Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of an Antibiotic-specific Sepsis Bundle on Appropriate and Timely Antibiotic Administration for Severe Sepsis in the Emergency Department.
Kalich, Bethany A; Maguire, Jennifer M; Campbell-Bright, Stacy L; Mehrotra, Abhi; Caffey, Tom; Tulu, Zeynep; Lin, Feng-Chang; Carson, Shannon S.
Afiliación
  • Kalich BA; Department of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Maguire JM; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Campbell-Bright SL; Department of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Mehrotra A; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Caffey T; University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Tulu Z; University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Lin FC; University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Carson SS; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
J Emerg Med ; 50(1): 79-88.e1, 2016 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26452597
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Guidelines recommend initiation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy within 1 h of severe sepsis diagnosis. Few sepsis bundles exist in the literature emphasizing initiation of specific antibiotic therapy.

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the impact of an antibiotic-specific sepsis bundle on the timely initiation of appropriate antibiotics.

METHODS:

For this before-and-after interventional study, the sepsis bundle at this 803-bed academic tertiary-care facility was redesigned to include specific antibiotic selection and dosing, based on suspected source of infection and susceptibility patterns. Protocol education and advertising was completed and bundle-specific antibiotics were put in the automated medication cabinet.

RESULTS:

Stepwise analysis of timely initiation of appropriate antibiotics included 1) Was the initial antibiotic appropriate? 2) If so, was it initiated within 1 h of diagnosis? 3) If so, were all necessary appropriate antibiotics started? and 4) If so, were they started within 3 h of diagnosis? In comparing the 3-month-before group and 3-month-after group (n = 124), the appropriate initial antibiotic was started in 33.9% vs. 54.8% of patients (odds ratio [OR] 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19-0.93, p = 0.03) and within 1 h in 22.6% vs. 14.5% of patients (OR 1.71, 95% CI 0.62-4.92, p = 0.36), respectively. All necessary appropriate antibiotics were initiated in 16.1% vs. 12.9% of patients (OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.42-4.10, p = 0.80), and within 3 h in 14.5% vs. 9.7% of patients, respectively (OR 1.58, 95% CI 0.46-5.78, p = 0.58).

CONCLUSIONS:

An updated antibiotic-specific sepsis bundle, with antibiotics put in an automated medication cabinet, can result in improvements in the initiation of appropriate initial antibiotic therapy for severe sepsis in the emergency department.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sepsis / Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Emerg Med Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sepsis / Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Emerg Med Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article