Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Wearable electronic devices for chronic pain intensity assessment: A systematic review.
Avila, Francisco R; McLeod, Christopher J; Huayllani, Maria T; Boczar, Daniel; Giardi, Davide; Bruce, Charles J; Carter, Rickey E; Forte, Antonio J.
Afiliación
  • Avila FR; Division of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
  • McLeod CJ; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
  • Huayllani MT; Division of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
  • Boczar D; Division of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
  • Giardi D; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
  • Bruce CJ; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
  • Carter RE; Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
  • Forte AJ; Division of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Pain Pract ; 21(8): 955-965, 2021 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34080306
Wearable electronic devices are a convenient solution to pain intensity assessment as they can provide continuous monitoring for more precise medication adjustments. However, there is little evidence regarding the use of wearable electronic devices for chronic pain intensity assessment. Our primary objective was to examine the physiologic parameters used by wearable electronic devices for chronic pain intensity assessment. We initially inquired PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase for studies evaluating the use of wearable electronic devices for chronic pain intensity assessment. We updated our inquiry by searching on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar. English peer-reviewed studies were included, with no exclusions based on time frame or publication status. Of 348 articles that were identified on the first inquiry, 8 fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Of 179 articles that were identified on the last inquiry, only 1 fulfilled the eligibility criteria. We found articles evaluating wristbands, smartwatches, and belts. Parameters evaluated were psychomotor and sleep patterns, space and time mobility, heart rate variability, and skeletal muscle electrical activity. Most of the studies found significant positive associations between physiological parameters measured by wearable electronic devices and self-reporting pain scales. Wearable electronic devices reliably reflect physiologic or biometric parameters, providing a physiological correlation for pain. Early stage investigation suggests that the degree of pain intensity can be discerned, which ideally will reduce the bias inherent to existing numeric/verbal scales. Further research on the use of these devices is vital.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dispositivos Electrónicos Vestibles Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Pain Pract Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dispositivos Electrónicos Vestibles Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Pain Pract Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos