Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Transvenous revision of leads with cardiac perforation following device implantation-Safety, outcome, and complications.
Döring, Michael; Müssigbrodt, Andreas; Ebert, Micaela; Bode, Kerstin; Lucas, Johannes; Dagres, Nikolaos; Hindricks, Gerhard; Richter, Sergio.
Afiliación
  • Döring M; Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Müssigbrodt A; Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Ebert M; Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Bode K; Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Lucas J; Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Dagres N; Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Hindricks G; Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Richter S; Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 43(11): 1325-1332, 2020 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32909622
INTRODUCTION: Cardiac perforation is a rare complication of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation. Transvenous revision of perforated leads is associated with the risk of cardiac tamponade and death. Little is known about periprocedural complications and outcome of these patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients referred to our department with evidence or suspicion of cardiac perforation following CIED implantation underwent chest X-ray, transthoracic echocardiography, device interrogation, and, if necessary, a cardiac computed tomography (CT)-scan to diagnose lead perforation and associated complications. Transvenous lead revision (TLR) was performed in all patients with evidence of lead perforation. Patient characteristics, procedural complications, and outcome were recorded and analyzed. Fifty-six patients (75 ± 10 years, 43% male) were diagnosed with cardiac perforation, 34 patients (61%) early within 30 days post-implantation, and 22 patients (39%) thereafter. The most frequent perforation site was the right ventricular (RV) apex (75%), followed by the RV free wall (16%) and the right atrial appendage (9%). A total of 16 patients (29%) presented with severe complications; 12 patients (21%) with pericardial effusion treated by pericardiocentesis before lead revision and four patients (7%) with hematothorax requiring drainage. Late perforations showed significantly more frequent cardiac tamponades (P = .041). TLR was performed without further complications in 54 patients (96%). None of the patients required surgical treatment or experienced in-hospital death. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac perforation following CIED implantation is associated with severe complications in nearly one-third of the cases. Transvenous revision of the perforated lead can safely be performed with a very low complication rate.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Marcapaso Artificial / Desfibriladores Implantables / Remoción de Dispositivos / Lesiones Cardíacas Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Marcapaso Artificial / Desfibriladores Implantables / Remoción de Dispositivos / Lesiones Cardíacas Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania