Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Costs of integrating cervical cancer screening at an HIV clinic in Kenya.
Vodicka, Elisabeth L; Babigumira, Joseph B; Mann, Marita R; Kosgei, Rose J; Lee, Fan; Mugo, Nelly R; Okech, Timothy C; Sakr, Samah R; Garrison, Louis P; Chung, Michael H.
Afiliación
  • Vodicka EL; University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Babigumira JB; University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Mann MR; University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Kosgei RJ; University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Lee F; Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Mugo NR; University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Okech TC; University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Sakr SR; Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Garrison LP; Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Chung MH; United States International University, University of Lukasa, Nairobi, Kenya.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 136(2): 220-228, 2017 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28099724
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To estimate the societal-level costs of integrating cervical cancer screening into HIV clinics in Nairobi, Kenya.

METHODS:

A cross-sectional micro-costing study was performed at Coptic Hope Center for Infectious Diseases and Kenyatta National Hospital, Kenya, between July 1 and October 31, 2014. To estimate direct medical, non-medical, and indirect costs associated with screening, a time-and-motion study was performed, and semi-structured interviews were conducted with women aged at least 18 years attending the clinic for screening during the study period and with clinic staff who had experience relevant to cervical cancer screening.

RESULTS:

There were 148 patients and 23 clinic staff who participated in interviews. Visual inspection with acetic acid was associated with the lowest estimated marginal per-screening costs ($3.30), followed by careHPV ($18.28), Papanicolaou ($24.59), and Hybrid Capture 2 screening ($31.15). Laboratory expenses were the main cost drivers for Papanicolaou and Hybrid Capture 2 testing ($11.61 and $16.41, respectively). Overhead and patient transportation affected the costs of all methods. Indirect costs were cheaper for single-visit screening methods ($0.43 per screening) than two-visit screening methods ($2.88 per screening).

CONCLUSIONS:

Integrating cervical cancer screening into HIV clinics would be cost-saving from a societal perspective compared with non-integrated screening. These findings could be used in cost-effectiveness analyses to assess incremental costs per clinical outcome in an integrated setting.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino / Tamizaje Masivo / Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud / Detección Precoz del Cáncer Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Africa Idioma: En Revista: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino / Tamizaje Masivo / Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud / Detección Precoz del Cáncer Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Africa Idioma: En Revista: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos