Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Rate of device-related infections using an antibacterial envelope in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy reoperations.
Frausing, Maria Hee Jung Park; Nielsen, Jens Cosedis; Johansen, Jens Brock; Jørgensen, Ole Dan; Gerdes, Christian; Olsen, Thomas; Kronborg, Mads Brix.
Afiliación
  • Frausing MHJP; Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Bvld. 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
  • Nielsen JC; Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Bvld. 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
  • Johansen JB; Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, JB Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
  • Jørgensen OD; The Danish Pacemaker and ICD Register, Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
  • Gerdes C; The Danish Pacemaker and ICD Register, Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
  • Olsen T; Department of Thoracic, Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, Odense University Hospital, JB Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
  • Kronborg MB; Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Bvld. 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
Europace ; 24(3): 421-429, 2022 Mar 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34431989
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reoperations are associated with a particularly high risk of device-related infection (DRI). An antibacterial envelope reduces the occurrence of DRIs in a broad population of moderate-tohigh-risk patients. To investigate the efficacy of an antibacterial envelope in a very high-risk population of patients undergoing CRT reoperation. METHODS AND

RESULTS:

In this Danish two-centre, observational cohort study, we included consecutive patients who underwent a CRT pacemaker- or defibrillator reoperation procedure between January 2008 and November 2019. We obtained data from the Danish Pacemaker and ICD Register and through systematic medical chart review. Follow-up was restricted to 2 years. A total of 1943 patients were included in the study of which 736 (38%) received an envelope. Envelope patients had more independent risk factors for infection than non-envelope patients. Sixty-seven (3.4%) patients met the primary endpoint of DRI requiring device system extraction; 50 in the non-envelope group and 17 in the envelope group [4.1% vs. 2.3%, adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30-0.90; P = 0.021]. This difference persisted in propensity score analysis (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.29-0.90; P = 0.019).

CONCLUSION:

Use of an antibacterial envelope was associated with a clinically and statistically significant reduction in DRIs in patients undergoing CRT reoperations. Our results were comparable to those recently reported from a large randomized controlled trial, which is suggestive of a proportional effect of the envelope even in very high-risk patients.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Marcapaso Artificial / Desfibriladores Implantables / Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca / Insuficiencia Cardíaca Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Europace Asunto de la revista: CARDIOLOGIA / FISIOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Marcapaso Artificial / Desfibriladores Implantables / Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca / Insuficiencia Cardíaca Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Europace Asunto de la revista: CARDIOLOGIA / FISIOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca