Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The use of intravenous iron in pregnancy: for whom and when? A survey of Australian and New Zealand obstetricians.
Smith-Wade, Sarah; Kidson-Gerber, Giselle; Shand, Antonia; Grzeskowiak, Luke; Henry, Amanda.
Afiliación
  • Smith-Wade S; School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
  • Kidson-Gerber G; School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
  • Shand A; Haematology Department, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
  • Grzeskowiak L; School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
  • Henry A; Children's Hospital at Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 20(1): 665, 2020 Nov 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33148203
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Iron deficiency anaemia in pregnancy (IDAP) affects 11-18% of Australian pregnancies and is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. National prescribing data suggests the use of intravenous iron in pregnancy is increasingly common. This study aimed to 1) Establish the current patterns of intravenous iron use by Fellows of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians (FRANZCOG) when treating iron deficiency and IDAP including immediately postpartum and; 2) Assess FRANZCOG opinions regarding potential trial of intravenous iron for first-line treatment of IDAP.

METHODS:

An online survey of RANZCOG Fellows practicing obstetrics was distributed in September 2018. Results were analysed descriptively and responses compared by clinician demographics using Chi-squared testing.

RESULTS:

Of 484 respondents (21% of FRANZCOG), 457 were currently practicing obstetrics. Most prescribed intravenous iron in pregnancy (96%) and/or postpartum (85%). Most intravenous iron was prescribed for IDAP (98%) rather than iron deficiency without anaemia (53%), and for IDAP most commonly second-line to failed oral iron supplementation and first-line in special circumstances (59%). Intravenous iron prescribing was associated with shorter time since FRANZCOG completion (p = 0.01), public hospital practice (p = 0.008) and higher hospital birth numbers (p = 0.01). Most respondents (90%) would consider a randomised controlled trial of first-line intravenous iron for IDAP, although views on appropriate thresholds differed.

CONCLUSIONS:

Almost all respondents prescribed intravenous iron for IDAP, and while mostly used for second-line treatment over half sometimes used it first-line. With accelerating intravenous iron use, further research is required into its optimal use in pregnancy, recognizing important clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Hematológicas del Embarazo / Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina / Compuestos Férricos / Anemia Ferropénica / Hematínicos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Región como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Asunto de la revista: OBSTETRICIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Hematológicas del Embarazo / Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina / Compuestos Férricos / Anemia Ferropénica / Hematínicos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Región como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Asunto de la revista: OBSTETRICIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia