Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of monocyte separation methods using flow cytometric analysis.
Jones, B M; Nicholson, J K; Holman, R C; Hubbard, M.
Afiliación
  • Jones BM; Division of Host Factors, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA 30333.
J Immunol Methods ; 125(1-2): 41-7, 1989 Dec 20.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2575116
ABSTRACT
We isolated normal, nonactivated human monocytes from peripheral blood by four different

methods:

(1) rosetting with sheep erythrocytes pretreated with 2-aminoethylisothiouronium bromide hydrobromide (AET) followed by monoclonal antibody (OKT3 (CD3), B1 (CD19), Leu7, Leu11 (CD16] and complement treatment; (2) adherence to gelatin/plasma-coated flasks; (3) adherence to plastic dishes; and (4) separation by the Sepracell technique. We monitored these monocyte separations by determining cell recoveries, OKT4A+ lymphocyte contamination, monocyte binding to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), number of non-specific esterase-positive cells, and proportion of mononuclear cells reactive with a battery of monoclonal antibodies specific for monocytes. Our results indicate that of the four methods compared, adherence to gelatin/plasma-coated flasks produced the highest purity, recovery, and satisfactory binding to HIV with the fewest contaminating CD4+ T cells.
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Monocitos / Separación Celular Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Immunol Methods Año: 1989 Tipo del documento: Article
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Monocitos / Separación Celular Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Immunol Methods Año: 1989 Tipo del documento: Article