Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Risk of Prostate Cancer Progression in Active Surveillance Patients with Bilateral Disease Detected by Combined Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Fusion and Systematic Biopsy.
Williams, Cheyenne; Khondakar, Nabila R; Daneshvar, Michael A; O'Connor, Luke P; Gomella, Patrick T; Mehralivand, Sherif; Yerram, Nitin K; Egan, Jillian; Gurram, Sandeep; Rompré-Brodeur, Alexis; Webster, Bradley R; Owens-Walton, Jeunice; Parnes, Howard; Merino, Maria J; Wood, Bradford J; Choyke, Peter; Turkbey, Baris; Pinto, Peter A.
Afiliación
  • Williams C; Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Khondakar NR; Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Daneshvar MA; Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • O'Connor LP; Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Gomella PT; Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Mehralivand S; Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Yerram NK; Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Egan J; Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Gurram S; Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Rompré-Brodeur A; Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Webster BR; Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Owens-Walton J; Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Parnes H; Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Merino MJ; Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Wood BJ; Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Choyke P; Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Turkbey B; Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Pinto PA; Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
J Urol ; 206(5): 1157-1165, 2021 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34181465
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

We sought to evaluate whether bilateral prostate cancer detected at active surveillance (AS) enrollment is associated with progression to Grade Group (GG) ≥2 and to compare the efficacy of combined targeted biopsy plus systematic biopsy (Cbx) vs systematic biopsy (Sbx) or targeted biopsy alone to detect bilateral disease. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A prospectively maintained database of patients referred to our institution from 2007-2020 was queried. The study cohort included all AS patients with GG1 on confirmatory Cbx and followup of at least 1 year. Cox proportional hazard analysis identified baseline characteristics associated with progression to ≥GG2 at any point throughout followup.

RESULTS:

Of 579 patients referred, 103 patients had GG1 on Cbx and were included in the study; 49/103 (47.6%) patients progressed to ≥GG2, with 30/72 (41.7%) patients with unilateral disease progressing and 19/31 (61.3%) patients with bilateral disease progressing. Median time to progression was 68 months vs 52 months for unilateral and bilateral disease, respectively (p=0.006). Both prostate specific antigen density (HR 1.72, p=0.005) and presence of bilateral disease (HR 2.21, p=0.012) on confirmatory biopsy were associated with AS progression. At time of progression, GG and risk group were significantly higher in patients with bilateral versus unilateral disease. Cbx detected 16% more patients with bilateral disease than Sbx alone.

CONCLUSIONS:

Bilateral disease and prostate specific antigen density at confirmatory Cbx conferred greater risk of earlier AS progression. Cbx was superior to Sbx for identifying bilateral disease. AS risk-stratification protocols may benefit from including presence of bilateral disease and should use Cbx to detect bilateral disease.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Próstata / Neoplasias de la Próstata / Espera Vigilante Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Urol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Próstata / Neoplasias de la Próstata / Espera Vigilante Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Urol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article