Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Analysis of liver-directed therapies in U.S. cancer patients.
Alese, O B; Kim, S; Chen, Z; Ramalingam, S S; Owonikoko, T K; El-Rayes, B F.
Afiliación
  • Alese OB; Department of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, U.S.A.;
  • Kim S; Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, U.S.A.;
  • Chen Z; Department of Biostatistics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, U.S.A.
  • Ramalingam SS; Department of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, U.S.A.;
  • Owonikoko TK; Department of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, U.S.A.;
  • El-Rayes BF; Department of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, U.S.A.;
Curr Oncol ; 22(6): e457-61, 2015 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26715883
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The liver is a common site of primary and metastatic cancer. Liver-directed therapies are commonly used to treat cancer involving the liver. We report on the patterns, predictors, and outcomes of liver-directed therapies in hospitalized cancer patients in the United States.

METHODS:

Data were obtained from all U.S. states that contributed to the Nationwide Inpatient Sample maintained by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality between 2006 and 2010. Univariate and multivariate testing was used to identify factors significantly associated with patient outcome.

RESULTS:

For the 5-year period of interest, 12,540 patient discharges were identified. Mean age in the sample was 60 years. Primary liver lesions (n = 8840) made up 26.9% of the sample; the remaining cases were metastases. Most procedures were performed in large (79%) urban (98%) hospitals and in patients with insurance (97.9%). The most common intervention was partial hepatectomy (42.7%), followed by open (9.9%), percutaneous (7.2%), and laparoscopic (5.04%) ablation of liver lesions; embolization (9.8%); and liver transplantation (2.64%). The incidence of in-hospital mortality was very low (2.4%), and the complication rate was 12.2%. Complications such as acute liver necrosis, ascites, hepatic coma, hepatorenal syndrome, liver abscess, and high number of comorbid illnesses (>8) accounted for 60% of the in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSIONS:

The low rate of morbidity and mortality associated with liver-directed therapies in hospitalized cancer patients supports the continuing utility of such procedures in the management of primary and metastatic liver cancer. The patterns of health disparities observed with respect to the use of liver-directed therapies are concerning.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Curr Oncol Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Curr Oncol Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article