Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Differences in time-to-testing and time-to-isolation between community-onset and hospital-onset Clostridioides difficile cases at a tertiary care VA medical center.
Hostler, Christopher J; Bertumen, J Bradford; Park, Lawrence P; Wilkins, Susan B; Woods, Christopher W.
Afiliación
  • Hostler CJ; Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC; Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, NC. Electronic address: christopher.hostler@duke.edu.
  • Bertumen JB; Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC; Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
  • Park LP; Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC; Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
  • Wilkins SB; Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC.
  • Woods CW; Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC; Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Am J Infect Control ; 48(10): 1148-1151, 2020 10.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31911067
BACKGROUND: Delayed identification and isolation of patients with Clostridiodies difficile infection (CDI) may contribute to in-hospital transmission and delay appropriate therapy. To assess potential points for intervention, we conducted a retrospective cohort study to determine differences in time-to-testing and time-to-isolation among community-onset (CO), community-onset healthcare facility-associated (CO-HCFA), and hospital-onset (HO) CDI. METHODS: We compared clinical and demographic data of all CO, CO-HCFA, and HO CDI patients at our institution between October 2011 and September 2015. We then performed bivariable analysis on our cohorts to identify differences in time-to-testing and time-to-isolation for CO versus CO-HCFA versus HO CDI patients. RESULTS: 355 patients with CDI were hospitalized during the study; 138 (38.9%) with CO CDI, 52 (14.6%) with CO-HCFA CDI, and 165 (46.5%) with HO CDI. 117 (84.8%) CO CDI patients were tested within 1 day of diarrhea onset compared to 41 (78.8%) of CO-HCFA and 113 (68.5%) of HO CDI patients (P < .01). 51 CO CDI patients (36.7%) were placed on empirical isolation precautions at the time of diarrhea onset compared to 22 (43.1%) of CO-HCFA CDI patients and 32 (19.4%) of HO CDI patients (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: CO CDI patients are more likely to be isolated empirically and tested earlier than HO CDI patients. Further attention should be paid to isolating hospitalized patients who develop diarrhea as an inpatient.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infección Hospitalaria / Clostridioides difficile / Infecciones por Clostridium Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Infect Control Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infección Hospitalaria / Clostridioides difficile / Infecciones por Clostridium Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Infect Control Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article