Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wang, Bi-Cheng; Xiao, Bo-Ya; Lin, Guo-He; Wang, Chang; Liu, Quentin.
Afiliación
  • Wang BC; Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China. bcsnowell@163.com.
  • Xiao BY; Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, 200438, People's Republic of China.
  • Lin GH; Department of Oncology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230601, China.
  • Wang C; Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, CH-3012, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Liu Q; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
BMC Cancer ; 20(1): 393, 2020 May 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32375701
BACKGROUND: Induction chemotherapy (IC) combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has been recommended as the first-line therapy for locoregional nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Due to the different chemotherapeutic drugs used in the IC and CCRT, the results remain controversial. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically retrieved to search potentially eligible clinical trials up to Sep 11, 2019. Eligible studies were registered and prospective randomized controlled clinical trials. RESULTS: From 526 records, nine articles including seven randomized controlled clinical trials were eligible, with a total of 2311 locoregional advanced NPC patients. IC + CCRT had significantly lower risks of death (3-year hazard ratio [HR]: 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-0.89, p = 0.003; 5-year HR: 0.77, 95% CI 0.62-0.94, p = 0.01), disease progression (3-year HR: 0.67, 95% CI 0.55-0.80, p < 0.001; 5-year HR: 0.70, 95% CI 0.58-0.83, p < 0.0001), distant metastasis (3-year HR: 0.58, 95% CI 0.45-0.74, p < 0.0001; 5-year HR: 0.69, 95% CI 0.55-0.87, p = 0.001) and locoregional relapse (3-year HR: 0.69, 95% CI 0.50-0.95, p = 0.02; 5-year HR: 0.66, 95% CI 0.51-0.86, p = 0.002) than CCRT. Compared with CCRT, IC + CCRT showed higher relative risks of grade 3 or more neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, vomiting and hepatotoxicity throughout the course of treatment, and higher relative risks of grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia and vomiting during CCRT. CONCLUSION: IC combined with CCRT significantly improved the survival in locoregional advanced NPC patients. Moreover, toxicities were well tolerated during IC and CCRT. Further clinical trials are warranted to confirm the optimal induction chemotherapeutic regimen in the future.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas / Quimioradioterapia / Quimioterapia de Inducción / Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Cancer Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas / Quimioradioterapia / Quimioterapia de Inducción / Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Cancer Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China