pregnancies were identified, with 158 585 (58.4%) pregnancies involving the dispensing of at least one PBS medication. Category A medications (those considered safe in pregnancy) were the most commonly dispensed (n = 119 126, 43.8%) followed by B3 (n = 51 135, 18.8%) and B1 (n = 42 388, 15.6%) medication (those with unknown safety). Over the study period, the dispensing of PBS medications in pregnancy increased (OR: 1.06, 95%CI: 1.06, 1.07). The strongest predictor of medication dispensing in pregnancy was pre-pregnancy dispensing (OR: 3.61, 95%CI: 3.54, 3.68). Other factors associated with medication use in pregnancy were smoking, older maternal age, obesity, and prior pregnancies. CONCLUSION: Privacy preserving record linkage provides a way to link cross-jurisdictional data while preserving patient confidentiality and data security. The dispensing of PBS medication in pregnancy was common and increased over time, with approximately 60% of women dispensed at least one medication during pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Registro Médico Coordinado , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Australia Occidental , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Adulto Joven , Seguro de Servicios Farmacéuticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Recién Nacido
2.
Diabet Med ; 37(5): 822-827, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31197880

RESUMEN

AIMS: To examine whether income-related disparities in glycaemic control decline after the age of 65 years, when publicly funded universal drug insurance is acquired in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cross-sectional study using linked administrative healthcare databases. Adults with diabetes, aged 40-89 years, with available HbA1c data were included (N = 716 297). Income was based on median neighbourhood household income. Multiple linear regression was used to test for effect modification of age ≥65 years on the relationship between income and HbA1c . RESULTS: There was a significant inverse association between income and HbA1c level. After adjusting for baseline factors, the effect of income on HbA1c level was significantly greater for individuals aged <65 years (mean difference HbA1c for lowest vs highest income group +2.5 mmol/mol, 95% CI +2.3 to +2.7 [+0.23%, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.24]) than for those aged ≥65 years (+1.2 mmol/mol, 95% CI +1.0 to +1.3 [+0.11%, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.12]; P < 0.0001 for interaction). CONCLUSIONS: Despite universal access to healthcare, people with diabetes with lower incomes had significantly worse glycaemic control compared with their counterparts on higher incomes. However, income gradients in glycaemic control were markedly reduced after the age of 65 years, possibly as a result of access to prescription drug coverage.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Renta/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Servicios Farmacéuticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Cobertura Universal del Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Costo de Enfermedad , Diabetes Mellitus/economía , Diabetes Mellitus/metabolismo , Costos de los Medicamentos , Femenino , Financiación Gubernamental/estadística & datos numéricos , Hemoglobina Glucada/metabolismo , Control Glucémico/economía , Gastos en Salud , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ontario
3.
Am J Public Health ; 110(1): 61-64, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31725314

RESUMEN

Clinical trials have demonstrated that preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) protects against HIV infection; yet, even with its approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2012, less than 10% of eligible users in the United States are currently taking PrEP.While there are multiple factors that influence PrEP uptake and pose barriers to PrEP implementation, here we focus on PrEP's cost in the United States, which, at the current list price of $2000 per month and with high levels of cost sharing, can leave insured users with more than $1000 in out-of-pocket costs every year. We discuss how patient deductibles, monthly premiums, copayments, and coinsurance vary widely and may increase the financial burden. Although drug payment-assistance programs have made PrEP more affordable to uninsured and underinsured users, lack of insurance is a barrier to PrEP accessibility. The FDA approved a generic version in 2017; however, that version has not been distributed to US consumers and may not be more affordable.As other countries begin implementing PrEP programs, the extent of PrEP's availability as a tool in the global fight against HIV remains to be seen.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Servicios Farmacéuticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Profilaxis Pre-Exposición/métodos , Fármacos Anti-VIH/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Deducibles y Coseguros/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Asistencia Médica/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos
4.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 29(10): 1307-1311, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32212282

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To examine the RWE U.S. commercial health plans cite in their specialty drug coverage decisions. METHODS: We used the Tufts Medical Center Specialty Drug Evidence and Coverage Database to identify specialty drug coverage decisions (n = 7267) issued by 17 large commercial health plans. We categorized the clinical evidence plans cited in these coverage decisions (n = 5227) as randomized controlled trials (RCTs), RWE studies, and other clinical studies (studies other than RCT or RWE study). We categorized RWE studies with respect to study type, for example, case series, studies based on medical records, and so on. We compared the frequency that plans cited different categories of RWE, cited RWE for different diseases, and cited RWE for drugs on the market for different time periods. RESULTS: RWE comprised 16% of cited clinical studies. Health plans cited RWE with different frequencies (5%-31% of the cited clinical evidence). Overall, plans cited RWE categorized as medical records most often (26% of cited RWE studies). Plans varied in the frequency they cited different RWE categories. Plans most frequently cited RWE for gastroenterological diseases (35% of clinical study citations) and least frequently for respiratory diseases (11% of clinical study citations). Plans cited RWE more for drugs that have long been on the market. CONCLUSIONS: Health plans varied with respect to the number and types of RWE studies they cited in their specialty drug coverage decisions. Plans cited RWE more often for some diseases than others, and cited more RWE for older drugs.


Asunto(s)
Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Servicios Farmacéuticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Producción de Medicamentos sin Interés Comercial/economía , Toma de Decisiones , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Pragmáticos como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos
5.
Spinal Cord ; 58(5): 587-595, 2020 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31900410

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVES: To describe the most common prescription medications used and the extent of out-of-pocket cost, insurance coverage, and cost-related nonadherence (CRNA) for those medications by people with spinal cord injury (SCI) in Canada. SETTING: Community in Canada. METHODS: It was an observational study wherein data were collected through a cross-sectional online survey from individuals living with an SCI in Canada. We used descriptive statistics to describe the extent of drug cost, insurance coverage and CRNA among study sample, and analytical statistics to find association of CRNA with sociodemographic, injury-related and medication-related characteristics of the sample. RESULTS: Individuals with an SCI (n = 160) used an average of five medications and spent a median of $49 (interquartile range: $234.75) per month on their medications. More than 90% of participants had some form of drug insurance, though 37% reported CRNA. The most common medications that were forgone due to cost included opioids, antidepressants, and drugs for genitourinary and muscular spasms. Individuals with paraplegia and nontraumatic SCI had higher drug costs, though injury-related characteristics did not influence CRNA. Sex, monthly drug expenditure, and monthly additional healthcare costs were significantly associated with CRNA. CONCLUSIONS: People with SCIs are at risk of experiencing CRNA to their prescription medications despite having insurance coverage. Decision makers for the national pharmacare in Canada should account for their concerns judiciously.


Asunto(s)
Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Gastos en Salud , Cobertura del Seguro , Seguro de Servicios Farmacéuticos , Cooperación del Paciente , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/tratamiento farmacológico , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/economía , Adulto , Canadá , Estudios Transversales , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/economía , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Servicios Farmacéuticos/economía , Seguro de Servicios Farmacéuticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos
6.
Value Health ; 22(8): 871-877, 2019 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31426927

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate expenditures and sources of payment for prescription drugs in the United States from 1997 to 2015. METHODS: The Medical Expenditures Panel Survey (MEPS) was used for this analysis. Individuals with one or more prescription medicines were eligible for inclusion. Outcomes were the inflation-adjusted cost per prescription across all payment sources (self or family, public, private, and other sources) before and after the Medicare Part D benefit and the Affordable Care Act. RESULTS: The cost per prescription increased from $38.56 in 1997 to $73.34 in 2015. Nevertheless, consumers' out-of-pocket expenditures decreased from $18.19 to $9.61, whereas public program expenditures per prescription increased from $5.61 to $34.43 over this time. Out-of-pocket expenditures of individuals in the low-income group and near-poor group had larger declined percentages from 51.4% to 20.4% and 46.5% to 17.2% relative to individuals in higher-income groups before and after implementation of the Medicare Part D, respectively. Over 90% prescription purchases were covered by medical insurance by 2015. The per-prescription cost for medications consumed by uninsured individuals increased at a lower rate from $31.83 to $54.96 versus $40.12 to $75.58 for privately insured and $36.00 to $70.96 for publicly insured (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Prescription drugs expenditures have increased over the past 2 decades, but public sources now pay for a growing proportion of prescription drugs cost regardless of health insurance coverage or income level. Out-of-pocket expenditures have significantly decreased for persons with lower incomes since the implementation of Medicare Part D and the Affordable Care Act.


Asunto(s)
Renta/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Servicios Farmacéuticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Financiación Personal/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Lactante , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Asistencia Médica/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare Part D/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/estadística & datos numéricos , Distribución por Sexo , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
7.
Health Econ ; 28(4): 529-542, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30693596

RESUMEN

The objective of this study is to examine the causal effect of health care utilization on unmet health care needs. An IV approach deals with the endogeneity between the use of health care services and unmet health care, using the presence of drug insurance and the number of physicians by health region as instruments. We employ three cycles of the Canadian Community Health Survey confidential master files (2003, 2005, and 2014). We find a robustly negative relationship between health care use and unmet health care needs. One more visit to a medical doctor on average decreases the probability of reporting unmet health care needs by 0.014 points. The effect is negative for the women-only group whereas it is statistically insignificant for men; similarly, the effect is negative for urban dwellers but insignificant for rural ones. Health care use reduces the likelihood of reporting unmet health care. Policies that encourage the use of health care services, like increasing the coverage of public drug insurance and increasing after hours accessibility of physicians, can help reduce the likelihood of unmet health care.


Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Servicios Farmacéuticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos/provisión & distribución , Adulto , Anciano , Canadá , Femenino , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Estadísticos , Factores Socioeconómicos
8.
Aging Ment Health ; 23(2): 158-165, 2019 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29156947

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Given the common off-label use of antipsychotics (AP), we aimed to assess the factors associated with this use in community living older adults. METHODS: The study sample consisted of a large representative sample of older adults (n = 4108), covered under a public drug insurance plan in Canada. Off-label use of antipsychotics was defined by the absence of an approved indication for this use, according to Health Canada's drug product database. Multinomial logistic regression was used to assess the factors associated with off-label use. RESULTS: The prevalence of antipsychotics use was 2.5%, of which 78% was off-label. Compared to non-use, off-label antipsychotics use was negatively associated with advanced age (≥75 vs. 65-74 years old) (OR: 0.46; 95%CI: 0.27-0.78); and positively associated with higher education level (OR: 2.68; 95% CI: 1.64-4.40), higher number of outpatient visits (≥6) (OR: 2.39; 95%CI: 1.34-4.25), antidepressant or benzodiazepine use (OR: 5.81; 95%CI: 3.31-10.21), and the presence of an organic brain syndrome & Alzheimer's (OR: 5.73; 95%CI: 1.74-18.89). Compared to labeled use, off-label use was less likely in those with major depression (OR: 0.02; 95%CI: <0.01-0.11) and with insomnia (OR: 0.13; 95%CI: 0.02-0.91). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of antipsychotics prescribed to community living older adults were off-label. This off-label use was more likely in complex clinical cases with multiple outpatient visits and other psychotropic drugs use. Further research should focus on the long-term effects associated with off-label use of antipsychotics.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Encefalopatías/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Uso Fuera de lo Indicado/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/epidemiología , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Encefalopatías/epidemiología , Canadá/epidemiología , Escolaridad , Femenino , Humanos , Vida Independiente , Seguro de Servicios Farmacéuticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Visita a Consultorio Médico/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevalencia
9.
Clin Transplant ; 32(8): e13302, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29851159

