A cost minimisation analysis comparing iStent accompanying cataract surgery and selective laser trabeculoplasty versus topical glaucoma medications in a public healthcare setting in New Zealand.

PURPOSE: To produce an economic comparison of the iStent ab interno trabecular microbypass implant accompanying cataract surgery and selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) as first-line treatment versus topical medications for open-angle glaucoma in New Zealand in 2016. METHODS: The current annual costs of 19 available fully subsidised topical glaucoma medications by Pharmaceutical Management Agency (Pharmac) in 2016 were identified. Adjustments for pharmacist prescribing charges and previously described wastage levels were applied. The costs to perform iStent implantation and the cost to perform SLT were obtained from the local distributors, with the latter taking into account staff and consumable cost. Procedure costs divided by eye drops' cost produced a break-even level in equivalent years of eye drops use. RESULTS: The range of annual eye drop cost was NZD$42.25 to NZD$485.11, with an average of NZD$144.81. Comparison of annual eye drop cost with iStent cost revealed 3 of 19 (15.8%) drops breaking even within 5 years, 9 of 19 (47.3%) within 10 years, and 12 of 19 (63.2%) within 15 years. The cost of bilateral SLT performed by a consultant was NZD$102.30 (breaking even in 0.71 years). The equivalent cost for a registrar was NZD$97.59 (breaking even in 0.67 years). CONCLUSION: Economically, the iStent would appear to be a reasonably cost-effective treatment for glaucoma patients undergoing cataract surgery in a public healthcare setting in New Zealand, particularly for those using more expensive topical glaucoma medications, whilst SLT appears to be a worthwhile consideration as a first-line treatment for glaucoma in New Zealand.

Topical glaucoma therapy cost in Mexico.

Glaucoma is an important cause of irreversible blindness that represents a significant economic burden; most direct costs of glaucoma are drug-related. We calculated the annual cost of some of the most commonly prescribed glaucoma medications in Mexico, according to their average wholesale price (AWP) and dose regimen. Annual costs ranged from USD4.97 for Imot 15 ml (timolol 0.5 %; Laboratorios Sophia) to USD675.39 for Alphagan 5 ml (brimonidine 0.2 %; Allergan, Inc.). ß-Blockers were the least expensive glaucoma medications (range USD20.44-55.44). Alphagan 5 ml was 250 % more expensive than other selective α(2)-agonists. Of the carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, dorzolamide 2 % was less expensive than brinzolamide 1 % (USD326.91 vs. USD418.96). The annual cost for prostaglandin analogs ranged from USD235.58 for bimatoprost 0.03 % to USD337.78 for latanoprost 0.005 %. Some fixed combinations were less expensive than separate combinations. The average annual cost for all treatments increased by 27.87 ± 10.09 % between 2009 and 2012. Annual glaucoma therapy cost seems to be lower in Mexico than in other countries, due to a lower AWP, especially for some medications made by Mexican laboratories.

Survey and analysis of accessibility, availability, and affordability of topical glaucoma medicines.

PURPOSE: Affordability and availability of medicines is a growing global challenge for health-care systems. Access to medicines is recognized as an important determinant of treatment adherence. The access to glaucoma medicines and how it affects glaucoma management are not known. The purpose of this study was to determine the availability, affordability, and accessibility of topical intraocular pressure (IOP) -lowering eye drops in Haryana state of northern India using the World Health Organization (WHO)/Health Action International (HAI) methods. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was done to collect data on prices and availability of glaucoma topical medications in public and private sector pharmacies and retail outlets using the WHO/HAI methodology between October 2021 and January 2022. The availability and affordability of topical glaucoma medicines was determined. Comparison of the local price with international prices was done by calculating the median price ratio (MPR). RESULTS: A total of 191 facilities were randomly sampled across 11 ( n = 55) urban, 29 ( n = 92) semi-urban, and 44 ( n = 44) rural places during the study period. The availability of topical medication for glaucoma was low (35.7 ± 22.3) across all sampled sites and all classes of topical glaucoma medications. The median price of topical medication and availability were negatively correlated, Pearson's coefficient r (18) = -0.44, P 0.05, though the relationship was weak. A lowest paid, unskilled Indian government worker must spend between 15% and 203% of their daily wage to acquire a glaucoma medication. CONCLUSION: The availability and accessibility of topical glaucoma medications was low in this survey.

Low-cost protocol for the production of autologous serum eye drops by blood collection and processing centres for the treatment of ocular surface diseases.

OBJECTIVES: To create a low-cost protocol for the production of autologous serum eye drops (ASEs) by blood collection and processing centres using standard equipment and staff already available. The protocol must observe local and federal regulatory authorities' requirements for good manufacturing practice. AIM: The final aim is to improve accessibility to ASEs for patients who need them and to implement similar production parameters at all institutions producing ASEs. BACKGROUND: Despite evidence of the beneficial effects of ASEs in the treatment of severe ocular surface diseases, ASEs are not approved by most federal regulatory bodies in the United States or Europe. In some countries, such as the United States, access to ASEs is extremely limited and cost-prohibitive. Blood processing centres are in optimal position to help in increasing accessibility and lowering the cost of these products. MATERIALS/METHODS: Standard blood processing equipment, staff and materials were chosen for the protocol. The protocol was designed to minimise the risk of contamination as much as possible. RESULTS: A low-cost, open system protocol for production of ASEs was generated that can be implemented by most blood collection and processing centres in the United States and Europe. CONCLUSION: Efforts should be made to propagate a similar protocol for the production of ASEs in blood centres capable of collecting and processing blood products, making this service affordable and uniformly accessible to patients.

Rising Costs of Otic Drops: Review of a National Database.

OBJECTIVES: US prescription drug prices have increased substantially during the past decade and now account for approximately 17% of total US health expenditures. Otic drop prices are of particular interest given their common use in otolaryngologic clinical practice. We hypothesized that otic drop prices increased at a rate significantly higher than the overall inflation rate. We considered potential causes for otic drop price fluctuations during this period and whether they could be correlated with corporate restructuring events. METHODS: Publicly available data on otic antibiotic drop pricing was assessed from 2012 to 2020 and were correlated with contemporaneous publicly available information about corporate and political events. RESULTS: CiproHC (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX, US), Ciprodex (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX, US), Cortisporin-TC (Endo Pharmaceuticals, Dublin, Ireland), Coly-Mycin S (JHP Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Rochester, MI, US), generic neomycin-polymixin-HC otic drop, ciprofloxacin otic drop, and ofloxacin otic had overall change in cost between January 2014 and January 2020 of 69.9%, 63%, 268.9%, 219.5%, 232.5%, 13%, and 62.4%, respectively. Generic ofloxacin otic drop showed the most price fluctuation, temporarily rising 945% from July 2015 to its peak price of $26/mL in October 2016. CONCLUSION: Otic drop prices have been volatile, with overall price increases higher than overall inflation. Drug pricing is not transparent, making it difficult for prescribers and patients alike to be cost conscious when choosing the best therapy. We outline six factors that contribute to high US medication prices and also highlight two examples of otic drops that underwent significant price fluctuation during the studied period. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V Laryngoscope, 131:E1069-E1075, 2021.

Acceptability, adherence and economic analyses of a new clinical pathway for the identification of non-responders to glaucoma eye drops: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Assess whether a new clinical pathway for glaucoma was acceptable to patients and healthcare professionals and whether it provided useful clinical information on non-responsiveness and non-adherence to the treatment of elevated intraocular pressure with latanoprost eye drops. METHODS: A single arm non-randomised prospective observational study incorporating new glaucoma/ocular hypertension patients. To assess issues of acceptability, qualitative observation and interviews were conducted with patients and healthcare professionals. To determine clinical responsiveness, intraocular pressures were measured before and 4 hours after a clinician-instilled eye drop over two distinct appointments. Adherence data were collected using a Medicine Event Monitoring System. Economic analyses compared the costs between novel and standard care pathways. RESULTS: Of 72 patients approached, 53 entered the study (74.3%) and 50 completed all procedures (94.3%). Intraocular pressure was reduced more than 15% in 83 out of 92 study eyes by final visit (90.2%). The non-response rate was 5.1% once the effect of low adherence was minimised. For the 1376 drop instillation days under observation, eye drops were instilled as prescribed on 1004 days (73.0%), over-instilled on 137 days (9.9%) and not instilled on 235 days (17.1%). The Cardiff Model of Glaucoma Care involved negligible cost, although acceptance for healthcare professionals showed variation. CONCLUSIONS: The Cardiff Model of Glaucoma Care offers novel clinical and adherence insights at marginal costs while acceptable to patients. Healthcare professionals felt that 4 hour and 4 week follow-up appointments could cause administrative problems. A streamlined version of the pathway has therefore been developed to facilitate clinical adoption. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTNID:ISRCTN75888393.

A comprehensive perspective on patient adherence to topical glaucoma therapy.

TOPIC: Risk factors for poor adherence or nonadherence to topical glaucoma medication regimens. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Poor adherence to glaucoma medication regimens may be associated with subsequent visual loss and irreversible optic nerve damage. METHODS: A literature search was performed using the words "glaucoma AND adherence AND risk" and "glaucoma AND compliance AND risk," limited to those studies in English and focused on care in the United States. Publications from well-regarded journals in this field were reviewed, and a focused summary of the literature is presented. RESULTS: There are a myriad of adherence barriers inherent to the glaucoma patient population. Although most of these obstacles are common in the elderly (e.g., reduced cognition, musculoskeletal problems, and transportation difficulties), older age has not been shown to be a consistent risk factor for poor adherence to glaucoma medication regimens. Other expected barriers, such as medication cost, limited health insurance, disease severity, and role of complicated dosing regimens, have varied effects based on the patient population studied and the definition of adherence. Poor medication adherence also is associated with decreased adherence to follow-up medical visit schedules. A systematic taxonomy of adherence barriers has been formulated. In addition, subanalyses from the Glaucoma Adherence and Persistency Study identified 8 variables that affect adherence to glaucoma medication regimens as well as several characteristics that support the importance of and associations between doctor-patient communications. CONCLUSIONS: Recent studies have provided valuable insights into the many factors that increase the risk(s) for poor adherence in patients prescribed glaucoma medications. Four major types of barriers to effective patient adherence (medication regimen, patient factors, provider factors, and situational or environmental factors) have been identified. Addressing these specific barriers will require a tailored, patient-centered approach. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Prevalence and determinants of non-adherence to topical hypotensive treatment in Dutch glaucoma patients.

BACKGROUND: To assess the prevalence and determinants of non-adherence to topical hypotensive treatment in glaucoma patients in order to support interventions targeting enhancement of patient adherence. METHODS: One-hundred and sixty-six glaucoma patients, recruited by nationwide multi-stage sampling, filled in an extensive and carefully developed questionnaire covering various theoretically relevant determinants of patient adherence which were categorized as psychosocial aspects, barriers and skills. RESULTS: Prevalence of self-reported non-adherence was 27.3%. Younger patients (<55 years of age) had a higher risk of being non-adherent. Forgetfulness, unavailability of eye drops and difficulties with holding the bottle above the eye when applying the eye drops were the most cited reasons for non-adherence. Fifty percent of the patients indicated that they required more information on the correct administration of eye drops. There was no association between non-adherence and sex, level of education, type of insurance, duration of disease or family history of glaucoma. CONCLUSIONS: Non-adherence to topical glaucoma medication is fairly common. Aids that minimize forgetfulness and delivery systems facilitating the delivery of medications to the eye could be considered to enhance patient adherence before advancing to other therapies with additional risks and costs.

Cost analysis of glaucoma medications.

PURPOSE: To provide patients and health care providers with calculated yearly costs of topical glaucoma medications. DESIGN: Prospective, experimental, laboratory study. METHODS: Using the average wholesale price and common dosing patterns, we calculated the theoretical yearly cost of glaucoma medications. RESULTS: Calculated yearly cost ranged from $150.81 for generic timolol maleate 0.5% (Falcon Pharmaceuticals, Ltd, Fort Worth, Texas, USA) to $697.42 for Cosopt (Merck & Co, West Point, Pennsylvania, USA), and as high as $873.98 for a three-times-daily dose of Alphagan P 0.15% (Allergan, Inc, Irvine, California, USA). Among brand name beta-blockers, yearly cost ranged between $203.47 for Timoptic 0.5% (Merck & Co) and $657.24 for Betoptic S (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, Texas, USA). Generic beta-blockers consistently were more economical than their brand-name counterparts. Yearly cost of prostaglandin analogs ranged from $427.69 for Travatan (Alcon) to $577.62 for Lumigan (Allergan). The two carbonic anhydrase inhibitors Azopt (Alcon) and Trusopt (Merck & Co), yielded similar economic profiles. Alphagan P 0.15% had yearly calculated costs of $559.08 for twice daily dosing per eye. The generic selective alpha(2)-agonist brimonidine tartrate 0.2% (Bausch & Lomb Pharmaceuticals, Tampa, Florida, USA) costs approximately $352.89 and $529.34 per year for the respective two and three drops daily per eye regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Nonselective beta-blockers remain the most inexpensive class of glaucoma medications. Bottle size may impact yearly glaucoma medication expenditures. Costs of glaucoma medications may impact decision making in the medical management of glaucoma.

The costs of treating glaucoma with combinations of topical drugs in Spain.

PURPOSE: This study describes the treatment in ordinary clinical practice in Spain of patients with glaucoma with a two-drug combination therapy. The authors present the treatment outcome as endof-period intraocular pressure (IOP) and the calculated direct medical costs over a 2-year period. METHODS: Data were extracted retrospectively from patient charts recording the use of all medical resources related to glaucoma. Costs were estimated using unit costs from public sources (2005). Descriptive cost analysis according to combination treatment at baseline was performed. RESULTS: The study included 216 patients from 21 centers. Around half of the patients were started on a beta-blocker/prostaglandin analogue combination, while the rest received various other combinations containing either an alpha2-agonist or a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor. Across the seven groups considered, there was a statistically significant difference in the costs of the least and the two most costly groups, while the confidence intervals were overlapping in all other pairwise comparisons. The least costly drug combination was brimonidine/timolol. Assessing IOP at the end of follow-up, all the groups were equally effective (overlapping confidence intervals). In a multivariate regression analysis, the drug combination did not have an independent, significant impact on total direct medical costs, drug costs, or end-of-period IOP. Significant determinants of these variables were surgical interventions and one or more changes of drug combination during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Costs are determined by the response to treatment. Inadequate response triggers treatment changes and sometimes eventually surgical interventions, thereby increasing costs significantly.

A European perspective on costs and cost effectiveness of ophthalmic combinations in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma.

PURPOSE: Efficacy, safety, and cost implications are important considerations when choosing an ophthalmic treatment. Fixed-combination glaucoma medications containing brimonidine 0.2% and timolol 0.5%, or dorzolamide 2% and timolol 0.5%, were compared with brimonidine 0.2% and dorzolamide 2% that were used as adjunctive therapy to timolol 0.5%. METHODS: A literature review was conducted to determine the outcome parameters of intraocular pressure reduction and tolerability after 3 months of use of brimonidine or dorzolamide, each together with timolol as a fixed-combination or in concomitant therapy. Modelled cost-minimization and cost-effectiveness analyses were performed to investigate the economic consequences of ophthalmic therapy with brimonidine, dorzolamide, and timolol from a societal perspective. RESULTS: The literature review found that brimonidine and dorzolamide used as fixed combinations with timolol as well as in adjunctive therapy to timolol were equally effective and safe. Furthermore, in the European countries studied, the fixed combination of brimonidine/timolol represented a less costly option when compared to the fixed combination of dorzolamide/timolol evaluated over both a 3-month and a 12-month horizon. CONCLUSIONS: Brimonidine used as a fixed-combination therapy with timolol provided better cost value than dorzolamide/timolol in all the countries studied. For most countries, the fixed combination of brimonidine and timolol also provided better cost value than adjunctive therapy with brimonidine, which was more cost effective than adjunctive therapy with dorzolamide.

Prostaglandin analogues for ophthalmic use: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to perform an economic analysis of the cost-effectiveness of prostaglandin analogues for the treatment of increased intraocular pressure (IOP). Prostaglandin analogues for ophthalmic use are more costly than alternative agents for the lowering of IOP. An important policy decision is whether to support continued open listing of these agents or to restrict them to limited use status. METHODS: The cost-effectiveness of prostaglandin analogues was assessed using a decision analytic model. Latanoprost was compared with timolol, dorzolamide, and brimonidine, and travoprost was compared with timolol separately. The effectiveness data used for this economic analysis were the number of millilitres of mercury of IOP reduction compared with baseline and the incidence of adverse events resulting in a withdrawal of the patient from the study. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the study results. RESULTS: Compared with latanoprost, dorzolamide was not a cost-effective strategy. Compared with brimonidine, latanoprost provided a higher IOP reduction with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $16.17 (base case), but the additional IOP reduction with latanoprost was obtained at a cost higher than the average cost per millimetre of mercury reduction obtained with brimonidine. Compared with timolol, latanoprost and travoprost had a positive incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $34.48 and $39.06, respectively. INTERPRETATION: For the first-line treatment of glaucoma and elevated IOP, latanoprost is a more cost-effective strategy than dorzolamide and brimonidine. Latanoprost and travoprost are more effective than timolol but also more expensive. For those for whom timolol is not contraindicated, it would be preferable, from a cost-effectiveness standpoint, to initiate treatment with timolol and reserve the prostaglandin analogues as an alternative treatment or as add-on therapy for patients not achieving a clinical response with timolol. Better treatment compliance associated with these analogues improves their cost-effectiveness.

Cost-effectiveness of cycloplegic agents: results of a randomized controlled trial in nigerian children.

PURPOSE: To compare the cost and effectiveness of three cycloplegic agents among Nigerian children. METHODS: Two hundred thirty-three children aged 4 to 15 years attending outpatient eye clinics in Nigeria were randomized to (1) 1% cyclopentolate, (2) 1% cyclopentolate and 0.5% tropicamide, or (3) 1% atropine drops in each eye (instilled at home over 3 days). Ten children were lost to follow-up, nine from the atropine group. An optometrist measured the residual accommodation (primary outcome), dilated pupil size, pupil response to light, and self-reported side effects (secondary outcomes). Caregivers were interviewed about costs incurred due to cycloplegia (primary outcome). The incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated as the difference in cost divided by the difference in effectiveness comparing two agents. The 95% confidence intervals (CI) for ICERs were estimated through bootstrapping. RESULTS: The atropine group had significantly lower mean residual accommodation (0.04 +/- 0.01 D [SE]), than the combined regimen (0.36 +/- 0.05 D) and cyclopentolate (0.63 +/- 0.06 D) groups (P < 0.001). Atropine and the combined regimen produced better results for negative response to light and dilated pupil size than cyclopentolate. Atropine was more expensive, but also more effective, than the other agents. The ICER comparing atropine to the combined regimen was 1.81 (95% CI = -6.31-15.35) and compared to cyclopentolate was 0.59 (95% CI = -3.47-5.47). The combined regimen was both more effective and less expensive than cyclopentolate alone. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of cyclopentolate and tropicamide should become the recommended agent for routine cycloplegic refraction in African children. The combined regimen was more effective than cyclopentolate, but not more expensive, and was preferable to atropine, since it incurred fewer losses to follow-up.

Daily cost of glaucoma medications in China.

PURPOSE: To determine and compare the daily cost of various glaucoma medications in China. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The majority of glaucoma medications commercially available in China were included in this research. The total number of drops in 1 bottle of each medication was counted drop by drop. The mean volume per bottle of each medication was calculated. The cost per drop, number of days for both eyes usage per bottle, and daily cost was calculated. RESULTS: (1) The volume per drop ranged from 0.03 mL (brinzolamide 1%, travoprost 0.004%, bimatoprost 0.03%, and latanoprost 0.005%) to 0.05 mL (timolol 0.5%-Chengrui and pilocarpine 0.5% and 2%-Zhenrui). (2) The cost per bottle ranged from $0.69 (US dollar) (timolol 0.5%-Malaisuan Saimaluo'er) to $40.78 (latanoprost 0.005%). (3) The number of days for both eyes usage per bottle ranged from 52 days (bimatoprost 0.03%) to 11 days (pilocarpine nitrate 0.5%-Zhenrui). (4) The daily cost for both eyes usage from expensive to cheap were latanoprost 0.005%-$0.91, travoprost 0.004%-$0.77, brimonidine 0.2%-$0.61, bimatoprost 0.03%-$0.46, D-timolol 1%-$0.36, brinzolamide 1%-$0.34, pilocarpine 2%-Zhenrui-$0.28, levobunolol 0.5%-$0.25, betaxolol 0.25%-$0.24, pilocarpine 0.5%-Zhenrui-$0.18, pilocarpine 2%-Huming-$0.16, carteolol 1%-Mikelan-$0.15, carteolol 2%-Mikelan-$0.15, pilocarpine 1%-Huming-$0.10, timolol 0.5%-Chengrui-$0.08, timolol 0.5%-Malaisuan Saimaluo'er-$0.03. CONCLUSIONS: The daily cost of glaucoma medications in China ranged much more wildly than developed countries. These data may be useful in selecting medications for glaucoma therapy. The ophthalmic solution of prostaglandins is powerful in reducing intraocular pressure. However, its high price should be considered when selecting glaucoma medications in China.

Impact of administration angle on the cost of artificial tear solutions: does bottle positioning minimize wastage?

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe the cost considerations of multidose artificial tear products according to drop volume and the number of usable drops per bottle, based on a 45- versus 90-degree administration angle. METHODS: Densitometric assessment of the drop volume of five multidose artificial tear products of a 15-mL labeled bottle size in conjunction with predictive cost analysis. RESULTS: The correlation between drop volume and density was not significant (Spearman correlation, P = 0.4500; alpha < 0.05). Overall, drop size ranged from 65.9 microL to a nadir of 30.8 microL, with a statistically significant difference (Student t test, P < 0.05) between 45- and 90-degree volumes for all but one product. Cost analysis demonstrated up to a $1.93 per bottle cost savings by the administration of drops at a 45- rather than a 90-degree bottle angle. CONCLUSIONS: Products that provide a higher number of drops per dollar of product offer economic advantages that may not be otherwise discernible by the examination of the product retail price alone. Furthermore, it is shown that altering the angle of administration may, in general, result in significant economic ramifications in the use of multidose artificial tear products longitudinally.

[Practice of pharmaceutical care--therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacoeconomics of glaucoma--].

Clinical pharmacists now have many jobs in a hospital, including dispensing services, drug information, drug counseling for patients, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), and clinical research coordinating. These are important and essential jobs for a hospital pharmacist in his drug profession. During the performance of pharmaceutical services for patients and physicians, clinical pharmacists have an opportunity to change the medicine of a prescription. In this review, we outline the new developments in TDM and pharmacoeconomics achieved by pharmaceutical care at Hiroshima University Hospital. Pharmaceutical care is the professional practice in which the pharmacist takes charge of the needs of a patient related to his/her drugs. One of the aims was to investigate drug induced interaction in pharmacotherapy, and another was evaluation of the clinical efficacy of Bayesian analysis in detoxication treatments of overdoses using TDM. Pharmacoeconomics is an important aspect of the practice of pharmaceutical care. This review investigated the daily cost of ophthalmic solutions used in treating glaucoma and allergic conjunctivitis in Japan. It also summarizes the recent practice of pharmaceutical care in pharmacotherapy and pharmacoeconomics.

Regulatory and Economic Considerations of Retinal Drugs.

The advent of anti-VEGF therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration and macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion and diabetes mellitus has prevented blindness in tens of thousands of people. However, the costs of these drugs are without precedent in ophthalmic drug therapeutics. An analysis of the financial implications of retinal drugs and the impact of the Food and Drug Administration on treatment of retinal disease must include not only an evaluation of the direct costs of the drugs and the costs associated with their administration, but also the cost savings which accrue from their clinical benefit. This chapter will discuss the financial and regulatory issues associated with retinal drugs.

Preferences for eye drop characteristics among glaucoma specialists: a willingness-to-pay analysis.

PURPOSE: To determine the importance that US glaucoma specialists place on attributes of eye drops for lowering intraocular pressure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional survey by conducting a telephone interview with 113 members of the American Glaucoma Society. We administered a willingness-to-pay (WTP) instrument asking glaucoma specialists how much they would pay to obtain particular characteristics in an eye drop. Demographic data were correlated with the WTP responses. We compared the glaucoma specialists' responses to those previously obtained from patients. The main outcome measure was willingness-to-pay more (in US dollars). RESULTS: Almost all respondents were willing to pay extra to reduce the frequency of administration of eye drops from 3 times a day to once a day, and to avoid blurred vision, drowsiness, or inhibition of sexual performance. Only 54 (48%) were willing to pay more to avoid iris darkening. The mean amount that respondents were willing to pay (relative to US 50 dollars) differed significantly across eye drop characteristics (P < 0.001). The mean amount that the respondents were willing to pay was highest for avoidance of inhibition of sexual performance (US 105 dollars), blurred vision (US 92 dollars), and drowsiness (US 92 dollars). When compared with glaucoma and glaucoma suspect patients, more ophthalmologists were likely to pay extra for desirable eye drop attributes. However, the magnitude of the extra amount was similar between ophthalmologists and patients. CONCLUSIONS: Glaucoma specialists place differing value on various eye drop characteristics. Although the proportion of glaucoma specialists willing to pay more is generally greater than the proportion of patients, the preferences of glaucoma specialists and patients are alike.

Ocular irrigant alternatives in pediatric emergency medicine.

Minimizing pain and discomfort is an important consideration in pediatric ocular decontamination. The pH of an irrigant solution plays a significant role in its tolerability, because a solution with a pH that is too low or too high may cause edema and discomfort to the conjunctiva. We reviewed several available ocular irrigation solutions with respect to their chemical composition, pH, and cost efficiency. Currently, the irrigation solution of first choice for most ocular decontaminations in the pediatric emergency department (ED) is 0.9 % saline solution or normal saline (NS), which has a pH range between 4.5 and 6.0. Alternative ocular irrigant solutions available include Lactated Ringers solution (LR), which has a pH range between 6.2 and 7.5, buffered NS with pH adjusted to 7.4 with sodium bicarbonate, and Balanced Salt Solution Plus (BSS Plus), which has a pH of 7.4. Of these alternative solutions, all except BSS Plus are comparable in cost efficiency to NS. The use of more pH neutral solutions such as LR, NS with bicarbonate buffer, or BSS Plus may decrease ocular pain and irritation associated with copious irrigation, and may improve tolerance of ocular decontamination by a child.