Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Construction of a psychological aging scale for healthy people].
Lin, Fei; Long, Yao; Zeng, Ni; Wu, Lei; Huang, Helang.
Afiliación
  • Lin F; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China.
  • Long Y; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China.
  • Zeng N; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China.
  • Wu L; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China.
  • Huang H; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China.
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban ; 42(4): 440-444, 2017 Apr 28.
Article en Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28490703
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To construct a psychological aging scale, and to provide a tool and indexes for scientific evaluation on aging.


Methods:

The age-related psychological items were collected through literature screening and expert interview. The importance, feasibilityand the degree of authority for the psychological index system were graded by two rounds of Delphi method. Using analytic hierarchy process, the weight of dimensions and items were determined. The analysis for internal consistency reliability, correlation and exploratory factor was performed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scales.


Results:

By two rounds of Delphi method, 17 experts offered the results as follows the coefficient of expert authorities was 0.88±0.06, the coordination coefficients for the importance and feasibility in second round were 0.456 (P<0.01) and 0.666 (P<0.01), respectively. The consistency was good. The psychological aging scale for healthy people included 4 dimensions as follows cognitive function, emotion, personality and motivation. The weight coefficients for the 4 dimensions were 0.338, 0.250, 0.166 and 0.258, respectively. The Cronbach's α coefficient for the scale was 0.822, the reliability was 0.817, the content validity index (CVI) was 0.847, and the cumulative contribution rate for the 5 factors was51.42%.


Conclusion:

The psychological aging scale is satisfied, which can provide reference for the evaluation for aging. The indicators were representative and well-recognized.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Envejecimiento / Encuestas y Cuestionarios Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Humans Idioma: Zh Revista: Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Envejecimiento / Encuestas y Cuestionarios Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Humans Idioma: Zh Revista: Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China