Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Use of endpoint adjudication to improve the quality and validity of endpoint assessment for medical device development and post marketing evaluation: Rationale and best practices. A report from the cardiac safety research consortium.
Seltzer, Jonathan H; Heise, Ted; Carson, Peter; Canos, Daniel; Hiatt, Jo Carol; Vranckx, Pascal; Christen, Thomas; Cutlip, Donald E.
Afiliación
  • Seltzer JH; ACI Clinical, Bala Cynwyd, PA. Electronic address: jseltzer@aciclinical.com.
  • Heise T; Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN.
  • Carson P; Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC.
  • Canos D; Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD.
  • Hiatt JC; Kaiser Permanente, Pasedena, CA.
  • Vranckx P; Hartcenterum Hasselt, Belgium and European Clinical Research Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Christen T; Boston Scientific Corporation, Boston, MA.
  • Cutlip DE; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School and Baim Institute for Clinical Research, Boston, MA.
Am Heart J ; 190: 76-85, 2017 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28760216
ABSTRACT
This white paper provides a summary of presentations, discussions and conclusions of a Thinktank entitled "The Role of Endpoint Adjudication in Medical Device Clinical Trials". The think tank was cosponsored by the Cardiac Safety Research Committee, MDEpiNet and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and was convened at the FDA's White Oak headquarters on March 11, 2016. Attention was focused on tailoring best practices for evaluation of endpoints in medical device clinical trials, practical issues in endpoint adjudication of therapeutic, diagnostic, biomarker and drug-device combinations, and the role of adjudication in regulatory and reimbursement issues throughout the device lifecycle. Attendees included representatives from medical device companies, the FDA, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), end point adjudication specialist groups, clinical research organizations, and active, academically based adjudicators. The manuscript presents recommendations from the think tank regarding (1) rationale for when adjudication is appropriate, (2) best practices establishment and operation of a medical device adjudication committee and (3) the role of endpoint adjudication for post market evaluation in the emerging era of real world evidence.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados / Enfermedades Cardiovasculares / Determinación de Punto Final / Investigación Biomédica / Equipos y Suministros Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Am Heart J Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados / Enfermedades Cardiovasculares / Determinación de Punto Final / Investigación Biomédica / Equipos y Suministros Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Am Heart J Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article