Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Application of in vitro skin penetration measurements to confirm and refine the quantitative skin sensitization risk assessment of methylisothiazolinone.
Rothe, Helga; Ryan, Cindy A; Page, Leanne; Vinall, Joanne; Goebel, Carsten; Scheffler, Heike; Toner, Frank; Roper, Clive; Kern, Petra S.
Afiliación
  • Rothe H; Coty, Berliner Allee 65, 64295 Darmstadt, Germany.
  • Ryan CA; The Procter & Gamble Company, Mason Business Center, 8700 Mason Montgomery Rd., Mason, OH 45040, USA.
  • Page L; Charles River Laboratories Edinburgh Ltd, Elphinstone Research Centre, Tranent, East Lothian, EH33 2NE, UK.
  • Vinall J; Charles River Laboratories Edinburgh Ltd, Elphinstone Research Centre, Tranent, East Lothian, EH33 2NE, UK.
  • Goebel C; Coty, Berliner Allee 65, 64295 Darmstadt, Germany.
  • Scheffler H; Procter & Gamble Service GmbH, Frankfurter Strasse 145, 61476 Kronberg, Germany.
  • Toner F; Charles River Laboratories Edinburgh Ltd, Elphinstone Research Centre, Tranent, East Lothian, EH33 2NE, UK.
  • Roper C; Charles River Laboratories Edinburgh Ltd, Elphinstone Research Centre, Tranent, East Lothian, EH33 2NE, UK.
  • Kern PS; Procter & Gamble Services Company NV, Temselaan 100, B-1853 Strombeek-Bever, Belgium. Electronic address: kern.ps@pg.com.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 91: 197-207, 2017 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29080845
ABSTRACT
Use of quantitative risk assessment (QRA) for assessing the skin sensitization potential of chemicals present in consumer products requires an understanding of hazard and product exposure. In the absence of data, consumer exposure is based on relevant habits and practices and assumes 100% skin uptake of the applied dose. To confirm and refine the exposure, a novel design for in vitro skin exposure measurements was conducted with the preservative, methylisothiazolinone (MI), in beauty care (BC) and household care (HHC) products using realistic consumer exposure conditions. A difference between measured exposure levels (MELs) for MI in leave-on versus rinse-off BC products, and lower MELs for MI in HHC rinse-off compared to BC products was demonstrated. For repeated product applications, the measured exposure was lower than estimations based on summation of applied amounts. Compared to rinse-off products, leave-on applications resulted in higher MELs, correlating with the higher incidences of allergic contact dermatitis associated with those product types. Lower MELs for MI in rinse-off products indicate a lower likelihood to induce skin sensitization, also after multiple daily applications. These in vitro skin exposure measurements indicate conservatism of default exposure estimates applied in skin sensitization QRA and might be helpful in future risk assessments.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tiazoles Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Regul Toxicol Pharmacol Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tiazoles Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Regul Toxicol Pharmacol Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania