Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Inconsistency of Karyotyping and Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) in a Mosaic Turner Syndrome Case.
Tulay, Pinar; Ergoren, Mahmut Cerkez; Alkaya, Ahmet; Yayci, Eyup; Sag, Sebnem Ozemri; Temel, Sehime Gulsum.
Afiliación
  • Tulay P; Near East University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus.
  • Ergoren MC; Near East University, DESAM Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus.
  • Alkaya A; Near East University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus.
  • Yayci E; Near East University, DESAM Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus.
  • Sag SO; Bilecik Seyh Edebali University, Graduate School of Applied Sciences, Gulumbe Yerleskesi, Bilecik, Turkey.
  • Temel SG; Near East University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Glob Med Genet ; 7(4): 128-132, 2020 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33693446
Purpose Turner syndrome is a sex chromosomal aberration where majority of the patients have 45,X karyotype, while several patients are mosaic involving 45,X/46,XX; 46,X,i(Xq); and other variants. Cytogenetic analysis, karyotyping, is considered to be the "gold standard" to detect numerical and structural chromosomal abnormalities. In the recent years, alternative approaches, such as array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), have been widely used in genetic analysis to detect numerical abnormalities as well as unbalanced structural rearrangements. In this study, we report the use of karyotyping as well as aCGH in detecting a possible Turner syndrome variant. Methods An apparent 16-year-old female was clinically diagnosed as Turner syndrome with premature ovarian failure and short stature. The genetic diagnosis was performed for the patient and the parents by karyotyping analysis. aCGH was also performed for the patient. Main Findings Cytogenetic analysis of the patient was performed showing variant Turner syndrome (46,X,i(X)(q10)[26]/46,X,del(X)(q11.2)[11]/45,X[8]/46,XX[5]). The patient's aCGH result revealed that she has a deletion of 57,252kb of Xp22.33-p11.21 region; arr[GRCh37] Xp22.33-p11.21 (310,932-57,563-078)X1. Both aCGH and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results suggested that short stature Homeobox-containing ( SHOX ) gene, which is located on Xp22.33, was deleted, though FISH result indicated that this was in a mosaic pattern. Conclusion In the recent years, aCGH has become the preferred method in detecting numerical abnormalities and unbalanced chromosomal rearrangements. However, its use is hindered by its failure of detecting mosaicism, especially low-level partial mosaicism. Therefore, although the resolution of the aCGH is higher, the cytogenetic investigation is still the first in line to detect mosaicism.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Glob Med Genet Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Chipre

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Glob Med Genet Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Chipre