Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Open abdomen with negative pressure device vs primary abdominal closure for the management of surgical abdominal sepsis: a retrospective review.
Bleszynski, Michael S; Chan, Tiffany; Buczkowski, Andrzej K.
Afiliación
  • Bleszynski MS; Division of General Surgery, Department of General Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital Rm 3100-Jim Pattison Pavillion North, 950 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1M9, Canada. Electronic address: mbleszyn@gmail.com.
  • Chan T; Division of General Surgery, Department of General Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital Rm 3100-Jim Pattison Pavillion North, 950 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1M9, Canada.
  • Buczkowski AK; Division of General Surgery, Department of General Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital Rm 3100-Jim Pattison Pavillion North, 950 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Am J Surg ; 211(5): 926-32, 2016 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27020900
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Open abdomen with temporary abdominal closure remains a controversial management strategy for surgical abdominal sepsis compared with primary abdominal closure (PAC) and on-demand laparotomy. The primary objective was to compare mortality between PAC and open abdomen with vacuum assisted closure (VAC).

METHODS:

Retrospective review of a tertiary center intensive care unit database (2006 to 2010) including suspected/diagnosed severe abdominal sepsis/septic shock requiring source control laparotomy. Groups were categorized according to closure method at index source control laparotomy. APACHE-IV was used as a measure of disease severity.

RESULTS:

Of 211 patients, 75 PAC and 136 VAC cases were included. Controlling for disease severity, adjusted odds ratio of mortality for VAC was .41 95% confidence interval (.21, .81; P = .01) compared with PAC. PAC and VAC APACHE-1V predicted mortality rate were both 45%. VAC mortality was lower than PAC (22.8% vs 38.6%; P = .012).

CONCLUSIONS:

Open abdomen with VAC is associated with significantly improved survival compared with PAC in abdominal sepsis requiring laparotomy.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dehiscencia de la Herida Operatoria / Cicatrización de Heridas / Sepsis / Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas / Laparotomía Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Am J Surg Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dehiscencia de la Herida Operatoria / Cicatrización de Heridas / Sepsis / Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas / Laparotomía Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Am J Surg Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article