Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Estimated GFR for Living Kidney Donor Evaluation.
Huang, N; Foster, M C; Lentine, K L; Garg, A X; Poggio, E D; Kasiske, B L; Inker, L A; Levey, A S.
Afiliación
  • Huang N; Division of Nephrology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.
  • Foster MC; Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Lentine KL; Division of Nephrology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.
  • Garg AX; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO.
  • Poggio ED; Division of Nephrology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
  • Kasiske BL; Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
  • Inker LA; Department of Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
  • Levey AS; Division of Nephrology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Am J Transplant ; 16(1): 171-80, 2016 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26594819
ABSTRACT
All living kidney donor candidates undergo evaluation of GFR. Guidelines recommend measured GFR (mGFR), using either an endogenous filtration marker or creatinine clearance, rather than estimated GFR (eGFR), but measurement methods are difficult, time consuming and costly. We investigated whether GFR estimated from serum creatinine (eGFRcr) with or without sequential cystatin C is sufficiently accurate to identify donor candidates with high probability that mGFR is above or below thresholds for clinical decision making. We combined the pretest probability for mGFR thresholds <60, <70, ≥80, and ≥90 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) based on demographic characteristics (from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) with test performance of eGFR (categorical likelihood ratios from the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) to compute posttest probabilities. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, 53% of recent living donors had predonation eGFRcr high enough to ensure ≥95% probability that predonation mGFR was ≥90 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) , suggesting that mGFR may not be necessary in a large proportion of donor candidates. We developed a Web-based application to compute the probability, based on eGFR, that mGFR for a donor candidate is above or below a range of thresholds useful in living donor evaluation and selection.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Biomarcadores / Trasplante de Riñón / Donadores Vivos / Creatinina / Insuficiencia Renal Crónica / Cistatina C / Tasa de Filtración Glomerular / Riñón Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Am J Transplant Asunto de la revista: TRANSPLANTE Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Marruecos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Biomarcadores / Trasplante de Riñón / Donadores Vivos / Creatinina / Insuficiencia Renal Crónica / Cistatina C / Tasa de Filtración Glomerular / Riñón Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Am J Transplant Asunto de la revista: TRANSPLANTE Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Marruecos