Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Implementation of a perioperative-enhanced recovery protocol in patients undergoing open gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
Blumenthaler, Alisa N; Robinson, Kristen A; Kruse, Brittany C; Munder, Kathryn; Ikoma, Naruhiko; Mansfield, Paul F; Gottumukkala, Vijaya; Kapoor, Ravish; Badgwell, Brian D.
Afiliación
  • Blumenthaler AN; Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Robinson KA; Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Kruse BC; The Institute for Cancer Care Innovation, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Munder K; Department of Clinical Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Ikoma N; Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Mansfield PF; Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Gottumukkala V; The Institute for Cancer Care Innovation, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Kapoor R; Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Badgwell BD; Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
J Surg Oncol ; 124(5): 780-790, 2021 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34227691
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVES:

The purpose of this study was to compare surgical outcomes before and after implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) in gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

METHODS:

We included patients who underwent open gastrectomy for gastric cancer before (January 2016 to September 2018) or after (October 2018 to September 2020) ERP implementation. The primary outcome was the postoperative length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes included 90-day readmission rates and Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3 complications.

RESULTS:

One hundred patients underwent gastrectomy before (pre-ERP group) and 52 underwent gastrectomy after (ERP group) protocol implementation. Demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics were similar. The median (interquartile range) postoperative LOS was shorter in the ERP group (7.0 days [6.0-8.0] vs. 8.0 days [7.0-11.0]; p < 0.001). The ERP group had similar rates of readmission (33% vs. 24%; p = 0.34) and grade ≥ 3 complications (19% vs. 19%; p = 1.0) compared to the pre-ERP group, but experienced lower rates of surgical wound complications (0% vs. 19%; p < 0.001). Rates of other complications were similar.

CONCLUSIONS:

Implementation of an ERP in patients undergoing open gastrectomy for gastric cancer is feasible and safe and has the potential to decrease postoperative LOS without increasing complication rates.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Adhesión a Directriz / Atención Perioperativa / Gastrectomía / Recuperación Mejorada Después de la Cirugía / Implementación de Plan de Salud / Tiempo de Internación Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Sysrev_observational_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Oncol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Adhesión a Directriz / Atención Perioperativa / Gastrectomía / Recuperación Mejorada Después de la Cirugía / Implementación de Plan de Salud / Tiempo de Internación Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Sysrev_observational_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Oncol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos