Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Peripheral regional anaesthesia and outcome: lessons learned from the last 10 years.
Kessler, J; Marhofer, P; Hopkins, P M; Hollmann, M W.
Afiliación
  • Kessler J; Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Marhofer P; Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, Austria peter.marhofer@meduniwien.ac.at.
  • Hopkins PM; Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Hollmann MW; Department of Anaesthesiology, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Br J Anaesth ; 114(5): 728-45, 2015 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25690833
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Our aim was to review the recent evidence for the efficacy of peripheral regional anaesthesia.

METHODS:

Following a systematic literature search and selection of publications based on prospectively agreed upon criteria, we produced a narrative review of the most commonly performed peripheral regional anaesthetic blocks for surgery on the upper limb, the lower limb, and the trunk. We considered short-term and longer-term benefits and complications among the outcomes of interest.

RESULTS:

Where good quality evidence exists, the great majority of the blocks reviewed were associated with one or any combination of reduced postoperative pain, reduced opioid consumption, or increased patient satisfaction. For selected surgical procedures, the use of blocks avoided general anaesthesia and was associated with increased efficiency of the surgical pathway. The exceptions were supraclavicular block, where there was insufficient evidence, and transversus abdominis plane block, where the evidence for efficacy was conflicting. The evidence for the impact of the blocks on longer-term outcomes was, in general, inadequate to inform clinical decision making. Permanent complications are rare.

CONCLUSIONS:

The majority of peripheral regional anaesthetic techniques have been shown to produce benefits for patients and hospital efficiency. Further interventional trials are required to clarify such benefits for supraclavicular block and transversus abdominis plane block and to ascertain any longer-term benefits for almost all of the blocks reviewed. Permanent complications of peripheral regional anaesthetic blocks are rare but accurate estimates of their incidence are yet to be determined.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dolor Postoperatorio / Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud / Anestesia de Conducción Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Br J Anaesth Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dolor Postoperatorio / Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud / Anestesia de Conducción Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Br J Anaesth Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania