The Tibial Tubercle-to-Trochlear Groove Distance Is Reliable in the Setting of Trochlear Dysplasia, and Superior to the Tibial Tubercle-to-Posterior Cruciate Ligament Distance When Evaluating Coronal Malalignment in Patellofemoral Instability.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine best practices for consistent and accurate evaluation of coronal alignment in patients with patellofemoral (PF) instability. METHODS: Six reviewers examined 239 knee magnetic resonance images (MRIs) in patients with PF instability and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. Measurements included tibial tubercle-to-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance measured at the most proximal and distal portions of the trochlea, tibial tubercle-to-PCL (TT-PCL) distance, and Dejour classification of trochlear dysplasia. RESULTS: Interrater reliability was low for Dejour classification (k = 0.289), but improved to moderate (k = 0.448) when patients were separated into normal/Dejour A and Dejour B/C/D. Interrater reliability was high for proximal and distal TT-TG measurements (interclass correlation coefficients [ICCs] = 0.807 and 0.936, respectively). TT-PCL was moderately reliable (ICC = 0.625), and correlated with TT-TG (r = 0.457, P < .001 proximal and r = 0.451, P < .001 distal). No significant difference was found between the proximal and distal measurements of TT-TG in each patient, though the PF group exhibited higher values than the ACL group (P < .001 for both). TT-PCL was significantly higher for the PF group than the ACL group (P = .015), but this difference lost significance when the group was divided by the TT-PCL cutoff of 24 mm (P = .371). CONCLUSIONS: The proximal and distal techniques for measuring the TT-TG distance are similar to each other, and reliable despite level of reviewer training or presence of dysplasia. The TT-TG distance was predictive of patellofemoral instability. The TT-PCL distance was found to be less reliable than either method of measuring the TT-TG distance. Thus, this study demonstrated TT-TG to be superior to TT-PCL as a measurement of coronal malalignment. Given the variability in Dejour classification in this and other studies, a more reliable classification system for trochlear dysplasia as defined on cross-sectional imaging is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, retrospective clinical trial.