RESUMEN

While guidelines support metformin as a therapeutic option for diabetic patients with mild-to-moderate renal insufficiency, the frequency and outcomes of metformin use in kidney transplant recipients are not well described. We integrated national U.S. transplant registry data with records from a large pharmaceutical claims clearinghouse (2008-2015). Associations (adjusted hazard ratio, 95% LCL aHR95% UCL ) of diabetes regimens (with and excluding metformin) in the first year post-transplant with patient and graft survival over the subsequent year were quantified by multivariate Cox regression, adjusted for recipient, donor, and transplant factors and propensity for metformin use. Among 14 144 recipients with pretransplant type 2 diabetes mellitus, 4.7% filled metformin in the first year post-transplant; most also received diabetes comedications. Compared to those who received insulin-based regimens without metformin, patients who received metformin were more likely to be female, have higher estimated glomerular filtration rates, and have undergone transplant more recently. Metformin-based regimens were associated with significantly lower adjusted all-cause (aHR 0.18 0.410.91 ), malignancy-related (aHR 0.45 0.450.99 ), and infection-related (aHR 0.12 0.320.85 ) mortality, and nonsignificant trends toward lower cardiovascular mortality, graft failure, and acute rejection. No evidence of increased adverse graft or patient outcomes was noted. Use of metformin-based diabetes treatment regimens may be safe in carefully selected kidney transplant recipients.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/fisiopatología , Rechazo de Injerto/mortalidad , Seguro de Servicios Farmacéuticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Trasplante de Riñón/mortalidad , Metformina/uso terapéutico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Rechazo de Injerto/tratamiento farmacológico , Rechazo de Injerto/epidemiología , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Fallo Renal Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Pruebas de Función Renal , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Receptores de Trasplantes , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
10.
Can J Psychiatry ; 63(10): 701-711, 2018 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29514506

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether neighbourhood deprivation is associated with exposure to an antidepressant drug treatment (ADT) and its quality among individuals diagnosed with unipolar depression and insured by the Quebec public drug plan. METHOD: We conducted an administrative database cohort study of adults covered by the Quebec public drug plan who were diagnosed with a new episode of unipolar depression. We assessed material and social deprivation using an area-based index. We considered exposure to an ADT as having ≥1 claim for an ADT within the 365 days following depression diagnosis. Among those exposed to ADT, ADT quality was assessed with 3 indicators: first-line recommended ADT, persistence with the ADT, and compliance with the ADT. Generalized linear models were used to estimate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS: Of 100,432 individuals with unipolar depression, 65,436 (65%) were exposed to an ADT in the year following the diagnosis. Individuals living in the most materially deprived areas were slightly more likely to be exposed to an ADT than those living in the least deprived areas (aPR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.06). The likelihoods of being exposed to a first-line ADT, persisting for the minimum recommended duration and complying with the ADT were independent of the deprivation levels. CONCLUSIONS: Neighbourhood deprivation was not associated with ADT quality among individuals insured by the Quebec public drug plan. It might be partly attributable to the public drug plan whose goal is to provide equitable access to prescription drugs regardless of income.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Servicios Farmacéuticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Carencia Psicosocial , Características de la Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Programas de Gobierno , Humanos , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Quebec , Adulto Joven
12.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 26(4): 386-392, 2017 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28120552

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study aims to quantify the magnitude of missed dispensings in commercial claims databases. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study has been used linking PharMetrics, a commercial claims database, to a prescription database (LRx) that captures pharmacy dispensings independently of payment method, including cash transactions. We included adults with dispensings for opioids, diuretics, antiplatelet medications, or anticoagulants. To determine the degree of capture of dispensings, we calculated the number of subjects with the following: (1) same number of dispensings in both databases; (2) at least one dispensing, but not all dispensings, missed in PharMetrics; and (3) all dispensings missing in PharMetrics. Similar analyses were conducted using dispensings as the unit of analysis. To assess whether a dispensing in LRx was in PharMetrics, the dispensing in PharMetrics had to be for the same medication class and within ±7 days in LRx. RESULTS: A total of 1 426 498 subjects were included. Overall, 68% of subjects had the same number of dispensings in both databases. In 13% of subjects, PharMetrics identified ≥1 dispensing but also missed ≥1 dispensing. In 19% of the subjects, PharMetrics missed all the dispensings. Taking dispensings as the unit of analysis, 25% of the dispensings present in LRx were not captured in PharMetrics. These patterns were similar across all four classes of medications. Of the dispensings missing in PharMetrics, 48% involved a subject who had >1 health insurance plan. CONCLUSIONS: Commercial claims databases provide an incomplete picture of all prescriptions dispensed to patients. The lack of capture goes beyond cash transactions and potentially introduces substantial misclassification bias. © 2017 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology & Drug Safety Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.


Asunto(s)
Sesgo , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios Farmacéuticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Bases de Datos Factuales/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Seguro de Servicios Farmacéuticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Farmacoepidemiología/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
13.
J Clin Pharm Ther ; 42(3): 318-328, 2017 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28370404

RESUMEN

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Pharmacy claims are commonly used to assess medication adherence. It is unclear how different approaches to handling hospitalizations compare to the gold standard of using outpatient and inpatient drug data. This study aimed to compare the impact of different approaches to handling hospitalizations on medication adherence estimation in administrative claims data. METHODS: We identified ß-blocker initiators after myocardial infarction (MI) and statin initiators regardless of hospitalization histories in the population-based, Taiwan database, which includes outpatient and inpatient drug claims data. Adherence to ß-blockers or to statins during a 365-day follow-up period was estimated in outpatient pharmacy claims using the proportion of days covered (PDC) in three ways: ignoring hospitalizations (PDC1); subtracting hospitalized days from the denominator (PDC2); and assuming drug use on all hospitalized days (PDC3). We compared these to an approach that incorporated inpatient drug use (PDC4). We also used a hypothetical example to examine variations across approaches in several scenarios, such as increasing hospitalized days. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Mean 365-day PDC was 74% among 1729 post-MI ß-blocker initiators (range: 73.1%-74.9%) and 44% among 69 435 statins initiators (range: 43.5%-44.0%), which varied little across approaches. Differences across approaches increased with increasing number of hospitalized days. For patients hospitalized for >28 days, mean difference across approaches was >15%. PDC3 consistently yielded the highest value and PDC1 the lowest. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS: On average, different approaches to handling hospitalizations lead to similar adherence estimates to the gold standard of incorporating inpatient drug use. When patients have many hospitalization days during follow-up, the choice of approach should be tailored to the specific setting.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/administración & dosificación , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/administración & dosificación , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Servicios Farmacéuticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/tratamiento farmacológico , Pacientes Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Taiwán
14.
Can Fam Physician ; 63(5): e277-e283, 2017 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28500210

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine use of first-line alcohol use disorder (AUD) medications (naltrexone and acamprosate) among public drug plan beneficiaries in the year following an AUD diagnosis. DESIGN: Retrospective population-based cohort study. SETTING: Ontario. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals eligible for public drug plan benefits who had an AUD diagnosis at a hospital visit between April 1, 2011, and March 31, 2012. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of AUD medications dispensed to public drug plan beneficiaries who had a recent hospital visit with an AUD diagnosis, and number of prescriptions dispensed per person. RESULTS: A total of 10 394 Ontarians between 18 and 65 years of age were identified who had a hospital visit with an AUD diagnosis and were eligible for public drug plan benefits. The rate of AUD medications dispensed in the subsequent year was 3.56 per 1000 population (95% CI 2.51 to 4.91; n = 37). This rate did not differ significantly by sex (P = .83). CONCLUSION: Very few public drug plan beneficiaries are dispensed first-line AUD medications in the year following an AUD diagnosis.


Asunto(s)
Disuasivos de Alcohol/uso terapéutico , Alcoholismo/tratamiento farmacológico , Seguro de Servicios Farmacéuticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Naltrexona/uso terapéutico , Taurina/análogos & derivados , Acamprosato , Adulto , Anciano , Alcoholismo/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ontario/epidemiología , Vigilancia de la Población , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sistema de Pago Simple/estadística & datos numéricos , Taurina/uso terapéutico , Adulto Joven
15.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 65(3): 41-6, 2016 Jan 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26821271

RESUMEN

Antidepressant medication use during pregnancy has been increasing in the United States (1). Many women require antidepressants on an ongoing basis, and a clear consensus on the safest medication options for both the mother and her fetus does not exist (2). Given that half of all U.S. pregnancies are unplanned (3), antidepressant use will occur during the first weeks of pregnancy, a critical period for fetal development. To understand trends among women of reproductive age, CDC used Truven Health's MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters data* to estimate the number of antidepressant prescriptions filled by women aged 15-44 years with private employer-sponsored insurance. During 2008-2013, an average of 15.4% of women aged 15-44 years filled at least one prescription for an antidepressant in a single year. The most frequently filled antidepressants included sertraline, bupropion, and citalopram. Prescribing of antidepressants is common, and research on antidepressant safety during pregnancy needs to be accelerated to provide evidence-based information to health care providers and women about the potential risks for antidepressant exposure before and during pregnancy and between pregnancies.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Planes de Asistencia Médica para Empleados/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Servicios Farmacéuticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Sector Privado/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
16.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 25(1): 26-34, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26507224

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess antipsychotic prescribing patterns according to insurance coverage type and physician specialty in the outpatient treatment of behavioral disorders (BD) in US youth. METHODS: We used 2003-2010 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data to compare antipsychotic prescribing in the outpatient treatment of BD in youth (6-19 years) according to insurance coverage (public vs. private) and physician specialty (psychiatrist vs. non-psychiatrist) using population-weighted Chi-square and multivariable analyses. Also, we examined co-prescribing of antipsychotics with other psychotropic medication classes. Subgroup analyses were conducted in BD visits with no other clinician-reported psychiatric diagnosis (non-comorbid BD visits). RESULTS: A large majority (71.0%) of BD visits were provided by non-psychiatrists. However, psychiatrists prescribed antipsychotics far more frequently than non-psychiatrists (24.2% vs. 4.6%; adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 5.1 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.8-9.2]) in total BD visits as well as in non-comorbid BD visits (18.6% vs. 3.6%; AOR = 5.8 [95% CI, 3.2-10.5]). Antipsychotic prescribing was nearly two-fold greater in visits by publicly insured 6-12 year olds (11.3% vs. 5.8%; AOR = 1.9 [95% CI, 1.1-3.5]) and 13-19 year olds (16.2% vs. 8.9%; AOR = 2.0 [95% CI, 1.1-3.6]) compared with their privately insured counterparts. In more than one-third of antipsychotic-prescribed BD visits, antipsychotics were prescribed concomitantly with ≥2 psychotropic medication classes regardless of age group, insurance coverage, or even in the absence of psychiatric comorbidities. CONCLUSION: In outpatient visits by youth for BD, antipsychotics were primarily prescribed by psychiatrists, concomitantly, and for the publicly insured. These treatment patterns merit further investigation.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Déficit de la Atención y Trastornos de Conducta Disruptiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Cobertura del Seguro , Seguro de Servicios Farmacéuticos , Adolescente , Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Antipsicóticos/economía , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/epidemiología , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/psicología , Déficit de la Atención y Trastornos de Conducta Disruptiva/epidemiología , Déficit de la Atención y Trastornos de Conducta Disruptiva/psicología , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Servicios Farmacéuticos/economía , Seguro de Servicios Farmacéuticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
17.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 25(12): 1434-1442, 2016 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27633276

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the predictive accuracy of different methods suggested for approximation of drug prescription durations in claims data. METHODS: We expanded a well-established modeling and simulation framework to compare approximated drug prescription durations with 'true' (i.e., simulated) durations. Real claims data of persons aged ≥65 years insured by the German nationwide 'Statutory Health Insurance Fund' AOK between 2010 and 2012 provided empiric input parameters that were completed with missing information on actual dosing patterns from an observational cohort. The distinct approximation methods were based on crude measures (one tablet a day), population-averaged measures (defined daily doses), or individually-derived measures (longitudinal coverage approximation of the applied dose, COV). As a proof-of-principle, we assessed the methods' performance to predict the well-characterized bleeding risks of anticoagulant, antiplatelet, and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. RESULTS: When applied to modeling and simulation data sets, the closest, least biased, and thus most accurate approximation was observed using the COV approximation. In a real-data example, rather similar results to an external reference were obtained for all methods. However, some of the differences between methods were meaningful, and the most reasonable and consistent results were obtained with the COV approach. CONCLUSION: Based on theoretically most accurate approximations and practically reasonable estimates, the individual COV approach was preferable over the population-averaged defined daily dose technique, although the latter might be justified in certain situations. Advantages of the COV approach are expected to be even bigger for drug therapies with particularly large dosing heterogeneity. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


Asunto(s)
Seguro de Servicios Farmacéuticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Teóricos , Farmacoepidemiología/métodos , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Sesgo , Simulación por Computador , Alemania , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Humanos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/efectos adversos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores de Tiempo
18.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 54(5): 369-77, 2016 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27007996

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to analyze and compare the exposure to individually prescribed drugs and the prevalence of polypharmacy according to age group and concomitant disease in South Korea. METHODS: The use of prescribed drugs was evaluated according to average numbers of prescription drugs used daily during a year or month, using the Korean Health Insurance Claims Database, which is representative of over 90% of citizens, in 2010 and 2011. The use of prescribed drugs was also analyzed according to concomitant diseases and age. Polypharmacy was defined as the use of 5 or more drugs daily during a specific observation period, and proportions of polypharmacy users were calculated according to comorbidity and age group. RESULTS: The annual average numbers of daily used prescription drugs in 2010 and 2011 were 0.3 (SD = 0.5), 0.4 (SD = 0.7), 1.2 (SD = 1.5), and 2.3 (SD = 2.0) for people aged < 20 years, 20-49 years, 50-64 years, and ≥ 65 years, respectively. Proportions of individuals demonstrating polypharmacy increased with age and were 9.5% and 44.1% for elderly individuals in the year- and month-based analyses, respectively. The annual average number of daily medications used increased by ~2 drugs in the concomitant disease group, and the higher mortality group used a higher number of prescribed drugs than the lower mortality group. CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight the elevated burden of multi-medication in elderly patients, and the study found that prescribed drug use increased with age and the number of concomitant diseases.


Asunto(s)
Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Servicios Farmacéuticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Programas Nacionales de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Polifarmacia , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , República de Corea , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
19.
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund) ; 11: 1-14, 2016 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27214926

RESUMEN

This brief examines changes in consumer health plan cost-sharing--deductibles, copayments, coinsurance, and out-of-pocket limits--for coverage offered in the Affordable Care Act's marketplaces between 2015 and 2016. Three of seven measures studied rose moderately in 2016, an increase attributable in part to a shift in the mix of plans offered in the marketplaces, from plans with higher actuarial value (platinum and gold plans) to those that have less generous coverage (bronze and silver plans). Nearly 60 percent of enrollees in marketplace plans receive cost-sharing reductions as part of income-based assistance. For enrollees without cost-sharing reductions, average copayments, deductibles, and out-of-pocket limits remain considerably higher under bronze and silver plans than under employer-based plans; cost-sharing is similar in gold plans and employer plans. Marketplace plans are more likely than employer-based plans to impose a deductible for prescription drugs but no less likely to do so for primary care visits.


Asunto(s)
Seguro de Costos Compartidos/estadística & datos numéricos , Deducibles y Coseguros/estadística & datos numéricos , Intercambios de Seguro Médico/estadística & datos numéricos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/economía , Seguro de Costos Compartidos/economía , Seguro de Costos Compartidos/tendencias , Deducibles y Coseguros/economía , Deducibles y Coseguros/tendencias , Predicción , Planes de Asistencia Médica para Empleados/economía , Intercambios de Seguro Médico/economía , Intercambios de Seguro Médico/tendencias , Humanos , Seguro de Servicios Farmacéuticos/economía , Seguro de Servicios Farmacéuticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Servicios Farmacéuticos/tendencias , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Estados Unidos
20.
Am J Public Health ; 105(2): e17-30, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25521879

RESUMEN

Previous reviews have shown that changes in prescription drug insurance benefits can affect medication use and adherence. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to identify studies addressing the association between prescription drug coverage and health outcomes. Studies were included if they collected empirical data on expansions or restrictions of prescription drug coverage and if they reported clinical outcomes. We found 23 studies demonstrating that broader prescription drug insurance reduces use of other health care services and has a positive impact on patient outcomes. Coverage gaps or caps on drug insurance generally led to worse outcomes. States should consider implementing the Affordable Care Act expansions in drug coverage to improve the health of low-income patients receiving state-based health insurance.


Asunto(s)
Seguro de Servicios Farmacéuticos , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Servicios Farmacéuticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación del Resultado de la Atención al Paciente , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/economía , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/uso terapéutico , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA