Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
UK multisite evaluation of the impact of clinical educators in EDs from a learner's perspective.
Hemavathi, Muniswamy; Huynh, Chi; Phillips, Eloise; Aiello, Matthew; Kennedy, Brian; Clancy, Mike; Hamer, Wayne; Rutherford, Graham; Khan, Aanika; Terry, David.
Afiliación
  • Hemavathi M; The Royal College of Emergency Medicine, London, UK.
  • Huynh C; Aston Pharmacy School, Aston University School of Life and Health Sciences, Birmingham, UK.
  • Phillips E; Aston Pharmacy School, Aston University School of Life and Health Sciences, Birmingham, UK.
  • Aiello M; Health Education England, London, UK.
  • Kennedy B; The Royal College of Emergency Medicine, London, UK.
  • Clancy M; The Royal College of Emergency Medicine, London, UK.
  • Hamer W; The Royal College of Emergency Medicine, London, UK.
  • Rutherford G; Health Education England, London, UK.
  • Khan A; Health Education England, London, UK.
  • Terry D; Aston Pharmacy School, Aston University School of Life and Health Sciences, Birmingham, UK d.terry@aston.ac.uk.
Emerg Med J ; 38(8): 630-635, 2021 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34103380
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In England, demand for emergency care is increasing while there is also a staffing shortage. The Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) suggested that appointment of senior doctors as clinical educators (CEs) would enable support and development of learners in EDs and improve retention and well-being. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of CEs in ED on learners.

METHODS:

CEs were placed in 54 NHS Acute Trust EDs for a pilot beginning July 2018 and ending October 2020. Learners from multiple disciplines working at 54 NHS Acute Trust EDs where CEs were deployed were invited to complete an online survey designed to identify the impact of CEs in July of 2019, as part of an interim service evaluation.

RESULTS:

Respondents numbered 493 from 49 of 54 study sites, including 286 (58%) medical (non-consultant) and 72 (14.6%) all other nursing, allied health professionals. 9 out of 10 learners reported having experienced a change to their learning as a result of the deployment of CEs in their department. 49.9% (246/493) reported that CEs had a positive impact on their well-being. 95% (340/358) reported an improved accessibility to undertaking clinical based assessments. 78% (281/358) perceived that access to CEs increased likelihood of passing assessments. Of those responding, 80.9% (399/493) reported they would remain/return to the same ED with a CE, and 92.5% (456/493) responded that they would prefer to go to a Trust with a CE.

CONCLUSIONS:

According to survey respondents, deployment of CEs across NHS Trusts has resulted in improvement and increased accessibility of learning and assessment opportunities for learners within ED. The impact of CEs on well-being is uncertain with half reporting improvement and the remaining half unsure. Further evaluation within the project will continue to explore the service benefit and workforce impact of the CEED intervention.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Médicos / Medicina de Emergencia / Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital / Docentes Médicos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Emerg Med J Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Médicos / Medicina de Emergencia / Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital / Docentes Médicos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Emerg Med J Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido