Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Association Between Early Sjögren Markers and Symptoms and Signs of Dry Eye.
Hubschman, Sasha; Rojas, Mario; Kalavar, Meghana; Kloosterboer, Amy; Sabater, Alfonso L; Galor, Anat.
Afiliación
  • Hubschman S; Department of Ophthalmology, Miami Veterans Administration Medical Center, Miami, FL; and.
  • Rojas M; Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL.
  • Kalavar M; Department of Ophthalmology, Miami Veterans Administration Medical Center, Miami, FL; and.
  • Kloosterboer A; Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL.
  • Sabater AL; Department of Ophthalmology, Miami Veterans Administration Medical Center, Miami, FL; and.
  • Galor A; Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL.
Cornea ; 39(3): 311-315, 2020 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31634227
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Animal models suggest that early markers of Sjögren syndrome (EMS)-antibodies against salivary protein 1, parotid secretory protein, and carbonic anhydrase 6 (CA6)-are more accurate signals of early Sjögren when compared with classic markers (anti-Ro and anti-La). To further understand the relationship between EMS and dry eye (DE), we compared symptoms and signs of DE in subjects who tested positive versus negative for EMS.

METHODS:

In this cross-sectional study, patients at the Miami Veterans Affairs Eye Clinic who were tested for EMS underwent a standard ocular surface examination. Indications for EMS testing included DE symptoms in combination with dry mouth symptoms, low tear production, corneal staining, or a Sjögren disease-associated autoimmune disease. Statistical tests performed were the χ test, Fisher exact test, independent sample t test, and Spearman correlation.

RESULTS:

Seventy-three percent of 44 patients tested positive for 1 or more EMS. CA6 IgG was most frequently elevated, followed by CA6 IgM and parotid secretory protein IgG. EMS-positive versus EMS-negative subjects were more likely to escalate DE treatment past artificial tears to topical cyclosporine (n = 32, 100% vs. n = 9, 75%, P = 0.02). There were no demographic or comorbidity differences between EMS-positive and EMS-negative subjects, and marker levels did not correlate with more severe tear film measures.

CONCLUSIONS:

Most of the individuals with DE tested positive for 1 or more EMS antibodies, including men and Hispanics. Future studies will be needed to understand how to incorporate EMS data into the care of an individual with DE.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Biomarcadores / Síndromes de Ojo Seco / Síndrome de Sjögren Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Cornea Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Biomarcadores / Síndromes de Ojo Seco / Síndrome de Sjögren Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Cornea Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article