Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
National Thoracic Surgery Standards Implementation: Barriers, Enablers, and Opportunities.
Arnaout, Angel; Prashad, Anubha; Dunk, Nadine; Rogers, Jess; Edwards, Annemarie; Argent-Katwala, Mary; Finley, Christian.
Afiliación
  • Arnaout A; Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, 145 King Street West, Toronto, ON M5H 1J8, Canada.
  • Prashad A; Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.
  • Dunk N; Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, 145 King Street West, Toronto, ON M5H 1J8, Canada.
  • Rogers J; Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, 145 King Street West, Toronto, ON M5H 1J8, Canada.
  • Edwards A; Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, 145 King Street West, Toronto, ON M5H 1J8, Canada.
  • Argent-Katwala M; Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, 145 King Street West, Toronto, ON M5H 1J8, Canada.
  • Finley C; Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, 145 King Street West, Toronto, ON M5H 1J8, Canada.
Curr Oncol ; 28(1): 405-416, 2021 01 13.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33450804
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis and surgical treatment decision making for thoracic cancers is complex. Moreover, there is demonstrated variability in how each province in Canada delivers cancer care, resulting in disparities in patient outcomes. Recently, the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (CPAC) published pan-Canadian evidence-based standards for the care of thoracic surgery cancer patients. This study was undertaken to assess the degree to which these standards were currently met in practice and to further understand the determinants to their implementation nationally. METHODS: This study was undertaken in two parts: (1) a national survey of thoracic surgeons to assess the perceived extent of implementation of these standards in their institution and province; and (2) formation of a focus group with a representative sample of thoracic surgeons across Canada in a qualitative study to understand the determinants of successful standards implementation. RESULTS: 37 surgeons (33% response rate) participated in the survey; 78% were from academic hospitals. The top categories of standards that were under-implemented included (a) quality assurance processes, data collection and clinician audit and feedback, and (b) ongoing regional planning and workload assessments for thoracic surgeons, and (c) pathology turnaround time target of two weeks and the use of a standardized synoptic pathology report format. Enablers, barriers, and opportunities for standards implementation contextualized the discussion within the focus group. CONCLUSION: Study results demonstrated variation in the implementation of surgery standards across Canada and identified the determinants to the delivery of high quality surgical care. Future work will need to include the promotion and development of quality improvement strategies and effective resource allocation that is aligned with the implementation of thoracic cancer surgery standards in order to improve patient outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cirugía Torácica / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Torácicos Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Curr Oncol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cirugía Torácica / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Torácicos Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Curr Oncol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá