Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety, Tolerability, and Nocebo Phenomena During Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trials.
Zis, Panagiotis; Shafique, Faiza; Hadjivassiliou, Marios; Blackburn, Daniel; Venneri, Annalena; Iliodromiti, Stamatina; Mitsikostas, Dimos-Dimitrios; Sarrigiannis, Ptolemaios G.
Afiliación
  • Zis P; Academic Department of Neurosciences, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
  • Shafique F; Medical School, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.
  • Hadjivassiliou M; Academic Department of Neurosciences, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
  • Blackburn D; Academic Department of Neurosciences, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
  • Venneri A; Sheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience, Sheffield, UK.
  • Iliodromiti S; Sheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience, Sheffield, UK.
  • Mitsikostas DD; School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  • Sarrigiannis PG; 1st Neurology Department, Aeginition Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University, Athens, Greece.
Neuromodulation ; 23(3): 291-300, 2020 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30896060
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The methodology used for the application of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is such that it may induce a placebo effect. Respectively, adverse events (AEs) can occur when using a placebo, a phenomenon called nocebo. The primary aim of our meta-analysis is to establish the nocebo phenomena during TMS. Safety and tolerability of TMS were also studied.

METHODS:

After a systematic Medline search for TMS randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we assessed the number of patients reporting at least one AE and the number of discontinuations because of AE in active and sham TMS groups.

RESULTS:

Data were extracted from 93 RCTs. The overall pooled estimate of active TMS and placebo treated patients who discontinued treatment because of AEs was 2.5% (95% CI 1.9%-3.2%) and 2.7% (95% CI 2.0%-3.5%), respectively. The pooled estimate of active TMS and placebo treated patients experiencing at least one AE was 29.3% (95% CI 19.0%-22.6%) and 13.6% (95% CI 11.6%-15.8%), respectively, suggesting that the odds of experiencing an AE is 2.60 times higher (95% CI 1.75-3.86) in the active treatment group compared to placebo (p < 0.00001). The most common AE was headache, followed by dizziness. Secondary meta-analyses in depression and psychotic disorders showed that the odds of experiencing an AE is 3.98 times higher (95% CI 2.14-7.40) and 2.93 times higher (95% CI 1.41-6.07), respectively, in the active treatment groups compared to placebo.

CONCLUSIONS:

TMS is a safe and well-tolerated intervention. Nocebo phenomena do occur during TMS treatment and should be acknowledged during clinical trial design and daily clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal / Efecto Nocebo Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Neuromodulation Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal / Efecto Nocebo Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Neuromodulation Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido