Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Hepatitis E virus: seroprevalence and frequency of viral RNA detection among US blood donors.
Stramer, Susan L; Moritz, Erin D; Foster, Gregory A; Ong, Edgar; Linnen, Jeffrey M; Hogema, Boris M; Mak, Matthew; Chia, Chee Poh; Dodd, Roger Y.
Afiliación
  • Stramer SL; Scientific Support Office, American Red Cross, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
  • Moritz ED; Scientific Support Office, American Red Cross, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
  • Foster GA; Scientific Support Office, American Red Cross, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
  • Ong E; Hologic, Inc., San Diego, California.
  • Linnen JM; Hologic, Inc., San Diego, California.
  • Hogema BM; Department of Blood-Borne Infections, Virology Diagnostic Services, Sanquin Blood Supply Foundation, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Mak M; MP Biomedicals Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd., Singapore.
  • Chia CP; MP Biomedicals Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd., Singapore.
  • Dodd RY; North Potomac, Maryland.
Transfusion ; 56(2): 481-8, 2016 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26434952
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is a nonenveloped emerging virus of increasing worldwide interest. Antibody prevalence, RNA frequencies, and transfusion transmissions have been reported. We investigated the HEV RNA and antibody frequencies in US blood donors. STUDY DESIGN AND

METHODS:

Individual-donation HEV RNA testing was performed on 18,829 donations from six US geographic regions using a CE-marked nucleic acid test (95% limit of detection, 7.9 IU/mL). Repeat-reactive donations were confirmed by in-house, real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR; 10.3 IU/mL). Total HEV seroprevalence in a randomly selected subset of donations (n = 4499) was assessed by a direct, double-antigen sandwich assay; reactives were further tested for immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgM. As part of the total antibody confirmatory algorithm, the cutoff was adjusted.

RESULTS:

Two donations tested confirmed-positive for RNA (PCR not quantifiable, IgM/IgG positive; and 14 IU/mL, antibody negative) for a frequency of 1 in 9500 (95% confidence interval [CI], 12850-156,180) and 99.96% specificity (95% CI, 99.92%-99.98%); both donors were from the Midwest United States. Antibody prevalence was 9.5% (95% CI, 8.7-10.5) before the cutoff adjustment and 7.7% (95% CI, 7.0%-8.5%) after adjustment; 0.58% (95% CI, 0.39%-0.85%) were IgM positive.

CONCLUSIONS:

We confirmed comparatively low rates and low viral loads of HEV RNA in US blood donors indicating the need for individual-donation testing if screening is implemented. Antibody prevalence rates were comparable to those reported by one US study using a different assay, but lower than those reported in another study using yet a third assay. We did not answer the question of whether US blood donation screening is warranted. Selective strategies involving providing HEV-negative blood to severely immunosuppressed patients at risk of developing hepatitis may be considered.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Donantes de Sangre / Algoritmos / ARN Viral / Virus de la Hepatitis E / Hepatitis E / Selección de Donante / Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Transfusion Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Donantes de Sangre / Algoritmos / ARN Viral / Virus de la Hepatitis E / Hepatitis E / Selección de Donante / Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Transfusion Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article