A pilot trial comparing the availability of vitamins C, B6, and B12 from a vitamin-fortified water and food source in humans.
Int J Food Sci Nutr
; 60 Suppl 5: 114-24, 2009.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-19180356
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: In a cross-over randomized pilot study, the relative absorption of vitamins C, B(6) and B(12) were tested using a commercial vitamin-water (VW) and a standardized mixed meal (MM). METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Twelve adults (22.9+/-3.7 years), received the VW and the MM, randomly ordered, with a minimum 7-day washout period between. Blood was drawn pre-ingestion and over a post-ingestion period of 300+ min. Test meal quantities were formulated to contain equal amounts of vitamins B(6), B(12), and C as per the water label. Analysis revealed that a scaling factor had to be used to balance the actual content differences between test products. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Using the adjusted numbers for actual water vitamin concentration, there were no differences in the maximum concentration and the 5-h area under the curve for vitamins B(6), B(12) or C between the VW and the MM. CONCLUSIONS: VW was found to provide similar in vivo nutrition as the test MM at a caloric saving.
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Banco de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Ácido Ascórbico
/
Vitamina B 12
/
Bebidas
/
Agua
/
Alimentos Fortificados
/
Vitamina B 6
/
Análisis de los Alimentos
Tipo de estudio:
Clinical_trials
/
Prognostic_studies
Límite:
Adult
/
Animals
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Int J Food Sci Nutr
Asunto de la revista:
CIENCIAS DA NUTRICAO
Año:
2009
Tipo del documento:
Article
País de afiliación:
Estados Unidos