Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
External quality assessment for PML-RARα detection in acute promyelocytic leukemia: Findings and summary.
Wu, Qisheng; Zhang, Rui; Fu, Yu; Zhang, Jiawei; Chen, Kun; Li, Jinming.
Afiliación
  • Wu Q; National Center for Clinical Laboratories, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China.
  • Zhang R; Graduate School, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
  • Fu Y; Beijing Engineering Research Center of Laboratory Medicine, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Zhang J; National Center for Clinical Laboratories, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China.
  • Chen K; Beijing Engineering Research Center of Laboratory Medicine, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Li J; National Center for Clinical Laboratories, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China.
J Clin Lab Anal ; 33(6): e22894, 2019 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31131502
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The confirmation of clinical diagnosis, molecular remission, and sequential minimal residual disease monitoring required PML-RARα detection in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). The current status of PML-RARα detection in various laboratories remains unknown.

METHODS:

In 2018, external quality assessment (EQA) for PML-RARα detection was carried out in China. Three EQA sample panels for PML-RARα isoform L/S/V were prepared by different mock leukocyte samples. The performances of PML-RARα detection, including admission screening, and qualitative and quantitative detection by real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR), were assessed based on APL simulated clinical case.

RESULTS:

The mock leukocyte samples met the requirements of a clinically qualified sample for PML-RARα EQA panel. Among the laboratories, 13/50 (26.0%) were "competent," 21/50 (42%) classified as "acceptable," and 16/50 (32.0%) classified as "improvable." One (1/50, 2.0%) laboratory reported one screening mistake. Twenty-six (26/50, 52.0%) laboratories reported 29 false-positive and 19 false-negative results. Twenty-three (23/50, 46.0%) laboratories reported 42 quantitative incorrect results.

CONCLUSION:

Significant differences were not found in PML-RARα detection performance among laboratories that used different extraction methods. The performances of qualitative and quantitative RT-qPCR detection were worse accurate for PML-RARα isoform V. Quantitative variation was higher for low-level samples. Further continuous external assessment and education are needed in the management of PML-RARα detection.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Leucemia Promielocítica Aguda / Proteínas de Fusión Oncogénica / Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico / Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Lab Anal Asunto de la revista: TECNICAS E PROCEDIMENTOS DE LABORATORIO Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Leucemia Promielocítica Aguda / Proteínas de Fusión Oncogénica / Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico / Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Lab Anal Asunto de la revista: TECNICAS E PROCEDIMENTOS DE LABORATORIO Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China