Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Introduction of a new paediatric asthma guideline: Effects on asthma control levels.
Hammer, S C; Sonneveld, L J H; van de Kant, K D G; Hendriks, H J; Heynens, J W; Droog, R; Dompeling, E; Jöbsis, Q.
Afiliación
  • Hammer SC; Department of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Sonneveld LJH; Department of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • van de Kant KDG; Department of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Hendriks HJ; Department of Paediatrics, Vie Curi Hospital, Venlo, The Netherlands.
  • Heynens JW; Department of Paediatrics, Orbis Medical Centre, Sittard, The Netherlands.
  • Droog R; Department of Paediatrics, Elkerliek Hospital, Helmond, The Netherlands.
  • Dompeling E; Department of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Jöbsis Q; Department of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol ; 28(3): 266-272, 2017 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28107572
BACKGROUND: In 2008, a new national paediatric asthma management guideline based on the international Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guideline was launched in the Netherlands. We studied whether asthma control and treatment regimens improved after introduction of the guideline by comparing survey data before and after the guideline introduction. METHODS: Two comparable groups of children (6-16 years) with asthma were included before (2004) and after (2013) the introduction of the guideline. Children, parents and paediatricians completed questionnaires about asthma symptoms, medication and healthcare use. Spirometry was performed. RESULTS: Data of 209 patients were analysed. Level of asthma control did not improve between 2004 and 2013 with a proportion of (partly) controlled asthmatics of 51% in 2004 and 59% in 2013 (p = 0.28). In 2013, paediatricians characterized 76% of children as (partly) controlled, while 59% of children was (partly) controlled according to GINA criteria (p < 0.05). Step-down treatment in controlled patients was more applied by paediatricians in 2013 compared to 2004 (from 8 to 40%, p < 0.05). Step-up treatment in uncontrolled patients did not improve. CONCLUSIONS: Asthma control did not improve after the introduction of the new guideline. Compared to 2004, an improvement was observed in step-down treatment in patients with controlled disease.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Asma / Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Qualitative_research Límite: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Pediatr Allergy Immunol Asunto de la revista: ALERGIA E IMUNOLOGIA / PEDIATRIA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Asma / Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Qualitative_research Límite: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Pediatr Allergy Immunol Asunto de la revista: ALERGIA E IMUNOLOGIA / PEDIATRIA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos