Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Preventing Respiratory Failure After Cardiac Surgery Using Post-extubation Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure Therapy.
Melton, Nathaniel; Lazar, John F; Childers, William K; Anderson, Douglas; Jaik, Nikhil P; Loran, David B; Woods, Clarke; Mumtaz, Mubashir A.
Afiliación
  • Melton N; General Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pinnacle, Harrisburg, USA.
  • Lazar JF; Cardiovascular Thoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pinnacle, Harrisburg, USA.
  • Childers WK; General Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pinnacle, Harrisburg, USA.
  • Anderson D; General Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pinnacle, Harrisburg, USA.
  • Jaik NP; Cardiovascular Thoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pinnacle, Harrisburg, USA.
  • Loran DB; Cardiovascular Thoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pinnacle, Harrisburg, USA.
  • Woods C; Miscellaneous, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pinnacle, Harrisburg, USA.
  • Mumtaz MA; Cardiovascular Thoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pinnacle, Harrisburg, USA.
Cureus ; 11(3): e4236, 2019 Mar 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31131160
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Our study aimed to evaluate if an extubation protocol for all post-operative cardiac patients in the cardiothoracic intensive care unit using intermittent bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) could reduce the rate of re-intubation.

METHODS:

A total of 1,718 patients undergoing cardiac surgery from May 2012 to April 2016 were analyzed. Patients from May 2014 to April 2016 were included in a post-extubation BiPAP therapy protocol that included one hour of BiPAP followed by three hours of a nasal cannula for 24 hours after extubation in the cardiothoracic intensive care unit. The protocol cohort was retrospectively compared to a control group (nasal cannula only) from May 2012 to April 2014. All demographic and outcome data were analyzed from our institution's Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Cardiac Database.

RESULTS:

There was no statistical difference in the rate of re-intubation between the BiPAP group (n = 35; 4.07%) and the control group (n = 34; 3.96%; p = 0.9022). Sub-group analysis of the 69 re-intubated patients identified several significant risk factors prior valve surgery (p = 0.028), chronic lung disease (p = 0.0343), emergent operation (p = 0.0016), longer operating room time (p = 0.0109), cardiopulmonary bypass time (p = 0.0086), higher STS predicted risk of mortality score (p = 0.0015). Re-intubation was associated with higher 30-day mortality rates (p = 0.0026), prolonged cardiothoracic intensive care unit length of stay (p < 0.0001), and hospital length of stay (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION:

While a BiPAP protocol did not show a significant difference in re-intubation rates after cardiac surgery, the subgroup analysis of re-intubated patients showed several significant risk factors for re-intubation. Early identification of these risk factors when considering extubation may help teams avoid associated morbidity and mortality outcomes.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos