Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Decision coaching using a patient decision aid for youth and parents considering insulin delivery methods for type 1 diabetes: a pre/post study.
Lawson, Margaret L; Shephard, Allyson L; Feenstra, Bryan; Boland, Laura; Sourial, Nadia; Stacey, Dawn.
Afiliación
  • Lawson ML; Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L1, Canada. lawson@cheo.on.ca.
  • Shephard AL; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO), 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L1, Canada.
  • Feenstra B; University of Ottawa, School of Nursing, 451 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8M5, Canada.
  • Boland L; University of Ottawa, Population Health, 25 University Private, Ottawa, ON, K1N 7K4, Canada.
  • Sourial N; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO), 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L1, Canada.
  • Stacey D; University of Ottawa, School of Nursing, 451 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8M5, Canada.
BMC Pediatr ; 20(1): 1, 2020 01 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31900152
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Choice of insulin delivery for type 1 diabetes can be difficult for many parents and children. We evaluated decision coaching using a patient decision aid for helping youth with type 1 diabetes and parents decide about insulin delivery method.

METHODS:

A pre/post design. Youth and parent(s) attending a pediatric diabetes clinic in a tertiary care centre were referred to the intervention by their pediatric endocrinologist or diabetes physician between September 2013 and May 2015. A decision coach guided youth and their parents in completing a patient decision aid that was pre-populated with evidence on insulin delivery options. Primary outcomes were youth and parent scores on the low literary version of the validated Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS).

RESULTS:

Forty-five youth (mean age = 12.5 ± 2.9 years) and 66 parents (45.8 ± 5.6 years) participated. From pre- to post-intervention, youth and parent decisional conflict decreased significantly (youth mean DCS score was 32.0 vs 6.6, p < 0.0001; parent 37.6 vs 3.5, p < 0.0001). Youth's and parents' mean decisional conflict scores were also significantly improved for DCS subscales (informed, values clarity, support, and certainty). 92% of youth and 94% of parents were satisfied with the decision coaching and patient decision aid. Coaching sessions averaged 55 min. Parents (90%) reported that the session was the right length of time; some youth (16%) reported that it was too long.

CONCLUSION:

Decision coaching with a patient decision aid reduced decisional conflict for youth and parents facing a decision about insulin delivery method.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 / Tutoría Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Adolescent / Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Pediatr Asunto de la revista: PEDIATRIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 / Tutoría Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Adolescent / Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Pediatr Asunto de la revista: PEDIATRIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá