Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prognostic factors and surgical treatment in vulvar carcinoma: Single center experience.
Pecorino, Basilio; Scibilia, Giuseppe; Ferrara, Martina; Di Stefano, Andrea Benedetto; D'Agate, Maria Gabriella; Giambanco, Laura; Scollo, Paolo.
Afiliación
  • Pecorino B; Gynecology and Obstetrics, Maternal and Child Department, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy.
  • Scibilia G; Gynecology and Obstetrics, Maternal and Child Department, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy.
  • Ferrara M; Gynecology and Obstetrics, Maternal and Child Department, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy.
  • Di Stefano AB; Gynecology and Obstetrics, Maternal and Child Department, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy.
  • D'Agate MG; Gynecology and Obstetrics, Maternal and Child Department, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy.
  • Giambanco L; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S.Antonio Abate Hospital, Trapani, Italy.
  • Scollo P; Gynecology and Obstetrics, Maternal and Child Department, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 46(9): 1871-1878, 2020 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32700378
ABSTRACT

AIM:

Vulvar carcinoma represents 3-5% of all female genital cancers; the main surgical treatment is radical vulvectomy and inguinal lymphadenectomy. The aim of this study is to analyze prognostic factors in the patients underwent to primary surgery for vulvar carcinoma.

METHODS:

One hundred and eighteen cases of vulvar carcinoma underwent surgery between 2006 and 2016 at Operative Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics of Cannizzaro Hospital (Catania, Italy) were retrospective analyzed. Risk factors for relapse (age, tumor size, FIGO stage, type of surgery, lymphadenectomy, margins status, metastatic nodes and radiotherapy) were evaluated by logistic regression. Univariate analysis of prognostic factors (age, tumor size, FIGO stage, metastatic inguinal nodes and type of surgery) was obtained by Cox proportional hazard model. Overall survival was calculated by Kaplan-Meier curves either for the entire population and for comparison between positive and negative variables (margin status, nodes and radiotherapy) with log-rank test to determine significance. Statistical significance was reached for P < 0.05.

RESULTS:

Type of surgery (radical local excision vs. radical vulvectomy) and positive inguinal nodes were identified as risk factors for relapse. Positive inguinal nodes and positive margins were identified as prognostic factors either for overall survival and disease specific survival; tumor size greater than 4 cm was identified as prognostic factors for overall survival. Overall survival was 38.4% and it was significantly higher in the patients with negative margins and nodes.

CONCLUSIONS:

Nodes status, resection margins, age and type of surgery represent prognostic factors have to be considered for adjuvant treatment in the patients affected from vulvar carcinoma.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Vulva / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Obstet Gynaecol Res Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Vulva / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Obstet Gynaecol Res Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia